Literature DB >> 32559309

Hypermetabolism and Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Pey-Jen Yu1, Hugh Cassiere1, Sarah DeRosa1, Karl Bocchieri1, Shiraz Yar1, Alan Hartman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypermetabolism has been described in stress states such as trauma, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and severe burn injuries. We hypothesize that patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may develop a hypermetabolic state, which may be a major contributing factor to the extraordinary ventilatory and oxygenation demands in patients with COVID-19.
METHOD: Resting energy expenditure (REE), carbon dioxide production (VCO2 ), and oxygen consumption (VO2 ) were measured by indirect calorimetry on 7 critically ill patients with COVID-19.
RESULTS: The median measured REE was 4044 kcal/d, which was 235.7% ± 51.7% of predicted. The median VCO2 was 452 mL/min (range, 295-582 mL/min), and the median VO2 was 585 mL/min (range, 416-798 mL/min).
CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients with COVID-19 are in an extreme hypermetabolic state. This may explain the high failure rates for mechanical ventilation for these patients and highlights the potential need for increased nutrition requirements for such patients.
© 2020 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calorimetry; nutrition assessment; pulmonary disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32559309      PMCID: PMC7323185          DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   3.896


Clinical Relevancy Statement

We describe our findings that critically ill patients with COVID‐19 are in an extreme hypermetabolic state, with extraordinary oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. This may explain the high failure rates for mechanical ventilation for patients with severe COVID‐19, may help direct nutrition requirements for such patients, and may also suggest targets for therapeutic interventions that have not been explored to date.

Introduction

Many patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) remain hypoxic and hypercarbic despite being on maximal ventilator settings. A dissociation between the degree of lung injury and the severity of hypoxia and hypercapnia has been observed in patients with COVID‐19. This suggests that the severity of acute respiratory failure of patients with COVID‐19 may not be solely attributable to pulmonary compromise. As acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and induction of a hypermetabolic state, we hypothesize that patients with COVID‐19 may develop a hypermetabolic state, which may be a major contributing factor to the extraordinary ventilatory and oxygenation demands in patients with COVID‐19.

Methods and Results

This retrospective case series included 7 adults with confirmed COVID‐19 requiring mechanical ventilation, with continued hypercapnia and/or hypoxia. Resting energy expenditure (REE) was predicted using the Penn State equation and measured using CCM Express indirect calorimeter (MGC Diagnostics, St Paul, MN). All patients were on a fraction of inspired oxygen ≤ 60% and did not require renal replacement therapy and/or thoracostomy tubes to ensure the accuracy of the indirect calorimetry measurements. All patients were on intravenous sedation infusions. Median age was 62 years (range, 55–74 years), 5 (71.4%) patients were male, and median length of intubation was 19 days (range, 3–39 days). Median pCO2 and pO2 were 60 mmHg (range, 53–72 mmHg) and 75 mmHg (range, 61–95 mmHg), respectively. Indirect calorimetry results are shown in Table 1. The median measured REE was 4044 kcal/day, which was 235.7% ± 51.7% of predicted. The median carbon dioxide production (VCO2) was 452 mL/min (range, 295–582 mL/min), and the median oxygen consumption (VO2) was 585 mL/min (range, 416–798 mL/min). Levels of inflammatory markers are shown in Table 2. There were no strong positive correlations between C‐reactive protein and D‐Dimer to both measured REE and measured REE/predicted REE (Pearson correlation coefficient < 0.5).
Table 1

Indirect Calorimetry Results

Patient #AgeBody mass indexMeasured REE (kcal/d)Predicted REE (kcal/d)VCO2 (mL/min)VO2 (mL/min)
16226.651861733582750
27424.628451296303416
37037.530521865295455
45728.140442108452585
55727.439521955468565
66925.142821617401642
75525.254141753555798

REE, resting energy expenditure.

Table 2

Inflammatory Markers

Patient #Hospital day (#)Measured REE (kcal/d)Measured REE/predicted REE (% predicted)C‐reactive protein (mg/dL)D‐Dimer (ng/mL)
1851862997.1113,862
2828452190.52894
322305216413.361160
42340441923.94980
530395220213.382019
632428226514.5560
755541430912.61393

REE, resting energy expenditure.

Indirect Calorimetry Results REE, resting energy expenditure. Inflammatory Markers REE, resting energy expenditure.

Discussion

This case series demonstrates the significant metabolic demands of critically ill patients with COVID‐19. Hypermetabolism has been described in stress states, such as trauma, sepsis, ARDS, and severe burn injuries. , However, the measured REE seen in our case series of patients with COVID‐19 far exceeds that described for other disease states. , The profoundly increased VO2 and VCO2 seen in our patient cohort, as a result of their hypermetabolism, may help explain the high failure rates for mechanical ventilation for patients with severe COVID‐19. Some of these patients may be considered for extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support (ECMO); however, the VO2 and VCO2 in all 7 patients in our cohort would have exceeded the O2 and CO2 transfer capacity of typical adult oxygenators used in ECMO circuits. These observations may suggest the need for increased feeding beyond the 15–20 kilocalories per kilogram of actual body weight per day that is currently recommend for critically ill patients with COVID‐19. Although patients with ARDS have energy expenditures that are ∼30% above REE, we found most patients with COVID‐19 have energy expenditures of >200% of REE. Adequate nutrition support is vital for preservation of respiratory muscle function, promotion of immune response to infection, and mitigation of oxidative cellular injury. However, given the extraordinarily high REE seen in patients with COVID‐19, purely using REE measurements as the targeted goal for nutrition calories in these patients may result in overfeeding and increased CO2 production. We are currently involved in studies looking at the ideal target calories relative to the REE measured from indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients with COVID‐19. In addition to having implications for the management of nutrition support in patients with COVID‐19, our observations of extreme hypermetabolism in critically ill patients with COVID‐19 suggest possible targets for therapeutic interventions that have not been explored to date. We are currently embarking on interventional studies aiming to decrease the metabolic demand of patients with COVID‐19 and reconfiguring ECMO circuits to meet the increased need for gas exchange.

Statement of Authorship

P. Yu, H. Cassiere, S. DeRosa, K. Bocchieri, and A. Hartman contributed to the conception and design of the research; P. Yu, S. DeRosa, and S. Yar contributed to the acquisition of the data; P. Yu, H. Cassiere, S. DeRosa, K. Bocchieri, and A. Hartman contributed to the interpretation of the data; P. Yu drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript, agree to be fully accountable for enduring the integrity and accuracy of the work, and read and approved the final manuscript
  5 in total

1.  Nutritionally associated increased carbon dioxide production. Excess total calories vs high proportion of carbohydrate calories.

Authors:  S S Talpers; D J Romberger; S B Bunce; S K Pingleton
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Executive Summary.

Authors:  Robert G Martindale; Stephen A McClave; Vincent W Vanek; Mary McCarthy; Pamela Roberts; Beth Taylor; Juan B Ochoa; Lena Napolitano; Gail Cresci
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Reversal of catabolism by beta-blockade after severe burns.

Authors:  D N Herndon; D W Hart; S E Wolf; D L Chinkes; R R Wolfe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Hypermetabolism and efficiency of CO2 removal in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  R Kiiski; J Takala
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  COVID-19 Does Not Lead to a "Typical" Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Luciano Gattinoni; Silvia Coppola; Massimo Cressoni; Mattia Busana; Sandra Rossi; Davide Chiumello
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 21.405

  5 in total
  18 in total

1.  Nutritional profile and outcomes of noncritical hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in a large tertiary hospital in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Emeline Caldana Nunes; Sabrina Marcon; Paula Elisa de Oliveira; Sergio Henrique Loss
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.712

Review 2.  COVID-19 and Nutrition: Summary of Official Recommendations.

Authors:  Paraskevi Detopoulou; Christina Tsouma; Vassilios Papamikos
Journal:  Top Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 0.441

3.  Carotid stiffness, intima-media thickness and aortic augmentation index among adults with SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Rachel E Szeghy; Valesha M Province; Nina L Stute; Marc A Augenreich; Laurel K Koontz; Jonathon L Stickford; Abigail S L Stickford; Stephen M Ratchford
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.858

Review 4.  Indirect calorimetry in critical illness: a new standard of care?

Authors:  Elisabeth De Waele; Joop Jonckheer; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.359

5.  Early Enteral Nutrition in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Nicholas Farina; Sarah Nordbeck; Michelle Montgomery; Laura Cordwin; Faith Blair; Jill Cherry-Bukowiec; Michael D Kraft; Melissa R Pleva; Erica Raymond
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.204

6.  Energy expenditure and feeding practices and tolerance during the acute and late phase of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  P L M Lakenman; B van der Hoven; J M Schuijs; R D Eveleens; J van Bommel; J F Olieman; K F M Joosten
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2021-04-02

7.  Energy requirements of long-term ventilated COVID-19 patients with resolved SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Janusz von Renesse; Simone von Bonin; Hanns-Christoph Held; Ralph Schneider; Adrian M Seifert; Lena Seifert; Peter Spieth; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch; Ronny Meisterfeld
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2021-06-29

8.  Lessons Learned in Nutrition Therapy in Patients With Severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Juan B Ochoa; Diana Cárdenas; María E Goiburu; Charles Bermúdez; Fernando Carrasco; M Isabel T D Correia
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Challenges of Maintaining Optimal Nutrition Status in COVID-19 Patients in Intensive Care Settings.

Authors:  Nicole Minnelli; Lisa Gibbs; Jennifer Larrivee; Kamal Kant Sahu
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Indirect Calorimetry in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: More Questions Than Answers.

Authors:  Gilberto Fabian Hurtado-Torres
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.