Satoshi Koizumi1, Masaaki Shojima1,2, Osamu Ishikawa1, Hirotaka Hasegawa1,3, Satoru Miyawaki1, Hirofumi Nakatomi1, Nobuhito Saito1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Neurosurgery and Center for Cerebrovascular Intervention, Saitama Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan. 3. Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the embolization of lenticulostriate artery feeders is often warranted in the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations, it is technically challenging due to steep and repeated angulations. Here, we describe our novel technique of navigating a flow-guided microcatheter into lenticulostriate artery feeders using the strong support provided by an S-shaped distal access catheter. METHODS: We reviewed our retrospective cohort of brain arteriovenous malformations, in which lenticulostriate artery feeders were attempted to embolize. RESULT: During the study period, endovascular embolization was performed in 25 arteriovenous malformations cases. Of these, eight lenticulostriate artery feeders were present in six cases (24%). In two cases, lenticulostriate artery feeder catheterization was avoided from the beginning due to the small diameters of the feeders. After all, microcatheter navigation for lenticulostriate artery feeders were attempted in four cases with six lenticulostriate artery feeders. In all the six feeders, the S-shaped distal access catheter was successful in supporting the microcatheter to advance distally to the lenticulostriate artery feeders, even if other approaches were unsuccessful. Of the six catheterized lenticulostriate artery feeders, four were embolized. Symptomatic infarction in the lenticulostriate artery territory and mild vasospasm occurred in two cases each, but they did not result in permanent neurological deficits. CONCLUSION: Although some potential complications need to be considered, the S-shaped distal access catheter technique appears to be an effective alternative approach to gaining access to difficult feeders of arteriovenous malformations.
BACKGROUND: Although the embolization of lenticulostriate artery feeders is often warranted in the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations, it is technically challenging due to steep and repeated angulations. Here, we describe our novel technique of navigating a flow-guided microcatheter into lenticulostriate artery feeders using the strong support provided by an S-shaped distal access catheter. METHODS: We reviewed our retrospective cohort of brain arteriovenous malformations, in which lenticulostriate artery feeders were attempted to embolize. RESULT: During the study period, endovascular embolization was performed in 25 arteriovenous malformations cases. Of these, eight lenticulostriate artery feeders were present in six cases (24%). In two cases, lenticulostriate artery feeder catheterization was avoided from the beginning due to the small diameters of the feeders. After all, microcatheter navigation for lenticulostriate artery feeders were attempted in four cases with six lenticulostriate artery feeders. In all the six feeders, the S-shaped distal access catheter was successful in supporting the microcatheter to advance distally to the lenticulostriate artery feeders, even if other approaches were unsuccessful. Of the six catheterized lenticulostriate artery feeders, four were embolized. Symptomatic infarction in the lenticulostriate artery territory and mild vasospasm occurred in two cases each, but they did not result in permanent neurological deficits. CONCLUSION: Although some potential complications need to be considered, the S-shaped distal access catheter technique appears to be an effective alternative approach to gaining access to difficult feeders of arteriovenous malformations.
Authors: F Viñuela; J E Dion; G Duckwiler; N A Martin; P Lylyk; A Fox; D Pelz; C G Drake; J J Girvin; G Debrun Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1991-12 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Bharathi D Jagadeesan; Mikayel Grigoryan; Ameer E Hassan; Andrew W Grande; Ramachandra P Tummala Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Erik F Hauck; Rabih G Tawk; Nicholas S Karter; Mandy J Binning; Alexander A Khalessi; Sabareesh K Natarajan; L Nelson Hopkins; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2010-11-25 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: René Chapot; Hannes Nordmeyer; Markus Heddier; Aglaé Velasco; Petra Schooss; Michael Stauder; Paul Stracke; Pascal J Mosimann Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-05-05 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: J P Mohr; Michael K Parides; Christian Stapf; Ellen Moquete; Claudia S Moy; Jessica R Overbey; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Eric Vicaut; William L Young; Emmanuel Houdart; Charlotte Cordonnier; Marco A Stefani; Andreas Hartmann; Rüdiger von Kummer; Alessandra Biondi; Joachim Berkefeld; Catharina J M Klijn; Kirsty Harkness; Richard Libman; Xavier Barreau; Alan J Moskowitz Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 79.321