Literature DB >> 32558371

Vibrios from the Norwegian marine environment: Characterization of associated antibiotic resistance and virulence genes.

Fredrik Håkonsholm1, Bjørn Tore Lunestad1, Jose Roberto Aguirre Sánchez2, Jaime Martinez-Urtaza3, Nachiket Prakash Marathe1, Cecilie Smith Svanevik1.   

Abstract

A total of 116 Vibrio isolates comprising V. alginolyticus (n = 53), V. metschnikovii (n = 38), V. anguillarum (n = 21), V. antiquarius (n = 2), and V. fujianensis (n = 2) were obtained from seawater, fish, or bivalve molluscs from temperate Oceanic and Polar Oceanic area around Norway. Antibiotic sensitivity testing revealed resistance or reduced susceptibility to ampicillin (74%), oxolinic acid (33%), imipenem (21%), aztreonam (19%), and tobramycin (17%). Whole-genome sequence analysis of eighteen drug-resistant isolates revealed the presence of genes like β-lactamases, chloramphenicol-acetyltransferases, and genes conferring tetracycline and quinolone resistance. The strains also carried virulence genes like hlyA, tlh, rtxA to D and aceA, E and F. The genes for cholerae toxin (ctx), thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh), or zonula occludens toxin (zot) were not detected in any of the isolates. The present study shows low prevalence of multidrug resistance and absence of virulence genes of high global concern among environmental vibrios in Norway. However, in the light of climate change, and projected rising sea surface temperatures, even in the cold temperate areas, there is a need for frequent monitoring of resistance and virulence in vibrios to be prepared for future public health challenges.
© 2020 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vibrio spp.; antimicrobial resistance; marine environment; virulence; whole-genome sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32558371      PMCID: PMC7520990          DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.1093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiologyopen        ISSN: 2045-8827            Impact factor:   3.139


INTRODUCTION

Vibrio spp. have the sea and brackish water as their natural habitat and are among the most common bacteria found in surface waters worldwide (Vezzulli, Colwell, & Pruzzo, 2013). The genus includes several fish and human pathogenic species. Among these human pathogens, V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus have been extensively studied (Baker‐Austin et al., 2018; Stavric & Buchanan, 1997). V. cholerae has through history caused several pandemics and the main culprit being V. cholerae serotype O1/O139 encoding cholerae toxin (CTX; Islam et al., 2013). However, non‐O1/non‐O139 V. cholerae can also cause infections. The virulence factors of non‐O1 and non‐O139 include a heat‐stable enterotoxin, repeat in toxin (rtx) and El Tor hemolysin (hlyA) (Kumar, Peter, & Thomas, 2010). In contrast, the pathogenicity of V. parahaemolyticus is linked to their ability to produce a thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH), or a TDH‐related hemolysin (TRH), encoded by tdh and trh genes (Raghunath, 2015). For V. vulnificus, virulence is related to the production of a polysaccharide capsule and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), flagellum, hemolysin, and proteases (Roig et al., 2018). The genetic basis for human virulence is only partially known, although several studies suggest that all strains of V. vulnificus, regardless of their origin, may be able to cause infections in humans (Roig et al., 2018). Several other Vibrio spp., such as V. alginolyticus, V. fluvialis, V. mimicus, V. metschnikovii, V. furnissii, V. hollisae, and V. damsela, can occasionally cause infections in humans (Austin, 2010; Baker‐Austin et al., 2018). Vibrio infections in humans typically occur as a result of ingestion of contaminated seafood, through the handling of raw seafood or by exposure of wounds to seawater during recreation (Iwamoto, Ayers, Mahon, & Swerdlow, 2010). The human pathogenic vibrios show strong seasonality and are more abundant when the water temperature exceeds 18°C and the salinity drops below 25 ‰ (Vezzulli et al., 2013). In the last decades, an increase in infections caused by Vibrio spp. has been reported, also in colder regions of South America and Northern Europe, including Norway, where this was previously rare (Baker‐Austin et al., 2016). One of the primary effects of climate change is increased sea surface temperatures (SSTs), and this may facilitate the spread of seawater associated diseases (EEA, 2017). The temperature is predicted to increase further in northern temperate waters (EEA, 2017), and new areas may become more favorable for the pathogenic vibrios. Several fish pathogenic vibrios have been identified and are a challenge in aquaculture. The most common Vibrio species infecting farmed aquatic animals are V. parahaemolyticus, V. alginolyticus, V. harveyi, V. owensii, V. campbellii, and V. anguillarum (Ina‐Salwany et al., 2019). The role of the marine environment in the development and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance is largely unknown. Vibrios are indigenous to the sea (Banerjee & Farber, 2018), and in recent years, the occurrence of resistance genes in Vibrio spp. has been examined. Genes encoding resistance to β‐lactams like penA, bla TEM‐1 (Letchumanan, Chan, & Lee, 2015), and bla VCC‐1 (Hammerl et al., 2017; Mangat et al., 2016), chloramphenicol resistance genes, such as floR, catI, and catII, and several tet genes encoding resistance to tetracycline (Letchumanan et al., 2015), have been detected in Vibrio spp. Clinically important mobile resistance genes like qnrVC and qnrS have originated in Vibrio spp. (Fonseca, Dos Santos Freitas, Vieira, & Vicente, 2008). This makes Vibrio spp. a good model organism for the studying antibiotic resistance in the marine environment. Although V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholerae, and V. vulnificus have previously been isolated from Norway (Bauer, Ostensvik, Florvag, Ormen, & Rorvik, 2006), there is limited knowledge on the prevalence of different Vibrio spp. and associated resistance and virulence markers in the Norwegian marine environment. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of different Vibrio spp. in the Norwegian marine environment and to characterize associated virulence and antibiotic resistance genes among these. We here present a detailed account of taxonomy, resistance, and virulence genes detected based on phenotypic culture‐based methods and whole‐genome sequence (WGS) analysis.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Sampling

Water samples were collected from four different locations (A–D) at the West coast of Norway (Oceanic temperate zones) at five different depths (0, 2, 5, 7, and 10 m) from each location during May 2018, comprising 20 water samples. A total of 60 fish caught in the North Sea, including 40 herring (Clupea harrengus) and 20 Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus), were sampled from May to November 2018. The fish were caught by commercial fishing vessels during the catch season for the respective species. The bivalve molluscs samples were collected from 16 rearing locations along the Norwegian coast (Oceanic and Polar Oceanic zones) in November 2018 (Figure 1), through the annual surveillance program on Escherichia coli in bivalves by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA). This included 14 batch samples of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis), one batch sample of flat oysters (Ostrea edulis), and one batch sample of scallops (Pecten maximus), where each batch sample comprised batches of 10–15 individual bivalve molluscs. All samples were further examined at the Institute of Marine Research (IMR).
Figure 1

Map of Norway showing sampling locations for fish (herring and Atlantic mackerel) captured during commercial pelagic fisheries, seawater collected during the herring fisheries, and marine bivalves from harvesting areas included in the surveillance program of the Norwegian Food Safety Agency

Map of Norway showing sampling locations for fish (herring and Atlantic mackerel) captured during commercial pelagic fisheries, seawater collected during the herring fisheries, and marine bivalves from harvesting areas included in the surveillance program of the Norwegian Food Safety Agency

Isolation of Vibrio spp.

From each water sample, three aliquots of 100–250 ml were filtered through 0.45 µm filters (Merck Millipore, Germany) using the EZ‐fit Manifold 3‐place system (Merck Millipore, Germany) connected to a vacuum pump. Each filter was transferred to thiosulfate‐citrate‐bile‐sucrose (TCBS) agar (Oxoid, UK) plates and incubated at 37°C for 24–48 hrs. Also, an enrichment step was performed in duplicates on 500 ml water adding 50 ml concentrated (360 mg/ml) alkaline peptone water (APW) with 2% sodium chloride (NaCl). The enrichment cultures were incubated at 42 ˚C for 18 hr. After incubation, 100 µl of the enrichment cultures was streaked on TCBS agar and incubated at 37 ˚C for 24–48 hr. Typical colonies were picked from the plates and restreaked for obtaining pure cultures. Isolation of Vibrio spp. from fish and bivalve molluscs followed a method based on NMKL method no. 156 (NMKL, 1997). The method takes advantage of the vibrios alkaline and halophilic properties (Vezzulli et al., 2013) and applies APW supplemented with 2% NaCl and 42°C as incubation temperature for selective enrichment of human pathogenic species (NMKL, 1997). For isolation of Vibrio spp., TCBS is a widely used medium. The alkaline pH (8.6), bile salts, and NaCl concentration in the agar inhibit the growth of Enterobacteriaceae and Gram‐positive organisms (Donovan & van Netten, 1995). From herring collected in June 2018, samples were taken from the skin with muscle, gills, and intestine. From each tissue type, 20 g was homogenized in 180 ml APW with 2% NaCl and APW with 2% NaCl supplemented with polymyxin B (250 IU/ml) for 30 s. using a stomacher. The homogenate was incubated at 42 ± 1°C for 18 ± 2 hrs. After incubation, 10 µl of the enrichment cultures was streaked on TCBS agar and incubated at 37 ± 1°C for 24 ± 3 hrs. From mackerel collected in September, samples were taken from the skin with mussel following the same protocol as described previously. Samples were also collected from gut content and homogenized in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) (Sigma‐Aldrich), and tenfold dilution series were made. From each sample, 100 µl was spread on TCBS and incubated at 37 ± 1°C for 24 ± 3 hrs. From herring collected in November, samples were collected from the skin with muscle and prepared following the same method as described previously. From bivalve molluscs, 100 g soft tissue and intravalvular fluid from at least 10 individual bivalves were homogenized in sterile plastic bags and 20 g was transferred to new sterile bags. Enrichment followed the same protocol as for fish samples. Additionally, from the homogenate tenfold dilution series were made using peptone water (bioMerièux, France). From dilutions and undiluted samples, 100 µl was spread on TCBS and Vibrio ChromoSelect agar (VCS; Sigma‐Aldrich) and incubated at 37°C for 24–48 hrs followed by a selection of typical colonies.

Biochemical identification

Isolates were grown overnight on plate count agar (PCA) (Oxoid, UK) supplemented with 2% NaCl and characterized biochemical using the Analytical Profile Index 20E (API 20E, bioMerièux, France) following the instructions of the manufacturer. Overnight cultures were used to prepare bacterial inoculums corresponding to 0.5 McFarland in 2% sterile saline.

Identification by MALDI‐TOF‐MS

All isolates were grown overnight on PCA supplemented with 2% NaCl and sent to the Norwegian Veterinary Institute (NVI) in Bergen for identification by matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF‐MS) (Bruker, Germany). The obtained peptide mass fingerprints (PMFs) were compared to spectra in the commercial MALDI‐TOF‐MS database (MALDI Biotyper, Bruker, Germany) and to spectra in an in‐house generated database containing spectra from Vibrio spp. known to be associated with marine fish.

Whole‐genome sequencing and sequence analysis

Eighteen isolates were subjected to whole‐genome sequencing (WGS). DNA was extracted from isolates using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Germany). An additional lysis step was performed by resuspending the samples in 180 µl lysis buffer and incubating them at 37°C overnight. After incubation, DNA extraction was done as described by the manufacturer (Quiagen, 2006). The purity (260/280 and 260/230 ratios) and concentration in the DNA was measured using Nanodrop ND‐1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, USA) and Qubit 2.0 broad range dsDNA kit (Invitrogen, USA). Genomic libraries were prepared using Nextera DNA Flex Tagmentation (Illumina, USA) and sequenced using the MiSeq (Illumina, USA) platform to obtain 300 bp paired‐end reads. The raw sequence data were adapter and quality trimmed using BBDuk (https://jgi.doe.gov/data‐and‐tools/bbtools/bb‐tools‐user‐guide/) and assembled using SPAdes version 3.13.1 (Bankevich et al., 2012). Assembled genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (Tatusova et al., 2016) and the Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (Aziz et al., 2008). Resistance genes were detected using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database, CARD (Jia et al., 2017), and the Resistance Gene Identifier mode. Virulence genes were detected using virulence factors database (VFDB; Liu, Zheng, Jin, Chen, & Yang, 2019).

Species identification of WGS

Raw forward and reverse reads in the FastQ format were uploaded to The Microbial Genomes Atlas (MiGA) (Rodriguez et al., 2018) web server in the TypeMat mode. In this mode, the sequences are trimmed, assembled, and aligned to give the closest relatives found in the MiGA Reference database.

Phylogenetic inference

For each Vibrio species (V. metschnikovii, V. anguillarum, and V. alginolyticus), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were called with Harvest Suit (Treangen, Ondov, Koren, & Phillippy, 2014). Phylogenetic inference by ML was performed on the core genome with RAxML v8.1 (Stamatakis, 2014) and the GTRGAMMA model (1,000 bootstrap replicates). The resulting trees were visualized and edited using iTOL v4.3.3 (Letunic et al., 2006).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolated Vibrio spp. was conducted by disk diffusion according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method M42‐A (CLSI, 2006). Each isolate was tested against 18 antibiotics belonging to 10 different classes commonly used for either human administration, agriculture, veterinary medicine, or aquaculture in Norway (NORM/NORM‐VET, 2018) using. These included mecillinam (10 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), cefotaxime (5 µg), ceftazidime (10 µg), doxycycline (30 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), oxolinic acid (2 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), azithromycin (15 µg), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (25 µg), trimethoprim (5 µg), gentamycin (10 µg), tobramycin (10 µg), florfenicol (30 µg), and aztreonam (30 µg). V. alginolyticus, V. metschnikovii, and V. anguillarum were incubated at 28°C. E. coli CCUG17620 was included as quality control in each setup. Inhibition zones were interpreted according to breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae from CLSI method M100 (CLSI, 2017). For oxolinic acid, erythromycin and florfenicol breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for Aeromonas salmonicda from CLSI VET03/VET04 (CLSI, 2014) were used. For isolates showing reduced susceptibility for imipenem, MIC values were determined following CLSI method M42‐A using MIC evaluator strips (Oxoid, UK).

CarbaNP test

Isolates showing reduced susceptibility to imipenem by the disk diffusion method were grown overnight on tryptic soy agar (TSA; Merck, Germany) at 37°C and examined for carbapenemase production by the CarbaNP test as described by Dortet, Poirel, Errera, and Nordmann (2014).

Hemolysis

V. alginolyticus and V. metschnikovii isolates were screened for hemolytic activity on TSA with 5% sheep blood (VWR, USA) or TSA with 5% human blood. Agar plates containing human blood were prepared by using TSA (Merck, Germany) as a base and supplemented with 5% EDTA blood. Isolates were cultivated on TSA and incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs.

RESULTS

Physical parameters and bacteria plate count

The highest measured temperatures in seawater samples were seen close to the shore at location A (Figure 1), in samples collected in the surface and at 2 m depth, with temperatures of 16°C and 15°C, respectively (Figure 2a). All other samples had temperatures <15°C. In the seawater samples at location A (surface and 2 m), salinity of 12.4‰ and 16.9‰ was observed, which was the lowest of all samples (Figure 2b). The highest plate counts (cfu/100 ml) on thiosulfate‐citrate‐bile‐sucrose agar (TCBS) were observed in the samples with the highest temperature and lowest salinity (Figure 2c).
Figure 2

Physical parameters in seawater samples collected during herring fisheries, locations A, B, C, and D (Figure 1). (a) Measured temperature (°C). (b) Measured salinity (‰), note: missing measurement at 10 m from location B. (c) Number of colony‐forming units (cfu)/100 ml water on TCBS plates incubated at 37°C for 24–48 hrs.

Physical parameters in seawater samples collected during herring fisheries, locations A, B, C, and D (Figure 1). (a) Measured temperature (°C). (b) Measured salinity (‰), note: missing measurement at 10 m from location B. (c) Number of colony‐forming units (cfu)/100 ml water on TCBS plates incubated at 37°C for 24–48 hrs.

Prevalence and identification of Vibrio spp

Colonies were selected for further characterization based on morphology on TCBS agar (NMKL, 1997) and color formation on Vibrio ChromoSelect agar (VCS). Presumptive Vibrio spp. were detected in 50% of water samples, 33% of fish samples, and 31% of bivalve molluscs samples. In total, 60 isolates were recovered from water samples, 32 from fish and 24 from bivalves. Using Analytical Profile Index (API) 20E, 54 (47%) of the 116 isolates were identified as Vibrio spp., 49 of which were V. alginolyticus, three V. cholerae, and two V fluvialis. The remaining isolates were identified as members of Aeromonas, Pasteurella, Shewanella, and Proteus or yielded an “Unacceptable profile.” One hundred and fifteen (99%) of the 116 isolates were identified as Vibrio spp. by matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF‐MS), and one isolate could not be identified. The MALDI‐TOF‐MS identified vibrios belonging to the three species V. alginolyticus (n = 53), V. metschnikovii (n = 38), and V. anguillarum (n = 24), respectively. The Microbial Genomes Atlas (MiGA) run for 18 sequenced isolates identified seven V. alginolyticus, five V. anguillarum, two V. metschnikovii, two V. antiquarius, and two V. fujianensis. Incompliance between the identification by WGS MiGA and MALDI‐TOF‐MS was seen for the two isolates 1‐2(7‐a) and 11‐4(1), identified as V. antiquarius and V. alginolyticus, the two isolates 3‐2(1) and 2‐2(8), identified as V. alginolyticus and V. anguillarum, and for the one isolate 1‐1(7) identified as V. fujianensis and V. anguillarum, respectively. Among the species considered to be opportunistic human pathogens (Austin, 2010; Baker‐Austin et al. 2018), V. alginolyticus was isolated from water, herring, and bivalves, while V. metschnikovii was isolated from herring and water samples. On the other hand, species harboring virulence genes but not known to cause human disease, like V. antiquarius (Dahanayake, De Silva, Hossain, Shin, & Heo, 2018; Nur et al., 2015) and V. fujianensis (Fang et al., 2018), were isolated from water only. V. anguillarum, a well‐known fish pathogen (Ina‐Salwany et al., 2019) rarely associated with serious human infection (Sinatra & Colby, 2018), was only isolated from bivalves. Global mapping of the sequenced isolates of V. alginolyticus and V. anguillarum (Figures A1 and A2) showed that Vibrio isolates from Norway had high similarity to strains from other countries and continents, including the United States and China, indicating a global presence of these strains.
Figure A1

ML phylogenetic inference of Vibrio anguillarum strains included in this study. Genome used as reference is red shaded, while the genomes from this study are in green. Blue dots show nodes with bootstrap values above 85%

Figure A2

ML phylogenetic inference of Vibrio alginolyticus strains included in this study. Genome used as reference is red shaded, while the genomes from this study are in green. Blue dots show nodes with bootstrap values above 85%

Hemolytic activity on blood agar

None of the 53 V. alginolyticus isolates displayed hemolysis on blood agar. All 38 V. metschnikovii isolates were hemolytic on both sheep and human blood. On sheep blood, five V. metschnikovii isolates were β‐hemolytic, while the remaining isolates were α‐hemolytic on both media.

Characterization of virulence determinants in WGS

Eighteen drug‐resistant isolates were subjected to WGS. Detailed overview of genome assembly statistics and GenBank accession numbers is presented in Table A2. Several genes related to virulence were detected in the examined genomes, including genes for mannose sensitive hemagglutinin (msh), adherence, type IV toxin‐coregulated pilus (tcp), type IV pilus (pil), capsular antiphagocytosis polysaccharides (rml, vbf, cps, wec, wza, wzb, wzb), flagellar formation genes (che, fil, fla, flg, flh, fli, flr, mot, che), iron uptake (irg, vct, viu, vib, vie), quorum sensing genes (eps), ESP secretion systems (esp, gsp), T3SS1 secretion systems, VAS effector proteins, endotoxin production, and immune evasion genes. None of the isolates carried genes for cholerae toxin production (ctxA or ctxB), thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh), or zonula occludens toxin (zot).
Table A2

Assembly statistics for whole‐genome sequenced Vibrio spp

IsolateSpeciesAccession no.CoverageTotal lengthNo. ContigsGC (%)N50CDSs (Total)
B4‐6 V. anguillarum VHSL0000000054.8X3,901,4836944.51300,5193,560
B7 V. anguillarum VHSN0000000037.1X3,954,6574044.64283,3093,541
B1‐2 V. anguillarum VHSK0000000052.4X3,987,9764544.54242,2543,677
B4‐12 V. anguillarum VHSM0000000037.3X3,965,2394844.65283,3093,555
B8‐1 V. anguillarum VHSO0000000060.9X3,954,6724144.64283,3023,540
A8‐1 V. metschnikovii VHTC0000000030.2X3,761,45813344.3198,0183,543
A11 V. metschnikovii VHSI0000000055.8X3,803,6828144.14234,6903,464
2‐1 (7) V. alginolyticus VHSR0000000049.2X5,228,3822444.611,096,3034,869
2‐2 (2) V. alginolyticus VHSS0000000038.1X5,175,8143644.63604,4364,806
2‐2 (7) V. alginolyticus VHST0000000031.1X5,176,9903944.58501,7984,812
2‐2 (9)V. alginolyticusVHSV000000005.61X5,444,59841644.53112,4905,262
7‐5 (1‐a) V. alginolyticus VHSX0000000067.5X5,176,4593644.631,221,8624,806
3‐2(1) V. alginolyticus VHSW0000000079.8X4,110,5256644.37423,0043,731
2‐2(8) V. alginolyticus VHSU0000000038.1X3,980,4055544.53368,6573,677
1‐2 (7‐a) V. antiquarius VHSQ0000000057.4X5,204,3413244.77494,4324,786
11‐4 (1) V. antiquarius VHSY0000000031.7X5,251,3116744.79442,2534,937
1‐1 (7) V. fujianensis VHSP0000000067.8X3,651,0833743.48834,6633,560
12‐2 (3‐a) V. fujianensis VMQP0000000040.8X3,650,9094143.38834,6843,248

Abbreviation: CDSs, Coding sequences.

The most prominent virulence genes detected in this study were related to hemolysins. All Vibrio species examined had genes coding for the Aeromonas‐related hemolysin type III (Hemolysin III). The V. cholerae cytolysin A (hlyA) was detected among V. alginolyticus, V. metschnikovii, and V. anguillarum, whereas the thermolabile hemolysin gene (tlh) was present in all isolated species except V. fujianensis. A variety of the repeats‐in‐toxin holotoxins genes (rtxA to D) was detected in V. alginolyticus, V. metschnikovii, V. anguillarum, and V. fujianensis. The accessory V. cholerae enterotoxin genes ace (A, E, and F) were found in the two V. fujianensis isolates (Table 2).
Table 2

Isolation source, identification, and list of resistance and virulence genes detected in whole‐genome sequences of Vibrio spp. isolates

SampleIsolateMiGA TypeMatp‐valueMALDI‐TOF‐MSScoreAPI 20EID %T‐valueResistance genesVirulence genesAccession No.
BivalveB4‐6 V. anguillarum 0.004 V. anguillarum 2.39 A. hydrophila/caviae/sobria270.50.56 bla ampC, tet(34) Hem III, hylA, tlh rtxA, B, C, DVHSL00000000
BivalveB7 V. anguillarum 0.004 V. anguillarum 2.48 A. hydrophila/caviae/sobria270.50.56 catB‐related, tet(34) Hem III, hylA, tlh, rtxA, B, C, DVHSN00000000
BivalveB1−2 V. anguillarum 0.004 V. anguillarum 2.32 A. hydrophila/caviae/sobria154.20.36 bla ampC, varG, catB‐related, tet(34) Hem III, hylA, tlh, rtxA, B, C, DVHSK00000000
BivalveB4−12 V. anguillarum 0.004 V. anguillarum 2.38 A. hydrophila/caviae/sobria270.50.56 bla ampC, catB‐related, tet(34) Hem III, hylA, tlh, rtxA, B, C, DVHSM00000000
BivalveB8−1 V. anguillarum 0.004 V. anguillarum 2.38 A. hydrophila/caviae/sobria270.50.56 bla ampC, catB‐related, tet(34) Hem III, hylA, tlh VHSO00000000
HerringA8−1 V. metschnikovii 0.0094 V. metschnikovii 1.78Identification not valid adeF, bla CARB, catB‐related,Hem III, hylA, tlh VHTC00000000
HerringA11 V. metschnikovii 0.0094 V. metschnikovii 1.78Unacceptable profile bla CARB, catB‐relatedHem III, hylA, tlh VHSI00000000
Seawater2‐1 (7) V. alginolyticus 0.0016 V. alginolyticus 2.2 V. alginolyticus 97.80.74 adeF, bla CARB, bla ampC, catB‐related, qnr, tet(34), tet(35) Hem III, tlh VHSR00000000
Seawater2‐2 (2) V. alginolyticus 0.0016 V. alginolyticus 2.09 V. alginolyticus 85.90.81 adeF, bla CARB, catB‐related, qnr, tet(34), tet(35) Hem III, tlh VHSS00000000
Seawater2‐2 (7) V. alginolyticus 0.004 V. alginolyticus 2.21 V. alginolyticus 85.90.81 adeF, bla CARB, bla ampC, qnr, catB‐related, tet(34), tet(35) Hem III, tlh VHST00000000
Seawater2‐2 (9) V. alginolyticus 0.0016 V. alginolyticus 2.19 V. alginolyticus 97.80.74 adeF, bla CARB, bla ampC, qnr, catB‐related, tet(34), tet(35) Hem III, tlh VHSV00000000
Seawater7‐5 (1‐a) V. alginolyticus 0.0016 V. alginolyticus 2.11 V. alginolyticus 85.90.81 adeF, bla CARB, qnr, catB‐related, tet(34), tet(35) Hem III, tlh VHSX00000000
Seawater3‐2 (1) V. alginolyticus 0.0016 V. anguillarum 2.37 A. hydrophila/caviae/sobria269.80.28 catB‐related, tet(34) Hem III, hylA, tlh rtxA, B, C, DVHSW00000000
Seawater2‐2 (8) V. alginolyticus 0.0016 V. anguillarum 2.37Unacceptable profileHem III, hylA, tlh rtxA, B, C, DVHSU00000000
Seawater1‐2 (7‐a) V. antiquarius 0.0048 V. alginolyticus 2.21 V. alginolyticus 97.80.74 adeF, bla CARB, catB‐related, qnr, tet(34), tet(35) Hem III, tlh VHSQ00000000
Seawater11‐4 (1) V. antiquarius 0.004 V. alginolyticus 2.13 V. alginolyticus 85.90.81 adeF, bla CARB, bla ampC, catB‐related, qnr, tet(34), tet(35) Hem III, tlh VHSY00000000
Seawater1‐1 (7) V. fujianensis 0.0008 V. anguillarum 2.32 A. hydrophila/caviae/sobria137.30.33 bla ampC, tet(34)

Hem III, aceE, aceF, rtxA

VHSP00000000
Seawater12‐2(3a) V. fujianensis 0.0008Id. not possibleUnacceptable profileHem III, aceE, aceFVMQP00000000

Abbreviations: CARB: Carbenicillin‐hydrolyzation, catB‐related o‐acetyltransferase involved in chloramphenicol resistance, qnr family pentapeptide repeat protein involved in quinolone target protection, adeF is the membrane fusion protein of the multidrug efflux complex adeFGH, and tet(34) as well as tet(35) conferring resistance to tetracyclines. hlyA: V. cholerae cytolysin A, tlh: Thermolabile hemolysin, Hem III: Aeromonas‐related hemolysin type III, rtxA to D repeats‐in‐toxin holotoxins, aceA, E and F accessory cholerae enterotoxin genes.

Antimicrobial resistance

The phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the 116 Vibrio spp. showed 74% to be resistant to ampicillin, 33% to oxolinic acid, 21% to imipenem, 19% to aztreonam, and 17% to tobramycin (Table 1). All isolates were susceptible to tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole, while most isolates were susceptible to third‐generation cephalosporins (98%) and aminoglycosides (83%). For the isolates showing reduced susceptibility (intermediate resistance) to imipenem, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for imipenem ranged from 2 to 8 µg/ml. Detailed overview of the individual inhibition zones obtained from disk diffusion test is included in Table A1.
Table 1

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern among the Vibrio isolates

AgentV. alginolyticusV. metschnikoviiV. anguillarumV. antiquariusV. fujianensis
(n = 53)(n = 38)(n = 21)(n = 2)(n = 2)
S (%)I (%)R (%)S (%)I (%)R (%)S (%)I (%)R (%)S (%)I (%)R (%)S (%)I (%)R (%)
AMP0010079021001000010000100
MEL1000010000100001000010000
CTX10000973095501000010000
CAZ100009730100001000010000
TE1000010000100001000010000
DO1000010000100001000010000
IPM964010000001001000050500
MEM1000010000100001000010000
E980210000710291000010000
SXT1000010000100001000010000
W982010000100005050010000
OA346249730100000100010000
CIP1000010000100001000010000
CN1000082180100001000010000
TOB10000473913100001000010000
FFC1000010000100001000010000
AZM1000010000100001000010000
ATM982010000586101000050500

Abbreviations: AMP: Ampicillin, MEL: Mecillinam, CTX: Cefotaxime, CAZ: Ceftazidime, TE: Tetracycline, DO: Doxycycline, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, OA: Oxolinic acid, IPM: Imipenem, MEM: Meropenem, E: Erythromycin, AZM: Azithromycin, SXT: Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim, W: Trimethoprim, TOB: Tobramycin, CN: Gentamicin, FFC: Florfenicol, ATM: Aztreonam, S: Susceptible, I: intermediate, R: Resistant.

Table A1

Measured inhibition zones (mm) from antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolated Vibrio spp. by disk diffusion

V. alginolyticus Antibacterial agent, Inhibition zone (mm)
AMPMELCTXCAZTEDOCIPOAIPMMEMEAZMSXTWTOBCNFFCATM
1‐1 (4)632333126313432353616/2021312522233637
1‐1 (4‐a)635302929293533393716/2220302219203631
1‐1 (8)635323228/3331383537421821302217193431
1‐2 (7)63632343029323040422924271720223829
1‐3 (1)63632343130323242442127312621223827
1‐3 (1‐a)63530322930343441422128322621223827
1‐3 (2‐a)63128313029323235392125342821243931
1‐3 (3)63229303032322841432026332820223728
1‐3 (4)63430312829282836401924241619203325
1‐3 (4‐a)63432343230302935411925271618203528
1‐3 (4‐b)63127293029292834372024292518193425
1‐3 (5)63431323230292936391822281620223828
1‐3 (6)63433333231312839412223322221223732
1‐3 (6‐a)63334283029302838392024292319213630
1‐3 (7)633323431302927413918/2222302419213432
1‐3 (10)63327292930302937402026332918203631
2‐1 (2)63428293032282837411923331920213727
2‐1 (5)63632343030292636361824301919203830
2‐1 (6)62323212928252430321620312617183019
2‐1 (6‐a)63027253031242530321618272617183020
2‐1 (7)63023232927242531331618282617193120
2‐1 (7‐a)63430292928282534361825311919213724
2‐1 (9)63732332829322839402021282320223531
2‐2 (2)63624/3326/3429/3431/382727363615/2119/2524/2823182029/4222/29
2‐2 (2‐a)63229282830353237391924322419203527
2‐2 (3)63331322931363237382025302319193627
2‐2 (3‐a)63229302729343136371924322418203427
2‐2 (7)63332302930363540392125322518203527
2‐2 (8)62428233228373520291320352519213826
2‐2 (9)633312828272724371925281416173728
2‐3 (1)62927272626333336352924272117183223
2‐3 (5)630272628272829333518/1923363218193726
2‐3 (5‐a)634303129/3528/332827363718/2219/21312218193527
2‐3 (6)63731323132282740422225292118193332
2‐3 (6‐a)63733343332292740402225302219203531
2‐3 (9)63027272929302633351921/30333018193625
2‐3 (9‐a)631282926/3028333137382024322519203627
3‐1 (1)637323331/3631292838422126/36332419223832
3‐1 (1‐a)637323329/3628/332727363716/2220/30332421223533
3‐2 (1)62628243130363520311622332820213722
4‐1 (2)638343333312727373818/2219291918193529
4‐2 (2)63736373332302939372024322520223631
4‐3 (1)63028272928262732331921302916183524
4‐3 (2)63530323031282737392125292319203429
4‐5 (1)63227292829262734341823312618213837
4‐5 (1‐a)6322829303129284042212532272122/253824
4‐5 (2)63329302931272635381924312520213624
7‐5 (1‐a)63228282729343630342022/30291817193325
8‐1 (1)63129302830313239412124302119193426
8‐1 (1‐a)63129282930272836382123302018193425
B9‐163231303129312935362023292320203526/38
B9‐263027272926302933341823282519203525
B9‐363328282929313035372024282419193424
V. metschnikovii
5‐1 (4)3136272226283633394221/2628332913163425
5‐2 (1)303525202426363440412026353315163627
5‐2 (2)3136272327283531374020/2325312814163424
5‐2 (3)313731232930353340422125333014153525
6‐2 (1)293526212827403541442327333014153422
7‐5 (1)323632252832363036402124302714143323
A2164032242828363436381826343013153226
A2‐283830263230404042442226322826173428
A6323828222728383440462226322915163423
A73038282228264032424420/2626/32343213143627
A8183730223028363437402124323013153625
A8293629263030424244442226363215163828
A9323828242729424042442226322913153824
A10323830263132413341442023292711133222
A11113627233030383740422023292612143323
A12313628222728383644442224363013153427
A15313626222827363038401921302711133323
A17293526212726332937401922312812133423
TA 4‐184038273028423443412126/28363216183634
TA 4‐2274042444029423644432628383516184036
TA 5184036353132403542441922322915183528
TA 13303730242628383646452828343015173627
TA 16303628223028424044462129383218173831
TS2323728242927393340442024302812133323
TS 4313830222626403644452125373515153930
TS 6303731243029413943462228322913153722
GA 5273827222727363238392324333113153527
GA 9303529222827343539401925332813153725
GA 103238332630323733404319/24253229153424
GA 133039322426273433364120/2722/25322914153325
GA 14323832243030363437402325/34333017183325
GA 1663730262826414044452425363415173730
GA 203240362632313433374220/2724/32353115163326
GS 153140292328263435374020/2822/33373419213129
A12 (T.2)123930262930393638412328342915163526
A16 (T.2)3240352830283632364320/2824/33323115153925
A17 (T.2)324034262930413736382429322914183324
T7 u.f (T.2)404137293432373840442627343116183826
V. anguillarum
B1‐262527233331373118271320322620203519
B1‐462426233332373417291222402619213821
B4‐162628233230393518281218352618203618
B4‐362428223230423919301621332619203518
B4‐462527233231413618291416352719203820
B4‐562627243230413719301420332619203620
B4‐662427233129393518281319322418193517
B4‐762528233231423717291421352519203819
B4‐862527223131413619301620322519193818
B4‐962629233632403618291320312419203517
B4‐1062527233330393519291420302319193518
B4‐1162529243230403619291320312418193718
B4‐1262725223432423819301621332519203518
B4‐1362728243634403618291521362720213720
B4‐1462527233231383618291420332519203718
B4‐1562729253431413618301621342520213618
B4‐1662729253634433819311523362820213720
B462528243230433717301522332419203619
B762427243231423718291523342418193618
B8‐162728243432423818301522342519203919
B8‐262529223432393518291622352620213820
V. antiquarius
1‐2 (7‐a)63028272728302837392025261515173425
11‐4 (1)63230292930292939402124302019193326
V. fujianensis
1‐1 (7)62626223231363221291817332919193519
12‐2 (3‐a)122527253433423923311724393421213924

Abbreviations: AMP, Ampicillin; ATM, Aztreonam; AZM, Azithromycin; CAZ, Ceftazidime; CIP, Ciprofloxacin; CN, Gentamicin; CTX, Cefotaxime; DO, Doxycycline; E, Erythromycin; FFC, Florfenicol; IPM, Imipenem; MEL, Mecillinam; MEM, Meropenem; OA, Oxolinic acid; SXT, Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim; TE, Tetracycline; TOB, Tobramycin; W, Trimethoprim.

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern among the Vibrio isolates Abbreviations: AMP: Ampicillin, MEL: Mecillinam, CTX: Cefotaxime, CAZ: Ceftazidime, TE: Tetracycline, DO: Doxycycline, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, OA: Oxolinic acid, IPM: Imipenem, MEM: Meropenem, E: Erythromycin, AZM: Azithromycin, SXT: Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim, W: Trimethoprim, TOB: Tobramycin, CN: Gentamicin, FFC: Florfenicol, ATM: Aztreonam, S: Susceptible, I: intermediate, R: Resistant.

Examination of carbapenemase production

Among the 116 Vibrio isolates examined, resistance to imipenem was observed in all V. anguillarum isolates, while two V. alginolyticus isolates and one V. fujianensis isolate were intermediately susceptible to the agent. These imipenem‐resistant isolates were also resistant to ampicillin but susceptible to meropenem. All but one V. anguillarum isolate (B4‐12) was susceptible to cefotaxime. CarbaNP test was negative for all isolates, suggesting the absence of carbapenemase with high hydrolytic activity.

Genetic characterization of resistance determinants

The sequenced genomes revealed the presence of β‐lactamases like bla CARB genes in V. alginolyticus, V. metschnikovii, and V. antiquarius and ampC genes in V. alginolyticus, V. anguillarum, and V. antiquarius (Table 2). One V. anguillarum isolate harbored varG metallo‐β‐lactamase first described in V. cholerae (Hong‐Ting Victor et al., 2017). Genes encoding catB‐related o‐acetyltransferase, involved in acetylation of chloramphenicol, were detected in isolated V. metschnikovii and V. anguillarum, while genes encoding tetracycline resistance (tet34 and tet35) and multidrug membrane fusion protein (adeF) were found in all examined sequences from V. alginolyticus. V. alginolyticus also harbored genes encoding the qnr family pentapeptide repeat proteins conferring reduced susceptibility against quinolones (Marathe et al., 2019). Isolation source, identification, and list of resistance and virulence genes detected in whole‐genome sequences of Vibrio spp. isolates Hem III, aceE, aceF, rtxA Abbreviations: CARB: Carbenicillin‐hydrolyzation, catB‐related o‐acetyltransferase involved in chloramphenicol resistance, qnr family pentapeptide repeat protein involved in quinolone target protection, adeF is the membrane fusion protein of the multidrug efflux complex adeFGH, and tet(34) as well as tet(35) conferring resistance to tetracyclines. hlyA: V. cholerae cytolysin A, tlh: Thermolabile hemolysin, Hem III: Aeromonas‐related hemolysin type III, rtxA to D repeats‐in‐toxin holotoxins, aceA, E and F accessory cholerae enterotoxin genes.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the most comprehensive assessment of vibrios from the Norwegian marine environment describing the prevalence of Vibrio spp. in Norwegian pelagic fish, bivalves, and seawater, and their characteristics concerning antimicrobial resistance and virulence.

Prevalence of Vibrio spp. in the Norwegian marine environment

The highest plate count of aquatic bacteria was observed in the water samples collected closest to the shore, where the measured temperature was highest and the salinity lowest (Location A). A total of 67% of isolated V. alginolyticus were isolated from these samples, where the temperature was measured to above 15°C and the salinity to ≤25 ‰, close to the preferred conditions for vibrios (Vezzulli et al., 2013; Vezzulli, Pezzati, Brettar, Höfle, & Pruzzo, 2015). V. alginolyticus is usually the dominating species in Vibrio communities (Fu et al., 2016), and our results are in accordance with this study. From fish samples, V. metschnikovii was the dominating species, while V. anguillarum was the species most frequently isolated from bivalves. Of the vibrios isolated from water samples, only four V. alginolyticus isolates and one V. metschnikovii isolate were recovered from enrichment cultures, indicating a suboptimal enrichment method for water samples. V. vulnificus, V. cholerae, and V. parahaemolyticus all grow at 42°C (NMKL, 1997), and hence, 42°C is used as enrichment temperature for these species. Although such a high incubation temperature may affect the recovery of stressed cells (Huq et al., 2012), Bauer et al. (2006) showed that there was no difference in isolation rate of V. parahaemolyticus with enrichment at 37°C and 41.5°C for isolation of Vibrio spp. from bivalves. In a previous study, three major pathogenic Vibrio spp. (V. vulnificus, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. cholerae) were isolated from the Norwegian marine environment (Bauer et al., 2006). In summer of 2018, several Vibrio infections were reported after bathing along the Southeast coast of Norway (Naseer et al., 2019). However, none of these species was isolated in this study. Most of the samples that were obtained for this study were from the west coast of Norway, where the seas are influenced by the North and Atlantic Ocean. As a result, the sea temperature in these areas is normally low and the salinity is high. It is well known that the human pathogenic vibrios are most abundant at elevated sea temperatures, >18°C, and at lower salinity levels, <25‰ (Vezzulli et al., 2013). This may explain the absence of the major human pathogenic Vibrio spp. in this study. The risk of increased numbers of vibrios due to elevated temperatures is greater in the east coast of Norway and closer toward the Baltic sea (Escobar et al., 2015) where the seas are less affected by the open oceans.

Antimicrobial susceptibility

For the treatment of infections caused by non‐cholerae Vibrio spp., tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, and third‐generation cephalosporins are among the recommended agents (Elmahdi, DaSilva, & Parveen, 2016; Wong, Brown, Luscombe, Wong, & Mendis, 2015). Resistance to these agents has been reported within the genus (Hernández‐Robles et al., 2016; Lee, Ab Mutalib, Law, Wong, & Letchumanan, 2018; Letchumanan et al., 2015). All Vibrio spp. isolated during this study were phenotypically susceptible to tetracycline, doxycycline, meropenem, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, ciprofloxacin, florfenicol, mecillinam, and azithromycin. Consistent with previous reports, a high prevalence of resistance to ampicillin was observed in all Vibrio spp. isolates in our study (Banerjee & Farber, 2018; Chiou, Li, & Chen, 2015; Hernández‐Robles et al., 2016; Li et al., 1999; Pan et al., 2013), and this resistance is usually due to the presence of a bla CARB gene (Chiou et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016). The bla CARB ‐like genes have been found in V. cholerae predating the introduction of penicillins (Dorman et al., 2019). In this study, the bla CARB genes were detected in V. alginolyticus, V. metschnikovii, and V. antiquarius. Genes encoding ampC β‐lactamase were found in V. alginolyticus, V. anguillarum, and V. fujianensis, which is conflicting to the results from phenotypic susceptibility testing as all these isolates were susceptible to cephalosporins. This may indicate that the breakpoints used in this study are insufficient for detection of these enzymes by a phenotypic method. This also highlights the need for establishing breakpoints for environmental Vibrio species. However, differences between phenotype and genotype may also be caused by a variable expression of genes in tested isolates (Sundsfjord et al., 2004). A study on the antimicrobial susceptibility of environmental V. alginolyticus isolated from oysters in Mexico reported a high prevalence of resistance to tetracycline (Hernández‐Robles et al., 2016). Although all isolates in our study were susceptible to both tetracycline and doxycycline, the tetracycline enzymatic inactivation gene tet34 (Akinbowale, Peng, & Barton, 2007) and efflux encoding gene tet35 were frequently detected within the examined genomes in the current study. Resistance to oxolinic acid has been reported in V. alginolyticus (Scarano et al., 2014), and the prevalence of reduced susceptibility was quite high in this study. All examined isolates of V. alginolyticus carried the qnr gene. It has been suggested that the marine bacteria may constitute the origin of plasmid‐mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes (Poirel, Cattoir, & Nordmann, 2012) and vibrios might act as a reservoir for these genes (Poirel, Liard, Rodriguez‐Martinez, & Nordmann, 2005). Genes encoding chloramphenicol resistance are frequently found in examined Vibrio spp. (Letchumanan et al., 2015), and in the current study, V. metschnikovii and V. anguillarum harbored the catB‐like acetyltransferase able to inactivate chloramphenicol. This gene, however, does not give resistance to florfenicol (Schwarz, Kehrenberg, Doublet, & Cloeckaert, 2004), which was the only amphenicol tested in our study. Reduced susceptibility to aminoglycoside has been reported in clinical isolates of V. metschnikovii (Macarena Pariente, Elena Escribano, Liria, & S. & María Dolores Crespo, S., 2008; Wallet, Tachon, Nseir, Courcol, & Roussel‐Delvallez, 2005). This was observed quite frequently in our study; however, none of the acetyltransferases known to confer resistance to this class of agents was detected in the isolates subjected to WGS. Several efflux pumps, including members of the RND, MATE, and ABC family, were found in the isolates, but these have not been investigated in detail in our study. Pumps within these families are involved in the efflux of several classes of antibiotics, including aminoglycosides (Andersen et al., 2015; Garneau‐Tsodikova & Labby, 2016; Krause, Serio, Kane, & Connolly, 2016). Phenotypic susceptibility testing and determination of MIC indicated the presence of resistance to imipenem in all isolated V. anguillarum. Furthermore, two V. alginolyticus isolates and one V. fujianensis isolate were intermediately resistant to imipenem. However, none of these isolates produced positive results in the carbaNP test indicating another resistance mechanism than the production of a carbapenemase, or an imipenem hydrolyzing enzyme with a slow turnover rate (Verma et al., 2011). The observed resistance is likely caused by an alteration in porins, the presence of low‐affinity penicillin‐binding proteins or overexpression of ampC (El Amin et al., 2001; Nordmann, Dortet, & Poirel, 2012; Zapun, Contreras‐Martel, & Vernet, 2008). One V. anguillarum isolate carried gene encoding a VarG subclass B1‐like lactamase, an enzyme with the ability to hydrolyze most β‐lactam antibiotic, including cephalosporins and carbapenems (Lin et al., 2017). This isolate was, however, susceptible to both meropenem and cephalosporins.

Virulence

Members of the genus Vibrio are known to possess a range of virulence factors connected to adherence (ACF, IlpA, MAM7, MSHA pili, OmpU, TCP, VpadF), pili production, motility by flagella, regulation (AI‐2, CAI‐1), iron uptake, secretion system (T3SS1, T3SS2, T6SS), or toxin production (Ace, CT, MARTX, TDH, TRH, VCC, Zot, RTX), often arranged in pathogenicity cassettes and islands (VPI, VPI‐2) (Pérez‐Reytor, Jaña, Pavez, Navarrete, & García, 2018). The lack of cholerae toxin (ctxA or ctxB) production, thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh), or zonula occludens toxin (zot) indicates a low level of virulence among the examined isolates. The most common virulence genes among the isolates included in this study were the Aeromonas‐related hemolysin type III (Hemolysin III) (Goncalves Pessoa et al., 2019). The V. cholerae cytolysin A gene (hlyA) was found among V. alginolyticus, V. metschnikovii, and V. anguillarum, whereas the thermolabile hemolysin gene (tlh) was present in all species except V. fujianensis. Different repeats‐in‐toxin holotoxins (rtxA to D) were detected in V. alginolyticus, V. metschnikovii, V. anguillarum, and V. fujianensis. The hemolysins produced by V. metschnikovii is known to lyse cells from several animals, including humans, sheep, and horse (Miyake, Honda, & Miwatani, 1988). All the V. metschnikovii isolates were α‐hemolytic on tryptic soy agar (TSA) with 5% human blood and on TSA with sheep blood, except five isolates that were β‐hemolytic on TSA with sheep blood. The results indicate that sheep erythrocytes are more susceptible to these hemolysins, even though a previous study showed the opposite, where human cells were more susceptible to the hemolysins produced by V. metschnikovii (Matté et al., 2007). RTX is a pore‐forming toxin found in several pathogenic Gram‐negative bacteria (Lee, Choi, & Kim, 2008), while HlyA, also known as V. cholerae cytolysin (VCC), is a hemolysin and cytolysin with activity against a range of eukaryotic cells (Ruenchit, Reamtong, Siripanichgon, Chaicumpa, & Diraphat, 2017) and is found in both V. cholerae O1 and non‐O1/non‐O139. The cytotoxic activity has previously been described in V. metschnikovii isolated from a leg wound (Linde et al., 2004). Even though V. metschnikovii have caused infections in humans, it is poorly described with regard to virulence factors, and the presence of these genes may indicate a pathogenic potential. Horizontal gene transfer can mediate transfer not only antibiotic resistance genes but also virulence factors. V. cholerae virulence encoding genes, for example, zonula occludens toxin (zot), are encoded by prophages, and it has been suggested that the transfer of zot encoding phages occurs frequently in the Vibrio community (Castillo et al., 2018). Similarly, fragments of V. cholerae pathogenicity islands have been detected in V. alginolyticus, V. anguillarum, and V. metschnikovii, indicating that important virulence genes can be present in environmental Vibrio spp. (Gennari, Ghidini, Caburlotto, & Lleo, 2012).

Species identification

Identification and discrimination of closely related Vibrio spp. can be difficult (Bauer & Rørvik, 2007; Cano‐Gomez, Høj, Owens, Baillie, & Andreakis, 2015; Dieckmann, Strauch, & Alter, 2010; Moreno, Romero, & Espejo, 2002). In this study, several methods for identification of the isolates were applied. The API20E biochemical method was able to identify 47% of the isolates to the genus Vibrio. The API20E has a bias toward clinically relevant species (Viña‐Feas, Lozano‐Leon, de Novoa, Garcia‐Martin, & Martinez‐Urtaza, 2006) and does not include as many options for identification of environmental species. A previous study showed that this system was able to correctly identify 63.9% of the Vibrio spp. included in the database and performed best on the identification of V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus (O'Hara, Sowers, Bopp, Duda, & Strockbine, 2003). MALDI‐TOF‐MS is primarily designed for clinical use, and thus, the library mainly contains clinically relevant species (Santos, Hildenbrand, & Schug, 2016). By applying the Bruker standard library and an external generated library consisting of marine bacteria, MALDI‐TOF‐MS determined 99% of the 116 isolates to one of the three species of Vibrio. Although MALDI‐TOF‐MS can differentiate between closely related Vibrio spp. (Eddabra, Prévost, & Scheftel, 2012), the performance of this method is dependent on the strain catalogue in the reference library. For isolates identified by MiGA, a discrepancy with MALDI‐TOF‐MS was seen for five isolates. MiGA is based on average nucleotide identity (ANI) (Rodriguez et al., 2018), a method where WGS data are used to calculate an average similarity between homologues genomic regions shared between two genomes (Kim, Oh, Park, & Chun, 2014). MiGA can discriminate between closely related species (Rodriguez et al., 2018) and the reference database includes a large number of genomes, including the Vibrio spp. proposed by MALDI‐TOF‐MS (http://microbial‐genomes.org/projects/20). Hence, the results from identification by MiGA should be considered most reliable.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the most comprehensive assessment of vibrios from the Norwegian marine environment, where potentially human pathogenic species like V. alginolyticus and V. metschnikovii were detected. Although the low frequency of multidrug‐resistant isolates was observed, several clinically important resistance genes were detected in the Vibrio spp. isolates. These environmental vibrios could act as a reservoir of resistance genes in the marine environment.

ETHICS STATEMENT

None required.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

None declared.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Fredrik Håkonsholm: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Project administration (equal); Software (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐original draft (equal). Bjørn‐Tore Lunestad: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Project administration (equal); Resources (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Jose Roberto Aguirre‐Sanchez: Software (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Jaime Martinez‐Urtaza: Software (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Nachiket P Marathe: Data curation (equal); Investigation (equal); Resources (equal); Validation (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Cecilie Smith Svanevik: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Methodology (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal).
  77 in total

Review 1.  Genetic methods for detection of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Arnfinn Sundsfjord; Gunnar S Simonsen; Bjørg C Haldorsen; Håkon Haaheim; Stig-Ove Hjelmevoll; Pia Littauer; Kristin H Dahl
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.205

2.  Hydrolytic mechanism of OXA-58 enzyme, a carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamase from Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Vidhu Verma; Sebastian A Testero; Kaveh Amini; William Wei; Jerome Liu; Naresh Balachandran; Tharseekan Monoharan; Siobhan Stynes; Lakshmi P Kotra; Dasantila Golemi-Kotra
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Aminoglycosides: An Overview.

Authors:  Kevin M Krause; Alisa W Serio; Timothy R Kane; Lynn E Connolly
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Mechanisms of Resistance to Aminoglycoside Antibiotics: Overview and Perspectives.

Authors:  Sylvie Garneau-Tsodikova; Kristin J Labby
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 5.  Vibrio spp. infections.

Authors:  Craig Baker-Austin; James D Oliver; Munirul Alam; Afsar Ali; Matthew K Waldor; Firdausi Qadri; Jaime Martinez-Urtaza
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 6.  Vibriosis in Fish: A Review on Disease Development and Prevention.

Authors:  M Y Ina-Salwany; Nurhidayu Al-Saari; Aslah Mohamad; Fathin-Amirah Mursidi; Aslizah Mohd-Aris; M N A Amal; Hisae Kasai; Sayaka Mino; Tomoo Sawabe; M Zamri-Saad
Journal:  J Aquat Anim Health       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 1.625

7.  CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database.

Authors:  Baofeng Jia; Amogelang R Raphenya; Brian Alcock; Nicholas Waglechner; Peiyao Guo; Kara K Tsang; Briony A Lago; Biren M Dave; Sheldon Pereira; Arjun N Sharma; Sachin Doshi; Mélanie Courtot; Raymond Lo; Laura E Williams; Jonathan G Frye; Tariq Elsayegh; Daim Sardar; Erin L Westman; Andrew C Pawlowski; Timothy A Johnson; Fiona S L Brinkman; Gerard D Wright; Andrew G McArthur
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  New qnr gene cassettes associated with superintegron repeats in Vibrio cholerae O1.

Authors:  Erica L Fonseca; Fernanda Dos Santos Freitas; Verônica V Vieira; Ana C P Vicente
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Notes from the Field: Fatal Vibrio anguillarum Infection in an Immunocompromised Patient - Maine, 2017.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sinatra; Kate Colby
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 10.  Accessory Toxins of Vibrio Pathogens and Their Role in Epithelial Disruption During Infection.

Authors:  Diliana Pérez-Reytor; Victor Jaña; Leonardo Pavez; Paola Navarrete; Katherine García
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Vibrios from the Norwegian marine environment: Characterization of associated antibiotic resistance and virulence genes.

Authors:  Fredrik Håkonsholm; Bjørn Tore Lunestad; Jose Roberto Aguirre Sánchez; Jaime Martinez-Urtaza; Nachiket Prakash Marathe; Cecilie Smith Svanevik
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Vibrio metschnikovii: Current state of knowledge and discussion of recently identified clinical case.

Authors:  Yulian Konechnyi; Yurii Khorkavyi; Kateryna Ivanchuk; Ihor Kobza; Alicja Sękowska; Olena Korniychuk
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-03-04

3.  Epidemiologic potentials and correlational analysis of Vibrio species and virulence toxins from water sources in greater Bushenyi districts, Uganda.

Authors:  Hope Onohuean; Anthony I Okoh; Uchechukwu U Nwodo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparative genome analyses of five Vibrio penaeicida strains provide insights into their virulence-related factors.

Authors:  Wafaa Ragab; Satoshi Kawato; Reiko Nozaki; Hidehiro Kondo; Ikuo Hirono
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2022-02

Review 5.  Vibriosis Outbreaks in Aquaculture: Addressing Environmental and Public Health Concerns and Preventive Therapies Using Gilthead Seabream Farming as a Model System.

Authors:  Gracinda M M Sanches-Fernandes; Isabel Sá-Correia; Rodrigo Costa
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.064

6.  Antibiotic and Heavy Metal Susceptibility of Non-Cholera Vibrio Isolated from Marine Sponges and Sea Urchins: Could They Pose a Potential Risk to Public Health?

Authors:  Wellington Felipe Costa; Marcia Giambiagi-deMarval; Marinella Silva Laport
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.