Literature DB >> 32558248

The contribution of the systolic and diastolic components for the diagnosis of arterial hypertension under the 2017 ACC/AHA Guideline and metabolic heterogeneity among individuals with Stage 1 hypertension.

Fernando H Y Cesena1, Fernando C Nary1, Raul D Santos1,2, Marcio S Bittencourt1,3.   

Abstract

Little is known about the impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guideline on the distribution pattern of hypertension modalities (isolated systolic hypertension [ISH], isolated diastolic hypertension [IDH], and systolic-diastolic hypertension [SDH]). This cross-sectional study had the following objectives: to compare the prevalence of hypertension, ISH, IDH, and SDH, according to the definitions of the JNC 7 or the 2017 guideline; to determine the relative contribution of the systolic and the diastolic components for the diagnosis of hypertension; and to compare the metabolic profile of ISH, IDH, or SDH among new hypertensive individuals by the 2017 guideline. The authors retrospectively evaluated 33 594 patients (42 ± 10 years, 67% male) who underwent a routine health evaluation. Hypertensive patients not using antihypertensive medication were classified into ISH, IDH, or SDH using guideline-defined thresholds. The prevalence of hypertension increased from 21.1% by the JNC 7 definition to 54.7% using the 2017 criteria (2.6-fold increase). More profound increases were seen in the prevalence of IDH (8.7-fold) and SDH (3.3-fold), whereas the prevalence of ISH reduced from 1.1% (JNC 7) to 0.5% (2017 definition). Among patients with Stage 1 hypertension by the 2017 document, 85% had IDH and fewer metabolic abnormalities compared to those with SDH or ISH. The authors concluded that the 2017 guideline inflates the role of the diastolic component and diminishes the contribution of the systolic component for the diagnosis of hypertension. Individuals with Stage 1 hypertension by the 2017 guideline are metabolically heterogeneous and may have different long-term prognoses.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; guideline; hypertension; isolated diastolic hypertension; isolated systolic hypertension; metabolic syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32558248      PMCID: PMC8029912          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  20 in total

1.  Association of Blood Pressure Classification in Young Adults Using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline With Cardiovascular Events Later in Life.

Authors:  Yuichiro Yano; Jared P Reis; Laura A Colangelo; Daichi Shimbo; Anthony J Viera; Norrina B Allen; Samuel S Gidding; Adam P Bress; Philip Greenland; Paul Muntner; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Salvatore Mottillo; Kristian B Filion; Jacques Genest; Lawrence Joseph; Louise Pilote; Paul Poirier; Stéphane Rinfret; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Mark J Eisenberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Influence of systolic and diastolic blood pressure on stroke risk: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  E Lindenstrøm; G Boysen; J Nyboe
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Authors:  John W McEvoy; Natalie Daya; Faisal Rahman; Ron C Hoogeveen; Roger S Blumenthal; Amil M Shah; Christie M Ballantyne; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The contribution of the systolic and diastolic components for the diagnosis of arterial hypertension under the 2017 ACC/AHA Guideline and metabolic heterogeneity among individuals with Stage 1 hypertension.

Authors:  Fernando H Y Cesena; Fernando C Nary; Raul D Santos; Marcio S Bittencourt
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Prevalence of Hypertension, Treatment, and Blood Pressure Targets in Canada Associated With the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines.

Authors:  Stephanie Garies; Sylvia Hao; Kerry McBrien; Tyler Williamson; Mingkai Peng; Nadia A Khan; Raj S Padwal; Hude Quan; Alexander A Leung
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-03-01

9.  Relevance of prehypertension as a diagnostic category in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Fernando Costa Nary; Raul D Santos; Antonio Gabriele Laurinavicius; Raquel Dilguerian de Oliveira Conceição; José Antonio Maluf de Carvalho
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

10.  Impact of 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on prevalence of hypertension and eligibility for antihypertensive treatment in United States and China: nationally representative cross sectional study.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Yuan Lu; Jiapeng Lu; Anshul Saxena; Khurram Nasir; Lixin Jiang; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-07-11
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Is Isolated Diastolic Hypertension an Important Phenotype?

Authors:  Cesar A Romero; Aldo H Tabares; Marcelo Orias
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  The contribution of the systolic and diastolic components for the diagnosis of arterial hypertension under the 2017 ACC/AHA Guideline and metabolic heterogeneity among individuals with Stage 1 hypertension.

Authors:  Fernando H Y Cesena; Fernando C Nary; Raul D Santos; Marcio S Bittencourt
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Did the 2017 ACC/AHA blood pressure guideline get it wrong in reducing the diastolic threshold to define hypertension from 90 to 80 mmHg?

Authors:  Brian P McGrath; John W McEvoy
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.