| Literature DB >> 32552842 |
Lei Ding1, Fangling Zhang1,2, Qiao He1, Zhoulei Li1, Xinchong Shi1, Ruocheng Li1, Xiangsong Zhang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differentiation of suprasellar meningiomas (SSMs) from non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFPMAs) is useful for clinical management. We investigated the utility of 13N-ammonia combined with 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in distinguishing SSMs from NFPMAs retrospectively.Entities:
Keywords: Non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma; Suprasellar meningioma; 18F-FDG; 13N-ammonia; PET-CT
Year: 2020 PMID: 32552842 PMCID: PMC7301455 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06852-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Distribution map of T/G ratios of 18F-FDG and 13N-ammonia. As shown in this figure, there was a small overlap between NFPMA (blue spot) and SSM (red spot)
Fig. 2Imaging results in cases with NFPMA(A-D) and SSM(E-F). Trans-axial and sagittal contrast MRI images (a, b) showed the tumor (white arrows) had obvious enhancement. The pituitary gland was under the tumor intactly (white arrowheads) and the tumor was misdiagnosed as a pituitary macroadenoma on MRI images. Slight uptake of 18F-FDG (c) and high uptake of 13N-ammonia (d) on PET images. Trans-axial and coronal contrast MRI images (e, f) showed a marked enhancement (white arrows) mass mostly in the suprasellar region. The mass grew into the pituitary fossa and the pituitary gland was compressed. The lesion displayed obviously higher uptake of 13N-ammonia (h) compared with normal gray matter and low uptake of 18F-FDG (g)
Predicted accuracy of discriminant analysis for the 2 groups
| Predicted Group Membership | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | NFPMA | SSM | Total | ||
| n (%) | NFPMA | 14 (100) | 14 (100) | ||
| SSM | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | 11 (100) | ||
| n (%) | NFPMA | 14 (100) | 14 (100) | ||
| SSM | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | 11 (100) | ||
Fig. 3Discriminant function results of T/G ratios between the two groups. The function results of NFPMA were obviously lower than that of SSM (− 1.23 ± 0.96 vs 1.57 ± 1.01). The combination of the two tracers could distinguish these two clinical entities effectively