Literature DB >> 25391163

Endoscopic endonasal surgery for olfactory groove meningiomas: outcomes and limitations in 50 patients.

Maria Koutourousiou, Juan C Fernandez-Miranda, Eric W Wang, Carl H Snyderman, Paul A Gardner.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Recently, endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) has been introduced in the management of skull base tumors, with constantly improving outcomes and increasing indications. The authors retrospectively reviewed the effectiveness of EES in the management of olfactory groove meningiomas.
METHODS: Between February 2003 and December 2012, 50 patients (64% female) with olfactory groove meningiomas underwent EES at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. The authors present the results of EES and analyze the resection rates, clinical outcome, complications, and limitations of this approach.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients presented with primary tumors, whereas six were previously treated elsewhere. The patients' mean age was 57.1 years (range 27-88 years). Clinical presentation included altered mental status (36%), visual loss (30%), headache (24%), and seizures (20%). The mean maximum tumor diameter was 41.6 mm (range 18-80 mm). All patients underwent EES, which was performed in stages in 18 giant tumors. Complete tumor resection (Simpson Grade I) was achieved in 66.7% of the 45 patients in whom it was the goal, and 13 (28.9%) had neartotal resection (> 95% of the tumor). Tumor size, calcification, and absence of cortical cuff from vasculature were significant factors that influenced the degree of resection (p = 0.002, p = 0.024, and p = 0.028, respectively). Tumor residual was usually at the most lateral and anterior tumor margins. Following EES, mental status was improved or normalized in 77.8% of the cases, vision was improved or restored in 86.7%, and headaches resolved in 83.3%. There was no postoperative deterioration of presenting symptoms. Complications were increased in tumors > 40 mm and included CSF leakage (30%), which was significantly associated with lobular tumor configuration (p = 0.048); pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis, more commonly in elderly patients (20%); sinus infections (10%); and delayed abscess months or years after EES (6%). One patient had an intraoperative vascular injury resulting in transient hemiparesis (2%). There were no perioperative deaths. During a mean follow-up period of 32 months (median 22 months, range 1-115 months), 1 patient underwent repeat EES for tumor regrowth.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic endonasal surgery has shown good clinical outcomes regardless of patient age, previous treatment, or tumor characteristics. Tumor size > 40 mm, calcification, and absence of cortical vascular cuff limit GTR with EES; in addition, large tumors are associated with increased postoperative complications. Significant lateral and anterior dural involvement may represent indications for using traditional craniotomies for the management of these tumors. Postoperative CSF leakage remains a problem that necessitates innovations in EES reconstruction techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25391163     DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.focus14330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  19 in total

1.  The Endoscopic Endonasal Management of Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Matteo Zoli; Federica Guaraldi; Ernesto Pasquini; Giorgio Frank; Diego Mazzatenta
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-08-27

2.  Preservation of olfaction in anterior midline skull base meningiomas: a comprehensive approach.

Authors:  Timothy H Ung; Alexander Yang; Mohammed Aref; Zach Folzenlogen; Vijay Ramakrishnan; A Samy Youssef
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 3.  Endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery: pushing the boundaries.

Authors:  Nathan T Zwagerman; Georgios Zenonos; Stefan Lieber; Wei-Hsin Wang; Eric W Wang; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Carl H Snyderman; Paul A Gardner
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  The extended, transnasal, transsphenoidal approach for anterior skull base meningioma: considerations in patient selection.

Authors:  Joseph P Castlen; David J Cote; Hasan A Zaidi; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  How I Do It: Endonasal transethmoidal, transcribriform approach for resection of giant olfactory groove meningioma.

Authors:  Christopher B Cutler; J Curran Henson; Jeremiah Alt; Michael Karsy
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Olfactory Outcomes after Resection of Tuberculum Sella and Planum Sphenoidale Meningiomas via a Transcranial Approach.

Authors:  Ronak Ved; Matthew Mo; Caroline Hayhurst
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-01-21

7.  Combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital multiportal approach for complex skull base lesions involving multiple compartments.

Authors:  Won-Jae Lee; Sang Duk Hong; Kyung In Woo; Ho Jun Seol; Jung Won Choi; Jung-Il Lee; Do-Hyun Nam; Doo-Sik Kong
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  Surgical complications of endoscopic approach to skull base: analysis of 584 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghvaei; Sara Fallah; Shokufeh Sadaghiani; Seyed Mousa Sadrhosseini; Azin Tabari; Mohammadreza Fathi; Mehdi Zeinalizadeh
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  The expanding role of the endonasal endoscopic approach in pituitary and skull base surgery: A 2014 perspective.

Authors:  Bjorn Lobo; Annie Heng; Garni Barkhoudarian; Chester F Griffiths; Daniel F Kelly
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-05-20

Review 10.  Current Status of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Skull Base Meningiomas: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Masahiro Shin; Kenji Kondo; Nobuhito Saito
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.