| Literature DB >> 32551136 |
Diego Forni1, Rachele Cagliani1, Mario Clerici2,3, Uberto Pozzoli1, Manuela Sironi1.
Abstract
Human betaherpesviruses 6A and 6B (HHV-6A and HHV-6B) are highly prevalent in human populations. The genomes of these viruses can be stably integrated at the telomeres of human chromosomes and be vertically transmitted (inherited chromosomally integrated HHV-6A/HHV-6B, iciHHV-6A/iciHHV-6B). We reconstructed the population structures of HHV-6A and HHV-6B, showing that HHV-6A diverged less than HHV-6B genomes from the projected common ancestral population. Thus, HHV-6B genomes experienced stronger drift, as also supported by calculation of nucleotide diversity and Tajima's D. Analysis of ancestry proportions indicated that HHV-6A exogenous viruses and iciHHV-6A derived most of their genomes from distinct ancestral sources. Conversely, ancestry proportions were similar in exogenous HHV-6B viruses and iciHHV-6B. In line with previous indications, this suggests the distinct exogenous viral populations that originated iciHHV-6B in subjects with European and Asian ancestry are still causing infections in the corresponding geographic areas. Notably, for both iciHHV-6A and iciHHV-6B, we found that European and American sequences tend to have high proportions of ancestry from viral populations that experienced considerable drift, suggesting that they underwent one or more bottlenecks followed by population expansion. Finally, analysis of HHV-6B exogenous viruses sampled in Japan indicated that proportions of ancestry components of most of these viruses are different from the majority of those sampled in the USA. More generally, we show that, in both viral species, both integrated and exogenous viral genomes have different ancestry components, partially depending on geographic location. It would be extremely important to determine whether such differences account for the diversity of HHV-6A/HHV-6B-associated clinical symptoms and epidemiology. Also, the sequencing of additional exogenous and integrated viral genomes will be instrumental to confirm and expand our conclusions, which are based on a relatively small number of genomes, sequenced with variable quality, and with unequal sampling in terms of geographic origin.Entities:
Keywords: HHV-6; Human betaherpesvirus; Roseolovirus; population structure; viral evolution
Year: 2020 PMID: 32551136 PMCID: PMC7293831 DOI: 10.1093/ve/veaa035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virus Evol ISSN: 2057-1577
Figure 1.HHV-6A/HHV-6B divergence. (A) Neighbor-net split network of 181 HHV-6A/HHV-6B genome sequences. Each sample is shown as a dot and colors are indicated in the legend. (B) DAPC of HHV-6A/HHV-6B genomes. The first two discriminants are plotted and samples are colored as in panel A. iciHHV-6A/iciHHV-6B, inherited chromosomally integrated HHV-6A and HHV-6B; vHHV-6A, HHV-6A exogenous virus.
Figure 2.HHV-6A/HHV-6B population structure. (A) Bar plot representing the proportion of ancestral population components from the STRUCTURE linkage model for all HHV-6A/HHV-6B genomes. Each vertical line represents a HHV-6A/HHV-6B genome. Samples are ordered on the basis of their integration/exogenous status and of viral species classification. (B) Analysis of optimal K for STRUCTURE analysis. ΔK is calculated as ΔK = mean(|L''(K)|)/SD(L(K)). The peak of this distribution is the optimal K used in STRUCTURE analysis. (C) Distributions of posterior F values for the ancestral populations. Colors are as in panel A.
Figure 3.HHV-6A population structure. (A) Bar plot representing the proportion of ancestral population components from the STRUCTURE linkage model for HHV-6A genomes. Each vertical line represents a HHV-6A genome. Samples are ordered on the basis of their integration/exogenous status and of geographic origin. (B) Analysis of optimal K for STRUCTURE. K= 4 was used in the analysis. (C) Distributions of posterior F values for the ancestral populations. Colors are as in panel A. (D) Neighbor-net split network of 181 HHV-6A/HHV-6B genome sequences. Tips (sequences) are colored according to the major ancestry component identified by STRUCTURE. In the enlargement of HHV-6A, tip shapes denote geographic origin.
Figure 4.HHV-6B population structure. (A) Bar plot representing the proportion of ancestral population components from the STRUCTURE linkage model for HHV-6B genomes. Each vertical line represents a HHV-6B genome. Samples are ordered on the basis of their integration/exogenous status and of geographic origin. (B) Analysis of optimal K for STRUCTURE. K = 5 was used in the analysis. (C) Distributions of posterior F values for the ancestral populations. Colors are as in panel A. (D) Neighbor-net split network of 181 HHV-6A/HHV-6B genome sequences. Tips (sequences) are colored according to the major ancestry component identified by STRUCTURE. In the enlargement of HHV-6B, tip shapes denote geographic origin.
Nucleotide diversity and Tajima’s D.
| Sequence set | Number of sequences |
|
| Tajima’s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ici-HHV-6A | 19 | 2.83 | 2.98 | 0.38 |
| vHHV-6A | 10 | 2.66 | 1.93 | −1.38 |
| iciHHV-6B | 84 | 1.15 | 0.36 | −2.01 |
| vHHV-6B | 68 | 2.54 | 1.10 | −2.39 |
| iciHHV-6B (USA) | 57 | 0.76 | 0.29 | −2.20 |
| iciHHV-6B (Europe) | 21 | 0.34 | 0.24 | −1.19 |
| vHHV-6B (USA) | 35 | 1.78 | 0.97 | −1.74 |
| vHHV-6B (Asia) | 24 | 0.89 | 0.71 | −0.79 |
| vHHV-6B (Africa) | 7 | 2.29 | 2.13 | −0.41 |
iciHHV-6A/iciHHV-6B, inherited chromosomally integrated HHV-6A and HHV-6B; vHHV-6A/vHHV-6B, exogenous HHV-6A and HHV-6B viruses.