Simon Krause1,2, Florian S Reuter3, Sebastian Ehrling1, Volodymyr Bon1, Irena Senkovska1, Stefan Kaskel1, Eike Brunner3. 1. Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, Bergstrasse 66, 01062 Dresden, Germany. 2. Centre for Systems Chemistry, Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Chair of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, Bergstrasse 66, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Abstract
The origin of crystal-size-dependent adsorption behavior of flexible metal-organic frameworks is increasingly studied. In this contribution, we probe the solid-fluid interactions of DUT-49 crystals of different size by in situ 129Xe NMR spectroscopy at 200 K. With decreasing size of the crystals, the average solid-fluid interactions are found to decrease reflected by a decrease in chemical shift of adsorbed xenon from 230 to 200 ppm, explaining the lack of adsorption-induced transitions for smaller crystals. However, recent studies propose that these results can also originate from the presence of lattice defects. To investigate the influence of defects on the adsorption behavior of DUT-49, we synthesized a series of samples with tailored defect concentrations and characterized them by in situ 129Xe NMR. In comparison to the results obtained for crystals with different size, we find pronounced changes of the adsorption behavior and influence of the chemical shift only for very high concentrations of defects, which further emphasizes the important role of particle size phenomena.
The origin of crystal-size-dependent adsorption behavior of flexible metal-organic frameworks is increasingly studied. In this contribution, we probe the solid-fluid interactions of DUT-49crystals of different size by in situ 129Xe NMR spectroscopy at 200 K. With decreasing size of thecrystals, the average solid-fluid interactions are found to decrease reflected by a decrease in chemical shift of adsorbed xenon from 230 to 200 ppm, explaining the lack of adsorption-induced transitions for smaller crystals. However, recent studies propose that these results can also originate from the presence of lattice defects. To investigate the influence of defects on the adsorption behavior of DUT-49, we synthesized a series of samples with tailored defect concentrations and characterized them by in situ 129Xe NMR. In comparison to the results obtained for crystals with different size, we find pronounced changes of the adsorption behavior and influence of thechemical shift only for very high concentrations of defects, which further emphasizes the important role of particle size phenomena.
A niche group of metal–organic
frameworks (MOFs) are known
to undergo large-scale structural transitions upon adsorption and
desorption of gases, resulting in unusual adsorption properties.[1] These were found to be beneficial for sensing
applications[2,3] as well as storage[4] and separation of gases.[5,6] Often, thecomplex mechanisms behind structural transitions of these so-called
flexible MOFs are elucidated by complex in situ investigations.[7] In general, thecrystal structures of the different
phases and their mixtures observed before and after the transition
provide some rationale for understanding the behavior of the “real
world” material. However, crystal size and morphology effects
are often overlooked considering structural transitions of a periodiccrystal structures, but these can drastically impact the materials’
properties. In recent years, the number of reports on crystal-size-dependent
adsorption behavior of flexible MOFs is increasing. So far, no general
mechanism has been postulated due to limited experimental and especially
computational analysis.[8,9] Often, empiricalcorrelations
are based on analyzing a series of MOF samples for which the synthesis
conditions are adopted to yield different crystallite sizes under
comparable chemicalcomposition.[10−15] However, the formation of microscopic defects beyond the resolution
and accuracy of the applied characterization techniques can impact
the adsorption behavior unnoticedly.[16] The
potential of formation of lattice defects is in particular important
for the usage of modulator agents which impact thecrystallization
process and consequently thecrystal size.[17,18] Often, modulator molecules such as monocarboxylic acids are found
to be present in the resulting solids.[19] Thus, several attempts have been undertaken to synthesize flexible
MOFs with varying crystal size distribution without using modulators.[10,11,20] However, rapid crystallization
can still result in lattice defects. It is thus of crucial interest
to further investigate the impact of crystal size and defects on structural
transitions in flexible MOFs.Recently, we reported a novel
adsorption phenomenon called negative
gas adsorption (NGA) in which themesoporousMOF DUT-49(Cu) expels
gas from the pores upon structuralcontraction.[21] In previous work, NGA was investigated in detail by a range
of in situ crystallographic and spectroscopic methods
aided by computational investigation.[22] Instead of analyzing structure before and after the transition of
the solid, we used in situ129Xe NMR to
monitor NGA from the perspective of the guest molecule. 129Xe NMR is a technique frequently used to study adsorption processes
in MOFs[23−25] and other porous solids.[24,26−30] In these experiments, thechemical shift of xenon is monitored as
a function of pressure and temperature. In the analysis of DUT-49
an abrupt increase in chemical shift by ca. 100 ppm upon contraction
and NGA is observed at a relative pressure of 0.13–0.18 at
200 K, providing a very sensitive technique to detect the structural
transition.[31] In addition, this method
is particularly suitable for analyzing materials with subtle differences
in composition and surface functionality because thechemical shift
of xenon is sensitive toward changes in porosity and surface functionality.[32] While analyzing the behavior of DUT-49 upon
adsorption of nitrogen at 77 K, we observed a strong dependence of
NGA and structuralcontraction on thecrystal size distribution.[33] NGA only occurred in thecrystal size range
of 2–10 μm while structuralcontraction was not present
in crystals below ca. 2 μm in size. Although the investigated
samples showed comparable chemicalcomposition, the impact of potentially
undetected defects remained an open question. In this contribution
we apply in situ129Xe NMR to analyze
the adsorption mechanism in DUT-49crystals of different size and
with different concentrations of defects to answer these open questions.
Experimental Section
Synthesis
In this
study two sets of samples were prepared
(Table ). First, the
impact of crystal size on the adsorption behavior of DUT-49 was investigated
by probing thechemical shift of 129Xe, δ, in a wide
relative pressure range at 200 K. To cover a wide range of crystal
sizes, samples DUT-49(1), -(2), -(3), -(4), and -(5) with mean crystal
sizes of 8.7 μm, 4.3 μm, 1.1 μm, 150 nm, and 106
nm, respectively, were investigated. The samples were taken from a
previous study, and synthesis conditions and characterization of these
materials can be obtained from ref (33). Second, a series of DUT-49 with tailored concentration
of defects were synthesized to further investigate the impact of lattice
defects on the adsorption behavior of DUT-49. Defects were introduced
into the framework of DUT-49 by replacing the tetradentate ligand
9,9′-([1,1′-[biphenyl]-4,4′-diyl)[bis(9H-carbazole-3,6-dicarboxylate (bbcdc) with the structurally
related bidentate 9H-carbazole-3,6-dicarboxylate
(cdc), while maintaining theconnectivity of theCu-SBU and MOP. In
a series of solvothermal syntheses theH2cdc/H4bbcdc ratio was increased from 0.5 to 200, keeping theCu to carboxylate
ratio to 0.5 (Table S1). The reactions
were conducted in NMP at 80 °C for 24 h, yielding blue powders
which were analyzed by PXRD (Figure ). As a control experiment H2cdc was reacted
with copper nitrate in NMP at 80 °C to obtain a potential side
product of the reaction. This reaction yielded hexagonalcrystals
of DUT-158.
Table 1
Definition and Composition of DUT-158
and DUT-49 Samples with Different Crystal Sizes and Number of Defects
(def)
material ID
composition
mean crystal size (nm)
DUT-49(1)
Cu2(bbcdc)1
8750 ± 2620
DUT-49(2)
Cu2(bbcdc)1
4269 ± 1871
DUT-49(3)
Cu2(bbcdc)1
1163 ± 968
DUT-49(4)
Cu2(bbcdc)1
150 ± 80
DUT-49(5)
Cu2(bbcdc)1
107 ± 71
defDUT-49(0)
Cu2(bbcdc)1
2041 ± 1213
defDUT-49(1)
Cu2.004(cdc)0.004(bbcdc)1
1778 ± 825
defDUT-49(2)
Cu2.078(cdc)0.078(bbcdc)1
1770 ± 811
defDUT-49(3)
Cu2.24(L1)0.24(bbcdc)1
1417 ± 776
defDUT-49(4)
Cu2.33(cdc)0.33(bbcdc)1
849 ± 342
defDUT-49(5)
Cu2.98(cdc)0.98(bbcdc)1
n.a.
defDUT-49(6)
Cu3.5(cdc)1.5(bbcdc)1
n.a.
defDUT-49(7)
Cu2(bbcdc)1
2041 ± 1213
DUT-158
Cu(cdc)
n.a.
Figure 2
PXRD patterns of defDUT-49 samples and DUT-158 (characteristic
peaks indicated as vertical dashed lines) (a) in DMF solvated and
(b) desolvated by supercritical activation. (c) Mean crystal size
of defDUT-49(0)–(4) determined by SEM analysis.
General Methods
Synthesis procedures for H2cdc (9H-carbazole-3,6-dicarboxylic
acid) and H4bbcdc (9,9′-(1,1′-[biphenyl]-4,4′-diyl)[bis(9H-carbazole-3,6-dicarboxylate)]) can be obtained from refs (34) and (35). 1HNuclear
magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were acquired on a Bruker Avance
III 500 spectrometer (500.13 MHz). All 1H are reported
in parts per million (ppm) downfield of TMS and were measured relative
to the residual signals of the solvents at 2.54 ppm (DMSO). Diffuse
reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectroscopy was performed
on a Bruker VERTEX 70 with a SPECAC Golden Gate DRIFT setup. Prior
to the measurement, 2 mg of sample was mixed with 10–15 mg
of dry KBr in a mortar and pressed in the DRIFT-cell. Thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA) was performed in synthetic dry air by using a NETZSCH
STA 409 thermal analyzer at a heating rate of 5 K min–1. Air-sensitive MOF samples were prepared in an Ar-filled glovebox
and inserted in the instrument with little exposure to ambient conditions.
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were collected in transmission
geometry with a STOE STADI P diffractometer operated at 40 kV and
30 mA with monochromaticCu Kα1 (λ = 0.15405
nm) radiation, a scan speed of 30–15 s/step, and a step size
of 2θ = 0.1°–2°. The samples were placed between
nondiffracting adhesive tape. “As made” samples were
analyzed while suspended in DMF. Desolvated samples were prepared
under an inert atmosphere. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images
were taken with secondary electrons in a Hitachi SU8020 microscope
using 1.0 kV acceleration voltage and 10.8 mm working distance. The
powdered samples were prepared on a sticky carbon sample holder. To
avoid degradation upon exposure to air, the samples were prepared
under an argon atmosphere. For each sample a series of images were
recorded at different magnifications, and for each sample three different
spots on the sample holder were investigated. Thecrystal size refers
to the edge length of thecubiccrystals as they are the easiest to
measure. The analysis of the SEM images was performed with the ImageJ
software package, and values for mean crystal size as well as relative
standard deviation (RSD) were obtained by using the ImageJ Analyze-Distribution
function.[36] Volumetric adsorption experiments
were performed on a BELSORP-max instrument, gases with high purity
were used (N2: 99.999%; He: 99.999%), and the measuring
routine of BELSORP-max was used. Targeted relative pressures in the
range 0.01–100 kPa were defined, and limits of excess and allowance
amount were set to 10 and 20 cm3 g–1,
respectively. Equilibration conditions for each point were set to
1% pressure change within 350 s. The dead volume was routinely determined
by using helium. Values for the adsorbed amount of gas in the framework
are all given at standard temperature and pressure (STP). Liquid nitrogen
was used as coolant for measurements at 77 K.
129Xe NMR Experiments
In situ high-pressure 129Xe NMR experiments
were performed on
an Avance 300 spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 83.02 MHz
using a 10 mm HR probe (6 μs pulse length). Experiments were
performed using a homemade apparatus allowing sample pressurization
directly inside theNMR magnet. The apparatus uses a high-pressure
single crystal sapphire tube with a home-designed gas- and vacuum-tight
titanium valve.[24] This apparatus can be
connected either to a vacuum pump or to an external gas reservoir.
Chemical shifts were referenced by measuring the signal of xenon gas
inside the tube at various pressures at room temperature and extrapolation
to zero pressure chemical shift. The activated sample is placed into
the sapphire tube under an argon atmosphere. Afterward, the sample
is evacuated under dynamic high vacuum at about 10–4 MPa. The sample tube is then mounted into theNMR spectrometer and
connected to an outside xenon reservoir equipped with a pressure gauge
using a Teflon hose. This allows the sample pressurization in situ within the magnet. We are thus able to measure 129Xe NMR spectra under controlled temperature and at the desired
pressure. The pressure was measured by using the pressure sensor Heise
ST-2H with a HQSC-2 module with ±0.02 MPa uncertainty. Samples
were allowed to equilibrate for at least 15 min after pressure changes
and at least 30 min after temperature changes. 129Xe NMR
signals were monitored during this equilibration time to make sure
that the signal remains constant after the equilibration period. The
sample temperature of 200 K was calibrated following the literature
by using the1HNMR chemical shifts of methanol.[37,38] This method may exhibit systematic errors of a few degrees. The
temperature was also calibrated by an independent second method. Thecondensation pressure of xenon, i.e., the pressure where liquefaction
starts inside the tube, was measured at the given temperature. Thecorresponding temperature was then determined from the phase diagram
of xenon with a vapor pressure of xenon at 200 K of 0.52 MPa.
Results
and Discussion
In this study two sets of samples were investigated
(Table ). To monitor
the impact of
crystal size on the adsorption behavior, samples with mean crystal
sizes from 8.7 μm to 106 nm were investigated. To investigate
the impact of lattice defects on the adsorption behavior of DUT-49,
we decided to rationally introduce defects into the framework of DUT-49
by replacing the tetradentate bbcdc4– by the structurally
related bidentate cdc2– ligand. Depending on theconcentration of thecdc in the framework, parts of the linker or
even whole building blocks such as theMOP will be cleaved (Figure ). In a control experiment
H2cdc was reacted with copper nitrate to investigate a
potential side product of theDUT-49 reactioncontaining H2cdc. This reaction yielded hexagonalcrystals of DUT-158.
Figure 1
(a–c)
Method applied to introduce defects into the DUT-49
lattice by replacement of bbcdc by cdc in the defect free DUT-49 crystal
lattice (a) with cdc generating defects (purple) of missing linkers
(b) or missing clusters (c). Color code: C, gray; O, red; H, white;
N, blue; Cu, turquoise. (d–g) SEM images of defDUT-49(0) (d),
defDUT-49(1) (e), defDUT-49(2) (f), and defDUT-49(3) (g); orange scale
bar 2 μm.
(a–c)
Method applied to introduce defects into theDUT-49
lattice by replacement of bbcdc by cdc in the defect free DUT-49crystal
lattice (a) with cdc generating defects (purple) of missing linkers
(b) or missing clusters (c). Color code: C, gray; O, red; H, white;
N, blue; Cu, turquoise. (d–g) SEM images of defDUT-49(0) (d),
defDUT-49(1) (e), defDUT-49(2) (f), and defDUT-49(3) (g); orange scale
bar 2 μm.
Sample Characterization
First, crystals of DUT-158
were analyzed by PXRD and single crystal diffraction. Thecrystal
structure of DUT-158consists of 2D layers known for cdc-related ligands
(Figure S19).[39] Interestingly, no peaks of DUT-158 and only peaks of the parent
DUT-49 structure could be observed in the PXRD patterns of defDUT-49(1)–(6),
showing that cdc is incorporated into theDUT-49 lattice (Figure ). After the powders were washed with DMF, the solvent was exchanged
to acetone, which was removed from the pores by supercritical activation
protocol previously applied for DUT-49.[34] To remove residual solvent, the samples were degassed in a dynamic
vacuum (<10–3 kPa) at 100 °C for 24 h. To
determine thecdc/bbcdc ratio present in the solids, 10 mg of MOF
was dissolved in a mixture of DCl/DMSO-d6, and 1HNMR spectra were recorded. Comparison of the
peak integrals yields the ratio at which the ligands are present in
the solid. In general, the amount of cdc implemented into theMOF
was in the range of the amount applied in the synthesis (Figure S3). This is well reflected by diffuse
reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectroscopy in which
peaks of bbcdc become less pronounced with increasing amount of cdc
(Figure S2). Thermogravimetric analysis
(Figure S3) shows that the decomposition
temperature decreases with increasing cdccontent from 300 to 250
°C, indicating that the framework becomes less thermally stable
upon introduction of defects. This is well-known for studies performed
on defective UiO-66.[40,41]The phase purity of defDUT-49
materials was analyzed by PXRD. In all cases no peaks of DUT-158could
be found, supporting that cdc is implemented into theDUT- 49 lattice
and not forming a crystalline side phase (Figure ). With increasing cdcconcentration, broadening
of the peaks is observed in both the solvated and desolvated samples,
showing that thecrystallinity of DUT-49 decreases with increasing
concentration of defects. In thecase of defDUT-49(6) no peaks are
observed after solvent removal, indicating a collapse of the structure.
Because the peak broadening could be caused by the formation of small
crystals, the morphology and size of thecrystals were analyzed by
scanning electron microscopy. With increasing cdccontent thecubiccrystals of DUT-49 are found to be deformed and exhibit holes on the
external surface (Figure ). From the SEM images thecrystal size distribution could
be determined in which the size represents the edge length of thecubiccrystals. With increasing cdccontent the mean crystal size
is found to decrease from 2 μm (defDUT-49(0)) to 849 nm (defDUT49(4))
(Figure ). For samples
defDUT-49(5) and -(6) no cubiccrystals could be detected, and the
particles are too small to be further analyzed by SEM (Figure S5). Obviously, the doping with cdc has
large effects on the morphology and composition of thecrystals of
DUT-49. To further determine the impact on the porosity and adsorption
behavior, we recorded nitrogen adsorption isotherms at 77 K (Figure S6). With increasing cdccontent the total
uptake as well as the surface area is found to decrease (Table S3). Furthermore, only samples defDUT-49(0)–(3)
exhibit NGA and structuralcontraction. Isotherms of defDUT-49(4)–(6)
exhibit reversible isotherms typical for DUT-49. The absence of hysteresis
at higher relative pressures indicates that no additional mesoporosity
detectable by N2 adsorption is generated. Instead, the
loss in uptake at higher concentrations of cdc indicates that regions
with a high concentration of defects exhibit a collapse of the pore
structure. Nevertheless, upon comparison of the normalized isotherms,
all materials exhibit the typical type IVb behavior previously found
for DUT-49. This indicates that part of theDUT-49 structure is retained
even at high concentrations of cdc and potentially embedded in amorphous,
nonporous DUT-49 substance. To test whether defects can also be introduced
postsynthetically, crystals of defDUT-49(0) were suspended in a 1
M solution of cdc in DMF and heated at 80 °C for 24 h (denoted
as defDUT-49(7)). The sample was then washed with fresh DMF, and the
solvent was removed analogous to the other samples. NMR analysis showed
no presence of cdc in theMOF powder, indicating that postsynthetic
ligand exchange in this MOF system cannot be achieved this way while
postsyntheticmetal exchange is known to occur in DUT-49.[42]PXRD patterns of defDUT-49 samples and DUT-158 (characteristic
peaks indicated as vertical dashed lines) (a) in DMF solvated and
(b) desolvated by supercritical activation. (c) Mean crystal size
of defDUT-49(0)–(4) determined by SEM analysis.
In Situ129Xe NMR Studies of Crystal
Size Effects
In analogy to the previous study of DUT-49, 129Xe NMR spectra were recorded at 200 K and different relative
pressures of xenon for samples with different mean crystal size. In
the low-pressure region before structuralcontraction and NGA, all
samples follow the same linear trend and exhibit comparable chemical
shifts (Figure ).
At a relative pressure of 0.17–0.18 all samples exhibit NGA
and structuralcontraction indicated by the sudden increase in chemical
shift (Figure a,b)
and increase in pressure in the measuring cell. At a relative pressure
of 0.2, that means beyond the pressure of structuralcontraction,
thechemical shift of xenon observed for the five samples shows strong
variations. The samples with the smallest crystals DUT-49(5) and -(4)
exhibit the lowest chemical shift of 198 ppm. In contrast, samples
with increasing crystal size exhibit shifts of 225 to 235 ppm (Figure a,b). This trend
is maintained up to a relative pressure of 0.7, at which DUT-49(1)
and -(2) exhibit a transition from thecontracted (cp) to the open pore (op) structure indicated by the
occurrence of a second signal at lower chemical shifts that could
previously be assigned to DUT-49op.[31] The reduction in chemical shift in the relative pressure
range 0.2–0.6 cannot be assigned to an op/cp mixture which would appear as a peak splitting in the
spectra, not observed in theconducted experiments. Consequently,
the observed trend for thechemical shift in this pressure range must
be a consequence of the different crystal size distributions. What
is the origin of these differences in chemical shift, and why is this
difference not observed at lower relative pressure <0.2 before
structuralcontraction?
Figure 3
129Xe NMR spectra of (a) DUT-49(1)
(microcrystals) and
(b) DUT-49(5) (nanocrystals). Dashed lines represent peak position
recorded for DUT-49(1) before (right) and after (left) NGA. (c) Evolution
of the chemical shift of Xe at 200 K at increasing relative
pressure of Xe for DUT-49 samples with different crystal size distributions.
129Xe NMR spectra of (a) DUT-49(1)
(microcrystals) and
(b) DUT-49(5) (nanocrystals). Dashed lines represent peak position
recorded for DUT-49(1) before (right) and after (left) NGA. (c) Evolution
of thechemical shift of Xe at 200 K at increasing relative
pressure of Xe for DUT-49 samples with different crystal size distributions.Thechemical shift of xenon observed in the performed
NMR experiments
represents the average of solid–fluid (s-Xe) and fluid–fluid
(Xe–Xe) interactions. The latter depend on the density of the
fluid, ρXe, and thechemical shift can be written
as defined by eq .While solid–fluid interactions are
restricted to the interaction with the internal and external surface
of the solid, fluid–fluid interactions occur inside the pore,
close to the outer surface and also in the interparticular void. Thecontribution of fluid–fluid interactions increases proportional
to the density of xenon. At lower relative pressures (<0.2) the
pores in DUT-49op are only partially filled with
xenon, and the majority of xenon is adsorbed on the inner surface.
Thus, solid–fluid interactions dominate thechemical shift.
Upon contraction, both the solid–fluid and the fluid–fluid
interactions increase drastically because the pores in DUT-49cp are suddenly completely filled, and the smaller pore
diameter increases the average interaction with the surface. This
can be observed by the strongly different chemical shift of DUT-49op and cp in DUT-49(1) at slightly higher
relative pressure. However, the major contributions to thechemical
shift originate from the increase in density and consequently enhanced
xenon–xenon interactions upon contraction. At 200 K and pressures
below saturation, the bulk phase of xenon is gaseous with a much lower
density compared to adsorbed xenon. Thus, thechemical shift of gaseous
xenon is much lower compared to xenon in the adsorbed phase.[43]For small particles, one has to consider
the possibility of fast
exchange between adsorbed xenon inside the particles and xenon outside
the particles. In NMR spectra of exchanging systems, the relevant
time scale is related to a so-called critical time constant, τcrit, for a two-site exchange between site A and B; thecritical
time constant can be defined aswhere
Δν = |νA – νB| denotes the frequency difference between
the two sites. The frequency difference can be calculated as thechemical
shift difference between A and B multiplied by the resonance frequency
of the respective nucleus at the given magnetic field. If a process
is much faster, theconsidered NMR parameter (e.g., thechemical shift)
will be averaged along the trajectory of the process. The same holds
in principle if the process includes exchange of xenon between more
than two sites: Δν is then the maximum frequency difference
along the trajectory in the porous crystal. The mean residence time,
τmean, of xenon inside a porous crystal depends on
two quantities: (i) the self-diffusion coefficient, D, inside the pore system of thecrystal, which is impacted by temperature,
pressure, pore diameter, and binding energy (adsorption enthalpy),
and (ii) the mean crystal diameter dcryst. Because the experiments were conducted at the same temperature,
in the same pressure range, and with the same porous material that
exhibits uniform ordered porosity, τmean is mainly
influenced by dcryst. The size of τmean in the pore system ando of the residence time in
the surrounding gas phase, τgas, will determine the
average chemical shift, δ, of xenon in fast exchange between
the outer crystal surface, the internal porosity of thecrystal, and
the surrounding gas phase:The probability
of being in the adsorbed phase, Pads,
is defined aswhere Nads and Ngas are the amount of xenon in the adsorbed
and gas phase, respectively, and Pgas =
1 – Pads. Consequently, the equilibrium
between adsorbed and gas phase, which determines the mean residence
time in these two phases, will determine the measured chemical shift.The self-diffusion of xenon in the gas phase at 200 K[44] is fast at theNMR time scale. Consequently,
τgas and also τmean are short, and
the measured chemical shift is expected to represent a weighted average
along the trajectory. Crystal downsizing will decrease the mean residence
time and consequently Pads of xenon in
the adsorbed phase in a single crystal of DUT-49. In addition, in
smaller particles the ratio between external and internal surface
is increased. It was shown that external surfaces exhibit reduced
solid–fluid interactions upon adsorption of gases in ZIF-8,[12] which is expected to be thecase for DUT-49
as well. These factors are the origin for the decrease in the experimentally
observed chemical shift and in signal intensity with decreasing crystal
size (Figure ). A
decrease in Pads would also be reflected
by a decrease in uptake in the volumetric adsorption isotherm, which
is observed for these samples upon adsorption of nitrogen at 77 K.[45] Interestingly, the decrease in chemical shift
for smaller crystals is only observed for thexenon-filled DUT-49cp phase and the op phase at higher pressures
but not for theDUT-49op phase at lower pressure
before structural transition. At low relative pressure, the degree
of pore filling in the op phase is rather low, and
the amount adsorbed is only slightly influenced by differences in
crystal size. This behavior has been previously observed upon nitrogen
adsorption in DUT-49[33] and was also reported
by Tanaka et al. on ZIF-8.[12] Consequently,
diffusivity and host–guest interactions are expected to be
less influenced by particle size effects at lower pressures and pore
fillings.[30] At higher degrees of pore filling
and higher pressures, the self-diffusivity of xenon within the pores
is reduced by the increasing density of the fluid. This is thecase
upon structuralcontraction and NGA where thexenon density increases
significantly due to the shrinkage in pore volume. However, upon structuralcontraction, dcryst of each crystal is
reduced by ca. 22%, which further reduces Pads. Thus, the investigated samples are found to exhibit pronounced
differences in chemical shift in thecp phase. Because
the same observation can be made for xenon adsorbed in the saturated op phase at elevated pressures, the observed changes in
chemical shift are obviously independent of thecrystal structure
and truly reflect the solid–fluid and fluid–fluid interactions
as well as Pads. This analysis clearly
demonstrates that the average adsorption interaction energy is reduced
with decreasing crystal size due to decreasing Pads of xenon in a single crystallite. As a result, the adsorption-induced
stress and driving force for the structuralcontraction are also expected
to decrease to some extent with decreasing crystal size, which could
explain the absence of structuralcontraction of DUT-49 samples with
crystals smaller than 1 μm upon adsorption of nitrogen at 77
K.[33] In fact, pronounced changes of thechemical shift were also found to occur for samples with mean crystal
size below 1 μm. The presence of NGA and structuralcontraction
in all performed NMR experiments is a consequence of the higher adsorption
enthalpy of xenoncompared to nitrogen.[46] Thus, this finding complements recent computational analysis of
crystal size effects in pillared-layer MOF systems in which the activation
barrier for structural transition of theMOFcrystal was found to
increase with decreasing crystal size.[8,9] Both the decrease
in adsorption-induced stress and the increase in activation barrier
for structural transition support the experimentally observed absence
of structural transitions in flexible MOFs.[10,14,33,47]In
situ129Xe NMR experiments prove to be very sensitive
in directly probing the interactions and mobility of the fluid within
thecrystals and pores of DUT-49, especially when the pores are saturated.
This approach extends the previous analysis of crystals size effects
in DUT-49 which focused on the adsorption behavior and structural
transition of the solid.[21,33,35]
In Situ129Xe NMR Studies of Defect
Effects
The 129Xe NMR unambiguously shows the
decrease in chemical shift of adsorbate (and as consequence reduced
overall Xe–solid interaction energy) for downsized crystals.
The reasons for such observation can be the growing fraction of the
outer surface, but the decrease in chemical shift might also potentially
be caused by increased concentration of defects in the internal structure,
which change the pore size and surface chemistry and thus reduce the
average solid–fluid interactions.[12] In fact, crystal size engineering often involves auxiliary reagents.
Rational engineering of MOFs with a high concentration of structurally
defined defects has become a major field of research,[19] especially in Zr-based MOFs like UiO-66.[48] Modulators such as amino acids[49] and other monocarboxylic acids[13,49,50] are used in the synthesis to improve thecrystallinity
by taking part in thecrystallization process in competition with
the linker. Consequently, crystal seeding is reduced to yield larger
crystals. However, in some cases, the modulator molecules are built
in the backbone of theMOF, creating structural defects[17] often missing linkers[51] that can strongly impact the porosity. At higher defect concentrations,
entire cluster–linker complexes are removed from the structure,
creating larger mesopores[52] detectable
by adsorption experiments[53] and usable
for catalytic[54,55] and gas storage applications.[56] Interestingly DUT-49 and UiO-66, although very
different in composition and porosity, both share the same fcu topology in which the 12-connecting Zr-cluster in UiO-66 represents
the 12-connecting cuboctahedralMOP in DUT-49. These building blocks
are arranged in a cubicclose packing with tetrahedral and octahedral
voids/pores. The introduction of modulating agent (in this case cdc)
in the backbone of DUT-49 is thus expected to yield similar types
of defects as reported for UiO-66-type MOFs.To study the impact
of defects in DUT-49 on the adsorption behavior, NGA, and fluid–solid
interactions, the samples with targeted concentration of defects (defDUT-49(2),
-(3), -(4), and -(5)) were analyzed by in situ129Xe NMR. From thenitrogen adsorption experiments at 77 K,
it is obvious that the introduction of defects strongly influences
the porosity of the resulting material. The obtained evolution of
chemical shifts with increasing pressure was compared to the previously
discussed isotherms of DUT-49(2) acting as nondefective reference
with comparable crystal size distribution. The recorded isotherms
of defDUT-49(2) and -(3) are found to be very similar (Figure ). All three isotherms exhibit
the same low-pressure chemical shift, structuralcontraction, and
NGA at a relative pressure around 0.19. The appearance of a second
signal at higher pressures indicates the pore opening. Consequently,
the small number of defects does not impact the adsorption behavior.
This finding is in line with thenitrogen physisorption isotherms
at 77 K, in which all three samples exhibit hysteresis and NGA. However,
higher defect concentration in defDUT-49(4) alters the adsorption
behavior drastically. After structuralcontraction at a relative pressure
of 0.2, a second signal in addition to the signal assigned to DUT-49cp is observed. This signal is found at chemical shifts
ca. 20 ppm lower than the signal of DUT-49cp and
is maintained over the whole pressure range. At higher pressures,
theDUT-49cp signal disappears, and only one signal
remains at a relative pressure of 0.8. This finding and the reduced
chemical shift are indications that this second signalcan be attributed
to xenon adsorbed in DUT-49op. Consequently, only
a part of the bulk material in defDUT-49(4) exhibits structuralcontraction,
and the other part of the sample remains in the op phase. This is in line with thenitrogen adsorption isotherms which
were found to be free of NGA, hysteresis, or other indications of
a structural transition. The observed trend is supported by the analysis
of defDUT-49(5). In this case, no signal for xenon adsorbed in thecp phase is detectable, which implies that the formation
of DUT-49cp is completely suppressed over the whole
pressure range. Interestingly, defDUT-49(4) and -(5) exhibit a higher
chemical shift in the low-pressure region, indicating that the microporous
structure of these samples is affected by the addition of cdc. This
can be attributed to either a change in surface functionality or thecollapse of mesopores with defective pore walls that introduce additional
microporosity. To further analyze the phase mixture in defDUT-49(4)
and to probe reversibility of the adsorption, additional desorption
isotherms were recorded for defDUT-49(4) and -(5) and compared to
the data recorded for DUT-49(2) (Figure ). The sudden increase in chemical shift
upon contraction during desorption and thecorresponding hysteresis
observed for DUT-49(2) are in stark contrast to the reversible isotherm
of defDUT-49(5), which lacks hysteresis and any indication for structuralcontraction. On the other hand, defDUT-49(4) exhibits partialcontraction
during adsorption and desorption in which signals for DUT-49op and -cp could be detected at intermediate
and low pressures, respectively. Consequently, the incorporation of
25% cdc in theDUT-49 framework seems to be thecritical value to
observe strong changes in adsorption behavior and structural transition.
It has to be noted that the strong reduction in uptake indicated that
the majority of the framework collapsed, and only small local regions
in the bulk retained the porosity which is apparently altered by cdc
incorporation and matrix effects. Thecomplete suppression of cp formation in defDUT-49(5) with 50% cdc indicates that
higher degrees of cdc inclusion impacts all particles within this
particular material and strongly alters the adsorption behavior.
Figure 4
(a) Nitrogen
adsorption isotherms at 77 K of selected samples.
Selected 129Xe NMR spectra of (b) defDUT-49(4) and (c)
defDUT-49(5); relative pressures of Xe are given as numbers on the
left of the spectra. Evolution of the chemical shift with increasing
relative pressure upon adsorption for defDUT-49(2) (d, orange), defDUT-49(3)
(e, yellow), defDUT-49(4) (f, green), and defDUT-49(5) (g, blue).
Isotherm and chemical shifts of DUT-49(3) are provided as black dashed
lines for comparison.
Figure 5
Adsorption (blue) and
desorption (red) isotherms recorded by in situ129Xe NMR at 200 K on (a) DUT-49(2),
(b) defDUT-49(4), and (c) defDUT-49(5). The appearance of a second
signal is indicated by a triangle.
(a) Nitrogen
adsorption isotherms at 77 K of selected samples.
Selected 129Xe NMR spectra of (b) defDUT-49(4) and (c)
defDUT-49(5); relative pressures of Xe are given as numbers on the
left of the spectra. Evolution of thechemical shift with increasing
relative pressure upon adsorption for defDUT-49(2) (d, orange), defDUT-49(3)
(e, yellow), defDUT-49(4) (f, green), and defDUT-49(5) (g, blue).
Isotherm and chemical shifts of DUT-49(3) are provided as black dashed
lines for comparison.Adsorption (blue) and
desorption (red) isotherms recorded by in situ129Xe NMR at 200 K on (a) DUT-49(2),
(b) defDUT-49(4), and (c) defDUT-49(5). The appearance of a second
signal is indicated by a triangle.While variation of thecrystal size demonstrated to impact the
fluid–solid interaction, high concentration of defects seems
to also impact the adsorption-induced contraction demonstrated by
the absence of structuralcontraction in defDUT-49(5). Thecritical
level of defects via cdc inclusion was found to be in the range beyond
45%, which is a surprisingly high level at which almost every fourth
linear link between theMOPs is missing. In contrast, low defectconcentrations
do not impact the adsorption behavior, structuralcontraction, and
NGA in DUT-49. Consequently, the previously discussed evolution of
chemical shift of nanometer-sized crystals of DUT-49 does not originate
from structural defects but represents the prevail influence of particle
size phenomena that were found to impact the adsorption energetics
by changes in residence time and average interactions of the fluid
with the porous host. In addition, structuralcontraction behavior
is only impacted at rather high concentrations of defects which are
not expected for a synthesis in which no defect forming agent is applied.
The performed xenonNMR experiments provide a unique experimental
approach to analyze these effects regardless of the materials porosity
and were found to be suitable for discriminating between effects caused
by defects and crystal size. To the best of our knowledge, this is
the first time in situ129Xe NMR experiments
have been applied in studying particle size and defect effects in
flexible MOFs or other materials that undergo adsorption-induced contraction.
Nevertheless, a more detailed investigation of surface effects that
are expected to be enhanced upon crystal downsizing is required. We
thus envision that this method can be applied in a rage of experimental
investigations to further study a range of materials know to exhibit
similar behavior as DUT-49. In addition, the analysis of defDUT-49(5)
which exhibits low crystallinity shows that this method might also
be useful for low- or noncrystalline solids like covalent organic
framework and porous polymers know to swell upon adsorption.[57]
Conclusions
In conclusion, we demonstrate
the influence of particle size and
defects on the adsorption behavior of the flexible MOF DUT-49(Cu)
and its negative gas adsorption behavior by in situ129Xe NMR experiments. We show that analysis of thechemical
shift in different pressure regimes allows to probe the average solid–fluid
interactions providing a local probe for the adsorption-induced structural
transitions. With decreasing mean crystal size, the average solid–fluid
interactions in the saturated pores are found to strongly decrease,
minimizing the driving force for structural transitions in smaller
crystals. To probe whether defects or crystal size phenomena are responsible
for the observed behavior, we investigated a series of six DUT-49
samples with increasing defect concentrations. We find that for low
defect concentrations below 20% cdc and comparable crystal size no
detectable difference in adsorption behavior is observed. However,
at higher concentrations of defects beyond 25% cdc, which are not
expected to occur in regularly synthesized DUT-49crystals, the adsorption
behavior is strongly altered leading to the absence of structuralcontraction and NGA. Consequently, we derive that the behavior observed
for smaller crystal sizes does not originate from defects but reflects
the impact of crystal size phenomena on the adsorption behavior in
DUT-49. With the results presented in this work, we hope to demonstrate
that particle size effects have a large impact on the adsorption interactions
not only in flexible MOFs but also porous solids in general and hope
to motivate further investigations in this field. In addition, we
point out the need to apply various methods to elucidate the nature
and structure of defects in both large and small crystals of flexible
MOFs and complement these with methods to characterize guest–host
properties.
Authors: Jarad A Mason; Julia Oktawiec; Mercedes K Taylor; Matthew R Hudson; Julien Rodriguez; Jonathan E Bachman; Miguel I Gonzalez; Antonio Cervellino; Antonietta Guagliardi; Craig M Brown; Philip L Llewellyn; Norberto Masciocchi; Jeffrey R Long Journal: Nature Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Stefano Dissegna; Pia Vervoorts; Claire L Hobday; Tina Düren; Dominik Daisenberger; Andrew J Smith; Roland A Fischer; Gregor Kieslich Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Francesco Walenszus; Jack D Evans; Volodymyr Bon; Friedrich Schwotzer; Irena Senkovska; Stefan Kaskel Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2021-10-06 Impact factor: 10.508
Authors: Simon Krause; Jack D Evans; Volodymyr Bon; Irena Senkovska; Sebastian Ehrling; Paul Iacomi; Daniel M Többens; Dirk Wallacher; Manfred S Weiss; Bin Zheng; Pascal G Yot; Guillaume Maurin; Philip L Llewellyn; François-Xavier Coudert; Stefan Kaskel Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Daniil M Polyukhov; Simon Krause; Volodymyr Bon; Artem S Poryvaev; Stefan Kaskel; Matvey V Fedin Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 6.888