Literature DB >> 32549959

Factors that Predicts the Size of Autologous Hamstring Tendon Graft for Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction.

Du-Hyun Ro1, Sahnghoon Lee1, Yool Cho1, Young-Min Lee1, Myung-Chul Lee1, Seong Hwan Kim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness of demographic data and radiographic measurements for predicting the diameter and length of autologous semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (GR) graft.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four cases were included to measure the size of 3 or 4 strands of ST and GR tendons retrospectively. The hamstring length on radiograph was defined as the length from the lowest point of ischial tuberosity to intercondylar notch of the femur. The linear and logistic regression analysis was used to assess the roles of the predictor variables, as demographic and radiologic data, in the outcome variables, as diameter of tendon grafts. The cross-validation with hold-out samples and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were also calculated.
RESULTS: The hamstring and leg length measurement and gender were associated with the diameter of 4-stranded ST tendon graft. The hamstring length measurement, age and BMI were the factors associated with the diameter of 3-stranded ST tendon graft. The hamstring length measurement was found as a common factor for predicting diameters of hamstring tendon with reliable predictability. Moreover, the equation of multivariate regression analysis for the diameter of 4-stranded ST tendon graft showed the most validated power of prediction. All of the cross-validated R 2 values were calculated as similar results of multivariate model, but CCC between the measured diameter and estimated value on the predictive equation showed moderate agreement only (CCC = 0.694).
CONCLUSIONS: Combining radiographic length measurements with demographic data showed reliable prediction in identifying the risk of inappropriate graft diameters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV retrospective cohort study. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate reconstruction; Diameter and length; Double-bundle anterior cruciate reconstruction; Hamstring tendon autograft

Year:  2020        PMID: 32549959      PMCID: PMC7270234          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-019-00014-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  28 in total

Review 1.  Anatomic Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Verena M Schreiber; Carola F van Eck; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; J Todd R Lawrence; Ryenn L West; Alison P Toth; Dean C Taylor; William E Garrett
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Prediction of the graft size of 4-stranded semitendinosus tendon and 4-stranded gracilis tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Chinese Han patient study.

Authors:  Guoming Xie; Xiaoqiao Huangfu; Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; Jeffrey Lyman; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Justin Roe; James Linklater
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  Systematic review of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes: a baseline assessment for consideration of double-bundle techniques.

Authors:  Paul B Lewis; A Dushi Parameswaran; John-Paul H Rue; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  How to improve the prediction of quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Erquicia; Pablo Eduardo Gelber; Jose Luis Doreste; Xavier Pelfort; Ferran Abat; Juan Carlos Monllau
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts.

Authors:  Kevin B Freedman; Michael J D'Amato; David D Nedeff; Ari Kaz; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Differences in length and cross-section of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and their effect on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study.

Authors:  W Pichler; N P Tesch; G Schwantzer; G Fronhöfer; C Boldin; L Hausleitner; W Grechenig
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-04

9.  The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael W Mariscalco; David C Flanigan; Joshua Mitchell; Angela D Pedroza; Morgan H Jones; Jack T Andrish; Richard D Parker; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring: Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Predict Graft Diameter?

Authors:  Brian M Grawe; Phillip N Williams; Alissa Burge; Marcia Voigt; David W Altchek; Jo A Hannafin; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.