| Literature DB >> 32549660 |
Chakradhar Reddy1, Venkata Sai1, Utsav Shah2, Ramesh Babu2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine whether shear wave velocity (SWV) on ultrasound elastography is useful in follow-up of children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) following pyeloplasty.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32549660 PMCID: PMC7279094 DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_379_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Urol ISSN: 0970-1591
Figure 1Ultrasound elastography to measure shear wave velocity (m/s); images depict measurements in the same patient. (a) Shear wave velocity in normal kidney was 2.38 m/s; (b) that of affected ureteropelvic junction obstruction kidney showing increased shear wave velocity at 3.11 m/s; (c) shear wave velocity at 6 months postpyeloplasty reduced to 2.56 m/s
Demographic data (n=31)
| Demographic data | Age group | Outcome summary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age distribution (years) | 0-5 | 10 | Median age: 8.5 years |
| 11-15 | 7 | ||
| Sex distribution | Male | 29 | Male:female=29:2 |
| Female | 2 | ||
| Side distribution | Left side | 22 | Left:right=22:9 |
| Right side | 2 |
Figure 2Bars represent mean shear wave velocity of all patients (n = 31); it was significantly higher (P = 0.011) in ureteropelvic junction obstruction kidney (black bar; 3.21 m/s) compared to that (dark gray bar; 2.72 m/s) found in normal. There was a significant reduction at 3 months and 6 months postoperative period (light gray bars) after pyeloplasty
Figure 3Bars represent 6-month shear wave velocity in relation to outcome subgroups. Among the patients who improved (n = 26), the mean shear wave velocity was 2.65 m/s (light gray bar). This was significantly (P = 0.006) higher at 3.57 m/s in those who remained static (dark gray bar; n = 3) and even higher at 4.36 m/s in those who worsened (black bar; n = 2)
Figure 4Scatter plot representing dynamic changes in shear wave velocity. There was an early trend of increase in shear wave velocity in the two patients (black lines) who worsened