Literature DB >> 32548655

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure for beginners to perform: experience from 1948 cases.

Gyeo Ra Lee1, Ji Hoon Kim2, Chang Hyun Kim1, Yoon Suk Lee3, Jin Jo Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIL-A) has recently become an option for treating appendicitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and surgical outcomes of SIL-A by residents and surgeons during the learning period.
METHODS: A total of 1948 consecutive patients who underwent SIL-A from May 2008 to November 2014 were studied retrospectively. Surgeries were performed by residents and eight surgeons. Prior to the first case, surgeons and residents had been trained in a training protocol during the learning period. Three initial cases of SIL-A were performed under the supervision of experienced surgeons. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (learning period, n = 483), the first 40 cases by each surgeon and resident; and group 2 (experienced period, n = 1465), cases after the 40th procedure performed by each surgeon. Surgical results were compared between the two groups by performing propensity score matching analysis.
RESULTS: After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in patient demographics and characteristics of appendicitis between the two groups. The operating time was longer in group 1 than in group 2 (45.3 ± 18.0 vs. 33.9 ± 16.1 min, p < 0.001). The morbidity rate (7.0% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.795) was similar between the two groups. Readmission rate (2.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.414) and reoperation rate (0.8% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.348) were also similar between the two groups. However, the rate of incisional hernia occurrence (0.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.066) tended to be larger in group 1 than in group 2 without showing a significant difference.
CONCLUSION: SIL-A is a technically feasible and safe procedure when it is performed by residents and surgeons during learning period under an appropriate training protocol. However, residents and surgeons in the learning period should perform it carefully to prevent incisional hernias.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendectomy; SILS appendectomy; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32548655     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07744-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  One-trocar appendectomy.

Authors:  W T Ng; S Tse
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Sanjay Purkayastha; Jean Nehme; Lord Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Heng-Fu Lin; Jiann-Ming Wu; Li-Ming Tseng; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Shih-Horng Huang; I-Rue Lai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy.

Authors:  Ma Dolores Frutos; Jesus Abrisqueta; Juan Lujan; Israel Abellan; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Bo Wei; Cui-Lling Qi; Tu-Feng Chen; Zong-Heng Zheng; Jiang-Long Huang; Bao-Guang Hu; Hong-Bo Wei
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Won-Suk Lee; Sang Tae Choi; Jung Nam Lee; Keon Kug Kim; Yeon Ho Park; Woon Kee Lee; Jeong-Heum Baek; Tae-Hoon Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  R C Frazee; J W Roberts; R E Symmonds; S K Snyder; J C Hendricks; R W Smith; M D Custer; J B Harrison
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omar E Aly; Douglas H Black; Haroon Rehman; Irfan Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 6.071

10.  Safety and efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for appendectomies: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping Li; Zong-Hui Chen; Qing-Guo Li; Tang Qiao; You-Yong Tian; Dao-Rong Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  2 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using the Surgical-Glove Port Through an Umbilical Incision: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Tran Que Son; Tran Hieu Hoc; Vu Duc Long; Tran Thanh Tung; Nguyen Minh Tuan; Bui Minh Hue; Nguyen Van Minh; Nguyen Toan Thang
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-26

2.  Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle-type grasping forceps compared with conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Yang Chen; Shigang Guo; Yanjie Liu; Jieqing Yuan; Zongqi Fan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 1.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.