Literature DB >> 23241869

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Won-Suk Lee1, Sang Tae Choi, Jung Nam Lee, Keon Kug Kim, Yeon Ho Park, Woon Kee Lee, Jeong-Heum Baek, Tae-Hoon Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical outcomes and quality of life between single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) in patients with acute appendicitis.
BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized single center study was performed to compare the outcome of SPLA and CLA in patients with acute appendicitis.
METHODS: A total of 248 patients were randomized, but because of 18 withdrawals, the outcome of 224 is analyzed, 116 in CLA and 114 in SPLA.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate (P = 0.470). There were no significant differences in infectious complications between the SPLA group and the CLA group (10.2% and 12.4%, respectively). The wound complication rate between the 2 groups was not significant (5.1% and 10.6%, respectively; P = 0.207). Cosmetic satisfaction score, 36-item short-form health survey, and postoperative pain scores were not significantly different between 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: SPLA failed to show any advantages over CLA relative to pain and cosmesis. However, SPLA is as safe as CLA (RCT number 01348464).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23241869     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318273bde4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  39 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing single incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Michael Clerveus; Antonio Morandeira-Rivas; Carlos Moreno-Sanz; Maria Luz Herrero-Bogajo; Joaquin Salvelio Picazo-Yeste; Gloria Tadeo-Ruiz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Learning lessons for the future: assessments of demand and benefit are required in addition to training in single incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Mikael H Sodergren; Paraskevas Parakseva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: assessment after 52 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Sébastien Gouy; Catherine Uzan; Stéphanie Scherier; Tristan Gauthier; Enrica Bentivegna; Aminata Kane; Philippe Morice; Frédéric Marchal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chaorong Xue; Bingqiang Lin; Zhengyuan Huang; Zhi Chen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic and single port appendicectomies.

Authors:  X Jiang; H B Meng; D L Zhou; W X Ding; L S Lu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in a small hospital.

Authors:  Byung Hee Kang; Kyung Chul Yoon; Sung Woo Jung; Gyeo Ra Lee; Hyung Soon Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Reduced-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbidly Obese Japanese Patients: a Retrospective Case-Matched Study.

Authors:  Manabu Amiki; Yosuke Seki; Kazunori Kasama; Srinivasulu Pachimatla; Michiko Kitagawa; Akiko Umezawa; Yoshimochi Kurokawa
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Single-port and multi-port laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy for treating benign liver diseases: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Minggen Hu; Guodong Zhao; Fei Wang; Dabin Xu; Rong Liu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Interventions to optimize recovery after laparoscopic appendectomy: a scoping review.

Authors:  James K Hamill; Jamie-Lee Rahiri; Gamage Gunaratna; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Gasless transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy as a safe and cost-effective alternative surgical procedure for mild acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Koji Munakata; Mamoru Uemura; Junzo Shimizu; Masakazu Miyake; Taishi Hata; Kimimasa Ikeda; Keizo Dono; Masashi Kitada; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.