Mohammad Ridwane Mungroo1, Ayaz Anwar1, Naveed Ahmed Khan2, Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui2. 1. Department of Biological Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway 47500, Malaysia. 2. Department of Biology, Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates.
Abstract
Balamuthia mandrillaris and Naegleria fowleri are free-living amoebae that cause infection of the central nervous system, granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE) and primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), respectively. The fact that mortality rates for cases of GAE and PAM are more than 95% indicates the need for new therapeutic agents against those amoebae. Considering that curcumin exhibits a wide range of biological properties and has shown efficacy against Acanthamoeba castellanii, we evaluated the amoebicidal properties of curcumin against N. fowleri and B. mandrillaris. Curcumin showed significant amoebicidal activities with an AC50 of 172 and 74 μM against B. mandrillaris and N. fowleri, respectively. Moreover, these compounds were also conjugated with gold nanoparticles to further increase their amoebicidal activities. After conjugation with gold nanoparticles, amoebicidal activities of the drugs were increased by up to 56 and 37% against B. mandrillaris and N. fowleri, respectively. These findings are remarkable and suggest that clinically available curcumin and our gold-conjugated curcumin nanoparticles hold promise in the improved treatment of fatal infections caused by brain-eating amoebae and should serve as a model in the rationale development of therapeutic interventions against other infections.
Balamuthia mandrillaris and Naegleria fowleri are free-living amoebae that cause infection of the central nervous system, granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE) and primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), respectively. The fact that mortality rates for cases of GAE and PAM are more than 95% indicates the need for new therapeutic agents against those amoebae. Considering that curcumin exhibits a wide range of biological properties and has shown efficacy against Acanthamoeba castellanii, we evaluated the amoebicidal properties of curcumin against N. fowleri and B. mandrillaris. Curcumin showed significant amoebicidal activities with an AC50 of 172 and 74 μM against B. mandrillaris and N. fowleri, respectively. Moreover, these compounds were also conjugated with gold nanoparticles to further increase their amoebicidal activities. After conjugation with gold nanoparticles, amoebicidal activities of the drugs were increased by up to 56 and 37% against B. mandrillaris and N. fowleri, respectively. These findings are remarkable and suggest that clinically available curcumin and our gold-conjugated curcumin nanoparticles hold promise in the improved treatment of fatal infections caused by brain-eating amoebae and should serve as a model in the rationale development of therapeutic interventions against other infections.
Pathogenic free-living amoebae, including Naegleria
fowleri and Balamuthia mandrillaris, are opportunistic protists that cause infection of the central
nervous system (CNS).[1−3] Infections with free-living amoebae almost always
lead to death, indicating the lack of effective treatments against
those virulent pathogens.[4−6]N. fowleri is known to infect the CNS of young children and adults, causing
primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), leading to a rapid onset
of the disease and death within days.[7] Amphotericin
B, used in combination with rifampin and azole compounds, is the main
treatment option but results in severe side effects, including nephrotoxicity.[8−10] Like N. fowleri, B.
mandrillaris also targets the CNS, causing the fatal
disease termed granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE).[11] The mortality rate of patients suffering from
GAE due to B. mandrillaris infections
is very high, resulting in death in over 95% of the reported cases.[11−14] Patients suffering from GAE caused by B. mandrillaris are usually treated with multidrug regimens, usually including miltefosine
and pentamidine isethionate.[13,14]Curcumin is a
hydrophobic polyphenol derived from the rhizome of
the herb Curcuma longa. Curcumin, the
active component of turmeric, has been traditionally used as an inflammatory
agent in the treatment of several diseases.[15] Human models and animal studies have demonstrated the extreme safety
of curcumin.[16] Curcumin expressed antioxidant
activities in the rat brain as it inhibits lipid peroxidation at low
concentrations.[17] Micromolar concentrations
of curcumin also resulted in the inhibition of superoxides and hydroxyl
radicals, further confirming its antioxidant activities.[18] Anti-inflammatory activities of curcumin in
both chronic and acute models of inflammation have been reported.[19] Antiviral activity of curcumin has been demonstrated in vivo in humans.[20] Curcumin
also possess antibacterial activities as demonstrated in a study where
curcumin inhibited the growth of Helicobacter pylori.[21] Antifungal and antiparasitic activities
of curcumin have also been demonstrated, such as its inhibitory effects
against Plasmodium falciparum at a
low IC50 of 5 μM and its activities against Trichomonas vaginalis, Giardia lambelia, Toxoplasma gondii, and Cryptosporidium parvum.(22−24) Anticancer activities of curcumin at low micromolar concentrations
have also been reported.[25] Also clearly
established are the myocardial infarction protective, hepatoprotective,
nephroprotective, thrombosis suppressing, and antirheumatic effects
of curcumin.[16]Curcumin has been
shown to possess significant amoebicidal activities
against Acanthamoeba castellanii.[26] Curcumin can also affect the cysts of A. castellanii.[27] However,
the amoebicidal activities of curcumin against N. fowleri and B. mandrillaris are yet to be
evaluated. We hypothesized that curcumin possesses antiamoebic activities
against N. fowleri and B. mandrillaris. Therefore, we evaluated the amoebicidal
properties of curcumin against N. fowleri and B. mandrillaris. We also conjugated
curcumin with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to further enhance its amoebicidal
properties.
Results and Discussion
Pathogenic free-living amoebae,
including N. fowleri and B. mandrillaris, are opportunistic
protists that cause infection of the CNS.[1−3] The lack of
effective treatments against those virulent pathogens is clearly indicated
by the fact that infections with free-living amoebae almost always
leads to death.[4−6]N. fowleri is known
to infect the CNS, causing PAM, while B. mandrillaris also targets the CNS, causing GAE.[7,11]Curcumin
expressed antioxidant activities by inhibiting lipid peroxidation,
superoxides, and hydroxyl radicals.[17,18] Curcumin is
known to exhibit antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and anticarcinogenic
activities as well as therapeutic efficacy against various cardiovascular
diseases, neurological disease, diabetes, and arthritis.[16] Also clearly established are the myocardial
infarction protective, hepatoprotective, nephroprotective, thrombosis
suppressing, and antirheumatic effects of curcumin.[16] The ability of curcumin to express neuroprotective abilities
has been reported.[28] This would indicate
the ability of curcumin to penetrate the blood–brain barrier,
and hence, it might be a treatment option for brain infections. Wound
healing and tissue repair are intricate processes, involving inflammation,
tissue remodeling, and granulation, that are enhanced by curcumin.[29] This might help the patient in recovery from
infections. Curcumin has been shown to possess significant amoebicidal
activities against A. castellanii trophozoites
and cysts.[26,27] Therefore, here, we evaluated
the amoebicidal properties of curcumin against N. fowleri and B. mandrillaris.
Curcumin was
Successfully Conjugated with AuNPs
The
size of curcumin after conjugation with AuNPs was determined using
dynamic light scattering. The particle size analyzer revealed that
the particles formed were in the nanometer range with an average size
of 53 nm (Figure ).
This confirms that the curcumin conjugated with AuNPs was successfully
synthesized.
Figure 1
Size distribution of curcumin–AuNPs. The figure
shows the
sizes of curcumin after conjugation with AuNPs determined by dynamic
light scattering.
Size distribution of curcumin–AuNPs. The figure
shows the
sizes of curcumin after conjugation with AuNPs determined by dynamic
light scattering.
Curcumin Exhibits No Cytotoxicity
toward HaCaT Cells at Concentrations
below 10 μM
At 10 μM and lower, curcumin did
not exhibit cytotoxic activities against human cells. At 12.5 μM,
2% cytotoxicity was recorded, while 6 and 8% were observed for 25
and 50 μM of curcumin, respectively (Figure ). While exhibiting 11% cytotoxicity at 100
μM, curcumin exhibited 20% cytotoxicity at 200 μM. Solvent
controls did not exhibit cytotoxic activities against human cells.
Gold nanoparticles at both 5 and 10 μM did not exhibit cytotoxic
activities against human cells. Curcumin conjugated with AuNPs at
both 5 and 10 μM did not exhibit cytotoxic activities against
human cells (Figure ). Curcumin is known to be safe for humans, and it has been shown
that even at doses of 8000 mg/day, curcumin did not cause any noticeable
toxicities, except diarrhea and mild nausea in some cases.[30]
Figure 2
(i) Curcumin did not express cytotoxic activities at concentrations
lower than 10 μM. The cytotoxic activities of curcumin against
HaCaT cells were determined at a range of concentrations. The cytotoxic
activities of the solvent control (ethanol), AuNPs, and curcumin–AuNPs
against HaCaT cells are also shown. Briefly, curcumin was incubated
with HaCaT cells for 24 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator.
The results showed that curcumin has limited host cell damage. The
data are presented as the mean ± standard error of two experiments
conducted in duplicates. (ii) Representative microscopic images of
HaCaT cells incubated with and without curcumin. (A) Untreated HaCaT
cells. (B) HaCaT cells treated with Triton X-100 (positive control).
(C) HaCaT cells treated with 200 μM curcumin. (D) HaCaT cells
treated with 10 μM curcumin–AuNPs.
(i) Curcumin did not express cytotoxic activities at concentrations
lower than 10 μM. The cytotoxic activities of curcumin against
HaCaT cells were determined at a range of concentrations. The cytotoxic
activities of the solvent control (ethanol), AuNPs, and curcumin–AuNPs
against HaCaT cells are also shown. Briefly, curcumin was incubated
with HaCaT cells for 24 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator.
The results showed that curcumin has limited host cell damage. The
data are presented as the mean ± standard error of two experiments
conducted in duplicates. (ii) Representative microscopic images of
HaCaT cells incubated with and without curcumin. (A) Untreated HaCaT
cells. (B) HaCaT cells treated with Triton X-100 (positive control).
(C) HaCaT cells treated with 200 μM curcumin. (D) HaCaT cells
treated with 10 μM curcumin–AuNPs.
Curcumin Expressed Significant Amoebicidal Activity at 50 μM
against B. mandrillaris
Amoebicidal
activities of curcumin against B. mandrillaris were investigated at a range of concentrations (Figure ). The solvent control expressed
17% activity, while curcumin expressed 19, 28, 34, 37, and 55% amoebicidal
activities at 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 μM, respectively (Figure a). As compared to
the solvent control, 4% ethanol (M = 17, SE = 4), curcumin exhibited
significant amoebicidal activities against B. mandrillaris at 50 (M = 34, SE = 4; t(4) = 2.83, P = 0.05) and 200 μM (M = 55, SE = 6 t(4) =
5.33, P = 0.006). The activity of curcumin against B. mandrillaris is concentration dependent (Figure b). According to
the Quest Graph IC50 calculator, the AC50 of
curcumin against B. mandrillaris was
172 μM.
Figure 3
Curcumin showed amoebicidal activities against B.
mandrillaris. Briefly, B. mandrillaris was incubated with various concentrations of curcumin for 24 h,
and viability was determined using trypan blue exclusion assay. The
percentage amoebicidal activity was calculated by [((RPMI cell count
– cell count for the sample)/RPMI cell count) × 100)].
The results revealed that curcumin caused a reduction in the number
of viable B. mandrillaris cells. The
results are representative of three independent experiments performed
in duplicates. The data are presented as the mean ± standard
error (*: P < 0.05, **: P <
0.01, using Student’s t test; two-tailed distribution).
(a) Bar chart showing the activity of individual concentrations and
controls. (b) Curve showing the concentration-dependent activity of
curcumin against B. mandrillaris.
Curcumin showed amoebicidal activities against B.
mandrillaris. Briefly, B. mandrillaris was incubated with various concentrations of curcumin for 24 h,
and viability was determined using trypan blue exclusion assay. The
percentage amoebicidal activity was calculated by [((RPMI cell count
– cell count for the sample)/RPMI cell count) × 100)].
The results revealed that curcumin caused a reduction in the number
of viable B. mandrillaris cells. The
results are representative of three independent experiments performed
in duplicates. The data are presented as the mean ± standard
error (*: P < 0.05, **: P <
0.01, using Student’s t test; two-tailed distribution).
(a) Bar chart showing the activity of individual concentrations and
controls. (b) Curve showing the concentration-dependent activity of
curcumin against B. mandrillaris.
Curcumin Expressed a Significant Amoebicidal
Activity at 50
μM against N. fowleri
Amoebicidal activities of curcumin against N. fowleri were investigated at a range of concentrations (Figure ). At 200 μM, curcumin
expressed 66% amoebicidal activity against N. fowleri (Figure a). As compared
to the solvent control, 4% ethanol (M = 23, SE = 5), 50 (M = 41, SE
= 4), 100 (M = 51, SE = 5), and 200 μM (M = 66, SE = 4) of curcumin
resulted in significant (t(4) = 2.81, P = 0.05; t(4) = 4.06, P = 0.02; t(4) = 6.56, P = 0.003) amoebicidal activities
against N. fowleri. At 6.25, 12.5,
and 25 μM, curcumin expressed 22, 30, and 35% amoebicidal activities,
respectively, against N. fowleri. The
activity of curcumin against N. fowleri is concentration dependent (Figure b). The AC50 of curcumin against N. fowleri was 74 μM, according to the Quest
Graph IC50 calculator. At 50 μM, curcumin exhibited
potent amoebicidal effects against N. fowleri (Figure c).
Figure 4
Curcumin showed
amoebicidal activities against N.
fowleri. Briefly, N. fowleri was incubated with various concentrations of curcumin for 24 h,
and viability was determined using trypan blue exclusion assay. The
percentage amoebicidal activity was calculated by [((RPMI cell count – cell
count for the sample)/RPMI cell count) × 100)]. A significant
reduction in the number of viable N. fowleri cells was observed for cells treated with curcumin at 50 μM
and above. The results are representative of three independent experiments
performed in duplicates. The data are presented as the mean ±
standard error (*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001 using Student’s t test; two-tailed distribution). (a) Bar chart showing
the activity of individual concentrations and controls. (b) Curve
showing the concentration-dependent activity of curcumin against N. fowleri. (c) Representative effects of curcumin
on N. fowleri.
Curcumin showed
amoebicidal activities against N.
fowleri. Briefly, N. fowleri was incubated with various concentrations of curcumin for 24 h,
and viability was determined using trypan blue exclusion assay. The
percentage amoebicidal activity was calculated by [((RPMI cell count – cell
count for the sample)/RPMI cell count) × 100)]. A significant
reduction in the number of viable N. fowleri cells was observed for cells treated with curcumin at 50 μM
and above. The results are representative of three independent experiments
performed in duplicates. The data are presented as the mean ±
standard error (*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001 using Student’s t test; two-tailed distribution). (a) Bar chart showing
the activity of individual concentrations and controls. (b) Curve
showing the concentration-dependent activity of curcumin against N. fowleri. (c) Representative effects of curcumin
on N. fowleri.When tested against another amoeba, Dictyostelium
discoideum, it was shown that curcumin acts by inhibiting
cell signaling, proliferation, and adhesion while increasing reactive
oxygen species (ROS) by inducing the expression of glutathione S-transferase.[31] The increase
in ROS induced by curcumin results in both mitochondrial and nuclear
DNA damage.[32] Curcumin can also induce
deformation due to swelling, morphological changes in cytoplasmic
membrane, and cell agglutination, and provoke apoptosis-like changes.[33] Moreover, the ability of curcumin to cause size
changes and cell membrane damage, leading to loss of cellular integrity
in amoebae, has been reported.[34] Curcumin
has also been shown to affect gene transcription and induce apoptosis
in cancer cells.[35] Other molecular targets
of curcumin include growth factors, transcription factors, protein
kinases, and inflammatory cytokines.[36] Hence,
curcumin may express amoebicidal activities against B. mandrillaris and N. fowleri using one or several of these mechanisms.Despite its safety
at high concentrations, curcumin has been shown
to exhibit poor bioavailability in humans due to rapid metabolism
and poor absorption.[16] Nanoparticles can
enhance the bioavailability of curcumin, a hydrophobic compound, by
overcoming its low aqueous solubility.[16] Hence, we conjugated curcumin with gold nanoparticles and tested
its amoebicidal activities against B. mandrillaris and N. fowleri at 5 and 10 μM.
Activity of Curcumin against B. mandrillaris was Significantly Enhanced after Conjugation with AuNPs
Amoebicidal activities of curcumin against B. mandrillaris after conjugation with AuNPs were investigated at 10 and 5 μM
(Figure ) since curcumin
did not exhibit cytotoxicity against human cells at concentrations
below 10 μM. At 10 μM, curcumin–AuNPs expressed
78% amoebicidal activities against B. mandrillaris. The activity of 10 μM curcumin–AuNPs (M = 78, SE =
3) was statistically significant (t(4) = 17, P = 0.00008; t(4) = 19, P = 0.00005; t(4) = 21, P = 0.00003)
as compared to 10 μM AuNPs (M = 18, SE = 2), 10 μM curcumin
(M = 22, SE = 0.2), and the solvent control (M = 11, SE = 1). For
curcumin–AuNPs at 5 μM, 64% amoebicidal activity was
observed. The amoebicidal activity of 5 μM curcumin–AuNPs
(M = 64, SE = 9) as compared to 5 μM AuNPs (M = 3, SE = 5),
5 μM curcumin (M = 15, SE = 0.2), and the solvent control (M
= 0, SE = 10) was statistically significant (t(4)
= 6, P = 0.004; t(4) = 5, P = 0.006; t(4) = 5, P = 0.01).
Figure 5
Activity of curcumin against B. mandrillaris was enhanced after conjugation with AuNPs. Briefly, B. mandrillaris was incubated with 5 and 10 μM
curcumin and curcumin–AuNPs for 24 h, and viability was determined
using trypan blue exclusion assay. The percentage amoebicidal activity
was calculated by [((RPMI cell count – cell count for the sample)/RPMI
cell count) × 100)]. The results revealed that the activity of
curcumin against B. mandrillaris cells
increased after conjugation with AuNPs. The results are representative
of three independent experiments performed in duplicates. The data
are presented as the mean ± standard error (**: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001 using Student’s t test; two-tailed distribution).
Activity of curcumin against B. mandrillaris was enhanced after conjugation with AuNPs. Briefly, B. mandrillaris was incubated with 5 and 10 μM
curcumin and curcumin–AuNPs for 24 h, and viability was determined
using trypan blue exclusion assay. The percentage amoebicidal activity
was calculated by [((RPMI cell count – cell count for the sample)/RPMI
cell count) × 100)]. The results revealed that the activity of
curcumin against B. mandrillaris cells
increased after conjugation with AuNPs. The results are representative
of three independent experiments performed in duplicates. The data
are presented as the mean ± standard error (**: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001 using Student’s t test; two-tailed distribution).
Activity of Curcumin against N. fowleri was Significantly Enhanced after Conjugation with AuNPs
Amoebicidal activities of curcumin conjugated with AuNPs were investigated
at 5 and 10 μM. Ten-micromolar curcumin–AuNPs resulted
in a 69% amoebicidal activity against N. fowleri (Figure ). As compared
to 10 μM AuNPs (M = 0, SE = 0), ethanol (2%) (M = 20, SE = 2),
and 10 μM curcumin (M = 32, SE = 3), 10 μM curcumin–AuNPs
(M = 69, SE = 1) showed significant amoebicidal activity (t(4) = 84, P = 0.0000001; t(4) = 19, P = 0.00004; t(4) = 11, P = 0.0004). At 5 μM, 53% amoebicidal activity was
observed for curcumin–AuNPs. The activity of 5 μM curcumin–AuNPs
(M = 53, SE = 2) was statistically significant (t(4) = 28, P = 0.000009; t(4) =
13, P = 0.0002; t(4) = 15, P = 0.0001) as compared to 5 μM AuNPs (M = 0, SE =
0), 5 μM curcumin (M = 21, SE = 2), and solvent control (M =
3, SE = 3).
Figure 6
Amoebicidal properties of curcumin against N. fowleri were significantly enhanced after conjugation with AuNPs. Briefly, N. fowleri was incubated with 5 and 10 μM curcumin
and curcumin–AuNPs for 24 h, and viability was determined using
trypan blue exclusion assay. Percentage amoebicidal activity was calculated
by [((RPMI cell count – cell count for sample)/RPMI cell count)
× 100)]. A significant increase in the activity of curcumin against N. fowleri cells was observed after conjugation with
AuNPs. The results are representative of three independent experiments
performed in duplicates. The data are presented as the mean ±
standard error (**: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001 using Student’s t test; two-tailed
distribution).
Amoebicidal properties of curcumin against N. fowleri were significantly enhanced after conjugation with AuNPs. Briefly, N. fowleri was incubated with 5 and 10 μM curcumin
and curcumin–AuNPs for 24 h, and viability was determined using
trypan blue exclusion assay. Percentage amoebicidal activity was calculated
by [((RPMI cell count – cell count for sample)/RPMI cell count)
× 100)]. A significant increase in the activity of curcumin against N. fowleri cells was observed after conjugation with
AuNPs. The results are representative of three independent experiments
performed in duplicates. The data are presented as the mean ±
standard error (**: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001 using Student’s t test; two-tailed
distribution).Our cytotoxicity results show
that curcumin did not exhibit any
cytotoxic activities against human cells at 10 and 5 μM. AuNPs
at both 5 and 10 μM did not exhibit any cytotoxic activities
against human cells. Also, curcumin conjugated with AuNPs at both
5 and 10 μM did not exhibit cytotoxic activities against human
cells. The amoebicidal activities of curcumin were enhanced from 15
and 22%, before conjugation, at 5 and 10 μM, to 64 and 78%,
respectively, after conjugation, against B. mandrillaris. Against N. fowleri, the amoebicidal
activities of curcumin was enhanced from 21 and 32%, before conjugation
at 5 and 10 μM, to 53 and 69%, respectively, after conjugation.The increase in activity of curcumin may be linked to the biological
activity of gold nanoparticles. AuNPs have been shown to cause the
formation of ROS that results in the disruption of the mitochondrial
membrane potential and indicates apoptosis.[37] AuNPs also caused a downregulation in the expression of genes involved
in cell cycle and DNA repair mechanisms.[37] Due to the drop in the mitochondrial function, the loss of mitochondrial
membrane potential, the activation of caspase-3, the increase in the
amount of intracellular calcium, and the increased levels of nuclear
p53, AuNPs cause cell death by apoptosis.[37] Enhanced effects of Au-conjugated drugs may also be explained by
the fact that metals such as Au affect the ability of the amoebae
to replicate DNA and its expression of enzymes and ribosomal subunit
proteins, which are involved in the ATP production and hence respiratory
chain.[38]In conclusion, curcumin
expressed significant amoebicidal activities
against both B. mandrillaris and N. fowleri at 50 μM while exhibiting limited
cytotoxicity toward human cells. The activity of curcumin was significantly
increased against both amoebae after conjugation with gold nanoparticles.
Although the mechanism of action of curcumin against B. mandrillaris and N. fowleri is yet to be explored as well as its in vivo abilities,
curcumin shows great promise as a future treatment option against
those free-living amoebae.
Materials and Methods
Nanoparticle
Conjugation
Potassium gold (III) chloride
and curcumin solutions were mixed in equal volume (1:1), and the solution
was stirred magnetically at 200 × g for 2 h. Sodium borohydride
was added to catalyze the formation of AuNPs from the potassium gold
(III) chloride. As previously described, curcumin–AuNPs complex
formation was indicted by color change of solution from colorless
to pale pink.[39] Dynamic light scattering
(Litesizer 500, Anton Paar) was performed at 25 °C and
a constant angle of 90° to analyze the size distribution profile
of curcumin–AuNPs in a suspension at 25 °C and
a constant angle of 90°, as previously described.[40]
Henrietta Lacks Cervical Cancer Cells
Henrietta Lacks
(HeLa) cervical cancer cells were used as a food source for amoeba
cells.[41] HeLa cells were acquired from
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC CCL-2, Singapore). Cells were
cultured in a Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Serana,
Germany), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma, United
States), 1% antibiotics (penicillin–streptomycin) (Nacalai
Tesque, Japan), 1% minimum essential medium amino acids (Nacalai Tesque,
Japan), and 1% l-glutamine (Nacalai Tesque, Japan) at 5%
CO2, 95% humidity, and 37 °C as previously described.[42]
Human Keratinized Skin Cells
Human
keratinized skin
cells (HaCaT) (CLS:300493) were obtained from CLS Cell Lines. HaCaT
cells were grown in RPMI-1640 (Serana, Germany) complemented with
10% FBS (Sigma, United States), 1% penicillin–streptomycin
(Nacalai Tesque, Japan), 1% minimum essential medium amino acids (Nacalai
Tesque, Japan), and 1% l-glutamine (Nacalai Tesque, Japan)
at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
N. fowleri Culture
N. fowleri was cultured
as previously described.[41]N. fowleri cells
(HB1 strain; ATCC 30174) were acquired from ATCC and cultured in an
RPMI-1640 medium (Serana, Germany) supplemented with 1% antibiotics
(penicillin–streptomycin) (Nacalai Tesque, Japan) with a monolayer
of HeLa cells used as a food source at 5% CO2 and 37 °C.
B. mandrillaris Culture
B. mandrillaris cells (ATCC 50209)
were acquired from ATCC and cultured in an RPMI-1640 (Serana, Germany)
medium supplemented with 1% antibiotics (penicillin–streptomycin)
(Nacalai Tesque, Japan) with a monolayer of HeLa cells used as a food
source at 5% CO2 and 37 °C, as previously described.[43]
Cytotoxicity Assay
Cytotoxicity
of curcumin against
human cells was assessed as previously described.[42,44] Various concentrations of curcumin were incubated in RPMI-1640 (Serana,
Germany) with HaCaT cells for 24 h at 5% CO2 and 37 °C.
Cell-free supernatant media was collected, and the presence of LDH
enzyme was assessed using a cytotoxicity detection kit (Roche Applied
Science). Percentage cytotoxic effects were determined as follows:
[(absorbance of media from cells treated with sample – absorbance
of media from untreated cells)/(absorbance of media from cells with
total LDH release – absorbance of media from untreated cells)]
× 100% = percentage cytotoxic activity].
Amoebicidal Assay
The ability of the compounds to kill
the amoebae was determined through amoebicidal assays, as previously
described.[41,42] In 24-well plates in RPMI-1640
(Serana, Germany), 5 × 105 amoeba cells were incubated
with curcumin, curcumin–AuNPs complexes, and solvents at 37
°C for 24 h. Amoebae incubated with RPMI-1640 served as a negative
control. For the positive control, miltefosine was used. The percentage
of viable amoebae was determined by counting unstained (live) amoeba
cells using a hemocytometer, following the addition of 0.1% trypan
blue. Statistical significance was calculated using Student’s t test with two-tailed distribution to compare the mean
of experimental results.
Statistical Analysis
The data are
illustrative of the
mean ± standard error of several independent experiments accomplished
in duplicates. Statistical significance for differences was evaluated
using a two-sample t test with two-tailed distribution,
contrasting the mean of two different experiments repeated using similar
conditions. P values were determined for analysis.
Authors: Matthew T Laurie; Corin V White; Hanna Retallack; Wesley Wu; Matthew S Moser; Judy A Sakanari; Kenny Ang; Christopher Wilson; Michelle R Arkin; Joseph L DeRisi Journal: mBio Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui; Mohammad Ridwane Mungroo; Tengku Shahrul Anuar; Ahmad M Alharbi; Hasan Alfahemi; Adel B Elmoselhi; Naveed Ahmed Khan Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2022-05-31
Authors: Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui; Anania Boghossian; Bushra Khatoon; Muhammad Kawish; Ahmad M Alharbi; Muhammad Raza Shah; Hasan Alfahemi; Naveed Ahmed Khan Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2022-04-19
Authors: Hasan Y Alniss; Naveed A Khan; Anania Boghossian; Noor Akbar; Hadeel M Al-Jubeh; Yousef A Msallam; Balsam Q Saeed; Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2022-07-13