The ataxias comprise diseases of both genetic and nongenetic origin with extreme clinical and genetic heterogeneity. They may present as a pure cerebellar form or as part of a more complex neurologic syndrome. Progressive, neurodegenerative sporadic adult-onset ataxias (SAOAs) without a known cause have a prevalence rate of 2.2–12.4 per 100,000. In several ataxia cohorts, repetitive genetic screening using high-coverage ataxia-specific gene panels in combination with next-generation sequencing (NGS) failed to identify a causative gene in 50%–90% of SAOAs.[1-3] Cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS), first described by Brownstein et al.,[4] is a slowly progressive neurodegenerative disorder with adult onset, affecting the cerebellum, sensory neurons, and the vestibular system. CANVAS is usually sporadic, but occasionally occurs in siblings. Two research groups recently identified large biallelic intronic AAGGG expansions in replication factor C subunit 1 (RFC1) resulting in CANVAS, an adult-onset neurodegenerative ataxia.[5-7]
RFC1 normally loads proliferating cell nuclear antigen onto DNA and activates DNA polymerases δ and ε to promote the coordinated synthesis of both strands during replication or after DNA damage.[8]In this issue of Neurology® Genetics, Syriani et al.[9] investigated the prevalence of intronic AAGGG expansions in the RFC1 gene in a North American cohort of 911 predominantly adult-onset patients with undiagnosed familial or sporadic ataxia. Testing in this cohort revealed 29 patients with biallelic expansions (3.2%), one-third of whom had the full CANVAS syndrome. The remaining had late-onset ataxia frequently accompanied by neuropathy (60%). All RFC1 expansion carriers were Caucasian. The rate of heterozygosity was as high as 6.8%, which may be caused by overrepresented alleles with repeat lengths below 400 repeats—the pathogenic threshold in RFC1 anticipated in 2 previous studies.
Nucleotide repeat disorder reloaded
Repetitive DNA sequences constitute approximately one-third of the genome. There is evidence that they may contribute to diversity within and between species. They display considerable variability in length between individuals, which is presumed to have no detrimental consequences unless the repeat number is expanded beyond a gene-specific threshold. Pathologic unstable repeat expansions are classified according to their length, repeat sequence, gene location, and underlying pathologic mechanisms. Large (hundreds-thousands of copies) pathogenic repeat expansions are typically located in noncoding regions including promoters, introns, and untranslated regions of genes and can show somatic instability. Repeat expansions in introns are thought to produce aberrant repeat-bearing RNAs that interact with and sequester a wide variety of essential proteins, resulting in cellular toxicity.Targeted non–sequence-based testing is still the method of choice to detect nucleotide repeat expansions in the human genome. Commonly used NGS techniques such as whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) fail to detect repetitive regions. Indeed, in the initial study in inherited CANVAS, WGS did not detect the causative mutation in RFC1.[5] The use of targeted non–sequence-based techniques and Southern blot finally led to the detection of 4 distinct intronic repeat conformations in RFC1: AAAAG11 (the wild-type sequence) and longer expansions of AAAAGn, AAAGGn, and AAGGGn. Of these, the AAGGG pentanucleotide expanded up to 400–2,000 repeats was the only disease-causing condition. The expansion occurs in the poly(A) tail of an AluSx3 element, and differs in both size and nucleotide sequence from the reference (AAAAG)11 allele.
Haplotype and allele carrier frequency in RCF1
The same ancestral haplotype is shared by the majority of familial and positive RFC1 cases, as well as some healthy carriers of 2 (AAAGG)exp alleles. It is likely that the nucleotide change from AAAAG to AAAGG or AAGGG represents an ancestral founder event, followed by the pathologic expansion of the repeated unit, whose size seems to be related to its guanine-cytosine content. Up to now, analyses of the core haplotype in the mixed ethnic cohort confirmed the European core haplotype estimated to have arisen more than 25,000 years ago. Although the AAGGG repeat expansion has been identified in non-European individuals (Native American, Arabic, and Japanese), it remains highly overrepresented in populations of European descent, with frequencies of 4%–6.8% (White and Hispanic).[7,9-11]In summary, the study by Syriani et al.[9] supports the notion that the newly discovered RCF1 gene is a major cause of CANVAS. Analysis of RCF1 should be included in clinical diagnostic testing of adult-onset neurodegenerative ataxia, especially when neuropathy is present. There are multiple areas for future work, including deep phenotyping in sporadic adult-onset ataxias, analyses for a correct determination of pathogenic repeat lengths, and the stability of this pentanucleotide repeat sequence across siblings and generations within families. Moreover, an understanding of the fine structure of RFC1 as it relates to the final repeat composition of the pathogenic pentanucleotide and its function remains to be elucidated by additional studies.[5,6,10]The fact that this highly prevalent ataxia gene was unknown until now, highlights both the importance of precise phenotyping and sampling, as well as the use of analytic techniques beyond currently available panels and NGS. Intronic repeat expansions, in particular, are difficult to identify but may be common causes of neurodegenerative disease.
Authors: René M Overmeer; Audrey M Gourdin; Ambra Giglia-Mari; Hanneke Kool; Adriaan B Houtsmuller; Gregg Siegal; Maria I Fousteri; Leon H F Mullenders; Wim Vermeulen Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Andrea Cortese; Roberto Simone; Roisin Sullivan; Jana Vandrovcova; Huma Tariq; Wai Yan Yau; Jack Humphrey; Zane Jaunmuktane; Prasanth Sivakumar; James Polke; Muhammad Ilyas; Eloise Tribollet; Pedro J Tomaselli; Grazia Devigili; Ilaria Callegari; Maurizio Versino; Vincenzo Salpietro; Stephanie Efthymiou; Diego Kaski; Nick W Wood; Nadja S Andrade; Elena Buglo; Adriana Rebelo; Alexander M Rossor; Adolfo Bronstein; Pietro Fratta; Wilson J Marques; Stephan Züchner; Mary M Reilly; Henry Houlden Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Brent L Fogel; Hane Lee; Joshua L Deignan; Samuel P Strom; Sibel Kantarci; Xizhe Wang; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Eric Vilain; Wayne W Grody; Susan Perlman; Daniel H Geschwind; Stanley F Nelson Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Ilaria Giordano; Florian Harmuth; Heike Jacobi; Brigitte Paap; Stefan Vielhaber; Judith Machts; Ludger Schöls; Matthis Synofzik; Marc Sturm; Chantal Tallaksen; Iselin M Wedding; Sylvia Boesch; Andreas Eigentler; Bart van de Warrenburg; Judith van Gaalen; Christoph Kamm; Ales Dudesek; Jun-Suk Kang; Dagmar Timmann; Gabriella Silvestri; Marcella Masciullo; Thomas Klopstock; Christiane Neuhofer; Christos Ganos; Alessandro Filla; Peter Bauer; Sophie Tezenas du Montcel; Thomas Klockgether Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Haloom Rafehi; David J Szmulewicz; Mark F Bennett; Nara L M Sobreira; Kate Pope; Katherine R Smith; Greta Gillies; Peter Diakumis; Egor Dolzhenko; Michael A Eberle; María García Barcina; David P Breen; Andrew M Chancellor; Phillip D Cremer; Martin B Delatycki; Brent L Fogel; Anna Hackett; G Michael Halmagyi; Solange Kapetanovic; Anthony Lang; Stuart Mossman; Weiyi Mu; Peter Patrikios; Susan L Perlman; Ian Rosemergy; Elsdon Storey; Shaun R D Watson; Michael A Wilson; David S Zee; David Valle; David J Amor; Melanie Bahlo; Paul J Lockhart Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Fulya Akçimen; Jay P Ross; Cynthia V Bourassa; Calwing Liao; Daniel Rochefort; Maria Thereza Drumond Gama; Marie-Josée Dicaire; Orlando G Barsottini; Bernard Brais; José Luiz Pedroso; Patrick A Dion; Guy A Rouleau Journal: Front Genet Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Andrea Cortese; Stefano Tozza; Wai Yan Yau; Salvatore Rossi; Sarah J Beecroft; Zane Jaunmuktane; Zoe Dyer; Gianina Ravenscroft; Phillipa J Lamont; Stuart Mossman; Andrew Chancellor; Thierry Maisonobe; Yann Pereon; Cecile Cauquil; Silvia Colnaghi; Giulia Mallucci; Riccardo Curro; Pedro J Tomaselli; Gilbert Thomas-Black; Roisin Sullivan; Stephanie Efthymiou; Alexander M Rossor; Matilde Laurá; Menelaos Pipis; Alejandro Horga; James Polke; Diego Kaski; Rita Horvath; Patrick F Chinnery; Wilson Marques; Cristina Tassorelli; Grazia Devigili; Lea Leonardis; Nick W Wood; Adolfo Bronstein; Paola Giunti; Stephan Züchner; Tanya Stojkovic; Nigel Laing; Richard H Roxburgh; Henry Houlden; Mary M Reilly Journal: Brain Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 15.255