| Literature DB >> 32547964 |
Uener R Dos Santos1, Marliete C Costa2, Gustavo J C de Freitas2, Flávia S de Oliveira3, Bianca R Santos1, Juneo F Silva1, Daniel A Santos2, Adriana A M Dias3, Luciana D de Carvalho1, Danillo G Augusto4, Jane L Dos Santos1.
Abstract
Biological control agents (BCA) are an alternative to chemical pesticides and an emerging strategy to safely eliminate plant pathogens. Trichoderma spp. are the most common fungi used as BCAs. They produce spores that are released into the air and can potentially interact with immune system of mammals. We previously showed that Trichoderma affects expression of genes encoding pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and cytokines in mice. PRRs are involved in the recognition of microorganisms and can lead to pro-tumoral signaling. Here, we evaluated if mice injected with low doses of murine melanoma exhibited increased development of lung tumor when treated with conidia of T. stromaticum. Mice treated with T. stromaticum and inoculated with B16-F10 melanoma cells exhibited significant increase in tumor uptake (p = 0.006) and increased number of visible nodules in the lungs (p = 0.015). We also analyzed mRNA expression levels of genes encoding PRRs in lung of mice exposed to T. stromaticum and demonstrated that mice treated with T. stromaticum conidia exhibited lower expression levels of Clec7a and increased expression of Tlr4 (toll like receptor 4) compared to non-treated controls. The expression levels of Clec7a and Tlr2 were increased in mice treated with T. stromaticum and inoculated with murine melanoma compared to controls only inoculated with melanoma. Our results demonstrate that intranasal exposition to T. stromaticum increases tumor in the B16-F10 model, which may raise concerns regarding the safety of its use in agriculture.Entities:
Keywords: Trichoderma; Tricovab; biological control; cancer; metastasis; patter recognition receptor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32547964 PMCID: PMC7272596 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Effect of T. stromaticum conidia in mice from B16-F10 melanoma model. (A) Experimental design from groups conidia, B16-F10 and a control group (n = 6 mice per group); numbers in the horizontal bar indicate the days of inoculation of conidia (below) and days of tumor cell inoculation (above); (B) body weight kinetics; and (C) lung-to-body weight ratio. (D) Experimental design from Protocol 1 (n = 5–6 mice per group); (E) body weight kinetics; black arrow indicates the days of exposition to T. stromaticum conidia and dashed line the day of tumor cells inoculation; (F) lung-to-body weight ratio. (G) Experimental design from Protocol 2 (n = 5–6 mice per group); (H) body weight kinetics; black arrow indicates the days of exposition to T. stromaticum conidia and dashed line the day of tumor cells inoculation; (I) lung-to-body weight ratio. The body weight was compared between groups using Two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni's post-test and Student's t-test for lung weight and lung-to-body weight ratio analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Value of p < 0.05 was considered for statistical significance.
Figure 2Conidia of T. stromaticum significantly increase lung tumor uptake and development. (A) Illustrative macroscopic image of the right lungs from mice in control group (1); inoculated only with conidia (2); only with B16-F10 (3); with PBS and B16-F10 (4); inoculated with conidia and B16-F10 cells (5); inoculated with B16-F10 cells and PBS (6); or inoculated with B16-F10 cells and conidia (7). White arrows (→) indicate the presence of tumor nodules. (B) Tumor uptake determined by the presence of tumor in the lung. Number of visible nodules count on lung surface from (C) mice treated only with conidia, only with B16-F10 cells and in control groups; in (D) Protocol 1 and (E) Protocol 2. The tumor uptake was assessed using Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test for visible nodules. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5–6 mice per group). Value of p < 0.05 were considered for statistical significance.
Figure 3Histopathological analysis of mice in experimental model. (A) Micrometastatic score from mice treated with conidia, B16-F10 and control; (B) in protocol 1 and (C) protocol 2. (D) Photomicrograph of lung from mice challenged only with conidia. (E) Representative photomicrograph of early pulmonary micrometastasis in the subpleural and (F) periarteriolar area of the lung parenchyma from mice challenged with conidia and B16-F10. Asterisk (*) indicate micrometastatic foci and black arrow (→) indicate the presence of melanin in micrometastatic foci. Paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were stained with hematoxylin & eosin (H&E). The micrometastatic score was assessed by Mann-Whitney test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5–6 mice per group). Value of p < 0.05 were considered for statistical significance.
Figure 4Expression levels of pattern recognition receptors. Abundance of mRNA transcripts of genes Clec7a, Tlr2 and Tlr4 from lungs tissue of mice. (A) Control and treated with T. stromaticum conidia. (B) Mice from protocols 1 (conidia + B16-F10) and protocol 2 (B16-F10 + Conidia) compared to control group only treated with B16-F10. Analyzed with Mann–Whitney test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5–6 mice per group). Value of p < 0.05 were considered for statistical significance.