Literature DB >> 32547694

Blocking Coronavirus 19 Infection via the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein: Initial Steps.

Jonathan Whisenant1, Kevin Burgess1.   

Abstract

Recent crystal structure data for protein-protein interactions featuring the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein will inevitably trigger a new wave of research in this area that was not possible before. This Viewpoint outlines a few of the ways that it is already happening.
Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32547694      PMCID: PMC7241730          DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett        ISSN: 1948-5875            Impact factor:   4.345


It is inspiring to see how quickly the scientific community has mobilized to address a new threat to human health. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, the COVID-19 virus) contains a spike protein that mediates entry into the host’s cells by binding a cell surface receptor there called angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2).[1] This Viewpoint focuses on factors that influence the SARS-CoV-2-spike protein·ACE2 protein–protein interaction and how it may be targeted for therapeutic gain. A milestone in this area has arisen from three groups who separately elucidated the crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein·ACE2.[2−4] These structures reveal ACE2 at the interface contributes almost exclusively a ∼24 amino acid extended helix. Correlations have been made between the dissociation constants for SARS-CoV S proteins from the ACE2 receptor and rates of transmissibility, viral infection, and disease severity.[1] SARS-CoV-2 S protein may have a lower Kd than the one from SARS-CoV; hence, the virus may have evolved to maximize this interaction.[3] To virologists, these structural insights into the SARS-CoV-2-spike protein·ACE2 interface reveal a potentially important epitope that vaccines might be engineered to bind. Peptide chemists, on the other hand, will view that helix as an inviting target to mimic with short peptide sequences or with helical peptide mimics, to retard uptake of the virus particles by the host cells. In fact, peptide chemists are already “on the case”. Initial steps in mimicry of the key helical peptide motif in ACE2 must involve synthesis of the native peptide and assays to determine its effects on SARS-CoV-2 spike protein·ACE2 in vitro; Pentelute’s group at MIT might be first to publish this.[5] Their 23-mer peptide bound SARS-CoV-2 spike protein gave a Kd value of 47 nM, whereas that for full length ACE2 was 7 nM (measured using biolayer interferometry, BLI). Consequently, even this unmodified peptide, consisting of only natural amino acids, might outcompete ACE2 for binding the virus, provided it is present in excess. These observations will cause excitement among the community preparing stapled helical peptides and other types of peptidomimetics, and it has already stimulated computational chemists from the University of Michigan to predict helical sequences comprised of naturally encoded amino acids that might bind more effectively.[6] When COVID-19 enters the mouth there are two immediate destinations: the lungs and the intestines. Intestines present about 200 m2 of epithelial cell surface per individual for the virus to work on, but relatively few patients with life-threatening cases of COVID-19 infection develop diarrhea; most show only severe respiratory symptoms. This outcome seems inconsistent with the fact that ACE2 is abundant on small intestine enterocytes as well as lung alveolar epithelial cells. COVID-19 seems to tend to lose the battle waged in the intestines because of defensins. Defensins are a subset of amphiphilic antimicrobial peptides of which the abundant HD5 (human defensin 5) is illustrative. In fact, HD5 also plays a key role in protecting cells in the intestine from the virus, as shown by a group from Third Military Medical University, Chongqing.[7] HD5 is secreted by Paneth cells in the crypts of the small intestine; it is a 32-residue peptide constrained by three disulfide bonds (Figure ). Abundance of HD5 in the intestine suggests that it may effectively compete with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to bind ACE2 even though it has a higher Kd (39.3 nM) than the viral protein (2.68 nM also via BLI; Kd value slightly different to that quoted above probably due to different protein source and, perhaps, glycosylation state). Modeling indicates HD5 binds the N-terminal region of the critical red helix shown in Figure , and this is the interaction that gives the blocking effect. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein also binds HD5 (Kd, 82 nM) though that interaction does not prevent it binding ACE2. The Chongqing group assayed their compounds by BLI for binding, by immunofluorescence (with and without HD5) of Paneth cells exposed to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds this on the cell surface, and by Western blot of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that makes its way into cells. As expected, HD5 suppresses uptake of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein into the colon cells, and it is in the colon where this defensin is excreted by Paneth cells.
Figure 2

Structure of human defensin 5 (HD5) from 1AMP.

Figure 1

(a) Receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein·ACE2 (PDB 6M0J). (b) Residues of the red helix in ACE2 that interact with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at the interface.

(a) Receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein·ACE2 (PDB 6M0J). (b) Residues of the red helix in ACE2 that interact with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at the interface. Structure of human defensin 5 (HD5) from 1AMP. In Science,[8] researchers from Scripps and The University of Hong Kong report the structure of mAb CR3022 bound to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. CR3022 is a neutralizing mAb for SARS-CoV (from “SARS”, Kd 1 nM), but it also binds SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Kd 115 nM) in the same region, where the two spike proteins are 86% homologous. Six CR3022 turns, three on the light chain and three on the heavy, bind the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Figure , turns in red), and the region where they bind does not overlap with that which contacts ACE2. CR3022 neutralizes SARS-CoV but not SARS-CoV-2 (from COVID-19). A mechanism of inactivation other than competition for ACE2 must be involved for SARS-CoV·CR3022 that is not applicable to SARS-CoV-2. On that subject the authors note the receptor binding domains of coronaviruses undergo hinge-like transitions between up and down conformations (Figure b, hinge in blue and CR3022 binding site in red/yellow); only the up is accessible to CR3022, and ACE2 only binds to the up form. These observations speak to the potential importance of mAbs and eventually small molecules that bind the spike protein, including ones that do not bind the PPI interface.
Figure 3

(a) SARS-CoV-2 spike protein RBD bound to the heavy and light chains of CR3022 via the six loops highlighted in red. (b) Structure of the SARS-COV-2 S glycoprotein. Yellow and red segments represent the receptor binding domain in up and down conformation, respectively, and the cyan is the truncated S protein.

(a) SARS-CoV-2 spike protein RBD bound to the heavy and light chains of CR3022 via the six loops highlighted in red. (b) Structure of the SARS-COV-2 S glycoprotein. Yellow and red segments represent the receptor binding domain in up and down conformation, respectively, and the cyan is the truncated S protein. Overall, it is an exciting time to be working on SARS-CoV-2 in an otherwise stressful period. “It was the best of times. It was the worst of times.” (Charles Dickens).
  5 in total

1.  Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor.

Authors:  Jun Lan; Jiwan Ge; Jinfang Yu; Sisi Shan; Huan Zhou; Shilong Fan; Qi Zhang; Xuanling Shi; Qisheng Wang; Linqi Zhang; Xinquan Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Structural and Functional Basis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Using Human ACE2.

Authors:  Qihui Wang; Yanfang Zhang; Lili Wu; Sheng Niu; Chunli Song; Zengyuan Zhang; Guangwen Lu; Chengpeng Qiao; Yu Hu; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Qisheng Wang; Huan Zhou; Jinghua Yan; Jianxun Qi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Jian Shang; Gang Ye; Ke Shi; Yushun Wan; Chuming Luo; Hideki Aihara; Qibin Geng; Ashley Auerbach; Fang Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A highly conserved cryptic epitope in the receptor binding domains of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV.

Authors:  Meng Yuan; Nicholas C Wu; Xueyong Zhu; Chang-Chun D Lee; Ray T Y So; Huibin Lv; Chris K P Mok; Ian A Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein.

Authors:  Alexandra C Walls; Young-Jun Park; M Alejandra Tortorici; Abigail Wall; Andrew T McGuire; David Veesler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

  5 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Chemodynamic features of nanoparticles: Application to understanding the dynamic life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols and aqueous biointerfacial zones.

Authors:  Jérôme F L Duval; Herman P van Leeuwen; Willem Norde; Raewyn M Town
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 15.190

Review 2.  Recent Developments on Therapeutic and Diagnostic Approaches for COVID-19.

Authors:  Joydeb Majumder; Tamara Minko
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2-host protein interaction network reveals new biology and drug candidates: focus on the spike surface glycoprotein and RNA polymerase.

Authors:  Esen Sokullu; Maxime Pinard; Marie-Soleil Gauthier; Benoit Coulombe
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 6.098

Review 4.  Drug Repurposing Approach, Potential Drugs, and Novel Drug Targets for COVID-19 Treatment.

Authors:  Zemene Demelash Kifle; Akeberegn Gorems Ayele; Engidaw Fentahun Enyew
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2021-04-22

5.  Brilacidin Demonstrates Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 in Cell Culture.

Authors:  Allison Bakovic; Kenneth Risner; Nishank Bhalla; Farhang Alem; Theresa L Chang; Warren K Weston; Jane A Harness; Aarthi Narayanan
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 6.  Potential Therapeutic Targets and Vaccine Development for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Pandemic Management: A Review on the Recent Update.

Authors:  Uttpal Anand; Shweta Jakhmola; Omkar Indari; Hem Chandra Jha; Zhe-Sheng Chen; Vijay Tripathi; José M Pérez de la Lastra
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  In silico Screening of Natural Phytocompounds Towards Identification of Potential Lead Compounds to Treat COVID-19.

Authors:  Muthumanickam Sankar; Balajee Ramachandran; Boomi Pandi; Nachiappan Mutharasappan; Vidhyavathi Ramasamy; Poorani Gurumallesh Prabu; Gowrishankar Shanmugaraj; Yao Wang; Brintha Muniyandai; Subaskumar Rathinasamy; Balakumar Chandrasekaran; Mohammad F Bayan; Jeyakanthan Jeyaraman; Gurumallesh Prabu Halliah; Solomon King Ebenezer
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-07-05

8.  Biophysical properties of the isolated spike protein binding helix of human ACE2.

Authors:  Anirban Das; Vicky Vishvakarma; Arpan Dey; Simli Dey; Ankur Gupta; Mitradip Das; Krishna Kant Vishwakarma; Debsankar Saha Roy; Swati Yadav; Shubham Kesarwani; Ravindra Venkatramani; Sudipta Maiti
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Supervised molecular dynamics for exploring the druggability of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Authors:  Giuseppe Deganutti; Filippo Prischi; Christopher A Reynolds
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 10.  The Spike of SARS-CoV-2: Uniqueness and Applications.

Authors:  Ranjith Kumavath; Debmalya Barh; Bruno Silva Andrade; Madangchanok Imchen; Flavia Figueira Aburjaile; Athira Ch; Diego Lucas Neres Rodrigues; Sandeep Tiwari; Khalid J Alzahrani; Aristóteles Góes-Neto; Marianna E Weener; Preetam Ghosh; Vasco Azevedo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.