Literature DB >> 32547024

Monte Carlo Evaluation of Dose Enhancement Due to CuATSM or GNP Uptake in Hypoxic Environments with External Beam Radiation.

Stephen Martinez1, Alexander Brandl1, Del Leary1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most solid tumors contain areas of chronic hypoxia. Gold nanoparticles (GNP) have been extensively explored as enhancers of external beam radiation; however, GNP have lower cellular uptake in hypoxic conditions than under normoxic conditions. Conversely, the chelator diacetyl-bis (N(4)-methylthiosemicarbazonato) copper II (CuATSM) deposits copper in hypoxic regions, allowing for dose enhancement in previously inaccessible regions.
METHODS: External beam sources with different spectra were modeled using a Monte Carlo code (EGSnrc) to evaluate radioenhancement in a layered model with metal solutions. Also considered was a simple concentric layered tumor model containing a hypoxic core with each layer varying in concentrations of either copper or gold according to hypoxic conditions. Low energy external photon beams were then projected onto the tumor to determine the regional dose enhancement dependent on hypoxic conditions.
RESULTS: Dose enhancement was more pronounced for beam spectra with low energy photons (225 kVp) and was highly dependent on metal concentrations from 0.1 g/kg to 100 g/kg. Increasing the depth of the metallic solution layer from 1 cm to 6 cm decreased dose enhancement. A small increase in the dose enhancement factor (DEF) of 1.01 was predicted in the hypoxic regions of the tumor model with commonly used diagnostic concentrations of CuATSM. At threshold concentrations of toxic subcutaneous injection levels, the DEF increases to 1.02, and in simulation of a high concentration of CuATSM, the DEF increased to 1.07. High concentration treatments are also considered, as well as synergistic combinations of GNP/CuATSM treatments.
CONCLUSION: The research presented is novel utilization of CuATSM to target hypoxic regions and act as a radiosensitizer by the nature of its ability to deposit copper metal in reduced tissue. We demonstrate CuATSM at high concentrations with low energy photons can increase dose deposition in hypoxic tumor regions.
© 2020 Martinez et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypoxia; modeling; radiation therapy; radiosensitivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32547024      PMCID: PMC7261688          DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S241756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine        ISSN: 1176-9114


  44 in total

Review 1.  Gold nanoparticles as novel agents for cancer therapy.

Authors:  S Jain; D G Hirst; J M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Cell-specific radiosensitization by gold nanoparticles at megavoltage radiation energies.

Authors:  Suneil Jain; Jonathan A Coulter; Alan R Hounsell; Karl T Butterworth; Stephen J McMahon; Wendy B Hyland; Mark F Muir; Glenn R Dickson; Kevin M Prise; Fred J Currell; Joe M O'Sullivan; David G Hirst
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  A Monte Carlo investigation of low-Z target image quality generated in a linear accelerator using Varian's VirtuaLinac.

Authors:  David Parsons; James L Robar; Daren Sawkey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Internal radiotherapy with copper-64-diacetyl-bis (N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) reduces CD133+ highly tumorigenic cells and metastatic ability of mouse colon carcinoma.

Authors:  Yukie Yoshii; Takako Furukawa; Yasushi Kiyono; Ryo Watanabe; Tetsuya Mori; Hiroshi Yoshii; Tatsuya Asai; Hidehiko Okazawa; Michael J Welch; Yasuhisa Fujibayashi
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  The toxicity of dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) for the dog, pig, rat and rabbit.

Authors:  P R Noel; K C Barnett; R E Davies; D W Jolly; J S Leahy; L E Mawdesley-Thomas; K W Shillam; P F Squires; A E Street; W C Tucker; A N Worden
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 6.  Imaging tumor hypoxia to advance radiation oncology.

Authors:  Chen-Ting Lee; Mary-Keara Boss; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 8.401

7.  A comprehensive system for dosimetric commissioning and Monte Carlo validation for the small animal radiation research platform.

Authors:  E Tryggestad; M Armour; I Iordachita; F Verhaegen; J W Wong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Copper delivery to the CNS by CuATSM effectively treats motor neuron disease in SOD(G93A) mice co-expressing the Copper-Chaperone-for-SOD.

Authors:  Jared R Williams; Emiliano Trias; Pamela R Beilby; Nathan I Lopez; Edwin M Labut; C Samuel Bradford; Blaine R Roberts; Erin J McAllum; Peter J Crouch; Timothy W Rhoads; Cliff Pereira; Marjatta Son; Jeffrey L Elliott; Maria Clara Franco; Alvaro G Estévez; Luis Barbeito; Joseph S Beckman
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 9.  Focus on the Controversial Aspects of (64)Cu-ATSM in Tumoral Hypoxia Mapping by PET Imaging.

Authors:  Mathilde Colombié; Sébastien Gouard; Mathieu Frindel; Aurélien Vidal; Michel Chérel; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Caroline Rousseau; Mickaël Bourgeois
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-08-24

10.  Validation of 64Cu-ATSM damaging DNA via high-LET Auger electron emission.

Authors:  Dayton D McMillan; Junko Maeda; Justin J Bell; Matthew D Genet; Garrett Phoonswadi; Kelly A Mann; Susan L Kraft; Hisashi Kitamura; Akira Fujimori; Yukie Yoshii; Takako Furukawa; Yasuhisa Fujibayashi; Takamitsu A Kato
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.