Alleviation of Liver Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Underlies the Protective Effect of Ferulic Acid in Methotrexate-Induced Hepatotoxicity.

INTRODUCTION: In multiple studies, involvement of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of methotrexate (MTX)-mediated liver damage has been confirmed. Use of many drugs has been examined experimentally in order to prevent or diminish oxidative stress. However, no study has yet examined the effects of ferulic acid (FA) on MTX-induced liver damage. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of FA on protection against liver damage induced by MTX in mice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this the mice were divided into five groups in a random manner: I) control; II) MTX (20 mg/kg); III and IV) FA (50 and 100 mg/kg) + MTX; and V) FA (100 mg/kg), and we measured serum factors, oxidative stress and inflammatory factors.
RESULTS: In the MTX group, accumulation of inflammatory cells, accumulation of red blood cell (RBC), and nuclear pyknosis (NP) were detected in the liver. In line with the histological data, the levels of nitric oxide (NO), malondialdehyde (MDA), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α increased (TNF-α), whereas the reduced glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) content reduced in the MTX group. However, FA ameliorated these hazardous effects in the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory systems in MTX-treated groups.
CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, oxidative stress impairment and MTX-induced liver damage were ameliorated following FA pretreatment at both histological and biochemical levels. Therefore, FA can be effectively used in abrogation of MTX-induced toxicity.

Introduction

Drug-induced damage to the liver can be considered a challenging problem, complicating the course of drug therapy and limiting its effectiveness.1 Methotrexate (MTX), which is a folic acid antagonist, is recognized as a common anticancer drug. Nevertheless, the cytotoxic effects of MTX not only affect tumor cells, but also influence vital organs. Hepatotoxicity is a major type of toxicity associated with MTX chemotherapy.2,3 The prevalence of MTX-induced liver cirrhosis and fibrosis may reach up to 26% and 50% in patients, respectively.4 According to several studies, oxidative stress contributes to the pathogenesis of MTX-induced damage in multiple organs, particularly the liver.5–7

It is known that reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute to cell apoptosis.8 Generally, glutathione (GSH), as a major cytosolic antioxidant, uses nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH).9 It has been reported that MTX inhibits nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP)-malic enzymes and cytosolic NADP-dependent dehydrogenases. MTX, by inhibition of pentose cycle enzymes, reduces NADPH availability in cells. Therefore, any failure in the antioxidant defense system can increase cell sensitivity to ROS-mediated damage.10 It has been also reported that MTX can cause damage to the liver by increasing the level of proinflammatory cytokines.11 Therefore, finding an adjuvant hepatoprotective compound is essential for the safe application of this immunosuppressant anticancer drug. Substantial evidence confirms the strong antioxidant characteristics of flavonoid components in vitro.

Ferulic acid (FA), as a phenolic compound, is formed during tyrosine and phenylalanine metabolism and is mostly found in wheat, rice, barely, banana, tomato, citrus fruits, and vegetables.12 FA, which is recognized as a strong membrane antioxidant, seems to be effective against skin cancer, influenza, muscle wasting, and fatigue.13 Furthermore, FA exerts many pharmacological effects, including anti-nociceptive, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, anti-diabetic, anti-hyperlipidemic, neuroprotective and anti-hypertensive activities.14–19

FA, given its extended side chain and phenolic nucleus, can form resonance-stabilized phenoxy radicals, which are responsible for the free radical-scavenging properties.20 FA scavenges both reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and ROS through its free radical scavenging activities.21,22 The antioxidant activity of FA, as well as its protective effects against Alzheimer’s disease, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and cardiovascular disease, has been established.23

Recently, major attention has been paid to phenolic acids for the prevention of various diseases, due to their antioxidant properties. In this study, we aimed at examining the antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects of FA on hepatotoxicity caused by MTX in mice. According to our literature search, this is the first study on the hepatoprotective role of FA in MTX-mediated liver damage.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Sigma (USA) provided FA and MTX, while Merck Co. (Germany) supplied all other chemicals and reagents of an analytical grade.

Animals

The animal house of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS) provided seven‐ to eight‐week‐old male Swiss albino mice (22–25 g) for this study. The animals were given one week for acclimatization in a 12:12 h light-dark cycle under optimal environmental conditions (moderate humidity, 65±5%; temperature, 22±2°C). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR.AJUMS.ABHC.REC.1397.004) and was conducted in conformity with international laws and policies (EEC Council directives 86/609, OJL 358, 1, December, 12, 1987; NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, NIH Publications No. 85‐23, 1985).

Study Design

The mice were divided into five groups in a random manner (seven mice per group):

Control group: receiving oral saline (10 mL/kg of FA vehicle) for seven days, as well as a single injection of 0.9% saline (MTX vehicle, i.p.) on day six;

MTX group: receiving a single MTX injection (20 mg/kg, i.p.) on day six;

FA+MTX groups: receiving two oral doses of FA (50, 100 mg/kg, p.o.) once every day for one week, as well as MTX (20 mg/kg, i.p.) on day six; and FA group: receiving only 100 mg/kg of oral FA (p.o.) for seven consecutive days.

The dosage regime of MTX2,11 and FA24,25 is based on previous articles that were added to the methods.

After sacrificing the animals via cervical dislocation on the eighth day, the blood samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3000 rpm. The collected serum was kept at −80°C until further analysis. The liver was dissected into two sections. The first section was formalin-fixed for the histopathological analysis, while the second part was used for the biochemical assessment, for which the tissue sections were rinsed in cold normal saline and homogenized in ice-cold potassium phosphate buffer (0.1 M). Two cycles of centrifugation were performed at 600 and 10,000 g on the final homogenate. The collected supernatant was stored at −70°C to determine the oxidative biomarkers, antioxidant enzymes, and proinflammatory cytokines.

Biochemical Analysis

The serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were measured, based on the colorimetric kit protocols (Human, Wiesbaden, Germany).

Protein Measurement

The method proposed by Lowry et al in 195126 was applied to measure the protein concentration, with BSA as the standard.

Oxidative Stress Markers

The hepatic malondialdehyde (MDA) content was measured based on the methods described by Uchiyama and Mihara in order to evaluate lipid peroxidation.27 The nitric oxide (NO) content was also determined based on a study by Green et al.28 Next, the tissue levels of catalase (CAT), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and reduced glutathione (GSH) were determined according to the methods by Beutler,29 Aebi30 and Prieto et al,31 respectively. Also, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activities were measured using the method described in the commercial kits (ZellBio Company, Germany).

Measurement of Proinflammatory Cytokines

Using ELISA kits, the serum tumor necrosis factor-α increased (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), levels were measured (IBL, Germany; TNF-α catalog number: 27,194; IL-6 catalog number: 53061). The manufacturer’s instructions were followed during the measurements, and an ELISA reader was used at 450 nm to read absorbance.

Histopathological Analysis

The livers were immediately excised following blood collection and fixed in 10% formalin. After dehydrating the samples in graded alcohol concentrations, they were paraffin-embedded. Then, sections (4–6 µm) were prepared, and haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed. For the analysis of histological changes, including nuclear pyknosis and accumulation of inflammatory cells and RBCs, six microscopic slides were examined per animal. The histological properties were classified into four groups: normal, weak, moderate, and intense (0–3); the average value was measured. In addition, the percentage of nuclear pyknosis was also measured. After determining the mean of six fields, the slide was read in a “blind” fashion.

Data Analysis

For data analysis, one-way ANOVA, as well as Tukey’s post hoc test, was used at a significance level of 0.05. Values are presented as mean±SD.

Results

Effect of FA and MTX on AST, ALT, and ALP

The ALT, AST and ALP levels increased significantly in the MTX group versus the control group (P< 0.001). In animals receiving 50 mg/kg of FA, ALT and AST, but not ALP, significantly reduced compared with the MTX group (P< 0.05). In mice receiving 100 mg/kg of FA, ALT, AST and ALP levels decreased significantly versus the MTX group (P< 0.001, P< 0.01, and P< 0.05, respectively). However, the control group was not significantly different from the group receiving a higher dose of FA (Figure 1A–C).

Figure 1

Effect of ferulic acid (FA) on markers of liver dysfunction in methotrexate (MTX)-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Values are means ± SD (n = 7). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. *Significant difference in comparison with the control group (***p< 0.001). #Significant difference in comparison with the MTX group (#p< 0.05; ##p< 0.01 and ###p< 0.001).

Effect of FA and MTX on Liver MDA and NO Content

The hepatic levels of MDA and NO increased significantly in the MTX group (P< 0.001) versus the control group. Nevertheless, FA pretreatment at 50 and 100 mg/kg could attenuate MDA in comparison with the MTX group (P< 0.05 and P< 0.01). The findings showed that 100 mg/kg of FA could significantly reduce the NO content, compared with the MTX group (P< 0.05). Nevertheless, higher FA concentrations did not significantly change the MDA or NO content versus the control group (Figure 2A and B).

Figure 2

Effect of ferulic acid (FA) on markers of oxidative stress in methotrexate (MTX)-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Values are means ± SD (n = 7). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. *Significant difference in comparison with the control group (***p< 0.001). #Significant difference in comparison with the MTX group (#p< 0.05; ##p< 0.01).

Effect of FA and MTX on Hepatic TAC and GSH Content

In MTX-treated mice, GSH and TAC levels decreased significantly, compared with the control group (P< 0.001). However, pretreatment with 50 and 100 mg/kg of FA significantly increased TAC and GSH content, compared with the MTX group (P< 0.05, P< 0.01, and P< 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the control group and the group receiving a higher dose of FA (Figure 3A and B).

Figure 3

Effect of ferulic acid (FA) on antioxidant factors in methotrexate (MTX)-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Values are means ± SD (n = 7). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. *Significant difference in comparison with the control group (***p< 0.001). #Significant difference in comparison with the MTX group (#p< 0.05; ##p< 0.01 and ###p< 0.001).

Effects of FA and MTX on Hepatic CAT, GPx, and SOD

The GPx, SOD, and CAT levels in the liver reduced in the MTX group versus the control group (P< 0.001, P< 0.001, and P< 0.01, respectively). Pretreatment with 50 and 100 mg/kg of FA significantly improved GPx activity in comparison with the MTX group (P< 0.05 and P< 0.001). Furthermore, 100 mg/kg of FA increased SOD significantly versus the MTX group (P< 0.05). CAT activity improved in the liver tissues of FA group to levels not significantly different from the MTX group. Also, no difference was found in theses enzymes between the control group and the group receiving only a higher dose of FA (Figure 4A–C).

Figure 4

Effect of ferulic acid (FA) on antioxidant enzymes in methotrexate (MTX)-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Values are means ± SD (n = 7). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. *Significant difference in comparison with the control group (**p< 0.01 and ***p< 0.001). #Significant difference in comparison with the MTX group (#p< 0.05 and ###p< 0.001).

Effect of FA and MTX on Inflammatory Markers

In comparison with the control group, the hepatic levels of TNF-α and IL-6 significantly increased in the MTX group (P< 0.001). This change was reversed by FA pretreatment at 50 and 100 mg/kg, which decreased these parameters, compared with the MTX group (P< 0.05 and P< 0.001). The control group showed no significant difference with the group receiving a higher dose of FA (Figure 5A and B).

Figure 5

Effect of ferulic acid (FA) inflammatory cytokines in methotrexate (MTX)-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Values are means ± SD (n = 7). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. *Significant difference in comparison with the control group (***p< 0.001). #Significant difference in comparison with the MTX group (#p< 0.05 and ##p< 0.01).

Effect of FA on MTX-Mediated Changes in Hepatic Histology

The control group showed normal hepatocytes. Accumulation of inflammatory cells, accumulation of red blood cells (RBCs), and nuclear pyknosis were reported in the MTX group. FA pretreatment at both doses could reverse the changes, and more normal hepatocytes were produced in the treatment groups. No change occurred in the hepatic architecture at higher doses of FA, which was similar to the control group (Figure 6 and Table 1).

Figure 6

The effect of normal saline, methotrexate, methotrexate + ferulic acid and ferulic acid administration on liver (stained with hematoxylin & eosin, magnification X 100). (Control), normal saline-treated mice showing normal morphological appearance; (MTX), methotrexate-treated mice showing massive accumulation of RBCs, accumulation of inflammatory cells and nuclear pyknosis; (MTX and FA) methotrexate + ferulic acid at doses (50 and 100 mg/kg) treated mice, showing mild hepatic accumulation of RBCs inflammatory cells, (FA) ferulic acid at dose 100 mg/kg treated mice showing normal morphological appearance similar to the control group. Arrows indicates NP: Nuclear pyknosis and AR: Accumulation of red blood cells, Circles indicates I: Inflammatory cells.

Table 1

Effect of Ferulic Acid (FA) on Damage Scores in Liver Tissues Following Methotrexate (MTX)- Induced Hepatotoxicity

	Groups
Histological criteria	Control	MTX	MTX+FA 50	MTX+FA 100	FA 100
Accumulation of RBCs	0.13 ± 0.00	2.23±0.24***	1.12± 0.16###	0.42± 0.26###	0.11±0.00
Accumulation of inflammatory Cells	0.14 ± 0.00	1.93±0.12***	0.83±0.21###	0.34±0.15###	0.12±0.00
Nuclear pyknosis (%)	0.00±0.00	1.49±0.13***	0.1 ±0.02###	0.00±0.00###	0.00±0.00

Notes: Values are means ± SD (n = 7). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. ***Significant with control group, ###Significant with MTX Group.

Discussion

In this experimental study, FA treatment protected against oxidative stress, inflammation, and morphological liver damage due to MTX. Given their negative effects on some organs, including the liver, testis, kidney, and heart, anticancer drugs are not widely used.32–34 Several reports have suggested MTX-induced liver toxicity, involving inflammation, apoptosis, and increased AST, ALT, and ALP levels in the serum.35–39 In the present study, it was found that MTX-treated mice experienced significant hepatic damages, as confirmed by the significant rise in the serum ALP, AST, and ALT. The histopathological analysis confirmed the biochemical changes, indicating major hepatic damage in the MTX group. The FA pretreatment significantly attenuated biochemical and histopathological changes, suggesting the counteraction of FA with MTX-induced hepatotoxicity.

Several theories have been proposed regarding the mechanisms of MTX-induced toxicity, involving inflammation, oxidative stress, nitrosative stress, and apoptosis.40,41 MTX triggers oxidative stress by inhibiting the synthesis of NADP, which maintains reduced GSH. Moreover, it leads to nitrative stress by increasing the concentration of TNF-α, which in turn improves inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression, as well as NO and Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) production.42 Reaction of these highly reactive species with biological macromolecules is associated with the production of lipid peroxides, cellular dysfunction, membrane degradation, and formation of inactivating proteins and mutating deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).10,43

The present study showed significant changes in the oxidant/antioxidant balance by MTX. Based on the findings, MDA content in the MTX group was significantly higher than the control group. MDA, a stable metabolite, is widely used as a marker of oxidative stress.44 Lipid peroxidation, caused by oxygen free radicals, may be a major cause of cell membrane damage, as well as MTX-mediated tissue damage.45

Similarly, in our study, an increase was found in the NO content of hepatic tissues in the MTX group. Previous studies have confirmed the major involvement of NO in the pathogenesis of MTX toxicity.46,47 The high NO content reacts with superoxide anions producing versatile oxidant peroxynitrite and activating nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB).47 In our study, MDA level and NO content significantly decreased following FA pretreatment. Overall, phenolic compounds scavenge free radicals and quench lipid peroxides. According to previous reports, FA, which is approved as a food additive in some countries, is recognized as an effective free radical scavenger, preventing lipid peroxidation.48–50

Antioxidant factors, including CAT, SOD, GPx, GSH, and TAC, comprise the first line of defense against oxidative damage. SOD is a sensitive marker of liver damage, as it scavenges superoxide anions to form hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), resulting in the reduction of toxic effects. The most important detoxifying systems for peroxides include GSH and CAT in hepatic cells.51 GSH and GPx convert H2O2 and lipid peroxides to nontoxic products through participation in the GSH redox cycle. Therefore, reduction of these factors may produce some negative effects, given the accumulation of H2O2 and superoxide radicals.52,53 Also, TAC represents the total effect of plasma antioxidants.54

In our study, MTX reduced the levels of SOD, CAT, GPx, GSH, and TAC of tissues. The feed-back inhibition or oxidative inactivation of enzyme proteins as a result of excess ROS formation may explain the observed decline,55 these results are consistent with previous studies.6,10 FA could regulate all changes induced by MTX. Also, pretreatment with FA could increase GSH, TAC, SOD, and GPx in an MTX model. These results show that the antioxidant characteristics may be associated with FA-mediated protection against MTX-induced hepatic damage. According to previous studies, FA is a potent antioxidant against carbon tetrachloride, alcohol, bleomycin, acetaminophen, and iron-induced oxidative stress.24,50,56–58

Assessment of the effects of MTX on inflammatory cytokines in intoxicated animals is necessary in order to understand the anti-inflammatory effects of FA. Generally, TNF-α and IL-6 are recognized as proinflammatory cytokines, regulating inflammatory responses. In addition, the release of other cytokines and NO production are promoted, thereby improving oxidative damage.59 In the current study, MTX increased the TNF-α and IL-6 levels in liver tissues. According to previous studies, MTX increases IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β levels.39,47,60,61 Also, the inflammatory markers significantly reduced in the FA+MTX groups in the current study. These findings are in line with previous studies, indicating the FA potential to thwart the CCl4-induced release of inflammatory factors.62

Based on the histopathological analysis, MTX induced an acute inflammatory reaction, associated with inflammatory cell accumulation, red blood cell (RBC) accumulation, and nuclear pyknosis. Earlier studies explained this reaction by the MTX potential to trigger oxidative and nitrative stress and activate p38 and NF-κB pathways.2,3,63 Moreover, our histopathological findings showed the positive effects of FA on MTX-mediated hepatic damage. This finding is consistent with a previous study, suggesting that FA can reduce acetaminophen-related histopathological changes.24

Conclusion

Based on our findings, FA could ameliorate MTX-mediated hepatotoxicity. FA, especially at dose 100 mg/kg could also decrease oxidative stress and inflammation and improve the endogenous antioxidant system to prevent MTX-mediated oxidative damage. Therefore, FA (at dose 100 mg/kg) could be a safe option for the prevention of MTX-induced toxicity in humans.