Literature DB >> 32546497

Environmental and Genetic Contributions to Imperfect wMel-Like Wolbachia Transmission and Frequency Variation.

Michael T J Hague1, Heidi Mavengere2, Daniel R Matute2, Brandon S Cooper3.   

Abstract

Maternally transmitted Wolbachia bacteria infect about half of all insect species. They usually show imperfect maternal transmission and often produce cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI). Irrespective of CI, Wolbachia frequencies tend to increase when rare only if they benefit host fitness. Several Wolbachia, including wMel that infects Drosophila melanogaster, cause weak or no CI and persist at intermediate frequencies. On the island of São Tomé off West Africa, the frequencies of wMel-like Wolbachia infecting Drosophila yakuba (wYak) and Drosophila santomea (wSan) fluctuate, and the contributions of imperfect maternal transmission, fitness effects, and CI to these fluctuations are unknown. We demonstrate spatial variation in wYak frequency and transmission on São Tomé. Concurrent field estimates of imperfect maternal transmission do not predict spatial variation in wYak frequencies, which are highest at high altitudes where maternal transmission is the most imperfect. Genomic and genetic analyses provide little support for D. yakuba effects on wYak transmission. Instead, rearing at cool temperatures reduces wYak titer and increases imperfect transmission to levels observed on São Tomé. Using mathematical models of Wolbachia frequency dynamics and equilibria, we infer that temporally variable imperfect transmission or spatially variable effects on host fitness and reproduction are required to explain wYak frequencies. In contrast, spatially stable wSan frequencies are plausibly explained by imperfect transmission, modest fitness effects, and weak CI. Our results provide insight into causes of wMel-like frequency variation in divergent hosts. Understanding this variation is crucial to explain Wolbachia spread and to improve wMel biocontrol of human disease in transinfected mosquito systems.
Copyright © 2020 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila santomea; Drosophila yakuba; cytoplasmic incompatibility; endosymbiosis; host–microbe interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32546497      PMCID: PMC7404227          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  86 in total

1.  Wolbachia Acquisition by Drosophila yakuba-Clade Hosts and Transfer of Incompatibility Loci Between Distantly Related Wolbachia.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Dan Vanderpool; William R Conner; Daniel R Matute; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The Jekyll and Hyde Symbiont: Could Wolbachia Be a Nutritional Mutualist?

Authors:  Irene L G Newton; Danny W Rice
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Male age, host effects and the weak expression or non-expression of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila strains infected by maternally transmitted Wolbachia.

Authors:  K Tracy Reynolds; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Wolbachia and virus protection in insects.

Authors:  Lauren M Hedges; Jeremy C Brownlie; Scott L O'Neill; Karyn N Johnson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Still a host of hosts for Wolbachia: analysis of recent data suggests that 40% of terrestrial arthropod species are infected.

Authors:  Roman Zug; Peter Hammerstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  From parasite to mutualist: rapid evolution of Wolbachia in natural populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  Andrew R Weeks; Michael Turelli; William R Harcombe; K Tracy Reynolds; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  The impact of host diet on Wolbachia titer in Drosophila.

Authors:  Laura R Serbus; Pamela M White; Jessica Pintado Silva; Amanda Rabe; Luis Teixeira; Roger Albertson; William Sullivan
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Dietary saccharides and sweet tastants have differential effects on colonization of Drosophila oocytes by Wolbachia endosymbionts.

Authors:  Moises Camacho; Mailin Oliva; Laura R Serbus
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.422

9.  One prophage WO gene rescues cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Dylan Shropshire; Jungmin On; Emily M Layton; Helen Zhou; Seth R Bordenstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The wMel strain of Wolbachia Reduces Transmission of Zika virus by Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Matthew T Aliota; Stephen A Peinado; Ivan Dario Velez; Jorge E Osorio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  11 in total

1.  Temperature effects on cellular host-microbe interactions explain continent-wide endosymbiont prevalence.

Authors:  Michael T J Hague; J Dylan Shropshire; Chelsey N Caldwell; John P Statz; Kimberly A Stanek; William R Conner; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Testing the potential contribution of Wolbachia to speciation when cytoplasmic incompatibility becomes associated with host-related reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Daniel J Bruzzese; Hannes Schuler; Thomas M Wolfe; Mary M Glover; Joseph V Mastroni; Meredith M Doellman; Cheyenne Tait; Wee L Yee; Juan Rull; Martin Aluja; Glen Ray Hood; Robert B Goughnour; Christian Stauffer; Patrik Nosil; Jeffery L Feder
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.622

Review 3.  Living in the endosymbiotic world of Wolbachia: A centennial review.

Authors:  Rupinder Kaur; J Dylan Shropshire; Karissa L Cross; Brittany Leigh; Alexander J Mansueto; Victoria Stewart; Sarah R Bordenstein; Seth R Bordenstein
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 31.316

Review 4.  A Review: Aedes-Borne Arboviral Infections, Controls and Wolbachia-Based Strategies.

Authors:  Samson T Ogunlade; Michael T Meehan; Adeshina I Adekunle; Diana P Rojas; Oyelola A Adegboye; Emma S McBryde
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  Wolbachia-Conferred Antiviral Protection Is Determined by Developmental Temperature.

Authors:  Ewa Chrostek; Nelson Martins; Marta S Marialva; Luís Teixeira
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Male Age and Wolbachia Dynamics: Investigating How Fast and Why Bacterial Densities and Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Strengths Vary.

Authors:  J Dylan Shropshire; Emily Hamant; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 7.867

7.  cifB-transcript levels largely explain cytoplasmic incompatibility variation across divergent Wolbachia.

Authors:  J Dylan Shropshire; Emily Hamant; William R Conner; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  PNAS Nexus       Date:  2022-06-28

8.  Wolbachia infection and genetic diversity of Italian populations of Philaenus spumarius, the main vector of Xylella fastidiosa in Europe.

Authors:  Giorgio Formisano; Luigi Iodice; Pasquale Cascone; Adriana Sacco; Roberta Quarto; Vincenzo Cavalieri; Domenico Bosco; Emilio Guerrieri; Massimo Giorgini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  A wMel Wolbachia variant in Aedes aegypti from field-collected Drosophila melanogaster with increased phenotypic stability under heat stress.

Authors:  Xinyue Gu; Perran A Ross; Julio Rodriguez-Andres; Katie L Robinson; Qiong Yang; Meng-Jia Lau; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.476

10.  Pervasive Effects of Wolbachia on Host Temperature Preference.

Authors:  Michael T J Hague; Chelsey N Caldwell; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.