| Literature DB >> 32546122 |
Xin Gu1, Shuai Yang2, Xiaohe Yang1, Liangliang Yao1, Xuedong Gao1, Maoming Zhang1, Wei Liu1, Haihong Zhao1, Qingsheng Wang1, Zengjie Li1, Zhimin Li1, Junjie Ding3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cercospora sojina is a fungal pathogen that causes frogeye leaf spot in soybean-producing regions, leading to severe yield losses worldwide. It exhibits variations in virulence due to race differentiation between strains. However, the candidate virulence-related genes are unknown because the infection process is slow, making it difficult to collect transcriptome samples.Entities:
Keywords: Cercospora sojina; Comparative transcriptomics; Nitrogen starvation; RNA-Seq; Weighted gene co-expression network
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32546122 PMCID: PMC7298872 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-01853-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Comparison of the pathogenicity of different virulent strains of C. sojina, a Race15, and b Race1
Statistics of the transcriptome sequencing results
| Sample Name | Clean Reads | Clean bases | Q20 (%) | GC (%) | Uniquely mapped | Total mapped |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race1_CK_24hA | 40,961,854 | 6,144,278,100 | 98.08% | 55.33% | 17,103,260 (85.30%) | 20,050,463(87.34%) |
| Race1_CK_24hB | 40,402,594 | 6,060,389,100 | 97.18% | 55.34% | 17,187,857 (85.25%) | 20,160,846(87.49%) |
| Race1_CK_24hC | 40,256,508 | 6,038,476,200 | 98.02% | 55.02% | 16,972,254 (84.62%) | 20,058,021(86.60%) |
| Race1_LN_24hA | 41,539,426 | 6,230,913,900 | 98.04% | 54.94% | 17,406,685 (83.91%) | 20,744,685(86.33%) |
| Race1_LN_24hB | 40,143,194 | 6,021,479,100 | 98.02% | 54.85% | 16,631,562 (81.91%) | 20,303,736(84.02%) |
| Race1_LN_24hC | 40,254,896 | 6,038,234,400 | 98.11% | 55.19% | 17,422,073 (84.19%) | 20,692,555(86.70%) |
| Race15_CK_24hA | 40,100,926 | 6,015,138,900 | 98.23% | 55.05% | 17,136,290 (83.67%) | 20,480,927(85.57%) |
| Race15_CK_24hB | 40,321,692 | 6,048,253,800 | 98.30% | 55.00% | 16,769,650 (83.01%) | 20,201,297(84.99%) |
| Race15_CK_24hC | 40,116,042 | 6,017,406,300 | 98.27% | 55.15% | 17,168,804 (85.30%) | 20,128,254(87.29%) |
| Race15_LN_24hA | 41,489,370 | 6,223,405,500 | 98.04% | 55.18% | 17,484,097 (84.18%) | 20,769,713(86.35%) |
| Race15_LN_24hB | 40,607,472 | 6,091,120,800 | 98.06% | 55.19% | 16,877,992 (84.09%) | 20,071,597(86.47%) |
| Race15_LN_24hC | 41,385,110 | 6,207,766,500 | 97.99% | 55.00% | 16,948,292 (84.20%) | 20,127,448(86.39%) |
Fig. 2Summary of the differentially expressed genes among the four comparison groups. a Hierarchical heatmap showing the transformed expressional values for the transcripts. Red indicates upregulation and blue downregulation; b Differentially expressed genes statistics in the four comparison groups; c Venn diagrams for upregulated differentially expressed genes in the four comparison groups; and d Venn diagrams for downregulated differentially expressed genes in the four comparison groups
Fig. 3The most significantly-enriched GO terms of the differentially expressed genes from the four comparison groups: a Race1-LN vs. Race1-CK and b Race15-LN vs. Race15-CK down
Fig. 4The most significantly enriched KEGG terms of the differentially expressed genes from the Race1-LN vs. Race1-CK group
Fig. 5The most significantly enriched KEGG terms of the differentially expressed genes from the Race15-LN vs. Race15-CK group
Fig. 6WGCNA of the transcript changes in the highly (Race15) and mildly (Race1) virulent strains. a Module trait correlation analysis showed that two modules were correlated with the high virulence of Cercospora sojinaafter infection. Each module has a space with each trait. The upper part of the space is the correlation coefficient between the module and the trait. The lower part of the space is a p-value, which represents the significance of the correlation coefficient. Red indicates positive correlation and blue indicates negative correlation. b Expression level of the ME gene in the green module. c Expression level of the ME gene in the red module. d Expression level of the ME gene in the turquoise module
Fig. 7Verification results of the differential gene expression by qRT-PCR