Literature DB >> 32546001

Impact of Accelerating Insulin on an Artificial Pancreas System Without Meal Announcement: An In Silico Examination.

Patricio Colmegna1,2, Eda Cengiz3,4, Jose Garcia-Tirado1, Kristen Kraemer3, Marc D Breton1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controlling postprandial blood glucose without the benefit of an appropriately sized premeal insulin bolus has been challenging given the delays in absorption and action of subcutaneously injected insulin during conventional and artificial pancreas (AP) system diabetes treatment. We aim to understand the impact of accelerating insulin and increasing aggressiveness of the AP controller as potential solutions to address the postprandial hyperglycemia challenge posed by unannounced meals through a simulation study.
METHODS: Accelerated rapid-acting insulin analogue is modeled within the UVA/Padova simulation platform by uniformly reducing its pharmacokinetic time constants (α multiplier) and used with a model predictive control, where the controller's aggressiveness depends on α. Two sets of single-meal simulations were performed: (1) where we only tune the controller's aggressiveness and (2) where we also accelerate insulin absorption and action to assess postprandial glycemic control during each intervention.
RESULTS: Mean percent of time spent within the 70 to 180 mg/dL postprandial glycemic range is significantly higher in set (2) than in set (1): 79.9, 95% confidence interval [77.0, 82.7] vs 88.8 [86.8, 90.9] ([Note to typesetter: Set all unnecessary math in text format and insert appropriate spaces between operators.] P < .05) for α = 2, and 81.4 [78.6, 84.3] vs 94.1 [92.6, 95.6] (P < .05) for α = 3. A decrease in percent of time below 70 mg/dL is also detected: 0.9 [0.4, 2.2] vs 0.6 [0.2, 1.4] (P = .23) for α = 2 and 1.4 [0.7, 2.8] vs 0.4 [0.1, 1.4] (P < .05) for α = 3.
CONCLUSION: These proof-of-concept simulations suggest that an AP without prandial insulin boluses combined with significantly faster insulin analogues could match the glycemic performance obtained with an optimal hybrid AP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial pancreas; fast-acting insulin analogues; model predictive control; type 1 diabetes; unannounced meals

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32546001      PMCID: PMC8258534          DOI: 10.1177/1932296820928067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  32 in total

1.  Hypoglycemia prevention via pump attenuation and red-yellow-green "traffic" lights using continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump data.

Authors:  Colleen S Hughes; Stephen D Patek; Marc D Breton; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

Review 2.  Moving toward the ideal insulin for insulin pumps.

Authors:  Eda Cengiz; Bruce Bode; Michelle Van Name; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.166

3.  Intraperitoneal insulin delivery provides superior glycaemic regulation to subcutaneous insulin delivery in model predictive control-based fully-automated artificial pancreas in patients with type 1 diabetes: a pilot study.

Authors:  Eyal Dassau; Eric Renard; Jérôme Place; Anne Farret; Marie-José Pelletier; Justin Lee; Lauren M Huyett; Ankush Chakrabarty; Francis J Doyle; Howard C Zisser
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 4.  Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart and the Need for New Mealtime Insulin Analogues in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Canadian Perspective.

Authors:  Peter Senior; Irene Hramiak
Journal:  Can J Diabetes       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.190

5.  GIM, simulation software of meal glucose-insulin model.

Authors:  Chiara Dalla Man; Davide M Raimondo; Robert A Rizza; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-05

6.  Improving Efficacy of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin (Afrezza) by Postmeal Dosing: In-silico Clinical Trial with the University of Virginia/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Simulator.

Authors:  Roberto Visentin; Clemens Giegerich; Robert Jäger; Raphael Dahmen; Anders Boss; Marshall Grant; Chiara Dalla Man; Claudio Cobelli; Thomas Klabunde
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Closed-Loop Control Without Meal Announcement in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Faye M Cameron; Trang T Ly; Bruce A Buckingham; David M Maahs; Gregory P Forlenza; Carol J Levy; David Lam; Paula Clinton; Laurel H Messer; Emily Westfall; Camilla Levister; Yan Yan Xie; Nihat Baysal; Daniel Howsmon; Stephen D Patek; B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  A novel insulin formulation with a more rapid onset of action.

Authors:  S Steiner; M Hompesch; R Pohl; P Simms; F Flacke; T Mohr; A Pfützner; L Heinemann
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Performance and safety of an integrated bihormonal artificial pancreas for fully automated glucose control at home.

Authors:  H Blauw; A C van Bon; R Koops; J H DeVries
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.577

10.  Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study.

Authors:  Lia Bally; Hood Thabit; Harald Kojzar; Julia K Mader; Jehona Qerimi-Hyseni; Sara Hartnell; Martin Tauschmann; Janet M Allen; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Thomas R Pieber; Mark L Evans; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 44.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.