| Literature DB >> 32545654 |
Puneet Paul1, Anida Mesihovic1, Palak Chaturvedi2, Arindam Ghatak2, Wolfram Weckwerth2,3, Maik Böhmer1, Enrico Schleiff1,4.
Abstract
Temperature elevations constitute a major threat to plant performance. In recent years, much was learned about the general molecular mode of heat stress reaction of plants. The current research focuses on the integration of the knowledge into more global networks, including the reactions of cellular compartments. For instance, chloroplast function is central for plant growth and survival, and the performance of chloroplasts is tightly linked to the general status of the cell and vice versa. We examined the changes in photosynthesis, chloroplast morphology and proteomic composition posed in Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts after a single or repetitive heat stress treatment over a period of two weeks. We observed that the acclimation is potent in the case of repetitive application of heat stress, while a single stress results in lasting alterations. Moreover, the physiological capacity and its adjustment are dependent on the efficiency of the protein translocation process as judged from the analysis of mutants of the two receptor units of the chloroplast translocon, TOC64, and TOC33. In response to repetitive heat stress, plants without TOC33 accumulate Hsp70 proteins and plants without TOC64 have a higher content of proteins involved in thylakoid structure determination when compared to wild-type plants.Entities:
Keywords: chloroplasts; heat stress; ppi1; proteome; quantitative proteomics; toc64; translocon
Year: 2020 PMID: 32545654 PMCID: PMC7349189 DOI: 10.3390/genes11060650
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Chlorophyll content and photosynthetic performance after heat stress. (a) Schematic representation of the heat stress (HS) regime. A. thaliana wild type, ppi1, and toc64-1 were grown under short-day conditions and were then either kept under control (c) conditions (21 °C) or submitted to heat stress conditions (42 °C) either only once on day 7 for 2 h (HS-I) or every alternate day (HS-II) until day 21. (b) Chlorophyll content from 21-day-old leaves of wild-type, ppi1, and toc64-1 plants subjected to control (c), HS-I (I), or HS-II (II) treatment as shown in (a). The values shown are the means of at least three measurements (± SD). Statistical analysis (see methods section) was performed (p < 0.05). (c,d) The kinetic of the quantum yield adaptation of photosystem II (c) or the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ; d) from 21-day-old leaves of wild-type (left), ppi1 (middle) or toc64-1 plants (right) after they have been subjected to control (black), HS-I (orange), or HS-II treatment (green) at low light conditions is shown. The maximal Φ(II) and NPQ value for HS-treated wild-type plants is indicated as a horizontal dashed line for comparison.
Proteins predicted to be plastidic localized and exhibiting lower or higher abundance in chloroplasts isolated from mutants in comparison to wild-type chloroplasts. The protein name, the process the protein is acting in, the accession number and the obtained label-free quantification (LFQ) values (log2) are shown. The fold change (FC) according to the LFQ values, is presented for toc64-1 and ppi1 in comparison to the wild type; fold-change values >2 or <2 are marked in green or red, respectively.
| Name | Process | Accession | log2(LFQ) | FC (LFQ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wt |
|
|
|
| |||
| CYP38 | photosynthesis | AT3G01480 | 20.44 | 21.96 | 21.10 | 2.87 | 1.59 |
| FNR2 | photosynthesis | AT1G20020 | 21.98 | 23.13 | 22.91 | 2.22 | 1.91 |
| cpHSP70-1 | protein synth. | AT4G24280 | 19.71 | 20.82 | 19.92 | 2.16 | 1.16 |
| TROL | photosynthesis | AT4G01050 | 21.57 | 22.67 | 22.45 | 2.14 | 1.84 |
| Rpl15 | protein synth. | AT3G25920 | 18.01 | 19.08 | 19.07 | 2.10 | 2.08 |
| FTSH5 | photosynthesis | AT5G42270 | 22.11 | 23.12 | 22.93 | 2.02 | 1.77 |
| LHCb1.5 | photosynthesis | AT2G34420 | 21.34 | 22.11 | 23.95 | 1.71 | 6.11 |
| Tic62 | TIC | AT3G18890 | 21.27 | 22.22 | 22.58 | 1.93 | 2.48 |
| LOX2 | JA synth. | AT3G45140 | 21.09 | 21.20 | 22.24 | 1.07 | 2.22 |
| unknown | AT3G61870 | 19.60 | 20.08 | 20.75 | 1.40 | 2.22 | |
| PetE2 | photosynthesis | AT1G20340 | 22.12 | 22.11 | 23.27 | 0.99 | 2.21 |
| PsaE1 | photosynthesis | AT4G28750 | 23.61 | 24.14 | 24.70 | 1.45 | 2.14 |
| cpATPδ | photosynthesis | AT4G09650 | 21.75 | 22.17 | 22.84 | 1.34 | 2.14 |
| OE33 | photosynthesis | AT3G50820 | 22.15 | 23.10 | 23.21 | 1.92 | 2.08 |
| unknown | AT5G37360 | 18.59 | 18.78 | 19.61 | 1.14 | 2.03 | |
| LHCa4 | photosynthesis | AT3G47470 | 24.35 | 23.16 | 23.33 | 0.44 | 0.49 |
|
| metabolism | AT1G42970 | 21.99 | 21.46 | 20.89 | 0.69 | 0.47 |
|
| regulation | AT5G06290 | 21.53 | 20.19 | 20.40 | 0.39 | 0.46 |
|
| photosynthesis | AT1G31330 | 25.84 | 24.89 | 24.68 | 0.52 | 0.45 |
| Ef-Ts | protein synth. | AT4G29060 | 19.02 | 19.13 | 17.82 | 1.08 | 0.44 |
|
| regulation | AT1G03680 | 19.54 | 18.58 | 18.30 | 0.52 | 0.43 |
|
| metabolism | AT3G26650 | 23.48 | 22.94 | 22.23 | 0.68 | 0.42 |
|
| metabolism | AT5G04140 | 20.81 | 20.40 | 19.38 | 0.75 | 0.37 |
|
| photosynthesis | AT1G03600 | 22.30 | 21.26 | 22.32 | 0.49 | 1.01 |
|
| photosynthesis | AT1G44575 | 24.27 | 23.22 | 23.53 | 0.48 | 0.60 |
|
| photosynthesis | AT4G12800 | 24.04 | 22.92 | 23.32 | 0.46 | 0.61 |
|
| metabolism | AT5G35630 | 22.26 | 21.14 | 21.62 | 0.46 | 0.64 |
|
| metabolism | AT5G58330 | 18.95 | 17.75 | 18.47 | 0.44 | 0.72 |
| LHCa3 | photosynthesis | AT1G61520 | 25.19 | 23.94 | 24.19 | 0.42 | 0.50 |
|
| photosynthesis | ATCG00560 | 21.12 | 16.75 | 20.91 | 0.05 | 0.86 |
Comparison of protein changes in chloroplasts isolated from young (10 days; [84]) and older plants (21 days; present study). Given are the name, the accession number, the reported fold change for chloroplasts from 10-day old plants (ppi1/wild-type), the LFQ (log2) observed here for the same proteins and the fold change of the LFQ for toc64-1 and ppi1 when compared to the wild type (wt). n.d.: not detected. Fold-change values >1.5 are marked in red.
| Name | Accession | FC [ | log2(LFQ) | FC (LFQ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wt |
|
|
|
| |||
| HSP90 homolog | At2g04030 | 2.4/1.8 | 19.96 | n.d. | 19.97 | n.d. | 1.00 |
| Chaperonin 60β | At1g55490 | 1.9/1.6 | 21.92 | 22.56 | 22.09 | 1.57 | 1.13 |
| At3g13470 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | ||
| HSP70 homolog | At4g24280 | 1.8 | 19.71 | 20.82 | 19.92 | 2.16 | 1.16 |
| At5g49910 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | ||
| PPIase | At3g62030 | 1.8 | 21.06 | 20.67 | 20.51 | 0.77 | 0.68 |
| EF-Tu homolog | At4g20360 | 1.7 | 22.74 | 22.33 | 22.58 | 0.75 | 0.90 |
| Chaperonin 60α | At2g28000 | 1.6 | 21.59 | 22.03 | 21.89 | 1.36 | 1.23 |
| R-5-P isomerase | At3g04790 | 0.6/0.5 | 19.37 | n.d. | 19.91 | n.d. | 1.45 |
|
| At4g10340 | 0.6 | 25.82 | 25.65 | 26.30 | 0.89 | 1.39 |
| LHCII type 1 | At1g29910 | 0.6 | 25.85 | 25.58 | 26.66 | 0.83 | 1.74 |
| At1g29920 | |||||||
| At1g29930 | |||||||
| At2g34420 | 21.34 | 22.12 | 23.95 | 1.72 | 6.11 | ||
| OE23 | At1g06680 | 0.6 | 24.82 | 25.27 | 25.19 | 1.37 | 1.29 |
| OE33 | At3g50820 | 0.6/0.5 | 22.15 | 23.11 | 23.21 | 1.93 | 2.08 |
| At5g66570 | 25.03 | 25.66 | 25.88 | 1.55 | 1.79 | ||
|
| At1g67090 | 0.4 | 23.62 | 23.37 | 23.48 | 0.85 | 0.91 |
The proteome of chloroplasts isolated from toc64-1 plants shows distinct alterations when compared to the wild type and ppi1 (Figure 3 and Figure 6; toc64-1 panel). The observed changes in protein abundance again are centered around PSI or PSII, which is consistent with the reduced photosynthetic performance of the mutant. However, we did not find PS components, but many regulatory factors with higher abundance (HHL1, RBD1, Lil3.1, Trx-m1, Cyp38, FNR, TROL, FTSH5; Figure 6; [72,73,74,75,85,89,90,91,92]). In toc64-1, the five PS components with altered abundance are all reduced (Figure 3; Table 1). As for ppi1, the other mostly downregulated proteins are linked to the action of ferredoxin and FNR: GLN2, MDH, TRX-m1 and PrxB (Figure 6).
Figure 2Chloroplast ultrastructure of heat-stress-treated wild-type, ppi1, and toc64-1 plants. (a) The leaves of 21-day-old plants were analyzed. Representative images of each line and condition are shown in two magnifications (11,500×: complete chloroplast and 66,000×: for stacks). Scale bar for each image shows 1 µm for the 11,500× fold magnification and 0.2 µm for 66,000× fold magnification. Plastoglobules are marked by yellow arrows. (b,c) The number of grana stacks and discs per grana stack was counted for each plant line (at least four chloroplasts per plant line per condition). Significance (p < 0.05; n = 5) determined by statistical analysis (ANOVA with Duncan post hoc test) is indicated.
Figure 3Proteome analysis of chloroplasts. (a) The number of identified proteins is shown. “Total” indicates all proteins identified in at least one sample; subsequently, the number of proteins discovered in individual samples is shown (black: control, orange: HS-I, green HS-II). The full bar indicates the fraction of plastid localized proteins based on SUBA, and the open segment indicates the fraction of proteins with localization to other cellular sub-compartments. The total number of discovered proteins is indicated on top. (b) The box plot of the log2(LFQ) value distribution with indicated maximal and minimal values is shown for each fraction. (c) The proteins detected in all three genotypes under control conditions are compared. The total number of proteins involved in photosynthesis (PS), metabolism, protein synthesis, and other process is shown, and proteins with lower (red) or higher (green) abundance in the mutants relative to wild-type plants are shown as indicated on the right.
Figure 4Protein abundance of non-plastidic proteins in chloroplast fractions after heat stress. (a) The number of plastid (p -localized (dark blue) or non-plastidic (np) proteins (light blue; based on SUBA) found in all, or in at least 8, 7, 6 or 5 chloroplast samples is shown. Yellow crosses indicated the ratio between plastid localized proteins and non-plastidic proteins. (b) The log2(LFQ) for the indicated protein group was normalized to the lowest log2(LFQ) value found for the indicated group in any of the samples. The value is plotted for the wild type (blue), ppi1 (magenta) or toc64-1 (yellow). The dotted frames indicate the 99% confidence interval of the median of the log2(LFQ) values normalized to the lowest median (control, HS-I, and HS-II) of all non-plastidic proteins in one sample.
Figure 5Abundance of plastidic proteins in chloroplast fractions after heat stress. (a) The distribution of the log2(LFQ) values for a protein normalized by subtracting the smallest found value was analyzed for each probe. The box plot presentation is shown. The difference in the distribution was analyzed by ANOVA. (b–e) The log2(LFQ)-log2(LFQmin) values are plotted for proteins with a difference > 1.65 between control, and one HS-treated sample for at least one genotype. The symbols are colored according to the legend. Enlarged symbols and dashed lines indicate changes (>1.65) after HS. Dotted lines indicated changes (>1.65), assuming that the absence of detection suggests a protein abundance lower or equal to the lowest LFQ value observed for this protein.
Figure 6Proteomic alterations with respect to the genotype (top) or heat stress application (bottom). The results presented are summarized. On top, green indicates a higher and orange a lower abundance of the named protein in the indicated genotype (Fd: ferredoxin; CBC: Calvin Benson Cycle; for all other abbreviations and references see text). On the bottom, the color coding is according to the genotype (legend right bottom). Large letters indicate changes identified according to the described rule and small letters changes of at least two-fold. Normal letters indicated lower abundance (also indicated by downward arrow) and bold letters accumulation (upward arrow) when compared to the respective control sample. For further discussion, see text.