| Literature DB >> 32545178 |
Tung Thanh Diep1,2, Chris Pook3, Elaine C Rush2,4, Michelle Ji Yeon Yoo1,2.
Abstract
Amber (yellow), Laird's Large (red) and Mulligan (purple-red) cultivars of New Zealand tamarillo fruit were separated into pulp (endo- and mesocarp) and peel (exocarp), and analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for carotenoids, α-tocopherol and ascorbic acid contents. Fresh Mulligan pulp had the highest content of β-carotene (0.9 mg/100 g), α-tocopherol (1.9 mg/100 g), and ascorbic acid (28 mg/100 g). Higher concentrations of β-carotene and ascorbic acid, and lower concentrations of α-tocopherol were detected in pulps compared with peels. Compared with standard serves of other fruit, tamarillo had the highest β-carotene (9-20% RDI (recommended dietary intake)/serve), high ascorbic acid (67-75% RDI/serve), and α-tocopherol (16-23% adequate intake/serve). All cultivars had diverse carotenoid profiles dominated by provitamin A carotenoids (β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin) and xanthophyll carotenoids (lutein; zeaxanthin and antheraxanthin). Favorable growth conditions (high light intensity and low temperature) may explain the higher antioxidant vitamin content in New Zealand tamarillos compared to those from other countries. Tamarillo peels may be used as natural food coloring agent to reduce waste and deliver sustainable production.Entities:
Keywords: ascorbic acid; carotenoids; dietary antioxidants; provitamin A; tamarillo; α-tocopherol; β-carotene
Year: 2020 PMID: 32545178 PMCID: PMC7353566 DOI: 10.3390/foods9060769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) chromatograms of α-tocopherol, β-carotene and ascorbic acid standards.
Method validation for identification and quantification of α-tocopherol, β-carotene and ascorbic acid in peel and pulp of three New Zealand tamarillos.
| Parameters | α-Tocopherol | β-Carotene | Ascorbic Acid |
|---|---|---|---|
| RT (min) | 3.524 | 7.931 | 3.965 |
| Precursor ion ( | 431.0 | 537.0 | 175.0 |
| Product ion ( | 165.0 | 537.0 | 115.0 |
| Collision energy (V) | 32 | 1 | 8 |
| Regression equation | y = 4122.59x + 437.03 | y = x − 1741.49 | y = 1063.14x − 506.73 |
| Linear fit correlation coefficient2 | 0.9991 | 0.9998 | 0.9991 |
| Calibration range (mg/L) | 0.1563–20 | 0.1563–20 | 0.625–20 |
| Limit of detection (μg/L) | 0.1771 | 0.0258 | 0.8638 |
| Limit of quantification (μg/L) | 0.5366 | 0.0782 | 2.617 |
| Ion mode | Positive | Positive | Negative |
Figure 2Average contents of β-carotene (A), α-tocopherol (B), and ascorbic acid (C) in the peel and pulp of three New Zealand tamarillo cultivars (■ Amber, ■ Laird’s Large, ■ Mulligan). Data are presented as mean (mg/100 g FW) and error bar (standard deviation) (n = 3). Different letters indicate statistical difference (p < 0.05).
Quantity (mg) and recommended dietary intake (RDI) of vitamins that would be supplied by one serve of different tamarillo cultivars and other commonly consumed fruit in New Zealand [13]. Data was calculated based on the concentrations of the pulp samples.
| Fruit | Serving Size (g) | β-Carotene (mg/serve) | RDI of β-carotene | α-Tocopherol (mg/serve) | AI of α-Tocopherol | Ascorbic Acid (mg/serve) | RDI of Ascorbic Acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamarillos | |||||||
| Amber | 120 | 0.96 |
| 1.8 |
| 31.2 |
|
| Laird’s Large | 120 | 0.48 | 9% | 1.56 |
| 30 |
|
| Mulligan | 120 | 1.08 |
| 2.28 |
| 33.6 |
|
| Avocado | 85 | 0.041 | 1% | 1.61 |
| 6.2 |
|
| Blackcurrant | 118 | 0.189 | 4% | 0.94 | 9% | 189 |
|
| Blueberry | 157 | 0.012 | 0% | 1.41 |
| 6 |
|
| Boysenberry | 133 | 0.4 | 7% | 1.46 |
| 12.1 |
|
| Feijoa | 84 | 0.026 | 0% | 0.15 | 2% | 25.5 |
|
| Grapefruit | 118 | 0 | 0% | – | – | 47.2 |
|
| Kiwifruit | 100 | 0.049 | 1% | 1.7 |
| 122 |
|
| Lemon | 65 | – | – | – | – | 33.8 |
|
| Mandarin | 150 | 0.478 | 9% | 0.68 | 7% | 31.5 |
|
| Passion fruit | 18 | 0.002 | 0% | – | – | 3.6 | 8% |
| Persimmon | 83 | 0.058 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 42.2 |
|
| Raspberry | 136 | 0 | 0% | 0.48 | 5% | 18.5 |
|
| Strawberry | 175 | 0.01 | 0% | 0.72 | 7% | 79.8 |
|
RDI: recommended dietary intake [34]. AI: Adequate Intake (used when an RDI cannot be determined) 1 µg retinol (vitamin A) equivalent = 6 µg all trans β carotene RDI = 900 retinol equivalents. Vitamin E: AI = 10 mg, UL = 300 mg. Vitamin C: Estimated average requirement (EAR) = 30 mg, RDI = 45 mg. – : not identified. Bolded numbers are dietary source (>10% RDI) and bolded and underlined numbers are good source (>25% RDI) [35].
Pigment compounds and their relative contents identified in the pulp and peel of three tamarillo cultivars. The results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) and listed in the order of bioactive groups. Alphabets indicate statistical difference (p < 0.05) across each row.
| Pigments | Relative Concentration (mg/100 g FW) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Peel | Amber Pulp | Laird’s Large Peel | Laird’s Large Pulp | Mulligan Peel | Mulligan Pulp | |
| Provitamin A carotenoids | ||||||
| β-Carotene | 0.23 ± 0.07 a | 0.72 ± 0.19 b | 0.15 ± 0.02 a | 0.36 ± 0.1 a | 0.15 ± 0.03 a | 0.89 ± 0.2 b |
| β-Cryptoxanthin | 0.25 ± 0.08 a | 0.24 ± 0.04 a | 0.1 ± 0.01 b | 0.12 ± 0.03 b | 0.23 ± 0.05 a | 0.22 ± 0.04 a |
| Xanthophyll carotenoids | ||||||
| Astaxanthin | 0.02 ± 0.01 a | <0.005 b | 0.01 ± 0 b | <0.005 b | <0.005 b | <0.005 b |
| Violaxanthin | 0.04 ± 0.02 a | 0.02 ± 0.01 a,b | 0.04 ± 0.02 a | 0.01 ± 0 b | 0.04 ± 0.01 a | 0.02 ± 0.01 a,b |
| Diadinoxanthin | 0.01 ± 0.01 a | 0.01 ± 0 a,b | 0.01 ± 0.01 a,b | <0.005 b | 0.01 ± 0.01 a,b | 0.01 ± 0 a,b |
| Antheraxanthin | 0.15 ± 0.03 a | 0.09 ± 0.02 b,c | 0.09 ± 0.04 b | 0.04 ± 0.01 c | 0.07 ± 0.03 b,c | 0.11 ± 0.03 a,b |
| Dinoxanthin | <0.005 a | <0.005 a | <0.005 a | <0.005 a | <0.005 a | <0.005 b |
| Lutein | 0.13 ± 0.02 a,b,c | 0.17 ± 0.09 b,c | 0.06 ± 0.02 a | 0.08 ± 0.03 a | 0.09 ± 0.03 a,b | 0.2 ± 0.06 c |
| Flavoxanthin A | 0.02 ± 0 a,b | 0.02 ± 0.01 a,b | 0.01 ± 0 c | 0.02 ± 0.01 a | 0.01 ± 0.01 a,c | 0.03 ± 0 b |
| Diatoxanthin | <0.005 a | <0.005 a,b | n.d | n.d | n.d | <0.005 b |
| Zeaxanthin | 0.32 ± 0.06 a | 0.24 ± 0.08 ab | 0.11 ± 0.07 c,d | 0.06 ± 0.02 d | 0.06 ± 0.01 d | 0.2 ± 0.06 b,c |
| Siphonaxanthin | 0.01 ± 0.01 a | 0.01 ± 0 a | 0.01 ± 0.01 a | <0.005 a | 0.01 ± 0.01 a | <0.005 a |
| Caricaxanthin | n.d | <0.005 a | <0.005 a | n.d | n.d | n.d |
| Flavoxanthin B | 0.01 ± 0 a | 0.01 ± 0.01 a,b | <0.005 a | 0.01 ± 0.01 a,b | 0.01 ± 0 b | <0.005 a |
| Fucoxanthin | n.d | <0.005 a | n.d | <0.005 a | n.d | n.d |
| Chlorophyll pigments | ||||||
| Chlorophyll A | n.d | <0.005 a | <0.005 b | <0.005 b | <0.005 b | <0.005 b |
| Chlorophyll C1 | 0.01 ± 0.01 a | 0.02 ± 0.01 a | 0.03 ± 0.02 a | 0.01 ± 0.01 a | 0.02 ± 0.01 a | 0.02 ± 0.02 a |
| Chlorophyll C2 | 0.06 ± 0.01 a | <0.005 b | <0.005 b | <0.005 b | <0.005 b | <0.005 b |
| Chlorophyll C3 | 0.02 ± 0.01 a | <0.005 b | <0.005 b | <0.005 b | n.d | <0.005 b |
| Chlorophyll D | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d |
| Phaeophytin | n.d | 0.02 ± 0.01 a | n.d | 0.05 ± 0.01 a | n.d | 0.07 ± 0.05 a |
n.d: not detected. Means with different superscripts a,b,c,d are significantly different at p < 0.05.