Gold nanoparticles used in many types of nanostructure are mostly stabilized by citrate ligands. Fully understanding their dynamic surface chemistry is thus essential for applications, particularly since aging is frequently a problem. Using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in conjunction with density functional theory calculations, we are able to determine Au-citrate coordination in liquid with minimal invasiveness. We show that citrate coordination is mostly bidentate and simply controlled by its protonation state. More complex binding motifs are caused by interfering chloride ions and gold adatoms. With increasing age of stored gold nanoparticle suspensions, gold adatoms are found to move atop the Au facets and bind to an additional terminal carboxylate of the citrate. Aged nanoparticles are fully refreshed by removing these adatoms, using etching and subsequent boiling of the gold nanoparticles.
Gold nanoparticles used in many types of nanostructure are mostly stabilized by citrate ligands. Fully understanding their dynamic surface chemistry is thus essential for applications, particularly since aging is frequently a problem. Using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in conjunction with density functional theory calculations, we are able to determine Au-citrate coordination in liquid with minimal invasiveness. We show that citrate coordination is mostly bidentate and simply controlled by its protonation state. More complex binding motifs are caused by interfering chloride ions and gold adatoms. With increasing age of stored gold nanoparticle suspensions, gold adatoms are found to move atop the Au facets and bind to an additional terminal carboxylate of the citrate. Aged nanoparticles are fully refreshed by removing these adatoms, using etching and subsequent boiling of the gold nanoparticles.
Colloidal
gold nanoparticles
(AuNPs) form a fundamental building block in many applications across
nanotechnology as well as underpinning natural science. Over recent
decades, the synthesis of gold nanoparticles has been refined to yield
diverse shapes, sizes, and coatings.[1−3] Such AuNPs are now utilized
in immunoassays, drug-delivery systems, cancer therapy, catalysis,
microscopy, nanorobots, chemical sensing, and many more applications.[4−7] Synthesis of the prototypical colloidal system for spherical gold
nanoparticles is based on a simple reaction reducing auric acid with
either sodium citrate or sodium borohydride. Sodium citrate is particularly
interesting, as it is cheap and nontoxic and not only does it act
as the reducing agent but its negatively charged carboxylates are
also responsible for the charge stabilization of the AuNPs.As applications for citrate-capped gold nanoparticles become ever
more dependent on their precise surface chemistry, fully understanding
the citrate coordination and most crucially time-dependent rearrangements
(termed “aging”) on the AuNP surfaces is now essential.
Previous studies of citrate on metallic nanoparticles use various
spectroscopic techniques including attenuated total reflectance infrared
(ATR-IR),[8,9] Fourier transform infrared (FTIR),[10] X-ray photoelectron (XPS),[11] solid-state NMR,[12] and surface-enhanced
Raman spectroscopy (SERS)[13,14] reporting a wide range
of binding motifs (and contradicting each other). As demonstrated
below, we believe that this wide disparity of results is caused by
the high sensitivity of citrate binding to its chemical environment.
In order to provide a more complete picture, it is crucial to take
into account time dependence, pH, cations, and anions (specifically
chloride) and also the reconstruction of the gold surface itself.Here, we employ SERS, which is advantageous compared to previous
techniques (ssNMR, ATR-IR, XPS), as it records the vibrational signatures
of citrate anions directly in the liquid state and exclusively at
the metal interfaces of colloidal gold nanoparticles. We investigate
the effects of benign (Cucurbit[5]uril = CB[5]) and also more invasive
(e.g., NaCl) aggregating agents on citrate coordination.
Our plasma-cleaned AuNP films that mimic colloidal Au clusters without
the need for aggregating agents allow us to record SERS spectra in
the absence of chloride and citrate decomposition products.By this method, we provide strong evidence that the time- and temperature-dependent
rearrangement of citrate anions (from μ2 to μ4, c2 to c2t2, see Figure S6 for details on custom notation) on
the AuNP surface (aging) is driven by migration of Au adatoms on the
facet. As we show for CB[5], the increased binding affinity of citrate
inhibits ligand exchange. Aged AuNPs can simply be “refreshed”
by reconstructing the AuNP facets.With additional parameters
(age, pH, and ions), we find that it
is possible to unify previous results on citrate coordination found
in the literature: citrate coordinates in accordance with its protonation
state preferring bidentate binding with both carboxylateoxygens over
monodentate binding, which is only encountered in environments rich
in chloride ions. For pH < 6.8 bidentate bridging of the central
carboxylate (μ2-1κO1:2κO3, c2) is dominant, whereas only for pH > 6.8
are
modes of the terminal carboxylates bound independently of the central
carboxylate (e.g., μ4-1κO1′:2κO3′3κO1″:4κO3″, t2t2). In nanoparticle
clusters with sufficiently small gap sizes, we also see citrate spanning
across the nanogaps between neighboring nanoparticles. The presence
or absence of the citrate spanning mode is a handy tool to estimate
the gap size in AuNP nanoclusters.
Results and Discussion
Observing
Citrate Adatoms–AuNP Aging
Spherical
gold nanoparticles synthesized using the standard Turkevich/Frens
protocol serve as the basis of these aging investigations.[15,16] Stock AuNPs are synthesized to give average diameters of 50 ±
18 nm (Figure S1) at pH = 3.5 ± 0.1
and stored in three aliquots (50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes)
at different temperatures, 5 ± 0.5, 18 ± 2, and 28 ±
5 °C (Figure a, i, for detailed AuNP characterization see Figure S1).
Figure 1
Aging of AuNPs. (a, i) Protocol of AuNP aging;
(a, ii) protocol to form CB[5]:AuNP aggregates with
precise nanogaps of 0.9 nm; (a, iii) depiction of
CB[5] binding onto the AuNP surface displacing some of the citrate
anions. (b) Aging experiment over 35 days showing SERS spectra of
AuNP:CB[5] aggregates for AuNPs previously stored at 5, 18, and 28
°C. (c) Extracted CB[5] signature peak at 830 cm–1 (ring breathing mode). (d) Extracted citrate c2t2 peak at 1080 cm–1 for different temperatures
in (b), normalized to the CB[5] signature peak. (e, f) Proposed citrate
coordination in CB[5]:AuNP aggregates for fresh and aged AuNPs, showing
influence of thermally activated Au adatoms.
Aging of AuNPs. (a, i) Protocol of AuNP aging;
(a, ii) protocol to form CB[5]:AuNP aggregates with
precise nanogaps of 0.9 nm; (a, iii) depiction of
CB[5] binding onto the AuNP surface displacing some of the citrate
anions. (b) Aging experiment over 35 days showing SERS spectra of
AuNP:CB[5] aggregates for AuNPs previously stored at 5, 18, and 28
°C. (c) Extracted CB[5] signature peak at 830 cm–1 (ring breathing mode). (d) Extracted citrate c2t2 peak at 1080 cm–1 for different temperatures
in (b), normalized to the CB[5] signature peak. (e, f) Proposed citrate
coordination in CB[5]:AuNP aggregates for fresh and aged AuNPs, showing
influence of thermally activated Au adatoms.To probe the surface chemistry using SERS, the gold nanoparticles
are aggregated into clusters with the help of the linker molecule
cucurbit[5]uril (CB[5]), which acts as a precise molecular spacer
(Figure a, ii, see Figure S2 for alternative
salt aggregation).[17] A key advantage in
employing CB[5] (instead of a salt) is the highly reproducible SERS
spectra, which allow quantitative interpretation (such as calculating
activation energies, Figure S3). The CB[5]
molecules connect adjacent nanoparticles by displacing citrate (Figure a, iii) and binding to the gold surface via their carbonyl-rimmed
portals.[18] Any subtle change of the nanoparticle
surface chemistry is directly reflected in the SERS spectra.Over the course of 35 d aging of the AuNPs, SERS spectra of freshly
clustered CB[5]:AuNPs are taken after exactly 10 min of aggregation
time, giving different spectra for the three aliquots stored at different
temperatures (Figure b). Despite the excellent short-term reproducibility (<2%) of
CB[5]:AuNP aggregates (Figure S4), the
overall CB[5] signal diminishes, as tracked by the CB[5] signature
peak at 830 cm–1 (Figure c). The peak intensity drops by a half for T = 5 and 18 °C and even more for T = 28 °C to a quarter after 30 d. Concurrently, a range of peaks
emerge, which are not related to the CB[5] molecule. These vibrations
at 995, 1020, 1080, 1385, 1535, 1585, and 1604 cm–1 are ascribed to the presence of citrate anions on the gold surface
inside the nanogaps (see DFT in Figures S5 and S6). The temporal evolution of these peaks suggests that citrate
anions undergo temperature-dependent conformational changes (termed
aging), which partially inhibits CB[5] binding.Aggregates formed
from AuNPs stored at T = 28
°C give rise to a strongly increasing 1080 cm–1 vibration with aging (Figure d). This comes from the ν(CC) stretch (see DFT in Figure S6) and appears at this position only
if the central (c) and terminal (t) carboxylates are both bound (c2t2) to the same gold facet, forming a ring (Figure f). Here the subscript
2 indicates that a carboxylate has bidentate (μ2-1κO1:2κO3) binding (Figure e), with monodentate binding (1κO1) given by subscript 1 (see Figure S8 for kappa/mu convention naming scheme). This linear growth of the
c2t2 binding is much slower at lower temperature,
allowing extraction of its activation energy of ∼1.1 ±
0.2 eV (see Figure S3). This strongly suggests
that c2t2 binding can only occur upon reconstruction
of the Au surface through adatoms, which possess similar calculated
and measured activation energies on gold.[19,20] The emergence of the citrate-adatom peaks after aging shows that
CB[5] molecules are no longer able to displace the citrate from the
surface due to its greater (double) bidentate binding affinity. Eventually,
this leads to loss of aggregation and changes in other AuNP chemistries.
The time scales involved in this aging also match those for Auadatom
formation and migration under ambient conditions, which explains for
instance the need for refrigerated storage of SERS substrates (as
for Klarite).[21] In order to rule out other
effects, we investigate the role of monovalent cations and thermal
decomposition of citrate byproducts. Repeating the aging experiment
with nanoparticles synthesized with heavier K+ cations
instead of Na+ yields exactly the same result (see Figure S7). The lack of any shifts in vibrational
energies implies the role of cations can be neglected, as also suggested
by computational studies.[22]The SERS
spectra of the citrate byproducts acetone-dicarboxylate
(ADC), acetoacetate (AA), and acetate do not match the peaks emerging
in the aging experiments (see Figure S8). Such byproducts are formed during the AuNP reaction as citrate
is consumed and also after the reaction through thermal decomposition.
The activation energies for the thermal decomposition of ADC[23] and AA[24] are similar to the adatom activation
energy. However, rapid decomposition through decarboxylation occurs
within a few minutes to a maximum of a few days after AuNP synthesis
(see see Tables S2 and S3 for rate calculations).[25] Gold nanoparticles synthesized directly from
ADC do not resemble the aging peaks (see Figure S9). Swapping the supernatant between fresh and aged nanoparticles
neither ages the fresh nor refreshes the aged particles. Finally,
in a byproduct-free environment, the adatom-driven effect can also
be reproduced (see section 4). It is thus implausible that the aging
effects are caused by any citrate byproducts.
Citrate-Bound Adatoms:
Reactivation via “Refaceting”
Having shown strong evidence that Au adatoms control the chemical
changes in ligand binding, we demonstrate how to reverse this aging
by etching the AuNPs with a strong oxidizing agent such as auric chloride
(HAuCl4). This procedure removes weakly bound gold atoms
from edges, steps, and vertices[26,27] and therefore can attack
gold adatoms coordinated to citrate anions (Figure a).
Figure 2
Refreshing gold nanoparticles. (a) Aging by
adatoms (red) is reversed
by adding HAuCl4 to preformed CB[5]:AuNP aggregates assembled
from aged AuNPs, followed by boiling for 5 min. (b) Model of aging/reversal
process showing changing citrate coordination. (c) In situ time-dependent monitoring of SERS spectra during auric chloride
etching (reactivation), with (d) SERS strengths from CB[5], 1080 cm–1 adatom, and 995 cm–1 gap-spanning
citrate peaks.
Refreshing gold nanoparticles. (a) Aging by
adatoms (red) is reversed
by adding HAuCl4 to preformed CB[5]:AuNP aggregates assembled
from aged AuNPs, followed by boiling for 5 min. (b) Model of aging/reversal
process showing changing citrate coordination. (c) In situ time-dependent monitoring of SERS spectra during auric chloride
etching (reactivation), with (d) SERS strengths from CB[5], 1080 cm–1 adatom, and 995 cm–1 gap-spanning
citrate peaks.To monitor the etching process in situ, CB[5]-bound
aggregates are formed over 10 min using aged gold nanoparticles. After
aggregation, facet etching is initiated through addition of chloroauric
acid to a final concentration of 125 μM. Since the acid is added
to the AuNPs at room temperature, the presence of citrate does not
induce nucleation or significant growth (see Figure S10), as is the case during NP synthesis. The in situ SERS spectra (Figure b) resolve citrate peaks showing rapid adatom removal through the
disappearance of the 1080 cm–1 ν(CC) bidentate
binding (Figure c).
Detachment of the terminal carboxylates from adjacent AuNPs is also
seen as the decay of citrate vibrations ν(CC) = 995 cm–1, νa(COO) = 1535 cm–1, and νa(COO) = 1585 cm–1. The persisting νa(COO) = 1604 cm–1 vibration (Figure c, red arrow) shows that the
central carboxylate remains bound (c2).Subsequent
boiling in the presence of citrate anneals and reconstructs
the etched facets, restoring the CB[5]SERS peak. The unbound terminal
carboxylates again bind to the surface of the adjacent AuNP, giving
terminal-spanning bound citrate but without evidence of any adatoms.
The restored AuNP aggregates now behave with the same SERS sensing
capability as previously observed. The control measurement, boiling
aged AuNPs without adding HAuCl4, leads to an increase
of citrateadatom signals (see Figure S11).
Citrate Coordination in the Nanogap
From this understanding
of aging as adatom-induced reconfiguration of citrate anions on gold
facets, the general configuration of citrate ions inside nanogaps
formed between adjacent nanoparticles can be investigated, for both
fresh and aged nanoparticles.To determine more carefully the
citrate configurations inside smaller nanogaps, aggregates are instead
formed by salting (reducing the screening length) using either concentrated
sodium chloride (NaCl) or trisodium citrate (TSC) buffer solution
with pH matching that of the nanoparticle suspension. For freshly
made AuNPs aggregated with TSC, the SERS spectra (Figure a, i) reveal
coordination only via the central carboxylate (c2, red, bonds in Figure b). With full protonation of the non-surface-bound terminal
carboxylates at pH = 3.5, neighboring citrate anions should form carboxylic
acid dimers (seen in characteristic dimer vibrations at 1700–1715
cm–1, see Figure S4),
which are only weakly Raman active.[28]
Figure 3
Citrate
coordination in nanogaps. (a) SERS signals for both aggregation
agents at pH = 3.5, using fresh and aged AuNPs. (b, c) Proposed models
of citrate coordination inside nanogaps in AuNP aggregates for (b)
freshly made or (c) aged nanoparticles, formed using excess trisodium
citrate (top) or sodium chloride (bottom).
Citrate
coordination in nanogaps. (a) SERS signals for both aggregation
agents at pH = 3.5, using fresh and aged AuNPs. (b, c) Proposed models
of citrate coordination inside nanogaps in AuNP aggregates for (b)
freshly made or (c) aged nanoparticles, formed using excess trisodium
citrate (top) or sodium chloride (bottom).Forming fresh AuNP aggregates instead with excess NaCl generates
a different spectrum (Figure a, iii) in which the dominant citrate mode
changes from c2 to the gap-spanning c2–t2t2 (995 cm–1) (blue, bonds in Figure b). Here the dash
(−) separates groups bound to different nanoparticle surfaces.
In addition to the centrally bound carboxylate, the two terminal carboxylates
also coordinate with the neighboring nanoparticle while spanning the
nanogap (nanogap size estimate is 0.8 to 1.0 nm, see Figure S12). For this to occur, the citrate surface coverage
needs to be low enough to allow access to the Au surface. For TSC-salted
aggregates, addition of excess citrate instantaneously increases the
surface coverage so that spanning cannot happen due to steric crowding,
in contrast to NaCl aggregation. In addition to citrate rearrangement
with NaCl, a distinct shift from bidentate to monodentate coordination
is observed via the increasing C–O–Au
stretch[29] at ∼1300 cm–1 (dashed vertical line) together with the decreasing 1385 cm–1 symmetric COO––Au stretch,
as well as the emerging 1680 cm–1 C=O stretch
of the unbound oxygen (black arrow). We speculate that addition of
chloride anions near the gold surface (as surface chlorides) prevents
citrate from bidentate binding.[30−32] Low-wavenumber vibrations ascribed
to Au–Cl bonds indicate the presence of adsorbed chloride on
the Au surface (see Figure S13).[33,34] Further control measurements using salts containing mono- or divalent
anions with and without chloride ions (MgCl2, CaCl2, Na acetate, Mg citrate) confirm this hypothesis (see Figure S14).Using aged nanoparticles with
TSC (Figure a, ii), the characteristic
ν(CC) vibration at 1080 cm–1 (marked in green,
with bond in Figure c) clearly shows the adatom-induced c2t2 mode.
The shoulder around 1630 cm–1 (orange, ii) for deprotonated carboxylates likely stems from the dangling terminal
carboxylate of the c2t2 mode. Evidence is again
seen for intermolecular hydrogen bonding via the
carboxylic dimer formation (1700–1710 cm–1) between c2 citrates. Using NaCl-salted aged AuNP aggregates
(Figure a, iv) gives very similar SERS spectra to the fresh AuNPs,
apart from the adatom-induced c2t2 mode (green).
An additional asymmetric carboxylate–Au stretch at 1585 cm–1 suggests that the adatom-coordinated citrate can
also span the nanogap (orange, iv). This is supported
by the disappearance of the shoulder at ∼1630 cm–1 related to strain. Furthermore, loss of the 1020 cm–1 peak suggests that both (c,t) carboxylates are now fully coordinated.
Evidence for monodentate binding from peaks at 1300 and 1680 cm–1 again suggests chloride ions interfere with bidentate
binding.Results for fresh and aged AuNPs buffered at higher
pH values (most
commercial NPs are stabilized close to pH = 7) suggest that more citrate
coordination modes are present (Figure S2 and Table S1).
Citrate Coordination in
AuNP Films
Salting of gold
nanoparticles is thus invasive since it clearly changes how citrate
is coordinated to the gold nanoparticle surface. To determine the
intrinsic citrate signals, an alternative SERS substrate is employed
consisting of 1–3 layers of close-packed nanoparticles. To
remove all ligands (polymers, citrate, and all decomposition products)
from the commercially synthesized nanoparticles employed, these substrates
are O2 plasma cleaned for 30 min. From the SEM images (Figure a, close-up in insets
and Figure S15) it is evident that the
AuNP shape remains intact and no bridges between particles are formed
after treatment.[35] Comparing SERS measurements
before and after the plasma treatment (Figure b) shows all organic compounds are removed
from the films (red line), with only a layer of hydroxyl groups left
on the surface (giving the low ν(Au–OH) = 590 cm–1 peak).
Figure 4
Organic-stripped AuNP films. (a) SEM images
of AuNP films before
and after O2 plasma treatment with insets showing close-ups.
(b) SERS spectra before and after O2 plasma treatment,
evidencing ligand removal and OH layer (from ambient moisture). (c)
(i) SERS spectra normalized to symmetric carboxylate
stretch at ∼1380 cm–1 from treated AuNP films
with added citrate vs pH, together with (ii) details of ν(CC) peak and (iii) peak ratios. (d) Experimental protocol of accelerated aging, showing
heating of AuNP films directly after O2 plasma cleaning
leads to formation of adatoms, (e) seen in resulting SERS spectra.
Heated films resemble adatom response of aged colloidal AuNPs.
Organic-stripped AuNP films. (a) SEM images
of AuNP films before
and after O2 plasma treatment with insets showing close-ups.
(b) SERS spectra before and after O2 plasma treatment,
evidencing ligand removal and OH layer (from ambient moisture). (c)
(i) SERS spectra normalized to symmetric carboxylate
stretch at ∼1380 cm–1 from treated AuNP films
with added citrate vs pH, together with (ii) details of ν(CC) peak and (iii) peak ratios. (d) Experimental protocol of accelerated aging, showing
heating of AuNP films directly after O2 plasma cleaning
leads to formation of adatoms, (e) seen in resulting SERS spectra.
Heated films resemble adatom response of aged colloidal AuNPs.After immersing the treated films for 24 h in TSC
solution, SERS
spectra are taken with a droplet of the TSC solution left on the surface
to maintain a similar environment to that for the suspended aggregates.
To investigate the pH-dependence of citrate binding, a pH series between
1.4 and 8.3 is prepared by immersing the films in mixtures of TSC
and citric acid. The SERS spectra (Figure c, i) resemble those of
the TSC-salted colloidal aggregates (as compared to Figure S4). The absence of 1300 and 1680 cm–1 peaks implies that coordination is purely through bidentate bridging.
Again, the addition of chloride ions to the AuNP films instantaneously
generates some monodentate coordination as for colloidal aggregates
salted with NaCl (see Figure S16).Tracking the CC stretches (Figure c, ii, iii) shows
that the citrate coordination modes reflect the protonation states
of citrate set by its three pKa values
at 3.13 (central carboxylate) and 4.76 and 6.39 (terminal carboxylates).[36] Below pH = 6.5 citrate binding is again dominated
by the 1020 cm–1 vibration and therefore the c2 mode (Figure c, ii, iii, red). There is evidence
of dangling carboxylates for 3.5 < pH < 5.3 (Figure c, i, orange
arrow), but the absence of a strong 1080 cm–1 vibration
suggest that the adatom-driven mode c2t2 is
not present. Instead with a further increase of pH, spanning of the
nanogap with the modes c2–t2 and c2–t2t2 occurs, as seen by the
emerging vibrations at 975 cm–1 (light blue) and
995 cm–1 (dark blue). Above pH = 6.5 (where most
commercial NPs are stabilized) a decrease of 1020 cm–1 and steep increase of 975 cm–1 vibrations are
observed. Along with the loss of the central (red arrow) and gain
of the terminal (blue arrow) asymmetric COO––Au
stretches, additional citrate binding with only the terminal carboxylates
is found (Figure c, i). The strong ν(CCOO–) mode (black
arrow) at 925 cm–1 related to the unbound central
carboxylate is only present for t2t2 coordination.
Aging in AuNP Films
There are two separate pathways
for the aging of AuNP films and suspensions. For aged AuNP films with
their close-packed AuNPs (pH = 3.5, 18 °C), the citrate anions
preferentially span the gap (c2-t2t2) with both terminal carboxylates (Figure S17). This is different from aging of suspended individual AuNPs, where
spanning cannot occur. Instead, migrating adatoms attract one of the
terminal carboxylates to form the c2t2 mode.
After aggregation, the c2t2 mode can then transition
to c2t2–t2 inside the nanogaps
depending on the gap size.In order to observe the c2t2 mode in AuNP films, adatoms have to be generated before
the films are immersed in TSC solution. This is achieved by heating
a plasma-cleaned film to ∼100 °C for 10 min (Figure e). After cooling
to room temperature, control and heated films are immersed in the
same TSC solution for 24 h. The SERS spectra from the heated AuNP
films (Figure e) resemble
those of aged colloidal aggregates, showing the c2t2 modes together with c2–t2t2. The control sample exhibits only the usual c2 mode as expected for pH = 3.5. This shows that a detailed understanding
of the citrate-binding modalities and the SERS peaks produced allows
a full reconstruction and control of the citrate ligands on gold.
Overview of Adatom Experiments
A summary of experiments
supporting the adatom-driven reconfiguration of citrate anions on
the AuNP surface is shown in Table . It contains the name of each experiment, the parameters
that have been controlled, the experimental conditions, and its key
results. To make it easier for the reader to find the data, we have
added references to the corresponding figures in the main text and
also the Supporting Information.
Table 1
Summary of Experiments Carried Out
to Support the Hypothesis of Citrate Reconfiguration Driven by the
Formation of Gold Adatoms
Experiment
Parameter
Conditions
Key
results
Figure
AuNP:CB[5] aging
time
0 to
35 days aging
adatom signals emerge over time
1
AuNP:CB[5] aging
cations
time
trisodium (Na+) vs tripotassium
(K+) citrate AuNPs
same adatom signals over
time, no influence of cations
S7
AuNPs salted (NaCl, TSC) aging
time pH
5 mM, citrate-buffered pH = 3.8, 5.5, 6.8
adatom signals
observed, less intense for higher pH
S2
SERS of decomposition products
AuNP film vs suspension
peak positions
not related to citrate adatoms
S8
acetone-dicarboxylate AuNPs
fresh vs aged
peak positions not related to citrate
adatoms
S9
AuNP boiling with
HAuCl4
pH = 3.5 (before addition
of HAuCl4)
aging peaks removed
2
AuNP boiling without HAuCl4
pH = 3.5
aging peaks
intensify
S11
AuNP film accelerated
aging
film heated to T = 100 °C, then exposed
to TSC solution
adatom peaks same as in solution
4(e,f)
AuNP film aging
time
0 to 87 days
adatom peaks not observed, but citrate bridges AuNPs
S17
Conclusion
Our analysis of the SERS of colloidal gold in liquid provides a
nuanced account of the complexity of citrate binding to Au, which
has previously led to a wide variety of interpretations. By analyzing
multiple parameters such as pH, time-dependence (aging), and the influence
of the chemical environment (chloride), we are able to provide a complete
picture of citrate coordination.We show that the dominant coordination
mode of citrate (pH <
6.8) is the bidentate bridging of the central carboxylate (c2). For even higher pH values (>6.8), unbound central carboxylates
can be seen. We prove that surface-bound citrate anions almost exclusively
prefer bidentate over monodentate binding. Only in a chloride-rich
environment is monodentate binding present. For citrate trapped inside
sub-nanometer gaps, citrate molecules can be observed to span across
the nanogap while coordinating all three carboxylates in either the
c2–t2t2 or c2t2–t2 modes for fresh or aged nanoparticles,
respectively.With increasing age of stored gold nanoparticle
suspensions, gold
adatoms move atop the Au facets and bind to one of the terminal carboxylates,
yielding the double bidentate bridging mode (c2t2). These are rather stable, making citrate difficult to remove or
undergo surface diffusion. We find that the adatom signals are independent
of monovalent cations (K+vs Na+) and also of citrate decomposition products present in solution.
To what extent the adatom–citrate complex and its formation
kinetics depend on the type of surface facets is still an open question.Aged nanoparticles can be fully refreshed by removing these adatoms,
using etching, and subsequent boiling of the gold nanoparticles. Our
demonstration that Au adatoms play a crucial role gives much better
control of their utilization for sensing and other nanoassembly-based
technologies. This is crucial for widespread adoption in new generations
of functional materials and devices.
Experimental
Methods
AuNP Synthesis
Sodium citratetribasic dihydrate, potassium
citrate tribasic monohydrate, lithium citrate tribasic tetrahydrate,
and tetrachloroauric(III) acid trihydrate of analytical grade were
purchased from Merck/Sigma-Aldrich. To yield particles with an average
diameter of ∼50 nm, a gold/citrate ratio of 1.33 is employed.
A 2.28 mL amount of a 152 mM solution of citrate was added to 150
mL of a 0.38 mM chloroauric acid solution under reflux with vigorous
stirring. Reflux was continued for a further 15 min after the citrate
addition. The resulting wine-red suspension was allowed to cool to
room temperature for 1 h.
SERS/Raman Measurements
All Raman
and SERS measurements
used a Renishaw inVia Raman instrument. The excitation source is a
785 nm infrared laser with 147 mW of laser power available at the
objective. For solution measurements, the focal plane of the 5×
objective was always set to slightly below the air/liquid interface
by maximizing the counts through a z-axis scan. Each
solution spectrum was taken with full laser power 10 seconds integration
time (if not otherwise stated) and integrated over three acquisitions.
For the measurements of AuNP films, a 20× objective was focused
using an imaging camera. The integration time was set to 10 seconds
and three acquisitions were taken, with the laser power limited to
0.5% of full power. Liquid measurements were performed using polypropylene
96-well plates with 340 μL capacity per well.
AuNP Aggregate
Preparation
For the formation of CB[5]:AuNP
aggregates, 6.3 μL of a 125 μM solution of CB[5], synthesized
and separated according to the protocol mentioned by Barrow etal.,[37] was
added to 333 μL of the homemade nanoparticles. Exactly 10 min
was allowed for nanoclusters to form before taking SERS spectra. Salted
nanoparticles were prepared by using 30 μL of 0.5 M NaCl solution
or 1 M citrate solution. For the pH experiments, the pH of the citrate
solution was adjusted by mixing 1 M trisodium citrate and 1 M citric
acid.
DFT Calculations
Geometry optimization and frequency
calculation were performed using the hybrid functional PBE0 (PBE1PBE)
with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set and the Los Alamos ECP double-ζ
basis set for Au atoms and clusters.[38] Solvent
effects were considered using the polarizable continuum model (PCM)
solvation model. For all calculations the Gaussian 09 ab initio software suite was employed.[39] The Raman
intensities were corrected for the uniform polarizability in the plasmonic
gaps. This is achieved by extracting the polarizability tensors from
the Gaussian output file and recalculating the intensities.[40]
Authors: Mark Turner; Vladimir B Golovko; Owain P H Vaughan; Pavel Abdulkin; Angel Berenguer-Murcia; Mintcho S Tikhov; Brian F G Johnson; Richard M Lambert Journal: Nature Date: 2008-08-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: You-Jin Lee; Nicholas B Schade; Li Sun; Jonathan A Fan; Doo Ri Bae; Marcelo M Mariscal; Gaehang Lee; Federico Capasso; Stefano Sacanna; Vinothan N Manoharan; Gi-Ra Yi Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Tae Hwan Shin; Da Yeon Lee; Yong Eun Jang; Do Hyeon Kwon; Ji Su Hwang; Seok Gi Kim; Chan Seo; Man Jeong Paik; Ju Yeon Lee; Jin Young Kim; Seokho Park; Sung-E Choi; Shaherin Basith; Myeong Ok Kim; Gwang Lee Journal: Cells Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 7.666