Somsubhra Saha1, Bipan Dutta2, Manash Ghosh3, Joydeep Chowdhury1. 1. Department of Physics, Jadavpur University, 188, Raja S.C. Mallick Rd, Kolkata 700032, India. 2. Department of Physics, Sammilani Mahavidyalaya, Baghajatin Station, E. M. Bypass, Kolkata 700094, India. 3. Department of Spectroscopy, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Kolkata 700032, India.
Abstract
This paper reports the adsorptive behavior of the 4-mercaptopyridine (4MPy) molecule soaked in gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) that remain embedded in the bilayer Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) film matrix of stearic acid (SA) for various soaking times (STs). The as-fabricated substrate proved to be an efficient SERS sensing platform that can sense the analyte 4MPy molecules at trace concentrations of ∼1.0 × 10-9 M. The XPS study not only reveals the adsorption of 4Mpy molecules with AuNPs via a sulfur atom but also suggests partial degradation of the analyte molecule upon adsorption. This observation is further substantiated from the SERS spectral profile, which shows unusual broadening of the enhanced Raman bands of the molecule at higher STs. The experimental observations are supported by Born-Oppenheimer on-the-fly molecular dynamics (BO-OF-MD), time-resolved wavelet transform theory (WT), and the DFT calculations based on adcluster models. Selective enhancements of Raman bands in the SERS spectra further suggest the involvement of charge transfer (CT) interaction to the overall enhancements of Raman bands of the analyte molecule. The molecule → CT contribution has been estimated from electron density difference calculations and the corresponding CT distance; the amount of CT is also envisaged.
This paper reports the adsorptive behavior of the 4-mercaptopyridine (4MPy) molecule soaked in gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) that remain embedded in the bilayer Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) film matrix of stearic acid (SA) for various soaking times (STs). The as-fabricated substrate proved to be an efficient SERS sensing platform that can sense the analyte 4MPy molecules at trace concentrations of ∼1.0 × 10-9 M. The XPS study not only reveals the adsorption of 4Mpy molecules with AuNPs via a sulfur atom but also suggests partial degradation of the analyte molecule upon adsorption. This observation is further substantiated from the SERS spectral profile, which shows unusual broadening of the enhanced Raman bands of the molecule at higher STs. The experimental observations are supported by Born-Oppenheimer on-the-fly molecular dynamics (BO-OF-MD), time-resolved wavelet transform theory (WT), and the DFT calculations based on adcluster models. Selective enhancements of Raman bands in the SERS spectra further suggest the involvement of charge transfer (CT) interaction to the overall enhancements of Raman bands of the analyte molecule. The molecule → CT contribution has been estimated from electron density difference calculations and the corresponding CT distance; the amount of CT is also envisaged.
Surface-enhanced
Raman scattering (SERS) spectroscopy[1] has
opened up new horizons not only in the offing
of analytical sciences but also in elucidating the physics and chemistry
of the surfaces.[2−7] Although the underlying reason behind colossal enhancements in the
Raman signals has now been unanimously acclaimed to originate broadly
from electromagnetic (EM) and charge transfer (CT) mechanisms, there
however has been renewed interest in fabricating new SERS active substrates
and understanding their adsorptive behaviors with the aid of improved
adatom models.[8−11] While fabrications of new SERS active substrates that offer promising
applications in the real-world diagnostics and in forensic sciences
have gained significant attention from material scientists these days,[12−15] improved ad-cluster molecule–metal (M, n = 1 to 20) models from
quantum chemical calculations proved to be effective in understanding
their adsorptive behaviors.[16−21]Considering the above issues, the present paper reports facile
fabrication of a SERS active substrate through integration of self-assembly
and Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) deposition techniques. Efficacy
of the as-fabricated substrate has been tested from the SERS spectra
of the analyte 4-mercaptopyridine (4MPy) molecule. The adsorptive
site of the analyte molecule with the substrate has been investigated
in detail from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies. The
experimental observations are aided by Born–Oppenheimer on-the-fly
molecular dynamics (BO-OF-MD), time-resolved wavelet transform theory,
and density functional theory (DFT) calculations based on analyte
molecule–metal adcluster models. To the best of our knowledge,
this paper may be considered the first ever report where the most
probable molecule–adcluster model has been proposed from BO-OF-MD
followed by DFT calculations. The CT contribution to the overall enhancement
of the SERS spectra of the 4MPy molecule has also been envisaged from
electron density difference (EDD) studies.
Experimental
Procedure
Materials and Methods
Spectroscopic
grade 4MPy molecule, ∼95% purity; stearic acid (SA), >99%
purity;
and chloroauric acid (HAuCl4), 99.995% purity were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich and were used as received. Trisodium citrate (∼99%
purity), ethanol (>99% purity), and acetone (≥99% purity)
were
purchased from E-Merck (Germany) and were used without further purification.
Spectral grade chloroform was purchased from SRL India and was used
as received. The glassware used in the entire course of the experiment
was vigorously cleaned with freshly prepared aqua regia, rinsed with
distilled water, and dried in a hot oven before use. All of the required
solutions were prepared using triple distilled deionized water (∼18.2
MΩ cm resistivity and pH ∼ 6.8) from the Milli-Q-plus
system from Millipore Corporation, USA.Quasi-spherical gold
nanocolloids (AuNCs) of an average particle size of ∼55 nm
in diameter were synthesized by a citrate reduction method following
the recipe proposed by Frens.[22,23] The bilayer LB films
of SA were lifted on the precleaned quartz substrates by the Y-type
deposition technique using a computer controlled LB trough (Model
No. D2007) manufactured by the “Apex Instruments”. Chloroform
was used as a solvent which readily dissolves SA. The subphase of
the LB trough was filled with triple distilled deionized water. The
pressure–area (π–A) isotherm plot of SA was estimated
with a film balance, and the surface pressure was calibrated by the
Wilhelmy plate using filter paper. About 80 μL of SA in chloroform
solvent (∼1 mg/mL) was slowly and carefully dispensed with
the help of a microsyringe at the air–water interface of the
LB trough. The chloroform solvent was then allowed to evaporate by
keeping the system undisturbed for 20 min. Evaporations of the solvent
molecules eventually allow the amphiphilic SAs to settle as a floating
monolayer at the air–water interface on the LB trough. The
floating SA molecules in the LB trough were compressed by slowly moving
the barrier at a constant speed of 2 mm/min. The π–A
isotherm plot was monitored during the entirety of the compression
steps. The LB film of SA was then dipped in AuNCs for 24 h and finally
dried in a hot air oven to remove the excess metal ions from the surface
of the film. We designate this final LB film substrate accomplished
after dipping in AuNC as the “as prepared substrate”
(APS).
Instrumentation
The UV–vis
electronic absorption spectra of AuNC, APS, and the APS soaked in
an aqueous solution (1.0 × 10–9 M) of 4MPy
were recorded using a Jasco UV–vis absorption spectrometer
(model no: V-630). The absorption spectra of AuNC and APS were recorded
directly from the colloidal suspension and from the LB film substrate,
respectively. The electronic absorption spectra of the APS substrates
after being soaked in the 4MPy solution for 1, 1.5, and 2 h were also
recorded from the modified LB film substrates. The normal Raman (NR)
and the surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectra were recorded
with a J-Y Horiba Confocal Triple Raman Spectrometer (Model: T 64000)
fitted with gratings of 1800 groove/mm and a TE cooled Synapse CCD
detector from J-Y Horiba. An aliquot containing 50 μL of aqueous
solution of 1 M 4MPy was drop-casted on a quartz slide and was allowed
to dry before recording the NR spectrum. For SERS measurements, the
gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) embedded in the LB film substrates of SA
were soaked in 1.0 × 10–9 M aqueous solution
of 4MPy for 1, 1.5, and 2 h. The substrates were then removed from
the solution and allowed to dry before recording the SERS spectra.
The samples were then excited using a 632.8 nm red line of the He–Ne
laser [Spectra Physics, USA (Model.Stabilite2017)] with a spot diameter
and laser power of ∼1 μm and ∼60 μW, respectively.
The scattered signals were collected at a 180° scattering angle
to the excitations from an Olympus open stage microscope of 50×
objective. The detector and the data acquisition were controlled by
Lab Spec 5 software as provided by Horiba. The acquisition times for
recording both the NR and SERS spectra were fixed at 20 s. The surface
morphology of the LB films was recorded from FESEM (JEOL JSM 7600F)
at 15 kV excitation energy. The AFM studies were accomplished using
the NTEGRA system with a resolution of 1 nm from NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments.
The XPS analyses have been performed on the as-prepared SERS active
substrates with an ULVAC PHI 5000 Versa Probe-II, operating at 1.6
×
10–6 Pascals of pressure. An Al Kα (hυ = 1486.6 eV) X-ray source with a fixed operating
power at 25 W and X-ray focus area 100 μm in diameter was used
as a source to irradiate the substrates. The binding energy scales
were calibrated from the C 1s photoelectron peak centered at ∼284.8
eV. The narrow scan XPS spectra were recorded using an analyzer pass
energy of 58.7 eV with an energy step size of 0.125 eV.
Computational Details
The BO-OF-MD
simulations had been carried out using the CPMD program operated in
a Linux environment.[24] The 4Mpy molecule
and bulk gold (Au) atoms with ρAu ∼ 19.32
g/cm3 [25] were placed
in a simple cubic cell of dimensions 10.0 Å. Periodic boundary
conditions were applied on the cell with 10 Å edges to ensure
no appreciable interactions between the periodic images. The BO-OF-MD
simulations were then executed in the NVT ensemble at room temperature
over an equilibrium time of 30 ps. The time step was set to ∼0.1
fs. The temperature of the ensemble was controlled through a Nose–Hoover
thermostat.[26,27] The gradient corrected Perdew,
Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) functional[28] had been utilized to model the electronic exchange and correlation
factors. Core electrons were treated with the pseudopotentials of
Troullier and Martins,[29] while valence
electrons were represented by a plane-wave basis set truncated at
an extended energy cutoff of 80 Ry. The simulated data and the respective
snap shots were visualized using the VMD[30] visualization software.The DFT calculations were accomplished
using the Gaussian-09 suite of software[31] using the B3LYP[32,33] exchange correlation functional.
For structural optimizations and calculations of vibrational frequencies,
the 6-31++g(d,p) basis was used for the light elements (C, H, N, and
S) of the 4MPy molecule. For gold cluster models, the valence and
the core electrons of Au atoms were defined by the pseudopotential
LANL2DZ basis set. The vibrational frequencies of the respective molecule–metal
cluster models, so attained using the B3LYP/6-31++g(d,p) [for C, H,
N, and S]/LANL2DZ (for Au atoms) level of theory, had been scaled
with a scaling factor 0.98. In the process of geometry optimization
for the fully relaxed method with very tight criteria, convergence
of all of the calculations without any imaginary values in the vibrational
frequencies presage the accomplishment of local minima on the potential
energy surfaces. The electron densities of the 4Mpy molecule and the
Au atoms have been calculated using the B3LYP/6-31++g(d,p) [for C,
H, N, and S] and B3LYP/LANL2DZ levels of theory, respectively. However,
for the molecule–metal cluster models, the electron density
differences (EDD) have been estimated using the B3LYP/6-31++g(d,p)
[for C, H, N, and S]/LANL2DZ (for Au atoms) level of theory.The intensities of the Raman bands (IRaman) have been estimated from the differential Raman scattering cross
section (DRSC) (dσ/dΩ) values using
the following expression:[34−36]where σ and Ω signify the scattering
cross section and the solid angle at which the scattered light signal
is collected, while h, c, kB, and T represent the Planck
constant, speed of light, Boltzmann constant, and Kelvin temperature,
respectively. The frequencies (in cm–1) of the incident
light and the “ith” vibrational mode
are depicted by ω0 and ω, respectively. The Raman scattering factor (Å4/amu) for the “ith” normal mode of
vibration is expressed as where (dα/q) and (dγ/d) represent
the derivatives of the isotropic and anisotropic polarizabilities
α and γ with respect to the “Qth” normal mode, respectively.The 4-mercaptopyridine (4MPy) molecule is reported to exist in
protonated–deprotonated and in thiol–thione tautomeric
forms at neutral pH (pH ∼ 7).[37,38] However, from
our earlier study[39] and from the studies
reported elsewhere,[37,38,40,41] it is seen that, in the surface adsorbed
state, 4MPy molecules exist in the protonated thione (4MPyH) as well
as in the deprotonated thione (4MPyD) forms at neutral pH (pH ∼
7). The wavelet transform (WT) theory had thus been applied to estimate
the time-resolved vibrational spectra for both 4MPyH and 4MPyD forms
of the 4MPy molecule in the presence of a Au cluster system using
the BO-OF-MD calculations. The vibrational signatures of 4MPyH and
4MPyD in the vicinity of the Au cluster were obtained from the Fourier
transform of the trajectories so generated from the BO-OF-MD calculations.[36] The stretching distances of atoms as a function
of time linked with the vibrational modes of the molecule were elicited
from the BO-OF-MD trajectories. The VDOS of the corresponding normal
modes were then attained with the aid of Fourier transformation. Thereafter,
the wavelet transform was applied for the estimation of frequency
as a function of time for individual vibrational modes of the molecule.The wavelet transform W(s) in the reciprocal space is expressed as[36]where ω represents
the angular frequency for the kth normal
mode and F and ψ̂
are the Fourier transformations of the time series F and the mother wavelet ψ(t), respectively. The mother wavelet ψ(t) is represented as[42]Here, the parameters ω0 and
σ are considered from previous literature.[36,43] Successful applications of the above functional form of the mother
wavelet ψ(t) as reported elsewhere and are
known to reproduce the Fourier power spectrum accurately.[36,42−44]
Results and Discussions
The room temperature surface pressure (π)–area (A)
isotherm plot of SA is shown in Figure S1 under section S1 of the Supporting Information.
UV–Vis
Electronic Absorption Spectra
of the AuNC and APS
The room-temperature UV–vis absorption
spectrum of the as synthesized AuNC is shown in Figure . AuNCs show a single absorption maximum
peak at ∼534 nm. This band is ascribed to bulk-like surface
plasmon resonance (BL-SPR) and had been extensively reported elsewhere.[45,46] The electronic absorption spectrum of the APS is shown in Figure , trace b. The spectrum
is marked by the decrease in intensity of the BL-SPR band at ∼542
nm along with the appearance of an intense broad maximum at ∼692
nm in the low energy window. The low energy band at ∼692 nm
is attributed to the surface-like surface plasmon resonance (SL-SPR)
and is known to arise due to dipole–dipole interaction of the
aggregated AuNPs on the bilayer LB film matrix of SA.[45−47] The optical signature of this low energy band in the UV–vis
electronic absorption spectrum primarily illustrates the existence
of gap-plasmonic domains of gold nanoparticles which in turn is known
to promote the generation of “hot spots” on the APS.
These “hot spots” are recognized to be the special locations
on the substrate where the electric fields are strongly localized
and the probe molecules trapped within those spots exhibit colossal
SERS enhancements.[45,48] However, such conjecture needs
to be correlated with the morphology of the substrate from the FESEM
and AFM images.
Figure 1
Room temperature UV–vis electronic absorption spectra
of
(a) AuNC (pink trace); (b) the APS (brown trace) and the modified
M-APS so attained after (c) 1 h, (d) 1.5 h, and (e) 2 h of ST in 1.0
× 10–9 M aqueous solution of 4MPy. Traces b–e
of the absorption spectra have been scaled using uniform scale factor
×5 for visual clarity.
Room temperature UV–vis electronic absorption spectra
of
(a) AuNC (pink trace); (b) the APS (brown trace) and the modified
M-APS so attained after (c) 1 h, (d) 1.5 h, and (e) 2 h of ST in 1.0
× 10–9 M aqueous solution of 4MPy. Traces b–e
of the absorption spectra have been scaled using uniform scale factor
×5 for visual clarity.
Characterization of the Bilayer LB Film of
SA and APS
The FESEM and AFM images of the bilayer LB film
of SA and APS are shown in Figures S2 and S3, respectively, and their
morphological features are discussed under section S2 of the Supporting Information. To gain precise information
about the elemental composition of APS and to unveil the chemical
state and bonding configuration of Au with SA, XPS analyses have been
performed. As XPS is a surface sensitive technique and normally probes
to a depth of ∼10 nm, we believe for the LB film substrates
this technique may be reckoned to be the method of choice for such
characterizations. The wide range survey scan XPS spectrum of the
APS is shown in Figure a. A full survey scan spectrum shows the presence of prominent peak
characteristic of Au 4f, Si 2p, Si 2s C 1s, Au 4d, and O 1s elements
along with Auger peaks O KLL in the order of increasing binding energy
(BE) associated with gradual stepwise increase in background. The
XPS survey scan thus primarily confirms the presence of carbon (C),
oxygen (O), and gold (Au) atoms in the APS. The presence of Si in
the bare glass slide upon which the bilayer LB film of SA has been
deposited is marked by the appearance of Si 2p and Si 2s peaks. The
atomic percentages of Au0 and Au+ in the substrates
have been specifically estimated using the relation[49]where i,j = Au0, Au+. In eq , I represents the intensity of the Au0 and Au+ peaks while ∑I depicts the summation
of
intensities contributing from Au0 and Au+ peaks
in the XPS spectrum. The intensities I and I have been enumerated from the estimation of the areas under the
respective XPS peaks. The atomic sensitivity factor is represented
by X, X which for the Au 4f peak is considered
to be 6.250.[49]
Figure 2
(a) The XPS survey scan
of the APS. Narrow scan XPS spectra of
the APS in the binding energy windows that represent (b) Au 4f, (c)
C 1s, and (d) O 1s regions.
(a) The XPS survey scan
of the APS. Narrow scan XPS spectra of
the APS in the binding energy windows that represent (b) Au 4f, (c)
C 1s, and (d) O 1s regions.High resolution narrow scan XPS spectra exhibiting in the BE windows
of Au 4f, C 1s, and O 1s peaks are shown in Figure b–d, respectively. The XPS spectrum
in the BE of the Au 4f region has been closely monitored and is shown
in Figure b. Distinct
doublets at ∼83.9 and 87.6 eV with characteristic energy separation
(ΔE) ≈ 3.66 eV are observed for the
Au 4f peak. Deconvolution of the doublet peaks marks the appearance
of two pairs of bands centered at ∼83.9, 84.7 eV and 87.6,
88.3 eV owed to Au04f7/2, Au+4f7/2, and Au04f5/2, Au+4f7/2, respectively. These results primarily signify the presence
of both the neutral Au0 atoms and positively charged Au+ ions on the surface of AuNPs that remain entrapped in the
bilayer LB film matrix of SA. However, intensity ratios of the deconvoluted
doublet XPS peaks (IAu04f7/2/IAu+4f7/2 = 12.57; IAu04f5/2/ IAu+4f7/2 = 7.78) imply the preponderance of neutral
Au0 atoms (∼81.57%), albeit the explicit presence
of positively charged Au+ ions (∼18.43%) on the
APS cannot be neglected.The narrow scan XPS spectrum in the
C 1s region (Figure c) is characterized by an intense
and well resolved peak at ∼284.85 eV together with weak but
prominent bands peaked at ∼288.3 and 290.3 eV. Upon deconvolution
of the experimental data, three peaks appear at ∼284.8, 285.2,
and 285.7 eV, while the other two peaks in the higher BE region retain
their peak positions at ∼288.3 and 290.3 eV as were recorded
in the unconvoluted spectrum. The most prominent peak at ∼284.8
eV originates from the C–C and C–H groups, representing
the long aliphatic chain of SA,[50] while
the relatively weaker peak at 285.2 eV is attributed to the carbon
atoms that are located near the carboxylic group.[51] The peak at 285.7 eV corresponds to the BE associated with
the C–O group of SA.[52,53] A weak but distinct
peak at ∼288.3 eV is owed to Au-COO–,[50,54] while the XPS signal at 290.3 eV suggests the presence of a COOH
group nonbonded to the AuNPs.[50] A high
resolution narrow surface scan in the BE window of C 1s not only justifies
the presence of SA but also may point toward probable interaction
of its carboxylate group (which remain exposed to air in the bilayer
LB film of SA deposited through a Y-type deposition technique) with
the Au+ ions. This interaction in turn may promote the
possible entrapment of AuNPs in the bilayer LB film matrix of SA.Considerable attention may also be drawn from the narrow scan XPS
spectrum representing the O 1s signal in the BE window spanning the
range of 526.5 to 538 eV. The spectrum is shown in Figure d. Deconvolution of the O 1s
peak exhibits three bands peaked at 531.2, 532.5, and 533.3 eV. Two
weak peaks at ∼531.2 and 533.3 eV may be ascribed to the BEs
associated with Au–O and C=O bonds of the carbonyl group,
respectively,[55,56] while the most intense peak at
532.5 eV is owed to the C–O bond. These results further indicate
the presence of SA in the LB film substrate and their interaction
with AuNPs in agreement with our earlier conjecture.
Adsorption of the Probe 4MPy Molecule on the
APS
An aqueous solution at ∼1.0 × 10–9 M (pH ∼ 7) of the probe 4MPy molecule is soaked on the APSs
for 1, 1.5, and 2 h of soaking times (STs). The as-prepared substrate
so obtained upon soaking in the solution of the probe 4Mpy molecules
will henceforth be designated as the “modified-as prepared
substrate (M-APS)” to distinguish it from the APS so fabricated
from LB and self-assembly techniques without any adsorption of the
probe molecules. The delays in the various STs may allow the probe
molecules to penetrate deep into the substrate through gradual diffusion.
The UV–vis electronic absorption spectral features of the M-APS
substrates so obtained after soaking them in 4Mpy solution for 1,
1.5, and 2 h have been depicted under section S3 of the Supporting Information.
Characterization
of the M-APSs
The
FESEM and AFM images of the M-APSs after soaking in aqueous solution
of ∼1.0 × 10–9 M 4MPy over various STs
are shown in Figures S4 and S5, respectively, and their morphological
features are presented under section S4 of the Supporting Information. To understand the adsorption of the
4Mpy molecule on M-APS so obtained after 2 h of ST, the XPS analyses
have been performed. The corresponding spectra are shown in Figure . The wide range
survey scan XPS spectrum for the M-APS (Figure a) is markedly different in contrast to the
APS substrate as discussed earlier (Figure a; vide supra). Prominent
distinctions are noticed for the Au 4f, Au 4d5/2, and Au
4d3/2 XPS peak intensities, which appear as weak signals
for the APS. The pronounced increase in intensities of these bands,
together with small but definite peak shifts toward higher BE in the
XPS spectrum of the M-APS substrate in comparison to that of APS,
may signify considerable interaction of 4Mpy with Au. Moreover, the
deconvoluted high resolution narrow scan XPS spectrum in the BE window
of the Au 4f peak (Figure b) further suggests the existence of neutral Au0 atoms (∼83.52%) in the M-APS, although the presence of Au+ ions (∼16.48%) on the substrate cannot be ignored.
Another contrasting feature that is noticed in the survey scan spectrum
of M-APS is the presence of S 2p and N 1s XPS peaks. These peaks are
not observed in APS, thereby indicating their origin to be explicitly
owed to the probe 4MPy molecule that gets adsorbed in the M-APS.
Figure 3
(a) The
XPS survey scan of the M-APS so obtained after 2 h of ST.
Narrow scan XPS spectra of the M-APS so obtained after 2 h of ST in
the binding energy windows that represent (b) Au 4f, (c) S 2p, and
(d) N 1s regions.
(a) The
XPS survey scan of the M-APS so obtained after 2 h of ST.
Narrow scan XPS spectra of the M-APS so obtained after 2 h of ST in
the binding energy windows that represent (b) Au 4f, (c) S 2p, and
(d) N 1s regions.Close observation may
be drawn from the narrow scan XPS spectrum
covering the S 2p BE window ranging from 158 to 169 eV (Figure c). The narrow scan XPS signal
in the S 2p region shows broad spectral signature, distinctively
dissimilar to that reported for the free 4MPy molecule in the same
BE window.[52] This spectral feature not
only just suggests the interaction of 4Mpy with the M-APS but also
may signify different chemical states of the sulfur atom.[57] Subsequent deconvolution results in five probable
peaks centered at ∼161.5, 162.1, 163.3, 163.7, and 164.5 eV.
The peaks at ∼161.5 and 164.5 eV are characteristic of the
S 2p3/2 level, while the peak at 163.7 eV is known to originate
from the S 2p1/2 level of the sulfur atom.[58] The other two peaks at∼ 162.1 and 163.3 eV are owed
to 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 levels of sulfur, respectively,
and their relative intensity ratio ∼2:1 may presage the existence
of the thiolate form of the molecule.[59,60] The presence
of S– in the thiolate form of 4Mpy may be involved
in the adsorption process with the Au atoms of the AuNPs that remain
embedded on the substrate. This conjecture is further substantiated
by the absence of any S 2p peak at the higher BE beyond 167 eV, primarily
suggesting that the sulfur atom of the 4MPy molecule has not probably
been oxidized.[57]The high resolution
XPS spectrum in the N 1s peak region has been
recorded and is shown in Figure d. The N 1s spectrum has been deconvoluted into five
peaks. Among them, the peak centered at ∼397.5 eV is attributed
to the BE of the C–N bond associated with the 4MPy molecule.[60] The other deconvoluted peaks at ∼399.1
and at 400.6 and 401.5 eV are reported to emanate from the 4MPyD and
4MPyH forms of the 4-MPy molecule, respectively.[59] Interestingly, a weak but prominent band which appears
in a relatively higher BE and peaked at ∼402.5 eV is ascribed
to the oxidized N atom of the 4MPyD form of the 4Mpy molecule.[61]The above XPS analyses thus collectively
suggest the presence of
both the 4MPyH and 4MPyD thiolate forms of the 4MPy molecule that
remain adsorbed on the M-APS. No evidence presaging the oxidation
of the sulfur atom and the presence of the thiolate S– form together with the presence of the N 1s peak at ∼402.5
eV may signify the adsorption of the 4MPyH and 4MPyD thiolate forms
of the 4MPy molecule with the M-APS substrate via the sulfur atom
leaving the nitrogen atom free to oxidize.[58,59] Moreover, the complex and broad features in the narrow scan XPS
spectra of M-APS in the S 2p and N 1s peak regions (Figure c and d) so obtained after
2 h of ST may indeed signify degradation of 4Mpy molecules upon adsorption
on the AuNPs embedded in the bilayer LB film matrix of SA.[62,63] However, the conjecture is further strengthened from the SERS spectra
of the M-APS substrate and is depicted in the following section.
SERS spectra of M-APS
The SERS spectra
from the M-APS so obtained after soaking in 1.0 × 10–9 M aqueous solution (pH ∼ 7) of 4MPy molecules for 1, 1.5,
and 2 h of STs are shown in Figure a,b,c, respectively. The spectra are marked by distinct
vibrational signatures ∼416, 711, 1005, 1058, 1092, 1208, 1582,
and 1609 cm–1, characteristic of the 4MPy molecules.[37−39] These observations clearly indicate appreciable efficacies of all
of the M-APSs as good SERS sensing platforms. In order to establish
the spectral reproducibility, the relative standard deviation (RSD)
of the SERS spectra from the M-APS after 2 h of ST has been evaluated.
Figure S6 in the Supporting Information shows the SERS spectra of 1.0 × 10–9 M 4MPy
molecules so attained after interrogating the laser spot on 10 random
regions of the M-APS. The calculated RSD values of the well resolved
marker bands of 4-MPy centered at ∼1002, 1092, 1582, and 1608
cm–1 are 11.88%, 9.19%, 11.19%, and 12.34%, respectively.
The estimated RSD value of <13% marks the reproducibility of the
as prepared M-APS. However, changes in relative intensity of the SERS
spectra as shown in Figure and S6 from spot to spot may signify
partial degradation of the molecule on the surface, most probably
due to the large adsorption time adopted. The normal Raman spectrum
(NRS) of 4MPy in aqueous medium (pH ∼ 7) at 1 M concentration
is also recorded and is shown in Figure S7 (Supporting Information). The NRS spectrum exhibits Raman modes of vibrations
centered at around ∼429, 723, 1001, 1053, 1114, 1207, 1487,
1589, and 1621 cm–1, all known to emanate from the
protonated and deprotonated thione and the thiol forms of the 4MPy
molecule.[37,64−66] Interestingly, appreciable
changes in relative intensities are noted for the SERS bands of the
4MPy molecules centered at ∼1005, 1092, 1208, 1582, and 1609
cm–1 depending upon the STs of the probe molecule
on the M-APSs. The enhanced Raman bands at ∼1005, 1092, 1609,
and 1582 cm–1 in the SERS spectra are ascribed to
A1 and B2 irreducible representations, respectively.[38,40,41,67] These changes may primarily signify the presence of both the 4MpyH
and 4MpyD thione forms of the 4Mpy molecule, which are known to coexist
in different proportions under similar experimental conditions and
have been extensively reported in our earlier publication.[39] Alternatively, the selective enhancements of
Raman bands in the SERS spectra belonging to A1 and B2 irreducible representations (vide supra)
may be accounted from the CT interaction between the probe molecule
and the AuNP systems. Since the concentration (∼1.0 ×
10–9 M) and pH of the adsorbate 4Mpy molecules in
aqueous solution remain the same, we believe the variations in the
intensities of the enhanced bands in the SERS spectra may be due to
CT interactions between AuNPs and the existing 4MPyH and 4MPyD forms
of the 4Mpy molecule in the surface adsorbed state. The prevalence
of CT interaction is further substantiated by appreciable downshifts
of SERS bands at around ∼711 and 1092 cm–1, whose NRS counterparts are recorded at 723 and 1114 cm–1, respectively. The bands at ∼711 and 1092 cm–1 are assigned to mixed υ(C–S) stretching, in-plane β(C–C)
bending (ν6), and the ring breathing mode [12a1] coupled with υ(C–S) stretching vibrations,
respectively.[39,40] Furthermore, remarkable downshifts
of both of these bands may signify plausible interaction of the 4MPy
molecule with the AuNPs through lone pair electrons of the sulfur
(S) atom. This conjecture is in line with the observation as predicted
from the XPS studies (vide supra). The rationale
behind the CT interaction may be further extended from the intensity
reversals between the pair of bands ∼1582 and 1608 cm–1 in the SERS spectra of the 4Mpy molecule (Figure a–c) belonging to B2 and
A1 irreducible representations, respectively.[41,68] The intensity reversals between these pairs of bands owing to B2 and A1 irreducible representations are attributed
to CT interactions driven by intensity borrowing from the strongly
allowed molecular transition of the 4MPy molecule.[68] Close inspection of the SERS spectra further reveals unusual
broadening and change in intensity of the enhanced Raman band at
∼1608 cm–1 with ST. The unusual broadening
and change in intensity of the enhanced Raman bands may be attributed
to partial degradation of the 4Mpy molecule upon adsorption on the
AuNPs that remains embedded in the bilayer LB film matrix of SA.[62,63] This conjecture is further corroborated by the complex and broad
features in the narrow scan XPS spectra in the binding energy window
linked with the S 2p and N 1s peaks (Figure c and d) of the M-APSs.[62,63] To gain deeper insights into the adsorption behavior of 4Mpy with
M-APS, BO-OF-MD and DFT calculations have been further explored with
the aid of molecule–metal adatoms models.[59,69−71] The results of the pre- referred calculations are
depicted in the following section.
Figure 4
SERS spectra of 1.0 × 10–9 M aqueous solution
of 4MPy molecule adsorbed on the M-APSs over various STs (λex = 632.8 nm).
SERS spectra of 1.0 × 10–9 M aqueous solution
of 4MPy molecule adsorbed on the M-APSs over various STs (λex = 632.8 nm).
Born–Oppenheimer
Molecular Dynamics
and DFT Calculations on the Molecule- Au cluster Models
To
corroborate the CT effect of SERS, as evinced from the experimental
observations (vide supra), the adatom or small metal
cluster models have been adopted to understand the Au-4Mpy interactions
from the DFT calculations.[59,69−71] These adatom or adcluster models ensure the importance of specific
surface-active site/sites on the metal nanoparticles that are explicitly
involved in the chemisorption processes with the external probe molecules.[19,72] The surface active adatoms or adclusters contain single or few metal
atoms or ions and remain relatively isolated from the bulk metal.[73] Recent reports suggest that pragmatic applications
of such models have the real power to reproduce the experimentally
observed SERS spectra of various metal–molecule systems in
terms of both their vibrational frequencies and their relative intensities.[8−11,16−21,50,74,75]However, to envisage a reliable model
of the metal adcluster that can get involved in the binding processes
with both the existing 4MpyH and 4MpyD forms of the 4MPy molecule
on the “M-APSs”, the partial radial distribution function g(r) between the Au and the sulfur (S1)
and nitrogen (N9) atoms of the probe molecule have been estimated
from BO-OF-MD simulations. The partial radial distribution function
not only provides a firm basis to enumerate the composition of atom/atoms
in the Au adcluster but also helps in understanding their interactions
with the specific atom/atoms of the probe molecule, useful for the
ensuing DFT calculations. Figure a and b show the variation of g(r) as a function of radial distances between the S1–Au
for 4MpyH and the N9–Au and S1–Au atoms for 4MpyD forms
of the molecule, respectively. The radial distributions show one prominent
peak (Figure a), centered
at ∼2.53 Å, signifying the average distance between the
S1 of 4MpyH and the Au atoms of the adcluster. Such a close distance
of ∼2.53 Å between S1 and Au atoms may primarily indicate
probable involvement of the sulfur (S1) atom of the 4MpyH molecule
in the adsorption process with AuNPs. Interestingly, the variations
of gS1–Au(r) and gN9–Au(r) as a function
of distance for the 4MpyD molecule, as shown in Figure b, divulge some interesting observations.
While gS1–Au(r) exhibits the most prominent peak at a distance of ∼2.35
Å, the first prominent maximum of gN9–Au(r) however appears at a comparatively larger distance
of ∼4.02 Å. These results may signify the involvement
of a sulfur (S1) instead of a nitrogen (N9) atom, even in the adsorption
of 4MpyD forms of the probe molecule with AuNPs, as being suggested
for its 4MPyH form (vide supra, cf.Figure ). Close inspection of Figure a and b shows the
appearance of a weak peak at ∼5.2 Å. The appearance of
the weak peak may signify the average distance between S1 of 4MpyH/4MpyD
and the Au atoms of the adcluster in the second solvation shell of
the Au atoms.[76−79] Integrating the areas under the curves represented by the first
distinct peak of the gS1–Au(r) plots (Figure a and b) for the 4MpyH and 4MpyD forms of the molecule yields
the integration numbers ∼2.81 and 2.96, respectively. These
results suggest the existence of a maximum of three or minimum of
two Au atoms in the first neighboring shell near the sulfur (S1) atom
of both the 4MPyH and 4MPyD forms of the 4Mpy molecule. Thus, three
or two Au atoms in neutral or in positively charged forms may constitute
the Au adcluster (n =
3, 2) model to best represent the surface-active site of the AuNPs.
Figure 5
Partial
radial distribution function g(r) for (a) 4MpyH and (b) 4MpyD forms of the molecule in
the presence of surrounding Au atoms as estimated from BO-OF-MD simulation.
Partial
radial distribution function g(r) for (a) 4MpyH and (b) 4MpyD forms of the molecule in
the presence of surrounding Au atoms as estimated from BO-OF-MD simulation.The energy of the Au3 cluster has been
equilibrated
over a period of time ranging from 0 to 30 ps (ps) with the aid of
the BO-OF-MD calculation. The results are shown as a blue trace in
Figure S8a in the Supporting Information. After initial structural flexing and relaxations, the energy of
the Au3 cluster system is noted to be stabilized after
10 ps of the simulation run. The probable structure of the Au3 cluster evolved at ∼12 ps is shown in the inset of Figure S8a. The frequency distributions showing
variations of the r(Au–Au) bond length and
∠Au–Au–Au bond angle as obtained from the corresponding
BO-OF-MD trajectory are shown in Figure S8b and c, respectively. The weighted average values of the r(Au–Au) bond length and ∠Au–Au–Au
bond angle for the Au3 cluster are estimated to be ∼2.595
Å and 136°, respectively. The initial structural parameters
of the Au3 cluster, as obtained from the BO-OF-MD simulation,
have been fed for further geometry optimization using DFT calculations
with the B3LYP/LANL2DZ level of theory. The optimized structural parameters
of the Au3 cluster as estimated from BO-OF-MD and DFT calculations
are shown in Table S1 in the Supporting Information. Figure shows different
adsorptive stances of neutral (Au30) as well as charged Au+Au0Au0, Au+Au+Au0, and Au+Au+Au+ cluster systems with 4MpyH and
4MpyD forms of the probe molecule. The inclusion of neutral and charged
Au atoms in various Au3 adcluster models stem from the
XPS spectra of M-APS that marks the presence of both neutral (Au0) and charged Au+ ions as discussed earlier (cf. section ). Significantly enough, among the estimated SCF energies
of the probable Au3-molecule adatom models, the 4MPyH–Au0Au0Au0 and 4MpyD–Au0Au0Au0 surface complexes are found to be thermodynamically
most stable. These results are in line with the XPS studies that smear
the presence of Au0 atoms in abundance on the M-APS (vide ante; cf. section ). Figure S9 in the Supporting Information shows the theoretically simulated Raman
spectra of 4MPyH–Au0Au0Au0, 4MPyH–Au+Au0Au0, 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au+, 4MpyD–Au0Au0Au0, 4MpyD–Au+Au0Au0, 4MpyD–Au+Au+Au+,
and their corresponding mixed forms. Interestingly, neither of the
calculations can reproduce the experimentally recorded SERS spectra,
although among them the 4MPyH/4MPyD–Au0Au0Au0 adcluster models are estimated to be most stable from
theromdynamical considerations. On the contrary, the Raman spectra
of the mixed, 4MpyH–Au+Au+Au0 (IA), and 4MpyD–Au+Au+Au0 (IIA) forms, as estimated from the DFT calculations, are shown in Figure , which is in close
agreement with the experimentally observed SERS spectra of the molecule.
The calculated vibrational frequencies of 4MpyH–Au+Au+Au0 and 4MpyD–Au+Au+Au0 model complexes along with the experimentally
observed SERS bands at various STs are shown in Table S2 in the Supporting Information along with some of their
tentative assignments.
Figure 6
Optimized geometries of the model complexes of (a) 4MPyH–Au0Au0Au0, (b) 4MPyH–Au+Au0Au0, (c) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0, (d) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au+, (e) 4MPyD–Au0Au0Au0, (f) 4MPyD–Au+Au0Au0, (g) 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au0, and
(h) 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au+ adclusters
so obtained from DFT calculations with the B3LYP/6-31++g(d,p) [for
C, H, N and S]/LANL2DZ (for Au atoms) level of theory.
Figure 7
Theoretically simulated Raman spectra of (a) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 (IA), (b) 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au0 (IIA), and (c) mixed form Au+Au+Au0 (IA, IIA) adcluster models as
estimated from the B3LYP/6-31++g(d,p) [for C, H, N, and S]/LANL2DZ
(for Au atoms) level of theory.
Optimized geometries of the model complexes of (a) 4MPyH–Au0Au0Au0, (b) 4MPyH–Au+Au0Au0, (c) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0, (d) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au+, (e) 4MPyD–Au0Au0Au0, (f) 4MPyD–Au+Au0Au0, (g) 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au0, and
(h) 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au+ adclusters
so obtained from DFT calculations with the B3LYP/6-31++g(d,p) [for
C, H, N and S]/LANL2DZ (for Au atoms) level of theory.Theoretically simulated Raman spectra of (a) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 (IA), (b) 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au0 (IIA), and (c) mixed form Au+Au+Au0 (IA, IIA) adcluster models as
estimated from the B3LYP/6-31++g(d,p) [for C, H, N, and S]/LANL2DZ
(for Au atoms) level of theory.The optimized geometrical parameters of some selected bond lengths
and bond angles of 4MpyH–Au+Au+Au0, 4MpyD–Au+Au+Au0 model
complexes as estimated from the DFT calculations are shown in Table
S3 in the Supporting Information. Moreover,
the other possible interaction configuration of 4MPyH/4MPyD–Au3 may involve binding of the sulfur atom with the two gold
atoms of the Au3 adcluster. The DFT calculations have also
been performed for the newly proposed 4MpyH–Au+Au+Au0 (IB), 4MpyD–Au+Au+Au0 (IIB) adcluster models. The optimized geometries of
4MpyH–Au+Au+Au0 and 4MpyD–Au+Au+Au0 adcluster models so obtained
from DFT calculations are shown in Figure S10 in the Supporting Information. Figure S11 in the Supporting Information shows theoretically simulated Raman
spectra of the newly proposed 4MpyH–Au+Au+Au0 and 4MpyD–Au+Au+Au0 adcluster models and their corresponding mixed forms. However,
from Figure S11 in the Supporting Information, it is clearly seen that the theoretically simulated spectra for
newly proposed adcluster models fail to reproduce the experimentally
recorded SERS spectra (vide supra, cf. Figure ) in terms of both band positions
and intensities.Interesting observations may be drawn from
the results of WT theory,
which can estimate the fluctuations of the Au–S1 bond length
as a function of time. The temporal variations of the Au–S1
bond length for 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 and 4MpyD–Au+Au+Au0 model
complexes on the picosecond time scale are shown in Figure a,e. The VDOS of the ν6 [β(C–C)/ν(C–S)] and ν12 [trigonal ring-breathing with C=S deformation] normal
mode for 4MpyH–Au+Au+Au0 and
4MpyD–Au+Au+Au0 model complexes
have also been estimated from WT theory and are also shown in Figure b,c and f,g, respectively.
From Figure a–c
and e–g, it is clearly seen that the vibrational frequencies
of the normal modes ν6 and ν12 are
significantly downshifted from ∼728 to 707 cm–1 (∼721 to 710 cm–1) and ∼1105 to
1087 cm–1 (∼1100 to 1091 cm–1) as the Au atom approaches in the close proximity of the S1 atom
for the 4MPyH (4MPyD) forms of the 4MPy molecule. These results collectively
suggest the probable adsorption of the S1 atom with Au not only for
the 4MPyH and 4MPyD but for the mixed form of the 4MPy molecule as
well. The time-resolved vibrational frequencies, as estimated from
VDOS, further corroborate the experimentally recorded SERS spectra
of the 4MPy molecule, which show significant red shifts of the enhanced
vibrational frequencies at ∼711 and 1092 cm–1 compared to its NRS counterpart at ∼721 and 1114 cm–1, respectively (vide supra. cf.Figure ). The discrete snapshots of
the 4MPyH—Au+Au+Au0 and 4MPyD—Au+Au+Au0 model systems captured on the
20 and 23 ps time scales of the simulation run are shown in Figure d and h, respectively.
Interestingly, from BO-OF-MD simulations, the Au—S1 distances
for 4MpyH—Au+Au+Au0/4MPyD—Au+Au+Au0 model systems are estimated to
be 2.27(±0.017)/2.24(±0.014) Å, in close harmony with
that estimated from DFT calculations 2.36/2.37 Å for the most
probable 4MpyH–Au+Au+Au0/4MPyD–Au+Au+Au0 adcluster models.
Figure 8
Time evolution of Au–S1bond
length of (a) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 and (e) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 clusters
as obtained from BO-OF-MD simulations.
Time resolved band stretching frequencies of the C2–S1 bond
of (b,c) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 and
(f,g) 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au0 clusters
as obtained from wavelet transform theory. Discrete snapshots of the
BO-OF-MD simulations for (d) 4MpyH—Au+Au+Au0 and (h) 4MpyD—Au+Au+Au0 models captured on 20 and 23 ps time scales, respectively,
at T = 300 K.
Time evolution of Au–S1bond
length of (a) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 and (e) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 clusters
as obtained from BO-OF-MD simulations.
Time resolved band stretching frequencies of the C2–S1 bond
of (b,c) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 and
(f,g) 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au0 clusters
as obtained from wavelet transform theory. Discrete snapshots of the
BO-OF-MD simulations for (d) 4MpyH—Au+Au+Au0 and (h) 4MpyD—Au+Au+Au0 models captured on 20 and 23 ps time scales, respectively,
at T = 300 K.The electron densities that are harbored in the 4MPyH and 4MPyD
molecules and in the Au+Au+Au0 metal
cluster models are shown in Figure a, b, and c, respectively. From Figure a and b, it is clearly seen that the electron
densities are strongly localized on C, N, and S atoms of the respective
aromatic rings of the 4MPyH and 4MPyD molecules. The electron densities
for the Au+Au+Au0 clusters are however
confined on the Au atoms (Figure c). Figure d and e show the EDDs that are perceived in 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 and 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au0 molecule-Au cluster models, respectively. Figure d and e clearly reveal
depletion of charge clouds on the respective aromatic rings of 4MPyH
and 4MPyD molecules and accumulation of electron density clouds on
their respective S atoms and on the Au atoms of the adclusters. These
observations may signify appreciable shifts of electron clouds from
the aromatic rings of the molecule to the Au metal atoms, thereby
suggesting molecule → metal CT interaction. The molecule →
metal CT contribution to SERS may be envisaged from the broadening
and appreciable downshifts of the enhanced Raman bands centered at
∼711 and 1092 cm–1 (vide supra, cf. Figure ) whose
NRS counterparts are recorded at 723 and 1114 cm–1 [vide supra, cf. Figure S7 (Supporting Information)], respectively.[80] Moreover, selective enhancements and considerable
shifts of the Raman bands at ∼1582 and 1608 cm–1 in the SERS spectra further signify the involvement of CT interaction
in the overall enhancement of the Raman bands of the 4MPy molecule.[68] To quantify the molecule → metal CT interaction,
the charge transfer distance or the descriptor (DCT) has been estimated. A partial charge (namely Mulliken’s)
analysis has been adopted to calculate DCT, whose in-depth analysis has been reported elsewhere.[81] The charge transfer distance (DCT) and the amount of charge transfer have been estimated
to be ∼2.41 Å and 0.91 |e| and 2.39 Å and 0.79 |e|
for 4MpyH–Au+Au+Au0 and 4MpyD–Au+Au+Au0 model complexes, respectively.
Figure 9
Electron
density of (a) 4MPyH, (b) 4MPyD, and (c) Au+Au+Au0 metal and electronic density differences
of (d) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 and
(e) 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au0 adclusters
as estimated from the B3LYP/6-31++g(d,p) [for C, H, N, and S]/LANL2DZ
(for Au atoms) level of theory (isosurface value = 0.005 a.u).
Electron
density of (a) 4MPyH, (b) 4MPyD, and (c) Au+Au+Au0 metal and electronic density differences
of (d) 4MPyH–Au+Au+Au0 and
(e) 4MPyD–Au+Au+Au0 adclusters
as estimated from the B3LYP/6-31++g(d,p) [for C, H, N, and S]/LANL2DZ
(for Au atoms) level of theory (isosurface value = 0.005 a.u).
Conclusion
Adsorption
of 4Mpy molecules with AuNPs embedded in the LB film
matrix of stearic acid has been elucidated in detail from SERS and
XPS studies. The as-fabricated LB film substrate was soaked in the
aqueous solution (∼1.0 × 10–9 M) of
4MPy over various soaking times ranging from 1 to 2 h. All of the
MAPSs proved to be good SERS sensing platforms and can detect the
analyte 4MPy molecules at a trace concentration (∼1.0 ×
10–9 M). The XPS study not only signifies the adsorption
of 4Mpy molecules with AuNPs via a sulfur atom but also suggests partial
degradation of the analyte molecule upon adsorption. This result is
further corroborated from the SERS spectral profile, which shows unusual
broadening of the enhanced Raman bands of the molecule. The experimental
observations are aided by BO-OF-MD, time-resolved WT theory, and DFT
calculations based on analyte molecule–metal adcluster models.
The CT contribution to the overall enhanced Raman bands of the 4MPy
molecule has also been envisaged from electron density difference
calculations, and the corresponding CT distance has been estimated
from the descriptor (DCT).
Authors: Emilie Cauët; Stuart Bogatko; John H Weare; John L Fulton; Gregory K Schenter; Eric J Bylaska Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2010-05-21 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Isabel López-Tocón; Samuel Valdivia; Juan Soto; Juan Carlos Otero; Francesco Muniz-Miranda; Maria Cristina Menziani; Maurizio Muniz-Miranda Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 5.076