Literature DB >> 32541993

[Biodegradation properties of multi-laminated small intestinal submucosa].

W Y Wu1, B W Li1, Y H Liu1, X Z Wang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the biodegradation properties of multi-laminated small intestinal submucosa (mSIS) through in vitro and in vivo experiments, comparing with Bio-Gide, the most widely used collagen membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique, for the purpose of providing basis to investigate whether mSIS meets the requirements of GBR in dental clinics.
METHODS: The degradation properties were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. In vitro degradation was performed using prepared collagenase solution. Morphology of mSIS and Bio-Gide in degradation solution were observed and the degradation rate was calculated at different time points. In in vivo experiments, nine New Zealand rabbits were used for subcutaneous implantation and were divided into three groups according to observation intervals. Six unconnected subcutaneous pouches were made on the back of each animal and were embedded with mSIS and Bio-Gide respectively. At the end of weeks 4, 8, and 12 after operation, gross observation and HE staining were used to evaluate the degree of degradation and histocompatibility.
RESULTS: In vitro degradation experiments showed that mSIS membrane was completely degraded at the end of 12 days, while Bio-Gide was degraded at the end of 7 days. Besides, mSIS maintained its shape for longer time in the degradation solution than Bio-Gide, indicating that mSIS possessed longer degradation time, and had better ability to maintain space than Bio-Gide. In vivo biodegradation indicated that after 4 weeks of implantation, mSIS remained intact. Microscopic observation showed that collagen fibers were continuous with a few inflammatory cells that infiltrated around the membrane. Bio-Gide was basically intact and partially adhered with the surrounding tissues. HE staining showed that collagen fibers were partly fused with surrounding tissues with a small amount of inflammatory cells that infiltrated as well. Eight weeks after operation, mSIS was still intact, and was partly integrated with connective tissues, whereas Bio-Gide membrane was mostly broken and only a few residual fibers could be found under microscope. Only a small amount of mSIS debris could be observed 12 weeks after surgery, and Bio-Gide could hardly be found by naked eye and microscopic observation at the same time.
CONCLUSION: In vitro degradation time of mSIS is longer than that of Bio-Gide, and the space-maintenance ability of mSIS is better. The in vivo biodegradation time of subcutaneous implantation of mSIS is about 12 weeks and Bio-Gide is about 8 weeks, both of which possess good biocompatibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatible materials; Guided bone regeneration; Small intestinal submucosa

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32541993      PMCID: PMC7433422          DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  29 in total

1.  Alkaline phosphatase immobilization onto Bio-Gide® and Bio-Oss® for periodontal and bone regeneration.

Authors:  Daniël A W Oortgiesen; Adelina S Plachokova; Claudia Geenen; Gert J Meijer; X Frank Walboomers; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; John A Jansen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 8.728

2.  Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study.

Authors:  Jolene E Valentin; John S Badylak; George P McCabe; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Healing pattern of bone defects covered by different membrane types--a histologic study in the porcine mandible.

Authors:  Frank P Strietzel; Pathawee Khongkhunthian; Rutch Khattiya; Prapas Patchanee; Peter A Reichart
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.368

4.  Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: a comparative study.

Authors:  K W Owens; R A Yukna
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.454

5.  Synthetic design of growth factor sequestering extracellular matrix mimetic hydrogel for promoting in vivo bone formation.

Authors:  Hong Ji Yan; Tommaso Casalini; Gry Hulsart-Billström; Shujiang Wang; Oommen P Oommen; Matteo Salvalaglio; Sune Larsson; Jöns Hilborn; Oommen P Varghese
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Implants failures related to endodontic treatment. An observational retrospective study.

Authors:  Fanny López-Martínez; Gerardo Gómez Moreno; Patricia Olivares-Ponce; David Eduardo Jaramillo; José Eduardo Maté Sánchez de Val; José Luis Calvo-Guirado
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Carbodiimide crosslinked collagen from porcine dermal matrix for high-strength tissue engineering scaffold.

Authors:  Jianhua Li; Na Ren; Jichuan Qiu; Huaidong Jiang; Hongshi Zhao; Guancong Wang; Robert I Boughton; Yingjun Wang; Hong Liu
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 6.953

8.  Differences in degradation behavior of two non-cross-linked collagen barrier membranes: an in vitro and in vivo study.

Authors:  Ahmet Bozkurt; Christian Apel; Bernd Sellhaus; Sabien van Neerven; Bastian Wessing; Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Norbert Pallua
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  In vitro degradation of dermal sheep collagen cross-linked using a water-soluble carbodiimide.

Authors:  L H Olde Damink; P J Dijkstra; M J van Luyn; P B van Wachem; P Nieuwenhuis; J Feijen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Macrophage participation in the degradation and remodeling of extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Jolene E Valentin; Ann M Stewart-Akers; Thomas W Gilbert; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.