Literature DB >> 32541081

The Inverse OARSI-OMERACT Criteria Is a Valid Indicator of the Clinical Worsening of Knee Osteoarthritis: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Jeffrey B Driban1, Matthew S Harkey2, Lori Lyn Price3, Grace H Lo4, Timothy E McAlindon5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed if the inverse Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) criteria relate to concurrent radiographic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) progression and decline in walking speed, as well as future knee replacement.
METHODS: We conducted knee-based analyses of data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. All knees had symptomatic OA: at least doubtful radiographic KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 1) and knee pain ≥ 10/100 (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain) at the 12-month visit. The inverse of the OARSI-OMERACT responder criteria depended on knee pain and function, and global assessment of knee impact. We used generalized linear mixed models to assess the relationship of the inverse OARSI-OMERACT criteria over 2 years (i.e., 12-month and 36-month visits) with worsening radiographic severity (any increase in Kellgren-Lawrence grade from 12 months to 36 months) and decline in self-selected 20-m walking speed of ≥ 0.1m/s (from 12 months to 36 months). We used a Cox model to assess time to knee replacement during the 6 years after the 36-month visit as an outcome.
RESULTS: Among the 1746 analyzed, 19% met the inverse OARSI-OMERACT criteria. Meeting the inverse OARSI-OMERACT criteria was associated with almost double the odds of experiencing concurrent worsening in radiographic KOA severity (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.32-2.70) or decline in walking speed (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.37-2.40). A knee meeting the inverse OARSI-OMERACT criteria was more likely to receive a knee replacement after the 36-month visit (23%) compared with a nonresponder (10%; HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.89-3.41).
CONCLUSION: The inverse OARSI-OMERACT criteria for worsening among people with KOA had good construct validity in relation to clinically relevant outcomes.
Copyright © 2021 by the Journal of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  knee; osteoarthritis; pain; patient-reported outcome measures

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32541081      PMCID: PMC8607982          DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.200145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  13 in total

1.  Minimal clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities.

Authors:  Felix Angst; André Aeschlimann; Beat A Michel; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  How should worsening in osteoarthritis be defined? Development and initial validation of preliminary criteria for clinical worsening in knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Eam Mahler; A A den Broeder; T G Woodworth; Vjjf Busch; F H van den Hoogen; Jwj Bijlsma; Chm van den Ende
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Defining radiographic incidence and progression of knee osteoarthritis: suggested modifications of the Kellgren and Lawrence scale.

Authors:  David T Felson; Jingbo Niu; Ali Guermazi; Burton Sack; Piran Aliabadi
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Response criteria for clinical trials on osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: a report of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Standing Committee for Clinical Trials response criteria initiative.

Authors:  M Dougados; P Leclaire; D van der Heijde; D A Bloch; N Bellamy; R D Altman
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Can We Predict Those With Osteoarthritis Who Will Worsen Following a Chronic Disease Management Program?

Authors:  Jillian P Eyles; Kathryn Mills; Barbara R Lucas; Matthew J Williams; Joanna Makovey; Laurence Teoh; David J Hunter
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  Examining the Minimal Important Difference of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Individuals with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Model Using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.

Authors:  Kathryn A G Mills; Justine M Naylor; Jillian P Eyles; Ewa M Roos; David J Hunter
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited.

Authors:  T Pham; D van der Heijde; R D Altman; J J Anderson; N Bellamy; M Hochberg; L Simon; V Strand; T Woodworth; M Dougados
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Responder analysis and correlation of outcome measures: pooled results from two identical studies comparing etoricoxib, celecoxib, and placebo in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  C O Bingham; S R Bird; S S Smugar; X Xu; A M Tershakovec
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Multidimensional minimal clinically important differences in knee osteoarthritis after comprehensive rehabilitation: a prospective evaluation from the Bad Zurzach Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  Felix Angst; Thomas Benz; Susanne Lehmann; André Aeschlimann; Jules Angst
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2018-10-08

10.  Test-retest reliability and sensitivity of the 20-meter walk test among patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jillian M Motyl; Jeffrey B Driban; Erica McAdams; Lori Lyn Price; Timothy E McAlindon
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.