Literature DB >> 11069723

Response criteria for clinical trials on osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: a report of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Standing Committee for Clinical Trials response criteria initiative.

M Dougados1, P Leclaire, D van der Heijde, D A Bloch, N Bellamy, R D Altman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The domains of pain, function and patient's global assessment are identified as core variables and frequently measured in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and knee.
OBJECTIVE: To develop response criteria for OA of hip and knee based on the domains of pain, function and patient's global assessment.
METHODS: A methodology was developed by an interaction of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Standing Committee on Clinical Trials, biostatisticians, pharmaceutical company representatives and health agency representatives. Data from previously conducted placebo-controlled clinical trials were normalized and collated. Data were subset by location of OA (knee, hip), active agent used in the clinical trial (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, other agent) and route of administration (oral, intra-articular). Statistical analysis identified response criteria which best discriminate active agent from placebo.
RESULTS: Based on the analysis of data from 14 studies (totaling 1886 patients) and consensus opinion, the optimal responder criteria set differed for location of OA, active agent to be used, and route of administration. Because of nearly identical statistical results, two sets of responder criteria are proposed: (1) 'high' pain response or, alternatively, a 'moderate' response for at least two of three domains: pain, function and patient's global assessment; (2) 'high' response for either pain or function or, alternatively, a 'moderate' response for at least two of three domains: pain, function and patient's global assessment. The sensitivity (i.e., the percentage of responders in the active group) ranged from 52 to 96% and the specificity (i.e., the percentage of nonresponders in the control group) from 47 to 73%.
CONCLUSION: Based on data from clinical trials, two sets of responder criteria have been developed that can categorize an individual's responses to treatment in a clinical trial. These responder criteria require validation in additional datasets. Copyright 2000 OsteoArthritis Research Society International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11069723     DOI: 10.1053/joca.2000.0361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  51 in total

1.  A historic issue of the Annals: three papers examine paracetamol in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R Neame; W Zhang; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Oral enzyme combination versus diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee--a double-blind prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Naseer M Akhtar; Rizwan Naseer; Abid Z Farooqi; Wajahat Aziz; Mussadeq Nazir
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-07-24       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  The efficacy and tolerability of glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicola Giordano; Antonella Fioravanti; Panagiotis Papakostas; Antonio Montella; Giorgio Giorgi; Ranuccio Nuti
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2009-06

Review 4.  Science of assessment.

Authors:  N Bellamy
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Population-based normative values for the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index and the Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) hand osteoarthritis index functional subscales.

Authors:  Nicholas Bellamy; C Wilson; J Hendrikz
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 6.  Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults.

Authors:  Sheena Derry; Philip Conaghan; José António P Da Silva; Philip J Wiffen; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-22

7.  Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study.

Authors:  A-K Nilsdotter; I F Petersson; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Paracetamol in osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  C Miceli-Richard; M Le Bars; N Schmidely; M Dougados
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Management of osteoarthritis (OA) with an unsupervised home based exercise programme and/or patient administered assessment tools. A cluster randomised controlled trial with a 2x2 factorial design.

Authors:  P Ravaud; B Giraudeau; I Logeart; J S Larguier; D Rolland; R Treves; L Euller-Ziegler; B Bannwarth; M Dougados
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Effectiveness of diclofenac versus acetaminophen in primary care patients with knee osteoarthritis: [NTR1485], DIPA-trial: design of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Saskia P J Verkleij; Pim A J Luijsterburg; Bart W Koes; Arthur M Bohnen; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.