Literature DB >> 32540439

Excellent Hemodynamic Performance After Aortic Valve Neocuspidization Using Autologous Pericardium.

Markus Krane1, Johannes Boehm2, Anatol Prinzing3, Johannes Ziegelmueller3, Johannes Holfeld4, Rüdiger Lange1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) for trileaflet aortic valve reconstruction using autologous pericardium (Ozaki procedure) offers an alternative treatment modality to overcome drawbacks of conventional prosthetic aortic valve replacement.
METHODS: Between October 2016 and April 2019, 103 patients underwent surgery. Mean follow-up was 426 ± 270 days. Aortic stenosis was the leading diagnosis in 80 patients (77.7%) and aortic regurgitation in 23 (22.3%), respectively. Mean age was 54.0 ± 16.4 years (range, 13.8-78.5). A bicuspid valve was found in 81 patients (78.6%). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at discharge and at 6 to 12 months after surgery. During AVNeo surgery valve sizing for an Abbott/St Jude Trifecta bioprosthesis (virtually implanted Trifecta bioprosthesis; St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN) was performed to compare pressure gradients and effective orifice area with published data.
RESULTS: Trileaflet aortic valve reconstruction was achieved in all patients. In 38 patients neocommissures were created (36.9%). Mean cross-clamp time was 135 ± 20 minutes. Four patients underwent reoperation; the overall freedom from reoperation was 96.1%. Echocardiographic 6- to 12-months follow-up after surgery was available in 93.8% of patients and did not show any change in hemodynamic parameters compared with discharge. Comparison between AVNeo and virtually implanted Trifecta Bioprosthesis revealed a significantly lower mean pressure gradient (8.5 ± 3.7 mm Hg vs 10.2 ± 2.0 mm Hg, P < .001) and higher mean effective orifice area (2.2 ± 0.7 cm2 vs 2.1 ± 0.4 cm2, P = .037) for AVNeo.
CONCLUSIONS: AVNeo shows low reoperation rates after surgery within the first 2 years. The hemodynamic performance is excellent, and the effective orifice area and mean pressure gradient remain stable within the first year.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32540439     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Narrative review of the contemporary surgical treatment of unicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Maria von Stumm; Tatjana Sequeira-Gross; Johannes Petersen; Shiho Naito; Lisa Müller; Christoph Sinning; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

2.  An ex vivo evaluation of two different suture techniques for the Ozaki aortic neocuspidization procedure.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Saisho; Michael Scharfschwerdt; Tim Schaller; Jan Christian Reil; Stephan Ensminger; Buntaro Fujita; Anas Aboud
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

3.  Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement-Age-Dependent Choice of Prosthesis Type.

Authors:  Keti Vitanova; Felix Wirth; Johannes Boehm; Melchior Burri; Rüdiger Lange; Markus Krane
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Ex vivo evaluation of the Ozaki procedure in comparison with the native aortic valve and prosthetic valves.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Saisho; Michael Scharfschwerdt; Tim Schaller; Najla Sadat; Anas Aboud; Stephan Ensminger; Buntaro Fujita
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-03

5.  Short-term outcomes of aortic valve neocuspidization for various aortic valve diseases.

Authors:  Gregory Khatchatourov; Mathieu van Steenberghe; Doris Goy; Mathieu Potin; Javier Orrit; François Perret; Nicolas Murith; Jean-Jacques Goy
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-08-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.