Radu Tanasescu1,2,3,4, Christopher R Tench1,5, Cris S Constantinescu1,2, Gary Telford6, Sonika Singh1, Nanci Frakich1, David Onion7, Dorothee P Auer1,5,8, Bruno Gran1,2, Nikos Evangelou1,2, Yasser Falah1,2, Colin Ranshaw6, Cinzia Cantacessi9, Timothy P Jenkins9, David I Pritchard6. 1. Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England. 2. Department of Neurology, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Nottingham, England. 3. Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania. 4. Department of Neurology, Colentina Hospital, Bucharest, Romania. 5. National Institute of Health Research Nottingham BRC, Nottingham, England. 6. Immune Regulation Research Group, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England. 7. Flow Cytometry Facilities, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England. 8. Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England. 9. Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Abstract
Importance: Studies suggest gut worms induce immune responses that can protect against multiple sclerosis (MS). To our knowledge, there are no controlled treatment trials with helminth in MS. Objective: To determine whether hookworm treatment has effects on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and T regulatory cells in relapsing MS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 9-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted between September 2012 and March 2016 in a modified intention-to-treat population (the data were analyzed June 2018) at the University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, a single tertiary referral center. Patients aged 18 to 61 years with relapsing MS without disease-modifying treatment were recruited from the MS clinic. Seventy-three patients were screened; of these, 71 were recruited (2 ineligible/declined). Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either 25 Necator americanus larvae transcutaneously or placebo. The MRI scans were performed monthly during months 3 to 9 and 3 months posttreatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the cumulative number of new/enlarging T2/new enhancing T1 lesions at month 9. The secondary end point was the percentage of cluster of differentiation (CD) 4+CD25highCD127negT regulatory cells in peripheral blood. Results: Patients (mean [SD] age, 45 [9.5] years; 50 women [71%]) were randomized to receive hookworm (35 [49.3%]) or placebo (36 [50.7%]). Sixty-six patients (93.0%) completed the trial. The median cumulative numbers of new/enlarging/enhancing lesions were not significantly different between the groups by preplanned Mann-Whitney U tests, which lose power with tied data (high number of zeroactivity MRIs in the hookworm group, 18/35 [51.4%] vs 10/36 [27.8%] in the placebo group). The percentage of CD4+CD25highCD127negT cells increased at month 9 in the hookworm group (hookworm, 32 [4.4%]; placebo, 34 [3.9%]; P = .01). No patients withdrew because of adverse effects. There were no differences in adverse events between groups except more application-site skin discomfort in the hookworm group (82% vs 28%). There were 5 relapses (14.3%) in the hookworm group vs 11 (30.6%) receiving placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment with hookworm was safe and well tolerated. The primary outcome did not reach significance, likely because of a low level of disease activity. Hookworm infection increased T regulatory cells, suggesting an immunobiological effect of hookworm. It appears that a living organism can precipitate immunoregulatory changes that may affect MS disease activity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01470521.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Studies suggest gut worms induce immune responses that can protect against multiple sclerosis (MS). To our knowledge, there are no controlled treatment trials with helminth in MS. Objective: To determine whether hookworm treatment has effects on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and T regulatory cells in relapsing MS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 9-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted between September 2012 and March 2016 in a modified intention-to-treat population (the data were analyzed June 2018) at the University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, a single tertiary referral center. Patients aged 18 to 61 years with relapsing MS without disease-modifying treatment were recruited from the MS clinic. Seventy-three patients were screened; of these, 71 were recruited (2 ineligible/declined). Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either 25 Necator americanus larvae transcutaneously or placebo. The MRI scans were performed monthly during months 3 to 9 and 3 months posttreatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the cumulative number of new/enlarging T2/new enhancing T1 lesions at month 9. The secondary end point was the percentage of cluster of differentiation (CD) 4+CD25highCD127negT regulatory cells in peripheral blood. Results:Patients (mean [SD] age, 45 [9.5] years; 50 women [71%]) were randomized to receive hookworm (35 [49.3%]) or placebo (36 [50.7%]). Sixty-six patients (93.0%) completed the trial. The median cumulative numbers of new/enlarging/enhancing lesions were not significantly different between the groups by preplanned Mann-Whitney U tests, which lose power with tied data (high number of zeroactivity MRIs in the hookworm group, 18/35 [51.4%] vs 10/36 [27.8%] in the placebo group). The percentage of CD4+CD25highCD127negT cells increased at month 9 in the hookworm group (hookworm, 32 [4.4%]; placebo, 34 [3.9%]; P = .01). No patients withdrew because of adverse effects. There were no differences in adverse events between groups except more application-site skin discomfort in the hookworm group (82% vs 28%). There were 5 relapses (14.3%) in the hookworm group vs 11 (30.6%) receiving placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment with hookworm was safe and well tolerated. The primary outcome did not reach significance, likely because of a low level of disease activity. Hookworm infection increased T regulatory cells, suggesting an immunobiological effect of hookworm. It appears that a living organism can precipitate immunoregulatory changes that may affect MS disease activity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01470521.
Authors: J O Fleming; A Isaak; J E Lee; C C Luzzio; M D Carrithers; T D Cook; A S Field; J Boland; Z Fabry Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: F Barkhof; M Filippi; D H Miller; P Scheltens; A Campi; C H Polman; G Comi; H J Adèr; N Losseff; J Valk Journal: Brain Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Daniel Blount; Doreen Hooi; Johanna Feary; Andrea Venn; Gary Telford; Alan Brown; John Britton; David Pritchard Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Paul R Chapman; Stacey Llewellyn; Helen Jennings; Luke Becker; Paul Giacomin; Rodney McDougall; Jennifer Robson; Alex Loukas; James McCarthy Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Bonnie Douglas; Oyebola Oyesola; Martha M Cooper; Avery Posey; Elia Tait Wojno; Paul R Giacomin; De'Broski R Herbert Journal: Annu Rev Immunol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 28.527
Authors: Ivet A Yordanova; Friederike Ebner; Axel Ronald Schulz; Svenja Steinfelder; Berit Rosche; Anna Bolze; Friedemann Paul; Henrik E Mei; Susanne Hartmann Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2021-01-29
Authors: John Croese; Gregory C Miller; Louise Marquart; Stacey Llewellyn; Rohit Gupta; Luke Becker; Andrew D Clouston; Christine Welch; Julia Sidorenko; Leanne Wallace; Peter M Visscher; Matthew L Remedios; James S McCarthy; Peter O'Rourke; Graham Radford-Smith; Alex Loukas; Mark Norrie; John W Masson; Richard B Gearry; Tony Rahman; Paul R Giacomin Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Timothy P Jenkins; David I Pritchard; Radu Tanasescu; Gary Telford; Marina Papaiakovou; Riccardo Scotti; Alba Cortés; Cris S Constantinescu; Cinzia Cantacessi Journal: BMC Biol Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 7.431
Authors: Christina B Schroeter; Niklas Huntemann; Stefanie Bock; Christopher Nelke; David Kremer; Klaus Pfeffer; Sven G Meuth; Tobias Ruck Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 7.561