| Literature DB >> 32537632 |
Mohammad Najim Uddin1, Towsif Alam1, Muhammad Azharul Islam1, Tawhidul Amin Khan1, Raihan Uz Zaman2, Shofiul Azam3, Atm Mostafa Kamal1, Md Jakaria4.
Abstract
Actinodaphne angustifolia Nees (Family: Lauraceae) is commonly used in folk medicine against urinary disorder and diabetes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the antioxidant, cytotoxic, thrombolytic, and antidiarrheal activities of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) fraction of leaves of A. angustifolia (CTFAA) in different experimental models. Antioxidant activity was evaluated by using qualitative and quantitative assays, while antidiarrheal effects assessed with castor oil-induced diarrheal models in mice. The clot lysis and brine shrimp lethality bioassay were used to investigate the thrombolytic and cytotoxic activities, respectively. CTFAA showed antioxidant effects in all qualitative and quantitative procedures. The fraction produced dose-dependent and significant (P<0.05 and P<0.01) activities in castor oil-induced diarrheal models. Moreover, CTFAA significantly (P<0.05) demonstrated a 15.29% clot lysis effect in the thrombolytic test, and the brine shrimp lethality assay LC50 value was 424.16 μg/ml bioassay. In conclusion, the current study showed CTFAA has significant antidiarrheal effects along with modest antioxidant and thrombolytic effects, and these data warrant further experiment to justify and include CTFAA as a supplement to mitigate the onset of diarrheal and cardiovascular disease.Entities:
Keywords: Actinodaphne angustifolia Nees; Antidiarrheal activity; Antioxidant activity; Cytotoxic activity; Thrombolytic activity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32537632 PMCID: PMC7308611 DOI: 10.1042/BSR20201110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosci Rep ISSN: 0144-8463 Impact factor: 3.840
Figure 1CTFAA activity in the brine shrimp lethality assay
Various concentrations of CTFAA were assessed on the viability of brine shrimp nauplii after 24 h incubation (n = 10). Concentrations of CTFAA vs toxicity in brine shrimp nauplii were presented in the figure.
Figure 2DPPH radical scavenging activity of CTFAA and ascorbic acid
CTFAA dose-dependently scavenges the DPPH radical; ascorbic acid was used as the positive control.
Figure 3Reducing power of CTFAA
Different concentration of CTFAA shows reducing power, and ascorbic acid was used as a positive control.
Figure 4Total amount of phenolic, flavonoid, and flavonol contents of CTFAA
Values are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Unit for the total phenolic is mg GAE/g, the flavonoid is mg QE/g, and flavonol is mg QE/g.
Figure 5Clot lysis effect of CTFAA
Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 10). *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared with the negative control group and #P<0.05 compared with the positive control group (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test).
Effect of CTFAA on castor oil-induced diarrhea in mice (n = 5)
| Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | The onset of diarrhea (min) | Number of wet feces | Total number of feces | Total weight of wet feces (g) | Total weight of all feces (g) | % Inhibition of defecation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | – | 58.33 ± 2.69 | 9.16 ± 0.84 | 13.84 ± 0.32 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | – |
| Loperamide | 5 | 219.34 ± 5.25** | 2.60 ± 0.44** | 2.18 ± 0.41** | 0.14 ± 0.01** | 0.15 ± 0.01** | 71.62 |
| CTFAA | 150 | 75.67 ± 12.39* | 7.67 ± 1.67* | 11.67 ± 1.67* | 0.39 ± 0.08* | 0.51 ± 0.09* | 16.27 |
| CTFAA | 300 | 104.67 ± 23.13* | 5.33 ± 1.20* | 10.67 ± 1.67* | 0.33 ± 0.06* | 0.48 ± 0.06* | 41.81 |
Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared with the control group (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test).
Effect of CTFAA on castor oil-induced intestinal transit in mice (n = 5)
| Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | Peristaltic index (%) | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | – | 83.07 | – |
| Loperamide | 5 | 29.68** | 64.27 |
| CTFAA | 150 | 44.59** | 46.32 |
| CTFAA | 300 | 41.03** | 50.61 |
Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. **P<0.01 compared with the control group (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test).
Effect of CTFAA on castor oil-induced intestinal fluid accumulation in mice (n = 5)
| Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | Volume of intestinal content (ml) | Inhibition (%) | Weight of intestinal content (g) | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | – | 0.88 ± 0.08 | – | 1.13 ± 0.04 | – |
| Loperamide | 5 | 0.48 ± 0.03** | 45.45 | 0.38 ± 0.04** | 66.37 |
| CTFAA | 150 | 0.73 ± 0.18* | 17.05 | 0.51 ± 0.10** | 54.87 |
| CTFAA | 300 | 0.63 ± 0.09* | 28.41 | 0.48 ± 0.05** | 57.52 |
Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared with the control group (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test).