| Literature DB >> 32532974 |
Xiao-Yan Zhao1, Andreas Wilmen2, Dongli Wang3, Xinquan Wang3, Maxine Bauzon4, Ji-Yun Kim4, Lars Linden2, Liang Li3, Ursula Egner5, Tobias Marquardt5, Dieter Moosmayer5, Jan Tebbe2, Julian Marius Glück2, Philipp Ellinger2, Kirk McLean4, Shujun Yuan4, Subramanian Yegneswaran4, Xiaoqiao Jiang4, Vince Evans4, Jian-Ming Gu4, Doug Schneider4, Ying Zhu4, Yifan Xu4, Cornell Mallari4, Ashley Hesslein6, Yan Wang4, Nicole Schmidt4, Katrin Gutberlet7, Christine Ruehl-Fehlert7, Alexius Freyberger7, Terry Hermiston4, Chandra Patel4, Derek Sim4, Laurent O Mosnier8, Volker Laux9.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32532974 PMCID: PMC7293249 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16720-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Antibody characterization using SPR and ELISA.
a–d Affinity measurement by SPR for type I and type II mAbs: Biacore sensograms showing the association and dissociation curves for antibody binding to hAPC at concentrations of 1.56, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 nM (a, b) or to hPC at concentrations of 1.56, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 1000 nM (c, d). Black traces represent experimental data, and red traces represent the corresponding fits. Type I showed a slower on-rate (ka, 1.5 × 105 M−1 s−1) and off-rate (kd, 1.9 × 10−3 s−1) than type II (ka, 6.1 × 105 M−1 s−1; kd, 6.2 × 10−3 s−1). e, f Antibody-binding specificity by ELISA for type I mAb (e) and type II mAb (f) bound to hAPC (circle) or hPC (square). ELISA results are shown as mean ± SDs from triplicate wells for each antibody concentration, and experiments were repeated >3 times. g Schematic representation of the binding sites on APC protease domain for type I, type II, and R41C17 mAbs. R41C17, an anti-APC Gla-domain antibody, was used as control. h Type II but not type I bound the complex of PPACK-hAPC. PPACK-hAPC or hAPC was coated onto a MaxiSorp plate at 100 ng per well overnight. IgG or Fab at concentrations starting at 20 nM were tested for binding. SPR surface plasmon resonance, ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, hAPC human activated protein C, hPC human protein C, RU relative unit, OD490 absorbance at 490 nm, PPACK Phe–Pro–Arg–chloromethylketone, RFU relative fluorescence unit, IgG immunoglobulin G, Fab antigen-binding fragment.
Fig. 2Structural epitope mapping of type I and type II mAbs on APC by X-ray crystallography.
a Structure of the APC-C25K23Fab (type I) complex. b Close-up view showing that the HCDR3 loop plays a major role in interaction with APC. c Close-up view showing that the side chain of residue W104 of the HCDR3 inserts into the catalytic pocket of APC and d has steric overlap with the APC inhibitor PPACK. e Epitope of APC (salmon) within 5 Å to type I Fab marked on APC (wheat). f Critical residues (cyan) of APC interacting with PPACK (according to Fig. 5 of Mather et al.[16], PDB code: 1AUT) on APC (wheat). g Structure of the APC-h1573Fab (type II) complex. h Close-up view showing that the LCDR1 loop plays a major role in interaction with APC, and i the h1573Fab binding does not block the binding site of PPACK on APC, and the autolysis loop (His144–Thr152) of APC is observed in the APC-h1573Fab crystal structure (marine), but invisible in the APC–PPACK and APC-C25K23Fab structures (Supplementary Fig. 2d). j Epitope of APC (slate) within 5 Å to type II Fab marked on APC (wheat). k Side view of type I and type II Fab–APC complexes and structural superimposition of the two structures. In panels d, e, i, j, the positions of PPACK were determined by structural superimposition with APC–PPACK complex structure. APC residues are indicated using the Chymotrypsin numbering[16]. HCDR3 heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3, LCDR1 light- chain complementarity-determining region 1, PDB protein data bank.
Diffraction data collection and structural refinement statistics.
| (Type I) C25K23-APC | (Type II) h1573-APC | |
|---|---|---|
| Data collection | ||
| Beamline | SSRF BL17U | SSRF BL17U |
| Wavelength | 1.000 Å | 1.000 Å |
| Space group | C2 | P43212 |
| Cell dimensions | ||
| a, b, c (Å) | 112.257, 94.881, 114.298 | 124.339, 124.339, 666.156 |
| α, β, γ (°) | 90, 105.51, 90 | 90, 90, 90 |
| Resolution (Å) | 50.0−2.20 (2.26−2.20) | 50.0−3.70 (3.79−3.70) |
| a | 9.6 (98.9) | 27.6 (0.00) |
| b | 5.6 (53.1) | 14.9 (65.6) |
| cCC1/2 of the highest-resolution shell | 0.825 | 0.602 |
| I/ | 13.7 (2.3) | 6.0 (1.5) |
| Completeness (%) | 96.9 (97.1) | 99.6 (99.8) |
| Redundancy | 3.1 | 5.5 |
| Refinement | ||
| Resolution (Å) | 28.7−2.20 | 33.4−3.7 |
| No. of reflections | 50,696 | 56,425 |
| d | 20.1/24.1 | 28.0/30.2 |
| No. of atoms | ||
| Protein | 5725 | 5636 |
| Water | 191 | |
| B-factors (Å2) | ||
| Protein | 59.2 | 95.5 |
| Water | 56.6 | |
| r.m.s. deviations | ||
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Bond angles (°) | 1.199 | 1.130 |
| Ramachandran plot (%) | ||
| Most favored | 86.7 | 80.3 |
| Additionally allowed | 12.1 | 17.3 |
| Generously allowed | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Disallowed | 0.2 | 1.3 |
aRmerge = ∑∑ | I(hkl) − 〈I(hkl)〉|/∑hkl∑jI(hkl), where I is the intensity of reflection and h, k, and l are the indices of the reflections.
bRpim = ∑[1/(N−1)]1/2∑ | I(hkl) − 〈I(hkl)〉|/∑∑I(hkl), where N is the redundancy of the dataset.
cCC1/2 is the correlation coefficient of the half-datasets.
dRwork and Rfree are defined by R = Σ | |Fobs | − |Fcalc | |/Σ | Fobs | , where Fobs and Fcalc is the observed and the calculated structure factor, respectively. Rfree is the cross-validation R factor for the test set of reflections (5% of the total) omitted in model refinement.
Fig. 5Characterization of type I and type II mAbs in monkeys.
a, b TM–TGA in monkey plasma: a ETP and b peak thrombin levels. c, d Protac-aPTT in FVIII Ab-treated monkey plasma: c clotting time with IC50 values of 9.3 vs. 19.3 nM and d % inhibition with IC50 values. Experiments were performed with triplicate samples in (a, b) and duplicate samples in (c, d); data points reflect their average in each assay, and assays were repeated ≥3 times. e–j Testing mAbs in vivo. Plasma PC levels (μg/mL) in type I-treated (e) and in type II-treated (f) wild-type cynomolgus monkeys. Each bar represents the mean value ± SD of 3–6 measurements from one monkey (e) and two monkeys (f). g Pharmacokinetic profiles (c/t curves) of both mAbs at 3 mg/kg administered intravenously in wild-type cynomolgus monkeys. h, i Development of severe HemA monkey bleeding model and testing acute efficacy of type II mAb. h Plasma FVIII activity (IU/mL) in monkeys (n = 10 independent animals) before and after treatment with anti-FVIII antibody (no Ab vs. anti-FVIII Ab). LLOQ means the lower limit of quantification (0.04 IU/mL). Box and whiskers are based on the Tukey’s method with the center line representing median, box representing interquartile range (IQR) between 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers representing 25th or 75th percentile plus 1.51 IQR. i Total bleeding time in second(s) post injury in normal monkeys (i.e., no treatment: Trmt−) and in HemA monkeys (i.e., treated with anti-FVIII antibody: α-FVIII), as well as in HemA monkeys treated with type II mAb at 3 and 10 mg/kg or with the known procoagulant rFVIIa (recombinant activated factor VII) at its pharmacological dose (270 µg/kg) as control. p Values < 0.05 are indicated (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test). N = 10 monkeys per group. j Median hemoglobin remaining, 72 h post administration of BO2C11-cynoIgG1 (t = 0) and intramuscular needle injury (t = 2 h), as a readout of prophylactic efficacy of type II mAb in HemA cynomolgus monkeys. Median values of hemoglobin remaining in each group as % of non-hemophilic animals are shown by lines. * in the saline group denotes two monkeys that died.
Fig. 3Type I and type II mAbs are procoagulants in vitro.
a APC amidolytic activity is defined by the maximum velocity (Vmax) of its hydrolyzing reaction toward the small chromogenic substrate spectrozyme PCa, and percent inhibition of APC amidolytic activity by mAbs is shown in Supplementary Fig. 3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. N = 4–6. b Both mAbs protect FVa from APC-mediated proteolysis. In the absence of APC, the activity of FVa in the prothrombinase assay was designated as 100%. In the absence of added antibodies, APC proteolyzed FVa and reduced its activity to 6.4 ± 0.3% (mean ± SD). Assays were repeatedly performed in triplicates; a typical curve is shown. c, d TM–TGA in normal human plasma (FACT): c ETP and d peak thrombin levels. e, f TGA on EA.hy926 endothelial cells: e baseline thrombin levels (nM) shown as a representative experiment and f ETP as %NP (percent of normal pooled plasma). Data represent mean values ± SD from three independent experiments. g–l Plasma-clotting assays where IC50 values in nM of mAbs are compared in a table below each panel. Protac-aPTT using FACT: g clotting time in seconds (s), h percent inhibition. Protac-aPTT using HemA plasma: i clotting time in seconds (s) and j percent inhibition. Protac-aPTT using FVIII Ab-treated FACT: k clotting time in seconds (s) and l percent inhibition. In c–l, experiments were run with replicate samples in each assay, and data reflect the average of two replicates. Assays were repeated ≥3 times. FACT normal human plasma, Protac a protein C activator from A. contortrix venom.
Fig. 4Distinct effects of type I and type II mAbs on the cytoprotective activities of APC.
a Histone-mediated cytotoxicity assay using HUVECs (% live cells after 2 h). Positive (50 µg/mL histone 3, 0% live cells, black bar) and negative (no histone 3, 70% live cells, open bar) controls. Reduction of histone cytotoxicity by hAPC (20 nM, gray bars) in the presence of type I mAb (light gray) or type II mAb (dark gray). The results are shown as mean + SD of three independent experiments. b Effect of mAbs on PAR1 cleavage of SEAP–PAR1 reporter construct on transfected HEK293/wt-EPCR cells. Shown are mean ± SEM of n = 4 performed on two independent cell seedings. c PAR1 cleavage on EA.hy926 endothelial cells. The ATAP antibody reports PAR1 cleavage at Arg46[50]. Shown are mean ± SD of N = 10. * denotes p < 0.05 tested with ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test in both (c) and (d). d, e APC (50 nM)-mediated endothelial barrier protection in response to thrombin (2 nM)-induced barrier disruption of an EA.hy926 endothelial cell monolayer was determined using the iCelligence system. d Permeability is expressed as the percentage of maximal barrier disruption induced by thrombin (100%) in the absence of APC. Shown are mean ± SEM of N = 4. e Effect of the mAbs on APC’s barrier protection is expressed as the percentage of the maximal barrier-protective effect of APC in the absence of mAbs. Shown are mean ± SEM of N = 3. f Effect of the type II mAb on the inactivation of APC in human plasma by SERPINs. Data represent mean values ± SD from at least three independent experiments. HUVEC human umbilical vein endothelial cells, SEAP–PAR1 secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) fused to the N terminus of human PAR1, HEK293/wt-EPCR HEK293 cells with stable expression of wild-type human EPCR, SERPINs serine protease inhibitors.