| Literature DB >> 32532269 |
Bingjin Wang1, Wenbin Hua1, Wencan Ke1, Yukun Zhang1, Xianlin Zeng1, Cao Yang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The bony fusion of allograft bone using titanium mesh in the posterior-only surgical treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis has not been explained in detail. We aimed to analyze the efficacy of bony fusion of allograft bone using titanium mesh in the posterior-only surgical treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis.Entities:
Keywords: Allograft; Posterior approach; Spinal tuberculosis; Thoracic and thoracolumbar; Titanium mesh
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32532269 PMCID: PMC7291568 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00793-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Surg ISSN: 1471-2482 Impact factor: 2.102
Fig. 1A 26-year-old woman was diagnosed with thoracic tuberculosis after a 6 months history of intermittent back pain and numbness in both lower limbs. a-b preoperative X-ray showed that T2–3 tuberculosis with the vertebral body destroyed. c-d preoperative CT and MRI showed T2–3 vertebral body destruction with paravertebral abscess and spinal canal abscess with cord compression. e intraoperative image showed one-stage posterior debridement, allograft bone graft using titanium mesh, posterior instrumentation, and fusion. f-g postoperative X-ray before discharge showed well-positioned titanium mesh and posterior instrumentation. h CT scan at final follow-up (5 years) showed good bony fusion, correctly placed titanium mesh, and posterior instrumentation
Characteristics and clinical data of the patients
| Variable | Statistic |
|---|---|
| Mean age/years | 44.1 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 18 |
| Female | 14 |
| Region of tuberculosis | |
| Thoracic | 19 |
| Thoracolumbar | 13 |
| Mean surgery duration (minutes) | 172.7 |
| Mean blood loss (ml) | 710.9 |
Characteristics and clinical data of the patients
| Time | VAS | odi (%) | ASIA, n | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | D | E | |||
| Preoperative | 6.4 ± 1.8 | 47.7 ± 12.6 | 4 | 14 | 14 |
| Before discharge | 2.2 ± 0.7 | 25.1 ± 9.0 | 2 | 9 | 21 |
| At final follow-up | 0.6 ± 0.6 | 13.1 ± 7.2 | 3 | 29 | |
| T/P | 17.2/< 0.001a | 18.6/< 0.001a | |||
| 20.5/< 0.001b | 22.5/< 0.001b | ||||
apreoperative value compares with preoperative one
bpreoperative value compares with final follow-up one
Cobb angle, angle correction and angle lost
| Characteristics | Descriptive statistics |
|---|---|
| Preoperative Cobb angle (°) | 33.6 ± 9.3 |
| Cobb angle before discharge (°) | 10.6 ± 2.6 |
| Angle correction (°) | 23.0 ± 8.9 |
| Correction rate (%) | 66.2 ± 12.2 |
| Cobb angle at final follow-up (°) | 11.4 ± 3.1 |
| Angle lost (°) | 0.8 ± 0.9 |
| Lost rate (%) | 5.8 ± 5.4 |
| T/P | 14.4/< 0.001a |
| 14.0/< 0.001b |
apreoperative value compares with postoperative one
bpreoperative value compares with final follow-up one