Literature DB >> 32531763

A modular phantom and software to characterize 3D geometric distortion in MRI.

Jordan M Slagowski1, Yao Ding, Manik Aima, Zhifei Wen, Clifton D Fuller, Caroline Chung, J Matthew Debnam, Ken-Pin Hwang, Mo Kadbi, Janio Szklaruk, Jihong Wang.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers outstanding soft tissue contrast that may reduce uncertainties in target and organ-at-risk delineation and enable online adaptive image-guided treatment. Spatial distortions resulting from non-linearities in the gradient fields and non-uniformity in the main magnetic field must be accounted for across the imaging field-of-view to prevent systematic errors during treatment delivery. This work presents a modular phantom and software application to characterize geometric distortion (GD) within the large field-of-view MRI images required for radiation therapy simulation. The modular phantom is assembled from a series of rectangular foam blocks containing high-contrast fiducial markers in a known configuration. The modular phantom design facilitates transportation of the phantom between different MR scanners and MR-guided linear accelerators and allows the phantom to be adapted to fit different sized bores or coils. The phantom was evaluated using a 1.5 T MR-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) and 1.5 T and 3.0 T diagnostic scanners. Performance was assessed by varying acquisition parameters to induce image distortions in a known manner. Imaging was performed using T1 and T2 weighted pulse sequences with 2D and 3D distortion correction algorithms and the receiver bandwidth (BW) varied as 250-815 Hz pixel-1. Phantom set-up reproducibility was evaluated across independent set-ups. The software was validated by comparison with a non-modular phantom. Average geometric distortion was 0.94 ± 0.58 mm for the MR-Linac, 0.90 ± 0.53 mm for the 1.5 T scanner, and 1.15 ± 0.62 mm for the 3.0 T scanner, for a 400 mm diameter volume-of-interest. GD increased, as expected, with decreasing BW, and with the 2D versus 3D correction algorithm. Differences in GD attributed to phantom set-up were 0.13 mm or less. Differences in GD for the two software applications were less than 0.07 mm. A novel modular phantom was developed to evaluate distortions in MR images for radiation therapy applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32531763      PMCID: PMC7772054          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9c64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  22 in total

1.  The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Debois; R Oyen; F Maes; G Verswijvel; G Gatti; H Bosmans; M Feron; E Bellon; G Kutcher; H Van Poppel; L Vanuytsel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Reproducibility of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging based on phantom studies.

Authors:  T Mizowaki; Y Nagata; K Okajima; M Kokubo; Y Negoro; N Araki; M Hiraoka
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  A phantom study of the geometric accuracy of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging stereotactic localization with the Leksell stereotactic system.

Authors:  C Yu; M L Apuzzo; C S Zee; Z Petrovich
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Characterization of 3D geometric distortion of magnetic resonance imaging scanners commissioned for radiation therapy planning.

Authors:  Tarraf Torfeh; Rabih Hammoud; Gregory Perkins; Maeve McGarry; Souha Aouadi; Azim Celik; Ken-Pin Hwang; Joseph Stancanello; Primoz Petric; Noora Al-Hammadi
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Comprehensive MRI simulation methodology using a dedicated MRI scanner in radiation oncology for external beam radiation treatment planning.

Authors:  Eric S Paulson; Beth Erickson; Chris Schultz; X Allen Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  First demonstration of intrafractional tumor-tracked irradiation using 2D phantom MR images on a prototype linac-MR.

Authors:  Jihyun Yun; Keith Wachowicz; Marc Mackenzie; Satyapal Rathee; Don Robinson; B G Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Systematic Review of Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation Methodologies for Use in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Emily Johnstone; Jonathan J Wyatt; Ann M Henry; Susan C Short; David Sebag-Montefiore; Louise Murray; Charles G Kelly; Hazel M McCallum; Richard Speight
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Implementation of a novel algorithm for generating synthetic CT images from magnetic resonance imaging data sets for prostate cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Joshua Kim; Carri Glide-Hurst; Anthony Doemer; Ning Wen; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Radiotherapy treatment planning of basal meningiomas: improved tumor localization by correlation of CT and MR imaging data.

Authors:  L R Schad; G Gademann; M Knopp; H J Zabel; W Schlegel; W J Lorenz
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Optimization of a novel large field of view distortion phantom for MR-only treatment planning.

Authors:  Ryan G Price; Robert A Knight; Ken-Pin Hwang; Ersin Bayram; Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

1.  Design and construction of a customizable phantom for the characterization of the three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging geometric distortion.

Authors:  Tarraf Torfeh; Rabih Hammoud; Satheesh Paloor; Yoganathan Arunachalam; Souha Aouadi; Noora Al-Hammadi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Assessment of a novel commercial large field of view phantom for comprehensive MR imaging quality assurance of a 0.35T MRgRT system.

Authors:  Benjamin C Lewis; Jaeik Shin; Borna Maraghechi; Benjamin Quinn; Mike Cole; Enzo Barberi; Jin Sung Kim; Olga Green; Taeho Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.