Literature DB >> 10571190

The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer.

M Debois1, R Oyen, F Maes, G Verswijvel, G Gatti, H Bosmans, M Feron, E Bellon, G Kutcher, H Van Poppel, L Vanuytsel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the use of transaxial and coronal MR imaging improves the ability to localize the apex of the prostate and the anterior part of the rectum compared to the use of transaxial CT alone, and whether the incorporation of MR could improve the coverage of the prostate by the radiotherapy field and change the volume of rectum irradiated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten consecutive patients with localized prostate carcinoma underwent a CT and an axial and coronal MR scan in treatment position. The CT and MR images were mathematically aligned, and three observers were asked to contour independently the prostate and the rectum on CT and on MR. The interobserver variability of the prostatic apex location and of the delineation of the anterior rectal wall were assessed for each image modality. A dosimetry study was performed to evaluate the dose to the rectum when MR was used in addition to CT to localize the pelvic organs.
RESULTS: The interobserver variation of the prostatic apex location was largest on CT ranging from 0.54 to 1.07 cm, and smallest on coronal MR ranging from 0.17 to 0.25 cm. The interobserver variation of the delineation of the anterior rectum on MR was small and constant along the whole length of the prostate (0.09+/-0.02 cm), while for CT it was comparable to that for the MR delineation at the base of the prostate, but it increased gradually towards the apex, where the variation reached 0.39 cm. The volume of MR rectum receiving more than 80% of the prescribed dose was on average reduced by 23.8+/-11.2% from the CT to the MR treatment plan.
CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the additional use of axial and coronal MR scans, in designing the treatment plan for localized prostate carcinoma, improves substantially the localization accuracy of the prostatic apex and the anterior aspect of the rectum, resulting in a better coverage of the prostate and a potential to reduce the volume of the rectum irradiated to a high dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10571190     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00288-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  38 in total

Review 1.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging before and after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; David A McKenna; John Kurhanewicz; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  MR image-based synthetic CT for IMRT prostate treatment planning and CBCT image-guided localization.

Authors:  Shupeng Chen; Hong Quan; An Qin; Seonghwan Yee; Di Yan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Treatment planning using MRI data: an analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for different treatment regions.

Authors:  Joakim H Jonsson; Magnus G Karlsson; Mikael Karlsson; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Validation of the CT-MRI image registration with a dedicated phantom.

Authors:  Sofia Spampinato; Anna Maria Gueli; Luigi Raffaele; Concetta Stancampiano; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Technical Note: Characterization and correction of gradient nonlinearity induced distortion on a 1.0 T open bore MR-SIM.

Authors:  Ryan G Price; Mo Kadbi; Joshua Kim; James Balter; Indrin J Chetty; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Converting from CT- to MRI-only-based target definition in radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer: A comparison between two modalities.

Authors:  Tiina Seppälä; Harri Visapää; Juhani Collan; Mika Kapanen; Annette Beule; Mauri Kouri; Mikko Tenhunen; Kauko Saarilahti
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Cold spot mapping inferred from MRI at time of failure predicts biopsy-proven local failure after permanent seed brachytherapy in prostate cancer patients: implications for focal salvage brachytherapy.

Authors:  Gilles Crehange; Devan Krishnamurthy; J Adam Cunha; Barby Pickett; John Kurhanewicz; I-Chow Hsu; Alexander R Gottschalk; Katsuto Shinohara; Mack Roach; Jean Pouliot
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  A modular phantom and software to characterize 3D geometric distortion in MRI.

Authors:  Jordan M Slagowski; Yao Ding; Manik Aima; Zhifei Wen; Clifton D Fuller; Caroline Chung; J Matthew Debnam; Ken-Pin Hwang; Mo Kadbi; Janio Szklaruk; Jihong Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Using synthetic CT for partial brain radiation therapy: Impact on image guidance.

Authors:  Eric D Morris; Ryan G Price; Joshua Kim; Lonni Schultz; M Salim Siddiqui; Indrin Chetty; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.