Steven Kirshblum1, Amanda Botticello2, John Benedetto3, Jayne Donovan4, Ralph Marino5, Shelly Hsieh6, Nicole Wagaman7. 1. Department of Physical Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey; Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, West Orange, New Jersey; Kessler Foundation, West Orange, New Jersey. Electronic address: skirshblum@kessler-rehab.com. 2. Department of Physical Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey; Kessler Foundation, West Orange, New Jersey. 3. Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, West Orange, New Jersey. 4. Department of Physical Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey; Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, West Orange, New Jersey; Kessler Foundation, West Orange, New Jersey. 5. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 6. Department of Physical Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey. 7. University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri; Howard A. Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital, Columbia, Missouri.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the "sacral sparing" definition for completeness of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a more stable definition than the previously used Frankel Classification. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of individuals enrolled in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) database between 2011 and 2018. SETTING: SCIMS centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=804) with traumatic SCI who were at least 16 years old at time of injury, were admitted to rehabilitation within 30 days, had American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grades A-D at admission, and had complete neurologic data at the time of admission and 1 year. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frankel and AIS scores were computed for a cohort of 804 eligible cases. Stability was compared between the 2 classification systems by calculating the proportions of cases in which regression (conversion to a more severe impairment level) was observed. RESULTS: A larger proportion of individuals classified with "incomplete" injuries (grades B-D) at the time of admission using the Frankel system regressed to complete status at 1 year compared with the AIS criteria (9.4% vs 2.0%). Those with grade B injuries regressed to grade A more often using the Frankel system compared with the AIS system (19.7% to 5.4%). A larger proportion of people diagnosed as Frankel grade C or D regressed to Frankel grade A compared with individuals diagnosed as AIS grade C or D who regressed to AIS grade A (5.0% to 1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: More individuals diagnosed with neurologically incomplete SCI regressed to complete status at 1 year when using the Frankel system compared with AIS classification, which is based on sacral sparing. This reinforces the finding that the "sacral sparing" definition is a more stable classification in traumatic SCI.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the "sacral sparing" definition for completeness of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a more stable definition than the previously used Frankel Classification. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of individuals enrolled in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) database between 2011 and 2018. SETTING: SCIMS centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=804) with traumatic SCI who were at least 16 years old at time of injury, were admitted to rehabilitation within 30 days, had American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grades A-D at admission, and had complete neurologic data at the time of admission and 1 year. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frankel and AIS scores were computed for a cohort of 804 eligible cases. Stability was compared between the 2 classification systems by calculating the proportions of cases in which regression (conversion to a more severe impairment level) was observed. RESULTS: A larger proportion of individuals classified with "incomplete" injuries (grades B-D) at the time of admission using the Frankel system regressed to complete status at 1 year compared with the AIS criteria (9.4% vs 2.0%). Those with grade B injuries regressed to grade A more often using the Frankel system compared with the AIS system (19.7% to 5.4%). A larger proportion of people diagnosed as Frankel grade C or D regressed to Frankel grade A compared with individuals diagnosed as AIS grade C or D who regressed to AIS grade A (5.0% to 1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: More individuals diagnosed with neurologically incomplete SCI regressed to complete status at 1 year when using the Frankel system compared with AIS classification, which is based on sacral sparing. This reinforces the finding that the "sacral sparing" definition is a more stable classification in traumatic SCI.
Authors: Roland Thietje; Birgitt Kowald; Ralf Böthig; Arndt P Schulz; Markus Northmann; Yannick Rau; Sven Hirschfeld Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Dirk Rades; Jan Küchler; Lena Graumüller; Abdulkareem Abusamha; Steven E Schild; Jan Gliemroth Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 6.639