Aaron Bivins1, Devin North1, Arslan Ahmad2,3, Warish Ahmed4, Eric Alm5, Frederic Been6, Prosun Bhattacharya2,3, Lubertus Bijlsma7, Alexandria B Boehm8, Joe Brown9, Gianluigi Buttiglieri10, Vincenza Calabro11, Annalaura Carducci12, Sara Castiglioni13, Zeynep Cetecioglu Gurol14, Sudip Chakraborty11, Federico Costa15, Stefano Curcio11, Francis L de Los Reyes16, Jeseth Delgado Vela17, Kata Farkas18, Xavier Fernandez-Casi19, Charles Gerba20, Daniel Gerrity21, Rosina Girones22, Raul Gonzalez23, Eiji Haramoto24, Angela Harris16, Patricia A Holden25, Md Tahmidul Islam2, Davey L Jones26, Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern27, Masaaki Kitajima28, Nadine Kotlarz29, Manish Kumar30, Keisuke Kuroda31, Giuseppina La Rosa32, Francesca Malpei33, Mariana Mautus34, Sandra L McLellan35, Gertjan Medema6,36,37, John Scott Meschke38, Jochen Mueller39, Ryan J Newton35, David Nilsson2, Rachel T Noble40, Alexander van Nuijs41, Jordan Peccia42, T Alex Perkins43, Amy J Pickering44, Joan Rose45, Gloria Sanchez46, Adam Smith47, Lauren Stadler48, Christine Stauber49, Kevin Thomas39, Tom van der Voorn50, Krista Wigginton51, Kevin Zhu9, Kyle Bibby1. 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame, 156 Fitzpatrick Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States. 2. Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 10B, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden. 3. KWR Water Research Institute, Groningenhaven 7 3433 PE Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. 4. CSIRO Land and Water, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, Queensland 4102, Australia. 5. Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 21 Ames St, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States. 6. KWR Water Research Institute, Water Quality and Heath, Groningenhaven 7 3433 PE Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. 7. Analytical Chemistry in Public Health and the Environment, University Jaume I, Av. Vicent Sos Baynat, s/n 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain. 8. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States. 9. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States. 10. Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA), Emili Grahit 101, E-17003 Girona, Spain. 11. Laboratory of Transport Phenomena & Biotechnology, Department of Computer Engineering, Modeling, Electronics and Systems, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, Cubo 42/a 87036 Rende, Cosenza, Italy. 12. Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Via Volta 4 bis, 13 56126 Pisa, Italy. 13. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Instituto di Richerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri, 2, 20156 Milan, Italy. 14. Department of Chemical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 42, SE-11428 Stockholm, Sweden. 15. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. 40110-040. 16. Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, 2501 Stinson Dr, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States. 17. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Howard University, 2300 Sixth Street, NW #1026, Washington, D.C. 20059, United States. 18. School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, LL59 5AB, U.K. 19. Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. 20. Department of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, 2959 W Calle Agua Nueva, Tucson, Arizona 85745, United States. 21. Applied Research and Development Center, Southern Nevada Water Authority, 100 S City Pkwy Suite 700, Las Vegas, Nevada 89106, United States. 22. Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics, University of Barcelona, Diagonal, 643 08028 Barcelona, Spain. 23. Hampton Roads Sanitation District, 1434 Air Rail Ave, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23455, United States. 24. Interdisciplinary Center for River Basin Environment, University of Yamanashi, 4-3-11 Takeda, Kofu, Yamanashi 400-8511, Japan. 25. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, 3508 Bren Hall, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States. 26. School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Gwynedd, Wales LL57 2UW, United Kingdom. 27. Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down Bath, BA2 7AY, United Kingdom. 28. Division of Environmental Engineering, Hokkaido University, North 13 West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8628, Japan. 29. Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States. 30. Discipline of Earth Science, Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382 355, India. 31. Department of Environmental & Civil Engineering, Toyama Prefectural University, 5180 Kurokawa, Imizu-city, Toyama 9390398 Japan. 32. Department of Environment and Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Roma RM, Italy. 33. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Ambientale, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano MI, Italy. 34. Biobot Analytics, LLC, Somerville, Massachusetts 02143, United States. 35. School of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 600 E Greenfield Ave, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204, United States. 36. Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands. 37. Michigan State University, Natural Resources, 1405 S Harrison Rd, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, United States. 38. Dept. Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle Washington 98105-6099, United States. 39. Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), University of Queensland, 20 Cornwall Street, Brisbane, Queensland 4102 Australia. 40. UNC Chapel Hill Institute of Marine Sciences, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, United States. 41. Toxicological Centre, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, België. 42. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, 17 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8292, United States. 43. Department of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States. 44. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States. 45. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States. 46. Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA-CSIC), Catedratico Agustin Escardino Benlloch, 7 46980 Paterna - Valencia, Spain. 47. Astani Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, 3620 S Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States. 48. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main St, Houston, Texas 77005, United States. 49. School of Public Health, Georgia State University, 100 Piedmont Avenue, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30302, United States. 50. Institute of Environmental Systems Research, University of Osnabrück, Barbarastr. 12, D49069, Osnabrück, Germany. 51. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, 1351 Beal Avenue, EWRE 181 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2125, United States.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel member of the
Coronaviridae family, has been identified as the etiologic
agent of an ongoing pandemic of severe pneumonia known as COVID-19.[1] To date there have been millions of cases of COVID-19 diagnosed
in 184 countries with case fatality rates ranging from 1.8% in Germany to 12.5% in
Italy.[2] Limited diagnostic testing capacity and
asymptomatic and oligosymptomatic infections result in significant uncertainty in
the estimated extent of SARS-CoV-2 infection.[3] Recent reports
have documented that infection with SARS-CoV-2 is accompanied by persistent
shedding of virus RNA in feces in 27%[4] to 89% of patients at
densities from 0.8 to 7.5 log10 gene copies per gram.[5] The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in feces raises the potential to survey sewage
for virus RNA to inform epidemiological monitoring of COVID-19, which we refer to
as wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE),[6] but is also known as
environmental surveillance.[7]Several studies have reported the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater in the
early stages of local outbreaks, further supporting the technical viability of
WBE.[8−10] WBE
could be especially informative given that asymptomatic and oligosymptomatic
infections are unlikely to be detected during clinical surveillance. In such
instances, WBE can be used to determine the burden of undiagnosed infections at
the population level, which is critical to refining estimates of case-fatality
rates. Additionally, wastewater offers an aggregate sample from an entire
community that is more easily accessible than pooled clinical samples.[11] Along with clinical data and other technological approaches,
such as contact tracing, WBE could provide critical monitoring of SARS-CoV-2
transmission within a community including the beginning, tapering, or re-emergence
of an epidemic (Figure ). This approach
mirrors previous efforts in environmental monitoring, for example poliovirus RNA,
to inform mechanistic models of pathogen transmission dynamics.[12]
Figure 1
In wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE), the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2
infections in a community could be estimated by enumerating the virus
RNA in that community’s sewage and performing mass balances on
virus shedding using population and sewage flow rate data. Such
information can then inform public health responses to the
outbreak.
In wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE), the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2infections in a community could be estimated by enumerating the virus
RNA in that community’s sewage and performing mass balances on
virus shedding using population and sewage flow rate data. Such
information can then inform public health responses to the
outbreak.The ongoing pandemic provides a meaningful opportunity to field-test the hypothesis
that WBE can be used to detect and manage infectious disease transmission in
communities. Many research groups across the globe are mobilizing to monitor
wastewater for SARS-CoV-2 RNA for this purpose. However, the quantitative
relationship between RNA densities in sewage and humaninfection prevalence is
dependent on many spatial and temporal variables. Importantly, these relationships
must be examined in both urban settings with centralized wastewater facilities and
rural and low-income settings with decentralized wastewater infrastructure.
Assessing variation and uncertainty across such diverse settings requires the
systematic harmonization and validation of methodologies across research groups.
Therefore, to maximize the potential of the diverse WBE efforts underway, we
propose a global effort to coordinate methodologies and data-sharing to maximize
the yields of WBE for the current and future outbreaks of disease. The community
will also benefit from including appropriate quantitative controls and standards
as described previously by Bustin et al.[13] to ensure cross
laboratory comparability and data defensibility. Efficient harmonization of
sampling, quality control, and analysis methods in the near term and, in the
future, widespread dissemination of the resulting data sets and publications will
help to ensure a high-quality evaluation of WBE.In partnership with the Sewage Analysis CORe group Europe (SCORE) network and the
Global Water Pathogen Project, we have launched the COVID-19 WBE Collaborative
(https://www.covid19wbec.org/) as a hub to coordinate and promote the
efforts of research groups undertaking WBE for COVID-19. The Web site will include
content such as press releases, commentaries, and media content for public
outreach and will be used to solicit participation in the collaborative and
advertise events relevant to WBE. In the future, the site could also be used to
host data sets and promulgate publications and presentations that result from the
COVID-19 WBE Collaborative. We are pleased to invite our colleagues to join this
effort at a level commensurate with their discretion.The Web site also links to two important platforms for ongoing collaboration. The
first is a protocols.io workshare platform for methodological coordination.
Research groups currently undertaking wastewater surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 RNA
are invited to share their protocols to help produce comparable results across
geographies and time scales. Important details include, but are not limited to,
the timing, frequency, location, and volume of sampling, relevant metadata, sample
storage, means of concentration, extraction, and quantification of nucleic acids
and observed processing recoveries. As previously mentioned, harmonization in the
execution, or at a minimum, the reporting of relevant details, will greatly
enhance the robustness of resulting data sets for analyzing transmission dynamics
at various spatial and temporal levels. The second platform linked through the Web
site is a Slack workspace for informal communication regarding COVID-19 WBE. The
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve rapidly; therefore, any
collaborative effort must include a platform for rapid communication.As we work to sample sewage in the midst of this pandemic, biosafety remains
paramount. Beyond protocols for sample analysis, we encourage all interested
parties to work together to ensure appropriate biosafety measures while conducting
this important work. Additionally, we ask funding agencies and the wastewater
industry to consider funding for collaborative research related to COVID-19 WBE.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic requires engineers and scientists to collaborate
with population-based scientists, including epidemiologists, mathematical modelers
and public health agencies. A multidisciplinary approach on a global scale is
required for timely and high impact results to help society. To that end, we have
established the COVID-19 WBE Collaborative to facilitate such collaboration and we
encourage all interested parties to join us.
Authors: Mark E Sharkey; Naresh Kumar; Alejandro M A Mantero; Kristina M Babler; Melinda M Boone; Yoslayma Cardentey; Elena M Cortizas; George S Grills; James Herrin; Jenny M Kemper; Richard Kenney; Erin Kobetz; Jennifer Laine; Walter E Lamar; Christopher C Mader; Christopher E Mason; Anda Z Quintero; Brian D Reding; Matthew A Roca; Krista Ryon; Natasha Schaefer Solle; Stephan C Schürer; Bhavarth Shukla; Mario Stevenson; Thomas Stone; John J Tallon; Sreeharsha S Venkatapuram; Dusica Vidovic; Sion L Williams; Benjamin Young; Helena M Solo-Gabriele Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Harishankar Kopperi; Athmakuri Tharak; Manupati Hemalatha; Uday Kiran; C G Gokulan; Rakesh K Mishra; S Venkata Mohan Journal: Environ Technol Innov Date: 2021-06-17
Authors: Hannah D Greenwald; Lauren C Kennedy; Adrian Hinkle; Oscar N Whitney; Vinson B Fan; Alexander Crits-Christoph; Sasha Harris-Lovett; Avi I Flamholz; Basem Al-Shayeb; Lauren D Liao; Matt Beyers; Daniel Brown; Alicia R Chakrabarti; Jason Dow; Dan Frost; Mark Koekemoer; Chris Lynch; Payal Sarkar; Eileen White; Rose Kantor; Kara L Nelson Journal: Water Res X Date: 2021-07-31