Literature DB >> 32529843

Addiction stigma and the production of impediments to take-home naloxone uptake.

Renae Fomiatti1, Adrian Farrugia2, Suzanne Fraser3, Robyn Dwyer4, Joanne Neale5, John Strang5.   

Abstract

Opioid overdose deaths are a major health issue in Australia and around the world. Programmes to provide opioid consumers with 'take-home' naloxone to reverse overdose exist internationally, but uptake by mainstream health services and consumers remains inconsistent. Researchers have identified a range of important educational, training and logistical impediments to take-home naloxone uptake and distribution, yet they have focused less on the social dynamics that can enhance or limit access, such as stigma. In this article, we also explore impediments to uptake, drawing on qualitative interview data gathered for an Australian research project on take-home naloxone. Mobilising a performative approach to stigma, we argue that overdose and prevention are shaped by the social dynamics of stigma and, as such, responsibility for dealing with overdose, as with take-home naloxone, should also be considered social (i.e. shared among peers, the public, communities and governments). Our interview data illuminate the various ways in which addiction stigma limits the possibilities and capacities of take-home naloxone and overdose prevention. First, we focus on how stigma may impede professional information provision about take-home naloxone by limiting the extent to which it is presented as a matter of interest for all opioid consumers, not just those who consume opioids illicitly. Second, we explore how stigma may limit the scale-up and expansion of programmes and access points. From here, we focus on how stigma co-constitutes the politics of overdose and prevention, rendering take-home naloxone ill-suited to many social settings of overdose. In closing, we point out that stigma is not just a post hoc impediment to access to and use of take-home naloxone but is central to opioid overdose production itself, and to effective prevention. While take-home naloxone is an excellent life-saving initiative, uncritically valorising it may divert attention from broader goals, such as the de-stigmatisation of drug consumption through decriminalisation, and other ambitious attempts to reduce overdose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Judith Butler; overdose; qualitative research; stigma; take-home naloxone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32529843     DOI: 10.1177/1363459320925863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health (London)        ISSN: 1363-4593


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacists' experiences with a statewide naloxone standing order program in Massachusetts: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Robin A Pollini; Susannah Slocum; Jenny Ozga; Rebecca Joyce; Ziming Xuan; Traci C Green; Alexander Y Walley
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2021-08-23

2.  UNDERSTANDING PREFERENCES FOR TYPE OF TAKE-HOME NALOXONE DEVICE: INTERNATIONAL QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VIEWS OF PEOPLE WHO USE OPIOIDS.

Authors:  Joanne Neale; Adrian Farrugia; Aimee N Campbell; Paul Dietze; Robyn Dwyer; Renae Fomiatti; Jermaine D Jones; Sandra D Comer; Suzanne Fraser; John Strang
Journal:  Drugs (Abingdon Engl)       Date:  2021-02-22

3.  Australian Community Pharmacy Harm-Minimisation Services: Scope for Service Expansion to Improve Healthcare Access.

Authors:  Sara S McMillan; Hidy Chan; Laetitia H Hattingh
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26

4.  If we build it, will they come? Perspectives on pharmacy-based naloxone among family and friends of people who use opioids: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Susannah Slocum; Jenny E Ozga; Rebecca Joyce; Alexander Y Walley; Robin A Pollini
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  A qualitative examination of naloxone access in three states: Connecticut, Kentucky, and Wisconsin.

Authors:  Antoinette L Spector; Carol L Galletly; Erika A Christenson; H Danielle Green Montaque; Julia Dickson-Gomez
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  Associations Between Copays, Coverage Limits for Naloxone, and Prescribing in Medicaid.

Authors:  John C Messinger; Aaron S Kesselheim; Seanna M Vine; Michael A Fischer; Rachel E Barenie
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2022-09-29

Review 7.  The Impact of Stigma on People with Opioid Use Disorder, Opioid Treatment, and Policy.

Authors:  Ali Cheetham; Louisa Picco; Anthony Barnett; Dan I Lubman; Suzanne Nielsen
Journal:  Subst Abuse Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.