| Literature DB >> 32528328 |
Honglv Xu1,2, Jichang Guo3, Yuhui Wan1,2, Shichen Zhang1,2, Rong Yang1,2, Huiqiong Xu1,2, Peng Ding1,2, Fangbiao Tao1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although previous studies have shown that screen time (ST), fast foods (FFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption are associated with depressive symptoms in adolescents, research on these associations in Chinese adolescents is scarce. This study aimed to examine the association between ST, FFs, SSBs and depressive symptoms in Chinese adolescents, and explore the mediating effects of FFs and SSBs in the association between ST and depressive symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent; association; depressive symptoms; dietary behavior; screen time
Year: 2020 PMID: 32528328 PMCID: PMC7264365 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
The positive rate of depressive symptoms in Chinese adolescents of stratified by gender (%).
| Variables | Male (n = 7,347) | Female (n = 7,153) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Depressive symptoms (%) | χ2 |
| N | Depressive symptoms (%) | χ2 |
| ||
| Age(year) | 10–15 | 4,230 | 1,233 (29.1) | 0.447 | 0.504 | 4,557 | 1,250 (27.4) | 10.127 | 0.001 |
| 16–20 | 3,117 | 931 (29.9) | 2,596 | 804 (31.0) | |||||
| Grade | 1 | 1,133 | 270 (23.8) | 26.294 | <0.001 | 1,291 | 288 (22.3) | 25.802 | <0.001 |
| 2 | 1,210 | 301 (24.9) | 1,206 | 310 (25.7) | |||||
| 3 | 1,194 | 336 (28.1) | 1,213 | 312 (25.7) | |||||
| 4 | 1,189 | 372 (31.3) | 1,244 | 377 (30.3) | |||||
| 5 | 1,220 | 374 (30.7) | 1,198 | 347 (29.0) | |||||
| 6 | 1,401 | 388 (27.7) | 1,001 | 277 (27.7) | |||||
| Residence | Rural | 3,443 | 1,034 (30.0) | 16.377 | <0.001 | 3,438 | 948 (27.6) | 2.49 | 0.115 |
| City | 3,904 | 1,007 (25.8) | 3,715 | 963 (25.9) | |||||
| The only child in the family | Yes | 2,767 | 762 (27.5) | 0.129 | 0.720 | 1,902 | 477 (25.1) | 3.547 | 0.060 |
| No | 4,580 | 1,279 (27.9) | 5,251 | 1,434 (27.3) | |||||
| Boarding school | Yes | 3,506 | 911 (26.0) | 10.782 | 0.001 | 3,324 | 883 (26.6) | 0.073 | 0.787 |
| No | 3,841 | 1,130 (29.4) | 3,829 | 1,028 (26.8) | |||||
| Father’s education level | Illiteracy | 281 | 111 (39.5) | 77.578 | <0.001 | 283 | 104 (36.7) | 43.422 | <0.001 |
| Elementary school | 663 | 226 (34.1) | 788 | 216 (27.4) | |||||
| Secondary school | 2,333 | 668 (28.6) | 2,373 | 674 (28.4) | |||||
| High school | 2,146 | 556 (25.9) | 1,974 | 481 (24.4) | |||||
| The university | 1,832 | 433 (23.6) | 1,647 | 397 (24.1) | |||||
| Mother’s education level | Illiteracy | 561 | 193 (34.4) | 67.46 | <0.001 | 608 | 210 (34.5) | 50.5 | <0.001 |
| Elementary school | 996 | 303 (30.4) | 1,004 | 294 (29.3) | |||||
| Secondary school | 2,266 | 628 (27.7) | 2,398 | 637 (26.6) | |||||
| High school | 1,980 | 534 (27.0) | 1,806 | 438 (24.3) | |||||
| The university | 1,461 | 336 (23.0) | 1,274 | 301 (23.6) | |||||
| Self-perceived socioeconomic status | Worse | 832 | 310 (37.3) | 698 | 294 (42.1) | 179.643 | <0.001 | ||
| Poor | 334 | 165 (49.4) | 148.276 | <0.001 | 175 | 92 (52.6) | |||
| Medium | 4,821 | 1,232 (25.6) | 5,189 | 1,298 (25.0) | |||||
| Good | 241 | 83 (34.4) | 172 | 51 (29.7) | |||||
| Better | 1,119 | 251 (22.4) | 919 | 176 (19.2) | |||||
| The number of close friend | 0 | 291 | 182 (62.5) | 319.523 | <0.001 | 146 | 88 (60.3) | 254.791 | <0.001 |
| 1–2 | 1,355 | 524 (38.7) | 1,744 | 650 (37.3) | |||||
| 3–5 | 2,846 | 720 (25.3) | 3,305 | 804 (24.3) | |||||
| ≥6 | 2,855 | 615 (21.5) | 1,958 | 369 (18.8) | |||||
There are 180 adolescents(92 male students, 88 female students)without fathers.
There are 146 adolescents (83 male students, 63 female students) without mothers.
Values in parentheses represent the positive rate of depressive symptoms.
Association between the positive rate of depressive symptoms, ST, FFs and SSBs.
| Model | Variables | B | S.E. | Wald |
|
| 95% C.I. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | ST score | 0.071 | 0.007 | 119.003 | <0.001 | 1.074 | 1.060–1.088 |
| FFs score | 0.060 | 0.007 | 66.901 | <0.001 | 1.062 | 1.046–1.077 | |
| SSBs score | 0.112 | 0.010 | 122.001 | <0.001 | 1.119 | 1.097–1.141 | |
| Model 2 | ST score | 0.072 | 0.019 | 14.436 | <0.001 | 1.075 | 1.036–1.116 |
| FFs score | 0.060 | 0.008 | 58.564 | <0.001 | 1.062 | 1.046–1.078 | |
| SSBs score | 0.131 | 0.011 | 137.403 | <0.001 | 1.140 | 1.115–1.166 |
Model 1, unadjusted variable. Model 2, adjusted for sociodemographic variables.
Mediating effects of FFs and SSBs in the association between ST and depressive symptoms in adolescents.
| Effects | Paths | Bayesian model | Structural equation model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate |
|
| Estimate |
|
| ||
| Direct | F1 → F4 | 0.125** | 0.008 | 0.109–0.141 | 0.125** | 0.009 | 0.107–0.142 |
| F2 → F4 | 0.112** | 0.009 | 0.094–0.129 | 0.112** | 0.009 | 0.094–0.129 | |
| F3 → F4 | 0.092** | 0.009 | 0.074–0.109 | 0.092** | 0.010 | 0.072–0.110 | |
| F1 → F2 | 0.219** | 0.008 | 0.204–0.235 | 0.219** | 0.009 | 0.202–0.238 | |
| F1 → F3 | 0.018* | 0.008 | 0.002–0.033 | 0.018 | 0.010 | −0.001–0.036 | |
| F2 → F3 | 0.419** | 0.007 | 0.405–0.433 | 0.419** | 0.012 | 0.397–0.442 | |
| Indirect | F1 → F2 → F4 | 0.024** | 0.002 | 0.020–0.029 | 0.024** | 0.002 | 0.020–0.029 |
| F1 → F3 → F4 | 0.002** | 0.001 | 0.000–0.003 | 0.002** | 0.001 | 0.000–0.003 | |
| F1 → F2 →F3 →F4 | 0.008** | 0.001 | 0.006–0.010 | 0.008** | 0.001 | 0.007–0.010 | |
| F1 → F4 | 0.034** | 0.002 | 0.030–0.039 | 0.035** | 0.003 | 0.030–0.039 | |
**p < 0.001; *p < 0.05.
F1: Screen time; F2: Fast foods; F3: Sugar-sweetened beverages; F4: Depressive symptoms.
Figure 1Bayesian posterior parameter distributions.
Figure 3Bayesian autocorrelation plots.
Figure 2Bayesian posterior parameter trace plots.
Figure 4Bayesian posterior predictive checking scatter plots.
Figure 5Bayesian posterior predictive checking distribution plots.