| Literature DB >> 32528116 |
Elijah O Juma1, Brian F Allan2, Chang-Hyun Kim3, Christopher Stone3, Christopher Dunlap4, Ephantus J Muturi4.
Abstract
Pesticides commonly contaminate the aquatic environments inhabited by mosquito juveniles. However, their role in shaping the mosquito microbiota is not well understood. We hypothesized that environmentally relevant concentrations of atrazine, permethrin and malathion will mediate a shift in the mosquito gut bacterial community structure due to their toxic effect on the aquatic bacterial communities, and reduce mosquito gut bacterial diversity by enriching pesticide-degrading bacterial communities over susceptible taxa. Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16 S rRNA gene was used to characterize the microbial communities of larval and adult stages of the two mosquito species and the water samples from microcosms treated with each of the pesticides, separately. Bacterial community composition differed by sample type (larval stage vs. adult stage) and water sampling date (day 3 vs. day 7), but not by pesticide treatment. In larval stages, bacterial OTU richness was highest in samples exposed to malathion, intermediate in permethrin, and lowest in controls. Bacterial richness was significantly higher in larval stages compared to adult stages for all treatments. This study provides a primer for future studies evaluating mosquito microbial responses to exposures to chemical pesticides and the possible implications for mosquito ecology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32528116 PMCID: PMC7289809 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66452-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Composition of bacterial communities in Ae. albopictus and water samples. Taxa with sequence abundance <1% of total sequences were pooled together as “Other” in all the taxonomic ranks. Panel A – relative abundance at subphylum level; panel B – relative abundance at family level; panel C – relative abundance at genus level. L – Larvae; A – Adults; AT – Atrazine; MT – Malathion; PN – Permethrin; CT – Control; WS – Water Sample; D3 – Day 3; D7 – Day 7. Figures were generated using R version 3.6.1[76] (https://www.r-project.org/) within the RStudio environment version 1.2.1335[77] (https://rstudio.com/).
Figure 3NMDS based on Bray-Curtis distance ordination of bacterial communities from Ae. albopictus larval, adult, and water samples from pesticide treatments and control group. (A) – all mosquito and water samples presented together; (B) – mosquito and water samples partitioned by the treatment or control from which they were obtained. L – Larvae; A – Adults; WS – water samples; D3 – Day 3; D7 – Day 7. Figures were generated using R version 3.6.1[76] (https://www.r-project.org/) within the RStudio environment version 1.2.1335[77] (https://rstudio.com/).
MRPP results showing differences in bacterial communities of Ae. albopictus mosquitoes by life stage and water sample type.
| Sample type | Ad | N | T | A | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | vs. | A | 0.12 | vs. | 0.26 | 81 | vs. | 57 | −83.75 | 0.44 | <0.001 |
| L | vs | WS.D3 | 0.12 | vs. | 0.17 | 81 | vs. | 36 | −67.25 | 0.38 | <0.001 |
| L | vs | WS.D7 | 0.12 | vs. | 0.21 | 81 | vs. | 37 | −68.48 | 0.38 | <0.001 |
| A | vs | WS.D3 | 0.26 | vs. | 0.17 | 57 | vs. | 36 | −56.54 | 0.46 | <0.001 |
| A | vs | WS.D7 | 0.26 | vs. | 0.21 | 57 | vs. | 37 | −55.21 | 0.44 | <0.001 |
| WS.D3 | vs | WS.D7 | 0.17 | vs. | 0.21 | 36 | vs. | 37 | −30.50 | 0.29 | <0.001 |
Bacterial communities differed significantly between groups (larvae vs. adult samples vs. water samples). L – Larvae; A – Adults; WS – Water Sample; D3 – Day 3; D7 – Day 7.
Ad average within-group distances for mosquito species
N sample size
T-test statistic describing separation within groups.
A chance-corrected within-group agreement as log10.
Figure 2Composition of bacterial communities in Cx. pipiens L. and water samples. Taxa with sequence abundance <1% of total sequences were pooled together as “Other” in all the taxonomic ranks. Panel A – relative abundance at subphylum level; panel B – relative abundance at family level; panel C – relative abundance at genus level. L – Larvae; A – Adults; AT – Atrazine; MT – Malathion; PN – Permethrin; CT – Control; WS – Water Sample; D3 – Day 3; D7 – Day 7. Figures were generated using R version 3.6.1[76] (https://www.r-project.org/) within the RStudio environment version 1.2.1335[77] (https://rstudio.com/).
Figure 4NMDS based on Bray-Curtis distance ordination of bacterial communities from Cx. pipiens L. larval, adult, and water samples from pesticide treatments and control group. (A) – all mosquito and water samples presented together; (B) – mosquito and water samples partitioned by the treatment or control from which they were obtained. L – larvae; A – Adult; WS – water samples; D3 – Day 3; D7 – Day 7. Figures were generated using R version 3.6.1[76] (https://www.r-project.org/) within the RStudio environment version 1.2.1335[77] (https://rstudio.com/).
MRPP results showing differences in bacterial communities of Cx. pipiens L. mosquitoes by life stage and water sample type.
| Sample type | Ad | N | T | A | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WS.D3 | vs. | WS.D7 | 0.22 | vs. | 0.22 | 36 | vs. | 37 | −11.60 | 0.12 | <0.001 |
| WS.D3 | vs. | L | 0.22 | vs. | 0.21 | 36 | vs. | 94 | −66.76 | 0.34 | <0.001 |
| WS.D3 | vs. | A | 0.22 | vs. | 0.28 | 36 | vs. | 88 | −69.51 | 0.37 | <0.001 |
| WS.D7 | vs. | L | 0.22 | vs. | 0.21 | 37 | vs. | 94 | −63.07 | 0.32 | <0.001 |
| WS.D7 | vs. | A | 0.22 | vs. | 0.28 | 37 | vs. | 88 | −64.74 | 0.35 | <0.001 |
| L | vs. | A | 0.21 | vs. | 0.28 | 94 | vs. | 88 | −85.64 | 0.33 | <0.001 |
Bacterial communities differed significantly between groups (larvae vs. adult vs. water samples). L – Larvae; A – Adults; WS – Water Sample; D3 – Day 3; D7 – Day 7
Ad average within-group distances for mosquito species
N sample size
T-test statistic describing separation within groups
A chance-corrected within-group agreement as log10.