Literature DB >> 32527966

To walk or to run - a question of movement attractor stability.

Peter C Raffalt1,2, Jenny A Kent2,3, Shane R Wurdeman2,4, Nick Stergiou5,6.   

Abstract

During locomotion, humans change gait mode between walking and running as locomotion speed is either increased or decreased. Dynamical systems theory predicts that the self-organization of coordinated motor behaviors dictates the transition from one distinct stable attractor behavior to another distinct attractor behavior (e.g. walk to run or vice versa) as the speed is changed. To evaluate this prediction, the present study investigated the attractor stability of walking and running across a range of speeds evoking both self-selected gait mode and non-self-selected gait mode. Eleven subjects completed treadmill walking for 3 min at 0.89, 1.12, 1.34, 1.56, 1.79, 2.01, 2.24 and 2.46 m s-1 and running for 3 min at 1.79, 2.01, 2.24, 2.46, 2.68, 2.91, 3.13 and 3.35 m s-1 in randomized order while lower limb joint angles and sacrum displacements was recorded. Attractor stability was quantified by continuous relative phase and deviation phase of lower limb segment angles, and the largest Lyapunov exponent, correlation dimension and movement variability of the sacrum marker displacement and the hip, knee and ankle joint angles. Lower limb attractor stability during walking was maximized at speeds close to the self-selected preferred walking speed and increased during running as speed was increased. Furthermore, lower limb attractor stability was highest at a particular gait mode closest to the corresponding preferred speed, in support of the prediction of dynamical systems theory. This was not the case for the sacrum displacement attractor, suggesting that lower limb attractor behavior provides a more appropriate order parameter compared with sacrum displacement.
© 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coordination; Dynamical system theory; Dynamics; Gait; Locomotion

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32527966      PMCID: PMC7338268          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.224113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  52 in total

1.  Phase-dependent preferential activation of the soleus and gastrocnemius muscles during hopping in humans.

Authors:  T Moritani; L Oddsson; A Thorstensson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Long range correlations in the stride interval of running.

Authors:  Kimberlee Jordan; John H Challis; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Metabolic energy and muscular activity required for leg swing in running.

Authors:  Jesse R Modica; Rodger Kram
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-06

4.  Walking at the preferred stride frequency maximizes local dynamic stability of knee motion.

Authors:  Daniel M Russell; Joshua L Haworth
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The effect of walking speed on local dynamic stability is sensitive to calculation methods.

Authors:  Jan Stenum; Sjoerd M Bruijn; Bente R Jensen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements.

Authors:  H Haken; J A Kelso; H Bunz
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Energetic Cost and Stability During Human Walking at the Preferred Stride Velocity.

Authors:  K J Holt; S F Jeng; J Hamill
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  Walking at the preferred stride frequency minimizes muscle activity.

Authors:  Daniel M Russell; Dylan T Apatoczky
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  A mechanical trigger for the trot-gallop transition in horses.

Authors:  C T Farley; C R Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Economy, Movement Dynamics, and Muscle Activity of Human Walking at Different Speeds.

Authors:  P C Raffalt; M K Guul; A N Nielsen; S Puthusserypady; T Alkjær
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.