Literature DB >> 24210850

Walking at the preferred stride frequency maximizes local dynamic stability of knee motion.

Daniel M Russell1, Joshua L Haworth2.   

Abstract

Healthy humans display a preference for walking at a stride frequency dependent on the inertial properties of their legs. Walking at preferred stride frequency (PSF) is predicted to maximize local dynamic stability, whereby sensitivity to intrinsic perturbations arising from natural variability inherent in biological motion is minimized. Previous studies testing this prediction have employed different variability measures, but none have directly quantified local dynamic stability by computing maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponent (λ(Max)), which quantifies the rate of divergence of nearby trajectories in state space. Here, ten healthy adults walked 45 m overground while sagittal motion of both knees was recorded via electrogoniometers. An auditory metronome prescribed 7 different frequencies relative to each individual's PSF (PSF; ±5, ±10, ±15 strides/min). Stride frequencies were performed under both freely adopted speed (FS) and controlled speed (CS: set at the speed of PSF trials) conditions. Local dynamic stability was maximal (λ(Max) was minimal) at the PSF, becoming less stable for higher and lower stride frequencies. This occurred under both FS and CS conditions, although controlling speed further reduced local dynamic stability at non-preferred stride frequencies. In contrast, measures of variability revealed effects of stride frequency and speed conditions that were distinct from λ(Max). In particular, movement regularity computed by approximate entropy (ApEn) increased for slower walking speeds, appearing to depend on speed rather than stride frequency. The cadence freely adopted by humans has the benefit of maximizing local dynamic stability, which can be interpreted as humans tuning to their resonant frequency of walking.
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approximate entropy; Gait; Resonant frequency; Stability; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24210850     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Coordination dynamics of (a)symmetrically loaded gait.

Authors:  Daniel M Russell; Joshua L Haworth; Cesar Martinez-Garza
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Phase resetting behavior in human gait is influenced by treadmill walking speed.

Authors:  Jeff A Nessler; Tavish Spargo; Andrew Craig-Jones; John G Milton
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  To walk or to run - a question of movement attractor stability.

Authors:  Peter C Raffalt; Jenny A Kent; Shane R Wurdeman; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Biofeedback augmenting lower limb loading alters the underlying temporal structure of gait following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Cortney Armitano-Lago; Brian Pietrosimone; Hope C Davis-Wilson; Alyssa Evans-Pickett; Jason R Franz; Troy Blackburn; Adam W Kiefer
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.397

5.  Could local dynamic stability serve as an early predictor of falls in patients with moderate neurological gait disorders? A reliability and comparison study in healthy individuals and in patients with paresis of the lower extremities.

Authors:  Fabienne Reynard; Philippe Vuadens; Olivier Deriaz; Philippe Terrier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Can Gait Signatures Provide Quantitative Measures for Aiding Clinical Decision-Making? A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Gait Variability Behavior in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Niklas König; Navrag B Singh; Christian R Baumann; William R Taylor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.