| Literature DB >> 32527713 |
Gangarapu Kiran1, L Karthik2, M S Shree Devi3, P Sathiyarajeswaran4, K Kanakavalli5, K M Kumar6, D Ramesh Kumar2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Siddha Medicine is a valuable therapeutic choice which is classically used for treating viral respiratory infections, this principle of medicine is proven to contain antiviral compounds.Entities:
Keywords: JACOM; Kabasura Kudineer; Molecular docking; SARS-CoV-2; Spike protein
Year: 2020 PMID: 32527713 PMCID: PMC7247487 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2020.05.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
In silico docking studies of phytoconstituents of Siddha formulation Kabasura Kudineer Chooranam and JACOM against spike Protein SARS-CoV-2 (PDB ID: 6VSB) using docking software Cresset Flare.
| Plant Name | Compound name and Code | LF dG | LF VSscore | LF Rank Score | LF LE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-sesquiphellandrene | −6.638 | −6.846 | −2.658 | −0.443 | |
| β-bisabolene | −6.562 | −6.713 | −2.8 | −0.437 | |
| Geranial | −5.099 | −5.319 | −2.121 | −0.464 | |
| Piperine | −6.768 | −7.445 | −4.143 | −0.322 | |
| Piperlonguminine | −7.078 | −7.7 | −4.245 | −0.354 | |
| Eugenol | −4.818 | −5.559 | −6.182 | −0.402 | |
| β-Caryophyllene | −5.654 | −5.918 | −3.203 | −0.377 | |
| Stigmosterol | −9.724 | −10.39 | −7.466 | −0.324 | |
| 3-(2,4- dimethoxyphenyl)-6,7- dimethoxy-2,3- dihydrochromen-4-one | −6.433 | −7.316 | −9.011 | −0.247 | |
| Squalene | −9.722 | −10.187 | −1.389 | −0.324 | |
| γ−Sitosterol | −9.956 | −10.521 | −7.679 | −0.332 | |
| Andrograpanin | −6.819 | −7.678 | −7.854 | −0.296 | |
| 5-Hydroxy-7,8-dimethoxyflavanone | −7.356 | −7.966 | −9.035 | −0.334 | |
| Lupeol | −8.337 | −8.917 | −6.41 | −0.269 | |
| Betulin | −7.984 | −9.117 | −7.02 | −0.249 | |
| Chebulagic acid | −10.769 | −11.138 | −9.723 | −0.158 | |
| Gallic acid | −5.549 | −6.602 | −6.916 | −0.462 | |
| Vasicinone | −5.753 | −6.272 | −8.164 | −0.384 | |
| Carvacrol | −5.322 | −5.696 | −6.923 | −0.484 | |
| Cirsimaritin | −6.42 | −7.227 | −9.228 | −0.279 | |
| Chrysoeriol | −7.954 | −8.352 | −11.392 | −0.362 | |
| 6- Methoxygenkwanin | −6.415 | −7.527 | −9.293 | −0.279 | |
| Luteolin | −8.149 | −8.584 | −11.159 | −0.388 | |
| Costunolide | −6.081 | −6.607 | −3.799 | −0.358 | |
| Elemol | −6.587 | −6.696 | −5.43 | −0.412 | |
| Tinosponone | −7.043 | −7.434 | −8.145 | −0.293 | |
| Bharangin | −7.418 | −7.744 | −6.682 | −0.309 | |
| Scutellarein | −7.805 | −9.148 | −10.277 | −0.372 | |
| Magnoflorine | −7.635 | −8.527 | −9.762 | −0.305 | |
| Cycleanine | −6.184 | −8.214 | −3.432 | −0.134 | |
| Cyperene | −6.024 | −6.225 | −3.558 | −0.402 | |
| β-selinene | −6.33 | −6.587 | −3.412 | −0.422 | |
| Vasicine | −5.19 | −6.1 | −7.67 | −0.37 | |
| Quercetin | −8.408 | −8.59 | −11.478 | −0.382 | |
| Andrographolide | −7.74 | −8.45 | −7.85 | −0.31 | |
| Ursolic acid | −7.08 | −7.71 | −5.1 | −0.21 | |
| Meliacine | −4.2 | −8.76 | −5.14 | −0.88 | |
Amino acid residues of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein participated in H-Bond and hydrophobic interactions with ligands.
| Compound Code | LF Rank Score | Interactions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| H-Bonding | Hydrophobic | ||
| β-sesquiphellandrene | −2.65 | NHB | Ser373, Phe374 |
| β-bisabolene | −2.8 | Phe342, Ser373, | Phe338, Gly339 |
| Geranial | −2.12 | NHB | Ser373, Phe374, |
| Piperine | −4.14 | Phe374, Trp436 | Phe338, Ser373, |
| Piperlonguminine | −4.24 | Phe338 | Ser373, Phe342, Cys336, Leu335, Val367 |
| Eugenol | −6.18 | Asn343, Phe342, | Ser373 |
| β-Caryophyllene | −3.20 | Phe338, Gly337 | |
| Stigmosterol | −7.46 | Cys336, Gly336, | Phe342, Asn343, Ser373, |
| 3-(2,4- dimethoxyphenyl)-6,7- dimethoxy-2,3- dihydrochromen-4-one | −9.01 | Arg509, Trp436, | Phe374, Phe342, Asn343, Thr345, Ala344, Leu441 |
| Squalene | −1.38 | NHB | Thr345, Asn643, Phe342, Asn343, Phe338, Leu335 |
| γ−Sitosterol | −7.67 | Cys336, Gly339 | Ser373, Phe374, Val510 |
| Andrograpanin | −7.85 | Asn343 | Phe342, Leu335, Asp364 |
| 5-Hydroxy-7,8-dimethoxyflavanone | −9.03 | Asp 364, Gly339 | Cys336, Phe337, Leu335, Phe342, Phe338, Leu368 |
| Lupeol | −6.41 | Thr345 | Asn343, Ser373, Thr345, Arg509 |
| Betulin | −7.02 | Thr345, Ser373 | Asn422, Val341, Arg509, Phe373, Thr345 |
| Chebulagic acid | −9.72 | Tyr369, Asn370, Tyr369, Phe377, Cys379, Lys378 | Lys378, Phe337, Phe342, Cys336 |
| Gallic acid | −6.91 | Lys356, Val341 | Ala397, Val341, Lys356 |
| Vasicinone | −8.16 | Cys336, Gly339 | Val397, Cys336, Phe338, Leu335, Asp364 |
| Carvacrol | −6.92 | Asp364 | Cys336, Leu335, Asp364 |
| Cirsimaritin | −9.22 | Cys336, Asp364, Ser373, Asn343 | Phe338, Phe342, Phe374, Ser373 |
| Chrysoeriol | −11.39 | Cys336, Gly339, Asp364, | Phe338, Phe342, Phe374, Leu335, Val367, Ser373 |
| 6- Methoxygenkwanin | −9.29 | Cys336, Phe342 | Ser373, Phe342, Leu368, Phe338, Leu335 |
| Luteolin | −11.15 | Asp364, Val367, Ser371, Ser373, Cys336, Val362 | Phe338, Gly339, Phe374, Phe342 |
| Costunolide | −3.79 | Phe515, Gly431 | Val511, Phe515, Gly431 |
| Elemol | −5.43 | Asp364, Asp364 | Phe374, Phe342, Asn343, |
| Tinosponone | −8.14 | Phe342, Gly339 | Trp436, Asn343, Leu368, Val367 |
| Bharangin | −6.68 | Phe338, Gly339, | Phe337, Phe342, Ser373 |
| Scutellarein | −10.27 | Cys336, Phe338, Gly339, Asp364, Val362 | Ser373, Phe374, Leu335, Asn343 |
| Magnoflorine | −9.76 | Arg346, Val341, Thr345 | Ala344, Lys356, Ala397 |
| Cycleanine | −3.43 | Ser373 | Phe374, Trp436, |
| Cyperene | −3.55 | NHB | Ser373 |
| β-selinene | −3.41 | NHB | Phe342, Ser373 |
| Vasicine | −7.67 | Phe 338, Asn343 | Gly339 |
| Quercetin | −11.47 | Asp364 | Phe338, Leu335, Gly339, Leu368, cys336, he374 |
| Andrographolide | −7.85 | Asp364, Phe368, Gly339, Asn343 | Cys336, Phe342, Leu368, Phe374 |
| Ursolic acid | −5.1 | Val367 | Leu368 |
| Meliacine | −5.14 | Phe338 | Val367, Ser371, Leu368, Phe338 |
| Hydroxychloroquine( | −8.35 | Phe342, Asn343 | Gly339, Phe338, Leu368, Trp436, Ser373, Phe374 |
NHB: No Hydrogen Bond Interactions.
Fig. 1Molecular docking results of Chrysoeriol into SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. (A) Hydrophobic interaction of Chrysoeriol with SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (B) Binding mode of Chrysoeriol in SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. Amino acid residues involved in H-bond formation and H-bond networks are shown.
Fig. 2Molecular docking results of Luteolin into SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. (A) Hydrophobic interaction of Luteolin with SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (B) Binding mode of Luteolin in SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. Amino acid residues involved in H-bond formation and H-bond networks are shown.
Fig. 3Molecular docking results of Quercetin into SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. (A) Hydrophobic interaction of Quercetin with SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (B) Binding mode of Quercetin in SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. Amino acid residues involved in H-bond formation and H-bond networks are shown.
Fig. 4Molecular docking results of Hydroxychloroquine into SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. (A) Hydrophobic interaction of Hydroxychloroquine with SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (B) Binding mode of Hydroxychloroquine in SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. Amino acid residues involved in H-bond formation and H-bond networks are shown.
Proposed SNACK –V formulation containing plants and their phytoconstituents with Dock score.
| S.No | Plant Name | Phytoconstituents | LF Rank Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magnoflorine | −9.76 | |
| 2 | 5-Hydroxy-7,8-dimethoxyflavanone | −9.03 | |
| 3 | Tinosponone | −8.14 | |
| 4 | Cirsimaritin | −9.22 | |
| Chrysoeriol | −11.39 | ||
| 6- Methoxygenkwanin | −9.293 | ||
| 5 | Vasicinone | −8.16 | |
| Quercetin | −11.47 | ||
| 6 | Luteolin | −11.15 |