| Literature DB >> 32523076 |
Edoardo Cuniberto1, Abdullah Alharbi1,2, Ting Wu3, Zhujun Huang1, Kasra Sardashti4, Kae-Dyi You1, Kim Kisslinger5, Takashi Taniguchi6, Kenji Watanabe6, Roozbeh Kiani3,7, Davood Shahrjerdi8,9.
Abstract
Direct synthesis of thin-filmEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32523076 PMCID: PMC7286892 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66408-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Synthesis of micron-scale NG carbon islands. Schematic illustration of the main steps: (a) applying SU-8 resist onto SiO2, (b) creating micron-scale amorphous carbon islands through e-beam lithography and carbonization, (c) depositing Ni catalyst under UHV conditions, (d) transforming amorphous carbon islands into NG carbon islands through graphitization at 1100 °C.
Figure 2Preferential directionality of graphitic planes. (a,b) Cross-sectional TEM images of an NG carbon film directly on SiO2 at two different magnifications. The Ni clusters inside the NG carbon film are marked with dashed yellow lines. (c) Cross-sectional TEM image of an NG carbon film on hBN, showing ring-like graphitic planes with random orientations within the film. Scale bars in TEM images are 20 nm. Example optical images of amorphous carbon islands on (d) SiO2 and (f) hBN. The optical images of the same islands after graphitization on (e) SiO2 and (g) hBN. Scale bars in optical images are 30 µm.
Figure 3Characterization of NG micro-sensors. (a) Optical image of an example NG micro-sensor. Scale bar is 20 μm. (b) Cross-sectional schematic of our experimental setup for FSCV measurements of dopamine. A rapid potential sweep (VFSCV) was applied to the NG micro-sensor, and (c) the total current was measured with and without dopamine in a 1X PBS solution. (d) The subtraction of the measured currents before and after dopamine gives the cyclic voltammogram. Additional data showing the consistency of our NG micro-sensors are shown in Section S1 of Supplementary Information. (e) An example Raman spectrum of an NG micro-sensor. We used the Raman spectra of our sensors to quantify the average density of point defects and the size of the graphitic crystallites. (f) An example topographic image of an NG micro-sensor obtained using atomic force microscopy (AFM), showing an RMS roughness of ∼10 nm. The inset shows a line scan. Scale bar is 1 μm.
Figure 4Effect of material structure on main sensor characteristics. (a) Contour plot of SGA against n0D and La2. (b) The plot of SGA against n0D, showing a linear trend. The grey shading represents the region where n0D is below the detection limit of Raman. The error bars of SGA are ±5% and come from the uncertainties in calculations of the sensor area including the contribution of the surface roughness. (c) Scatter plot of S-B ratio against SGA. The data show two sensor groups (denoted as SGA1 and SGA2), where sensors within each group had similar SGA but different S-B ratio. (d) The monotonic increase of the S-B ratio with La2 for these two sensor groups suggests the effect of La2 on the background current. The dashed lines are guide for the eyes. The numbers next to the data points (1, 2, 3, 4) indicate the device names of four representative NG micro-sensors, which cover the entire range of measured SGA and S-B ratio in our experiments. The FSCV characteristics of these sensors are shown in the Supplementary Information. The error bars of the S-B ratio are less than ±4%.
Figure 5Relationship between the material structure and S-B ratio. (a) Contour plot of the inverse of Capp against LD2 and La2. We marked two contour lines with their corresponding values in units of 10−3 μF−1.cm2. (b) Capp increases in linear proportion with NCD, which is a function of LD2 and La2. The error bars of Capp are ±5% and come from the uncertainties in calculations of the sensor area. The numbers next to the data points represent the same sensors as those in Fig. 4(c). The S-B ratio data show a linear dependence on D.R., defined as the ratio of n0D to NCD.