Literature DB >> 29278719

Expected satiation alone does not predict actual intake of desserts.

Etienne Guillocheau1, Olga Davidenko2, Agnès Marsset-Baglieri1, Nicolas Darcel1, Claire Gaudichon1, Daniel Tomé1, Gilles Fromentin1.   

Abstract

The degree to which consumers expect foods to satisfy hunger, referred to as expected satiation, has been reported to predict food intake. Yet this relationship has not been established precisely, at a quantitative level. We sought to explore this relationship in detail by determining whether expected satiation predicts the actual intake of semi-solid desserts. Two separate experiments were performed: the first used variations of a given food (eight apple purées), while the second involved a panel of different foods within a given category (eight desserts). Both experiments studied the consumption of two products assigned to volunteers based on their individual liking and expected satiation ratings, given ad libitum at the end of a standardised meal. A linear model was used to find predictors of food intake and included expected satiation scores, palatability scores, BMI, age, sex, TFEQ-R, TFEQ-D, water consumption during the meal, reported frequency of eating desserts, and reported frequency of consuming tested products as explanatory variables. Expected satiation was a significant predictor of actual food intake in both experiments (apple purée: F(1,97) = 18.60, P < .001; desserts: F(1,106) = 9.05, P < .01), along with other parameters such as product palatability and the volunteers' age, sex and food restriction (variation explained by the model/expected satiation in the experiments: 57%/23% and 36%/17%, respectively). However, we found a significant gap between expected and actual consumption of desserts, on group and on individual level. Our results confirm the importance of expected satiation as a predictor of subsequent food intake, but highlight the need to study individual consumption behaviour and preferences in order to fully understand the role of expected satiation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expected satiation; Food intake; Palatability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29278719     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  3 in total

1.  Reliability and responsiveness of virtual portion size creation tasks: Influences of context, foods, and a bariatric surgical procedure.

Authors:  Jeon D Hamm; Jany Dotel; Shoran Tamura; Ari Shechter; Musya Herzog; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Jeanine Albu; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Blandine Laferrère; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-06-06

Review 2.  Obesity and Eating Disturbance: the Role of TFEQ Restraint and Disinhibition.

Authors:  Eleanor J Bryant; Javairia Rehman; Lisa B Pepper; Elizabeth R Walters
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2019-12

3.  Right Sizing: Sensory-Based Product Design Is a Promising Strategy to Nudge Consumers toward Healthier Portions.

Authors:  David Labbe; Lisa R Fries; Aurore Ferrage; Francine Lenfant; Nicolas Godinot; Nathalie Martin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.