| Literature DB >> 32522217 |
Alessandro Schneebeli1, Lorenzo Visconti2, Corrado Cescon3, Ron Clijsen3,4,5, Guido Giardini6, Maria Elisabetta Arizzio7, Marco Barbero3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound imaging techniques have been used to assess the characteristics of skeletal muscles and tendons. Such techniques (gray scale analysis) allow qualitative evaluation and have been used recently to assess the internal structure of muscles and tendons by computer-aided gray scale analysis. We hypothesized that changes in the internal structure of the Achilles and patellar tendons after a ski mountaineering race competition could be detected with ultrasound.Entities:
Keywords: Achilles tendon; Gray scale analysis; Patellar tendon
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32522217 PMCID: PMC7288471 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-020-00398-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Foot Ankle Res ISSN: 1757-1146 Impact factor: 2.303
Fig. 1Schematics of the participant position and the position of the ultrasound probe. a) The Achilles tendon was analyzed at the level of the medial malleolus. b) The patellar tendon was analyzed half-way between the apex of the patella and the tibial tuberosity
Fig. 2a) Transverse B-mode ultrasound image of the Achilles tendon with corresponding gray scale histogram. b) Transverse B-mode ultrasound image of the patellar tendon with corresponding gray scale histogram
Descriptive statistics for the Achilles and patellar tendon
| Dominant | Thickness (mm) | 4.62 (4.37–4.85) | 4.33 (3.80–4.55) | 4.35 (3.98–4.67) | 4.28 (3.95–4.78) |
| CSA (mm2) | 42.7 (40.3–44.2) | 38.9 (35.4–40.7) | 36.6 (35.2–38.9) | 37.3 (35.2–39.9) | |
| Echogenicity | 30.3 (28.3–32.5) | 36.7 (31.7–40.3) | 35.7 (30.9–40.1) | 39.5 (36–42.9) | |
| Non-Dominant | Thickness (mm) | 4.98 (4.48–5.2) | 4.04 (3.74–4.41) | 4.31 (4.02–4.61) | 4.21 (3.93–4.57) |
| CSA (mm2) | 43.6 (40.4–46.1) | 39.2 (34.5–43.3) | 39.9 (35.5–43.1) | 39.5 (36.5–44.6) | |
| Echogenicity | 30.5 (28.2–35.3) | 37.4 (33.2–42.9) | 38.2 (34.7–40) | 42.9 (38.6–47.4) | |
| Dominant | Thickness (mm) | 2.87 (2.51–3.13) | 2.77 (2.59–3.25) | 2.87 (2.45–3.38) | 2.85 (2.46–3.35) |
| CSA (mm2) | 82.6 (74.4–96.3) | 83.2 (70.6–105.9) | 86 (74.5–106.4) | 83.2 (70.2–97) | |
| Echogenicity | 44.7 (35.5–58.1) | 51 (44.4–61) | 48 (41.3–62.5) | 52.7 (45.9–65.8) | |
| Non-Dominant | Thickness (mm) | 2.84 (2.51–3.13) | 2.99 (2.55–3.47) | 2.90 (2.64–3.24) | 2.95 (2.66–3.32) |
| CSA (mm2) | 83.2 (69.5–91) | 80.2 (74.7–100) | 82.5 (74.8–98.7) | 82.3 (72.8–101) | |
| Echogenicity | 49 (42.7–59.2) | 55.5 (45.2–63.8) | 54.9 (45.3–68.3) | 57.5 (49.4–69.4) |
Data are presented as median and IQR(Q1-Q3)
Fig. 3Achilles tendon thickness a), cross-sectional area b), and echogenicity c) values for the non-dominant (dark gray) and dominant (light gray) leg, at the four evaluation times. Patellar tendon thickness d), cross-sectional area e), and echogenicity f) values for non-dominant (dark gray) and dominant (light gray) leg, at the four evaluation times. The box represents the median with the first and third quartile (Q1-Q3), whiskers represent the minimum and maximum value. * p < 0.05, indicates significant differences between the pre-race and post-race evaluation. (post-hoc analysis)