Literature DB >> 32522061

Evaluation of the effects of sugarcane processing on the presence of GM DNA and protein in sugar.

Maria Lorena Sereno1, Sofia Infante2, Adriana Cheavegatti-Gianotto1, Kyra Hjelle2, Ronald Lirette3, Lucas Cutri1, Moisés Sarto Rocha1, Jerry Hjelle2, Christopher Cullis4.   

Abstract

The Brazilian Sucro-energy Sector produces both energy, in the form of ethanol fuel, industrial steam and electricity, and sugar. Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira (CTC), the leading Brazilian sugarcane breeding company, has developed a pipeline of insect-protected sugarcane varieties to control sugarcane borer damage. The goal of this manuscript is to present the results of studies with three genetically modified (GM) sugarcane varieties and to evaluate the published literature regarding the possible presence of GM sugarcane DNA or protein in raw or refined sugar. Specifically, two varieties of approved GM sugarcane, CTC91087-6 and CTC175-A, and an experimental CTC variety, were grown in four individual plots to produce four batches each of processed raw sugar using standard smaller-scale laboratory processing methods resulting in a total of 12 independent batches of raw sugar. Herein, we report the development of event-specific probes and DNA detection methods, designed to detect the junction of sugarcane genomic DNA and the inserted DNA of the two approved GM varieties. An identical approach was used for the testing of sugar made from the experimental CTC variety. The methodology used TaqMan® real-time PCR and ELISA assays validated for the four GM proteins expressed by these three events (Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, NPTII, and PAT (bar)). The developed assays had very low limits of detection (LODs) for the various event-specific DNA probes (7.2-25 ng/g sugar) and insecticidal and selectable marker proteins (2.9-10.9 ng/g sugar). No event-specific DNA and no GM proteins were detectable in the 12 independent batches of raw sugar produced from these three GM sugarcane events. The results of this study, using very sensitive methods and testing several sugar batches, extend the conclusions of previous studies, reviewed herein, that showed the extensive degradation and removal of DNA and protein during sugarcane processing. Overall, these results indicate that there are no distinguishable differences between the highly purified, chemically defined sugar produced from conventional or GM varieties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Saccharum X officinarum ; event-specific detection methods; food safety; highly-purified substance; sugarcane processing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32522061      PMCID: PMC7518765          DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2020.1771134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GM Crops Food        ISSN: 2164-5698            Impact factor:   3.074


  13 in total

1.  Nucleic acid and protein elimination during the sugar manufacturing process of conventional and transgenic sugar beets.

Authors:  J Klein; J Altenbuchner; R Mattes
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  1998-02-26       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Ubiquitin genes as a paradigm of concerted evolution of tandem repeats.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests.

Authors:  F S Betz; B G Hammond; R L Fuchs
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Safety evaluation of the phosphinothricin acetyltransferase proteins encoded by the pat and bar sequences that confer tolerance to glufosinate-ammonium herbicide in transgenic plants.

Authors:  Corinne Hérouet; David J Esdaile; Bryan A Mallyon; Eric Debruyne; Arno Schulz; Thomas Currier; Koen Hendrickx; Robert-Jan van der Klis; Dominique Rouan
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Investigation of residual DNAs in sugar from sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.).

Authors:  Taichi Oguchi; Mari Onishi; Yukie Chikagawa; Takashi Kodama; Emiri Suzuki; Masaki Kasahara; Hiroshi Akiyama; Reiko Teshima; Satoshi Futo; Akihiro Hino; Satoshi Furui; Kazumi Kitta
Journal:  Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 0.464

6.  Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for heat denaturation of Cry1a(b) protein from transgenic maize (Zea mays).

Authors:  R De Luis; M D Pérez; L Sánchez; M Lavilla; M Calvo
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 7.  The food and environmental safety of Bt crops.

Authors:  Michael S Koch; Jason M Ward; Steven L Levine; James A Baum; John L Vicini; Bruce G Hammond
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  The insect-protected CTC91087-6 sugarcane event expresses Cry1Ac protein preferentially in leaves and presents compositional equivalence to conventional sugarcane.

Authors:  Adriana C Gianotto; Moisés S Rocha; Lucas Cutri; Francisco C Lopes; William Dal'Acqua; Jerry J Hjelle; Ron P Lirette; Wladecir S Oliveira; Maria L Sereno
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.074

9.  Lack of Detection of Bt Sugarcane Cry1Ab and NptII DNA and Proteins in Sugarcane Processing Products Including Raw Sugar.

Authors:  Adriana Cheavegatti-Gianotto; Agustina Gentile; Danielle Angeloni Oldemburgo; Graciela do Amaral Merheb; Maria Lorena Sereno; Ron Peter Lirette; Thais Helena Silva Ferreira; Wladecir Salles de Oliveira
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-27

10.  A General Safety Assessment for Purified Food Ingredients Derived From Biotechnology Crops: Case Study of Brazilian Sugar and Beverages Produced From Insect-Protected Sugarcane.

Authors:  Reese D Kennedy; Adriana Cheavegatti-Gianotto; Wladecir S de Oliveira; Ronald P Lirette; Jerry J Hjelle
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.