Literature DB >> 32520000

The Utility of Cloud Computing in Analyzing GPU-Accelerated Deformable Image Registration of CT and CBCT Images in Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy.

George Zaki1, William Plishker1, Wen Li2, Junghoon Lee3, Harry Quon3, John Wong3, Raj Shekhar1,4.   

Abstract

The images generated during radiation oncology treatments provide a valuable resource to conduct analysis for personalized therapy, outcomes prediction, and treatment margin optimization. Deformable image registration (DIR) is an essential tool in analyzing these images. We are enhancing and examining DIR with the contributions of this paper: 1) implementing and investigating a cloud and graphic processing unit (GPU) accelerated DIR solution and 2) assessing the accuracy and flexibility of that solution on planning computed tomography (CT) with cone-beam CT (CBCT). Registering planning CTs and CBCTs aids in monitoring tumors, tracking body changes, and assuring that the treatment is executed as planned. This provides significant information not only on the level of a single patient, but also for an oncology department. However, traditional methods for DIR are usually time-consuming, and manual intervention is sometimes required even for a single registration. In this paper, we present a cloud-based solution in order to increase the data analysis throughput, so that treatment tracking results may be delivered at the time of care. We assess our solution in terms of accuracy and flexibility compared with a commercial tool registering CT with CBCT. The latency of a previously reported mutual information-based DIR algorithm was improved with GPUs for a single registration. This registration consists of rigid registration followed by volume subdivision-based nonrigid registration. In this paper, the throughput of the system was accelerated on the cloud for hundreds of data analysis pairs. Nine clinical cases of head and neck cancer patients were utilized to quantitatively evaluate the accuracy and throughput. Target registration error (TRE) and structural similarity index were utilized as evaluation metrics for registration accuracy. The total computation time consisting of preprocessing the data, running the registration, and analyzing the results was used to evaluate the system throughput. Evaluation showed that the average TRE for GPU-accelerated DIR for each of the nine patients was from 1.99 to 3.39 mm, which is lower than the voxel dimension. The total processing time for 282 pairs on an Amazon Web Services cloud consisting of 20 GPU enabled nodes took less than an hour. Beyond the original registration, the cloud resources also included automatic registration quality checks with minimal impact to timing. Clinical data were utilized in quantitative evaluations, and the results showed that the presented method holds great potential for many high-impact clinical applications in radiation oncology, including adaptive radio therapy, patient outcomes prediction, and treatment margin optimization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cloud computing; computed tomography; image registration; oncology; parallel programming

Year:  2016        PMID: 32520000      PMCID: PMC6984195          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2016.2597838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  20 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Investigating the Use of Cloudbursts for High-Throughput Medical Image Registration.

Authors:  Hyunjoo Kim; Manish Parashar; David J Foran; Lin Yang
Journal:  Proc IEEE/ACM Int Conf Grid Computing       Date:  2009-10-13

3.  Automatic elastic image registration by interpolation of 3D rotations and translations from discrete rigid-body transformations.

Authors:  Vivek Walimbe; Raj Shekhar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 4.  Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT).

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Yiannis Kyriakou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Parallel computation of mutual information on the GPU with application to real-time registration of 3D medical images.

Authors:  Ramtin Shams; Parastoo Sadeghi; Rodney Kennedy; Richard Hartley
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review.

Authors:  R Schulze; U Heil; D Gross; D D Bruellmann; E Dranischnikow; U Schwanecke; E Schoemer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Deformable planning CT to cone-beam CT image registration in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Jidong Hou; Mariana Guerrero; Wenjuan Chen; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A survey of GPU-based medical image computing techniques.

Authors:  Lin Shi; Wen Liu; Heye Zhang; Yongming Xie; Defeng Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-09

9.  CT to cone-beam CT deformable registration with simultaneous intensity correction.

Authors:  Xin Zhen; Xuejun Gu; Hao Yan; Linghong Zhou; Xun Jia; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Quantitative evaluation of a cone-beam computed tomography-planning computed tomography deformable image registration method for adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Joshua D Lawson; Eduard Schreibmann; Ashesh B Jani; Tim Fox
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.