| Literature DB >> 32518982 |
Michael Dieckmeyer1, Florian Zoffl1, Lioba Grundl1, Stephanie Inhuber2, Sarah Schlaeger1,3, Egon Burian1, Claus Zimmer1, Jan S Kirschke1,4, Dimitrios C Karampinos3, Thomas Baum1, Nico Sollmann5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated the composition of the gluteal (gluteus maximus, medius, and minimus) and quadriceps (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, medialis, and intermedius) muscle groups and its associations with femoral bone marrow using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI) to improve our understanding of muscle-bone interaction.Entities:
Keywords: Bone marrow; Femur; Healthy volunteers; Magnetic resonance imaging; Muscles
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32518982 PMCID: PMC7283400 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-020-00162-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol Exp ISSN: 2509-9280
Fig. 1Overview of the image acquisition, postprocessing workflow, and image data analyses. BMI, Body mass index; PDFF, Proton density fat fraction
Fig. 2Representative segmentations (red areas) of the five muscular and osseous compartments, prescribed on axial proton density fat fraction maps of a 39-year-old female subject (body mass index 25.7 kg/m2): gluteal (a), quadriceps (b), femoral head (c), femoral neck (d), and greater trochanter (e)
Study population characteristics
| Males ( | Females ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 30.47 ± 4.90 | 29.87 ± 7.13 | 0.790 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.25, 5.50 | 26.13, 2.77 | 0.300 |
| PDFFgluteus (%) | 5.25 ± 1.73 | 5.49 ± 1.83 | 0.707 |
| PDFFquadriceps (%) | 2.53 ± 1.00 | 2.65 ± 1.02 | 0.714 |
| PDFFfemoral head (%) | 86.29 ± 8.25 | 83.69 ± 6.07 | 0.047* |
| PDFFfemoral neck (%) | 73.31 ± 10.59 | 62.87 ± 8.70 | 0.006* |
| PDFFfemoral greater trochanter (%) | 92.13 ± 2.20 | 90.26 ± 2.39 | 0.034* |
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation for age and PDFF, and as median and interquartile range for body mass index. PDFF, Proton density fat fraction
*Statistical significance (p < 0.05)
Fig. 3Representative colour-coded axial PDFF maps of the gluteal (a, d), quadriceps (b, e), and femoral neck (c, f) regions of a 39-year-old female subject (BMI 25.7 kg/m2, left column a–c) and a 41-year-old male subject (BMI 25.8 kg/m2, right column d–f), respectively. BMI, Body mass index; PDFF, Proton density fat fraction
Fig. 4Scatter plots and linear fit (represented by the continuous line) of BMI versus PDFF of the two muscle compartments (upper row) and three femoral compartments (bottom row). The areas between the dotted lines represent the 95 % confidence intervals of the best linear fit. BMI, Body mass index; PDFF, Proton density fat fraction
Partial correlation analysis of proton density fat fraction of muscles and femoral subregions with age and body mass index as control variables
| Gluteus | Quadriceps | Femoral head | Femoral neck | Femoral greater trochanter | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gluteus | 1 | 0.670 | -0.184 | -0.710 | 0.193 | |
| < 0.001 | 0.348 | 0.720 | 0.325 | |||
| Quadriceps | 1 | 0.192 | 0.210 | 0.375 | ||
| 0.328 | 0.283 | 0.049 | ||||
| Femoral head | 1 | 0.655 | 0.613 | |||
| < 0.001 | 0.001 | |||||
| Femoral neck | 1 | 0.638 | ||||
| < 0.001 | ||||||
| Femoral greater trochanter | 1 | |||||