Literature DB >> 25639780

Assessment of whole spine vertebral bone marrow fat using chemical shift-encoding based water-fat MRI.

Thomas Baum1, Samuel P Yap1, Michael Dieckmeyer1, Stefan Ruschke1, Holger Eggers2, Hendrik Kooijman3, Ernst J Rummeny1, Jan S Bauer4, Dimitrios C Karampinos1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The assessment of bone marrow composition has recently gained significant attention due to its association with bone loss pathophysiology and cancer therapy-induced bone marrow damage. The purpose of our study was to investigate the anatomical variation of the vertebral bone marrow fat using chemical shift-encoding based water-fat MRI and to assess the repeatability of these measurements.
METHODS: Chemical shift-encoding based water-fat MRI of the whole spine was performed in 28 young, healthy subjects (17 males, 11 females, 26 ± 4 years). Six subjects were scanned three times with repositioning to assess the repeatability of these measurements. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps were computed and manually segmented to obtain PDFF of C3-L5.
RESULTS: Mean PDFF of all subjects significantly increased from C3 to L5 (P < 0.05) with r = 0.88 (P < 0.05). PDFF averaged over C3-7, T1-6, T7-12, and L1-5 of males and females amounted to 31.7 ± 7.9% and 23.0 ± 7.8% (P = 0.002), 33.8 ± 6.8% and 24.6 ± 8.8% (P = 0.005), 33.8 ± 6.4% and 26.1 ± 6.4% (P = 0.023), and 38.8 ± 7.6% and 31.5 ± 12.4% (P = 0.063), respectively. The repeatability for PDFF measurements expressed as absolute precision error was 1.7% averaged over C3-L5.
CONCLUSION: Whole spine vertebral bone marrow fat could be reproducibly assessed by using chemical shift-encoding based water-fat MRI and showed anatomical variations.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnetic resonance imaging; proton density fat fraction (PDFF); vertebral bone marrow fat; water-fat imaging; whole spine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25639780     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  35 in total

1.  Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) MRI for differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral lesions.

Authors:  Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Peter Johannes Wagenhäuser; Michael Meier-Schroers; Daniel Lloyd Kuetting; Andreas Feißt; Jürgen Gieseke; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Frank Träber; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) MR imaging for differentiation of acute benign and neoplastic compression fractures of the spine.

Authors:  Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Simon Jonas Enkirch; Andreas Feißt; Christoph Hans-Jürgen Endler; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Peter Johannes Wagenhäuser; Frank Träber; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Reliability of measuring the fat content of the lumbar vertebral marrow and paraspinal muscles using MRI mDIXON-Quant sequence.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Zhuang Zhou; Chao Wang; Xiaoguang Cheng; Ling Wang; Yangyang Duanmu; Chenxin Zhang; Nicola Veronese; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Associations between vertebral body fat fraction and intervertebral disc biochemical composition as assessed by quantitative MRI.

Authors:  Roland Krug; Gabrielle B Joseph; Misung Han; Aaron Fields; Justin Cheung; Maya Mundada; Jeannie Bailey; Alice Rochette; Alexander Ballatori; Charles E McCulloch; Zachary McCormick; Conor O'Neill; Thomas M Link; Jeffrey Lotz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Short- and midterm reproducibility of marrow fat measurements using mDixon imaging in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Guanwu Li; Zheng Xu; Wei Yuan; Shixin Chang; Yongsheng Chen; Horea Calimente; Jiani Hu
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Reporting Guidelines, Review of Methodological Standards, and Challenges Toward Harmonization in Bone Marrow Adiposity Research. Report of the Methodologies Working Group of the International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society.

Authors:  Josefine Tratwal; Rossella Labella; Nathalie Bravenboer; Greet Kerckhofs; Eleni Douni; Erica L Scheller; Sammy Badr; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Sarah Beck-Cormier; Biagio Palmisano; Antonella Poloni; Maria J Moreno-Aliaga; Jackie Fretz; Matthew S Rodeheffer; Parastoo Boroumand; Clifford J Rosen; Mark C Horowitz; Bram C J van der Eerden; Annegreet G Veldhuis-Vlug; Olaia Naveiras
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 7.  Marrow adipose tissue imaging in humans.

Authors:  Vibha Singhal; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Measurement of vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in children using quantitative water-fat MRI.

Authors:  Stefan Ruschke; Amber Pokorney; Thomas Baum; Holger Eggers; Jeffrey H Miller; Houchun H Hu; Dimitrios C Karampinos
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue Quantification by Imaging.

Authors:  Ebrahim Bani Hassan; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; Mahdi Imani; Numan Kutaiba; David K Wright; Tara Sepehrizadeh; Gustavo Duque
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Quantification of renal steatosis in type II diabetes mellitus using dixon-based MRI.

Authors:  Takeshi Yokoo; Haley R Clark; Ivan Pedrosa; Qing Yuan; Ivan Dimitrov; Yue Zhang; Ildiko Lingvay; Muhammad S Beg; I Alexandru Bobulescu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.